The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Past Performance Information Questionnaire Past Performance Information Questionnaire for:_[Insert Name of Offeror] _______
Respondent: Please fill in the following table:
1. Complete Name and Title of Responder
2. Company or Agency Name, Address, Telephone Number, Facsimile Number (w/Area Code), and E-mail Address
3. Contract Name or Title, Contract Number and Type of Contract
4. Signature
| 4 | = | Outstanding |
| Performance was substantially and consistently above contract requirements. Contractor displayed an overall superior understanding of contract requirements, and used innovative approaches leading to enhanced performance. | | |
| 3 | = | Good |
| Performance was above minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a thorough understanding of contract requirements. | | |
| 2 | = | Satisfactory |
| Performance met minimum contract requirements. | | |
| 1 | = | Marginal |
| Performance was below minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a lack of thorough understanding of contract requirements in one or more significant performance areas. | | |
| 0 | = | Unsatisfactory |
| Performance completely failed to meet the minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a total lack of understanding of contract requirements. | | |
NA = Not Applicable
| DK | = | Don’t Know |
| No knowledge available to respond to this question. | | |
For any rating(s) less than 2, please attach an explanatory narrative. We greatly appreciate your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Attachment 2 - PPIQ
RFQ - SFSIAQ17Q4005
MTT
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Past Performance Information Questionnaire for: _[Insert Name of Offeror]______
1. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in the following areas: Meeting contract milestones? Submitting deliverables timely? Adherence to contract schedules?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
| 2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform within the contract ceiling or estimated cost? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 3. Did the contractor utilize cost efficiencies in performance of your contract? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 4. How would you rate the contractor’s cost performance? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 5. Did the contractor submit accurate and timely invoices? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 6. If proposals were generated for changes, requests for equitable adjustment, or claims, how would you rate the reasonableness of the pricing? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 7 How would you rate the contractor’s key personnel performance? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 8 How would you rate the contractor’s ability to recruit and retain strong, well-qualified key personnel? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 9. | Did the contractor utilize an effective project management system that included planning, budgeting, status tracking, reporting, baseline management, critical path analysis, and work breakdown structure? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 10. | Has there been a positive or negative trend in contract performance (“0” would be a very negative trend, “4” would be a very positive trend) |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 11. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to create teaming/partnering relationships to achieve project goals? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 12. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to integrate activities with other contractors on multiple contractor sites? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 13. | Was the Statement of Work executed effectively by the contractor in a consistently high quality manner? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 14. | How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness to technical direction? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
Past Performance Information Questionnaire for: _[Insert Name of Offeror]______
| 15. | Was the contractor effective in subcontract management and did it meet subcontracting goals? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 16. | Did the contractor provide an effective and efficient transition from the previous contractor? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 17. | Did the contractor effectively manage regulatory compliance programs and regulatory interfaces? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 18. | Did the contractor’s corporate office effectively support your contract? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 19. | Did the contractor develop and implement an effective quality assurance program? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 20. | Did the contractor effectively implement human resources requirements and manage labor relations? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 21. Did the contractor manage effectively including cooperation with the technical representatives, the Contracting Officer, and other stakeholders showing flexibility and responsiveness? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] |
| 22. | Was the contractor effective in working with organized labor, community groups, media, and other stakeholders? |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK] | |
| 23. | Provide an overall assessment of the contractor’s performance. |
| [4] [3] [2] [1] [0] | |
| 24. | Would you hire this Company again? |
| [ ] Yes [ ] No | |
Please Provide Any Additional Comments Below
