Attachment_V_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 157 KB Posted

Attached to
Fuels Management Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SPE600-17-R-0500
Issued by
Defense Logistics Agency Energy

About this file

Attachment V - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Fuels Management Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
SPE60017R05000005.pdf PDF
Attachment_III_-_Wage_Determination_CBA-2017-10001.pdf PDF
Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Amd_0002.pdf PDF
3)_Edwards_PWS _Nov_7 _2016.pdf PDF
5)_Bridge_Agreement_-_executed_Redacted.pdf PDF
1)_Q A_(64).pdf PDF
4)_Tabs_1-4.pdf PDF
2)_Preproposal_slides_ _sign-in.pdf PDF
Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_II_-_Offeror_Submission_Package.pdf PDF
Attachment_VI_-_JV_Consent_Form.pdf PDF
Edwards_RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment_VII_-_Air_Force_Consolidated_QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment_IV_-_DLA_Energy_Form_2019_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_III_-_Collective_Bargaining_Agreement.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

- 1 -

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Attachment V – Past Performance Questionnaire

SPE600-17-R-0500

Edwards AFB, CA

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Note: The past performance questionnaire consists of nine (9) pages.

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Offeror to complete blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

CONTRACTOR NAME: CCR CAGE CODE:

ADDRESS: CCR DUNs NUMBER:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT: CONTACT PHONE NUMBER:

2. Work Performed as:

Other (Explain)

Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

- 2 -

4. Contract Description:

Complexity of Work:

High Med Routine

How is this contract relevant to the requirement of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Reference to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number: Email

Address:

6. Describe the reference’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

The Government requests each Reference to complete this Past Performance Questionnaire and submit directly to the Government. Completed Questionnaires shall be submitted via email to: Alexandro.Cano@dla.mil mailto:Alexandro.Cano@dla.mil

- 3 -

GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE

A. The questionnaire should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of service being rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in their organization, as applicable.

B. Handwritten responses are sufficient. However, request they be legible.

C. Please provide explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible. These narratives need not be lengthy, just descriptive. Space for narrative comments is included after each question and on the last page of the survey. If more space is needed, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.

D. As the survey relates to an ongoing source selection for the services identified in the cover letter, request that all information provided within the survey be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure.

E. The following description should be used as a guide in providing element ratings:

5 = EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 = VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 = SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2 = MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1 = UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

- 4 -

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The following questions are two (2) types: YES/NO and RATING. The YES/NO questions should be supplemented with an explanatory narrative if the answer is, “YES.” When responding to the RATING type questions, choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 which most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. If the question is not applicable, circle, “N/A.” Responses to the RATING type questions should be supplemented with explanatory narrative as well, if necessary. The numbers 1 to 5 correspond with the following values:

1 = Unsatisfactory 2 = Marginal 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Very Good 5 = Exceptional

SCHEDULE

01. Was the Contractor responsive and timely in providing the required services? YES NO N/A 1 2 3 4 5

02.

Was the Contractor responsive and timely to administrative functions of the contract?

YES NO N/A

03.

Was the Contractor responsive and timely responding to questions or correspondence?

04.

Was the Contractor in compliance with contract terms and conditions?

05.

Were any contract concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor’s failure to accurately plan? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

- 5 -

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

06. Did the Contractor appropriately prepare & train the personnel? YES NO N/A

07.

Did the Contractor effectively manage subordinates?

QUALITY OF SERVICES

08. Did the Contractor assimilate & accommodate changes in contractual requirements and/or priority effectively?

09.

Did the Contractor exhibit knowledge of and comply with Government (or other) regulations?

10.

Did the Contractor demonstrate technical expertise in providing all contractual services?

11.

Did the Contractor possess/utilize tools/equipment necessary to adequately provide the required services?

- 6 -

12. Did the Contractor meet the standard for:

(a) Technical Performance? YES NO N/A

1 2 3 4 5

(b) Administrative Performance? YES NO N/A

1 2 3 4 5

(c) Safety & Health? YES NO N/A

13.

Has the Contractor ever failed to effectively control the quality of services provided? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

14.

Has a Contract Discrepancy Report (or equivalent) ever been issued? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

15.

Has a Cure Notice or Show Cause Letter ever been issued? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

16.

Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

- 7 -

17.

Has the Contractor demonstrated the ability to correct any of the problems for questions 14 through 16? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

18. Has the contract been terminated for default? YES NO N/A

19.

Has an election ever been made to not exercise an option due to the Contractor’s poor performance? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

BUSINESS RELATIONS

20. Did the Contractor satisfactorily manage subcontracts? YES NO N/A

21.

Have there been any labor disputes? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

22.

Have there been any violations of Public Law, especially the Service Contract Act?

(If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

- 8 -

23.

Did the Contractor consistently provide prompt and courteous service?

24. Did the Contractor promptly and courteously resolve customer complaints? YES NO N/A

25.

Did the Contractor’s actions show an overall commitment to customer satisfaction?

26.

Did the Contractor satisfactorily provide overall cooperation relative to this contract?

27.

How would you rate the integration and coordination of all activity needed to perform this contract?

28.

Did you feel that the Contractor’s overall performance was satisfactory?

- 9 -

29. Would you award similar contracts to this Contractor? YES NO N/A

REMARKS:

Use the below space for further comments. Please label each remark with the applicable question number.

Please list other known references regarding the Contractor’s performance:

TELEPHONE/

NAME ADDRESS FAX NUMBERS

1. Contractor Information:
CLIENT INFORMATION (Reference to complete Blocks 5-8)
The Government requests each Reference to complete this Past Performance Questionnaire and submit directly to the Government. Completed Questionnaires shall be submitted via email to: Alexandro.Cano@dla.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REMARKS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .