Scoring_Notes__1_.pdf
PDF 126 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection -Two Phase OH|DOT54324-1
- Contract number
- DOT54324-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document appears to be a detailed scoring evaluation of multiple transportation and engineering firms for a contract, including Aecom Technical Services, Jacobs Engineering Group, Parsons Transportation Group, Mindhop, Inc., and Gannett Fleming. The evaluation assesses each vendor across 10 different criteria, rating their performance as "Meets", "Partially Meets", "Does Not Meet", or "Exceeds" expectations. The scoring covers aspects such as team capabilities, project timelines, experience with transportation operations, software integration, data visualization, and federal grant expertise.
The scoring reveals significant variations among vendors, with Jacobs Engineering Group receiving the highest total score of 390, followed by Parsons Transportation Group at 370, Gannett Fleming at 360, Aecom Technical Services at 346, and Mindhop, Inc. at 318. Key differentiators included breadth of transportation knowledge, experience with Traffic Management Centers (TMCs), software development capabilities, and prior work with advanced transportation technologies like autonomous vehicle labs and smart city initiatives. Some vendors excelled in specific areas like federal grant experience, in-house software development, and solving real-world transportation challenges.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Aecom Technical Services - 346
1. Meets
2. Meets
3. Meets
4. Meets
5. Meets
6. Par�ally meets- Not much data integra�on more geared to ITS & so�ware integra�on.
7. Exceeds – Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons. Wide variety of transporta�on knowledge
8. Exceeds – Sheer number of TMC’s vendor operates na�onality
9. Meets
10. Meets
Jacobs Engineering Group - 390
1. Exceeds - Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
2. Exceeds - Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
3. Meets
4. Meets
5. Exceeds – Previous work with AV lab & Smart Columbus.
6. Exceeds – Many projects listed with company developed so�ware
7. Meets
8. Exceeds – Vendor has extensive DOT experience, mul�ple states, operates mul�ple TMC’s and has federal experience as well.
9. Meets
10. Exceeds – Extensive experience with Federal grants.
Parsons Transporta�on Group - 370
1. Exceeds - Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
2. Exceeds - Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
3. Exceeds – Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
4. Meets
5. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate details, experience not fully detailed.
6. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate details, experience not fully detailed.
7. Meets
8. Exceeds – Vendor greatly exceeded expecta�ons.
9. Exceeds – Develop ATMS so�ware in house
Mindhop, Inc. - 318
2. Par�ally Meets – The proposed team is very small and will not be capable of mee�ng the aggressive �meline as noted in the next criterion.
3. Does Not Meet – Deadline is in March; their proposed end date is past that.
4. Meets
5. Exceeds – Proposal has vast experience listed.
6. Exceeds – Clearly shows solving real world challenges
7. Meets
8. Exceeds – Wealth of experience in transporta�on opera�ons
9. Exceeds – Strong experience in AP development
Gannet Fleming - 360
2. Meets
3. Meets
4. Exceeds – Vast experience for all team members.
5. Par�ally Meets – Majority of experience is not aligned with data integra�on.
6. Meets
7. Exceeds – Proposal shows a vast amount of transporta�on experience
8. Exceeds – Experience running mul�ple TMC’s na�onally
9. Exceeds – Proposal shows vendor experience in developing useful tool in traffic data visualiza�on
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .