Score_Sheets__1_.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection -Two Phase OH|DOT54324-1
- Contract number
- DOT54324-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a scored evaluation sheet for a state and local transportation engineering contract, featuring technical proposals from five vendors: Jacobs Engineering Group, Parsons Transportation Group, Gannett Fleming, AECOM Technical Services, and Mindhop, Inc. The evaluation process involves a comprehensive technical scoring mechanism that assesses vendors across multiple criteria related to transportation engineering capabilities, with a minimum technical score requirement of 319 points.
The contract appears to focus on transportation engineering services, particularly involving Connected Vehicle/Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) data integration, data analytics, and transportation operations. Jacobs Engineering Group submitted the lowest cost per quality point at $1,682.26, with a total submitted price of $656,082.00 and a technical score of 390 points. Parsons Transportation Group and Gannett Fleming also qualified, with submitted prices of $1,015,510.00 and $1,299,991.40 respectively. The evaluation considered factors such as project workplan, team availability, experience in transportation engineering, data integration expertise, app development technologies, and federal grant project management. Mindhop, Inc. was the only vendor that did not meet the minimum technical score threshold and was therefore disqualified from further consideration.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP - 390
| Vendor | JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC | |||||
| Item #1 | PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | Yes | No | |||
| Does the vendor indicate they have at minimum 10 years Transportation Engineering? | x | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN | ||||||
| 1 | The vendor has included their proposed Project Workplan: This document should outline the steps for completing the project. It should also include a risk assessment. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 2 | Proposed Project Manager, Team, and availability to work on this project. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 3 | The vendor has submitted a timeline that meets all the requirements. | 5 | 40 | |||
| BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| 4 | The vendor has a Minimum 10 years’ experience in Transportation Engineering. | 2 | 16 | |||
| 5 | The vendor has experience in conducting at least similar types of projects/programs within the past 5 years that demonstrate expertise in CV/AV V2X data integration | 3 | 30 | |||
| 6 | The vendor has experience in projects involving data analytics and modeling to address real-world challenges. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 7 | The vendor has experience that shows advanced understanding of transportation engineering principles. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 8 | The vendor has experience in transportation operations. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 9 | The vendor has experience in app development technologies. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 10 | The vendor has experience with performing, managing and reporting on Federal Grant Projects. | 5 | 50 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 0 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 120 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 270 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 390 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 319 points?
| YES | x | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $656,082.00 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 390 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $1,682.26 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION - 370
| Vendor | PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC | |||||
| Item #1 | PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | Yes | No | |||
| Does the vendor indicate they have at minimum 10 years Transportation Engineering? | x | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN | ||||||
| 1 | The vendor has included their proposed Project Workplan: This document should outline the steps for completing the project. It should also include a risk assessment. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 2 | Proposed Project Manager, Team, and availability to work on this project. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 3 | The vendor has submitted a timeline that meets all the requirements. | 5 | 50 | |||
| BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| 4 | The vendor has a Minimum 10 years’ experience in Transportation Engineering. | 2 | 16 | |||
| 5 | The vendor has experience in conducting at least similar types of projects/programs within the past 5 years that demonstrate expertise in CV/AV V2X data integration | 3 | 18 | |||
| 6 | The vendor has experience in projects involving data analytics and modeling to address real-world challenges. | 4 | 24 | |||
| 7 | The vendor has experience that shows advanced understanding of transportation engineering principles. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 8 | The vendor has experience in transportation operations. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 9 | The vendor has experience in app development technologies. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 10 | The vendor has experience with performing, managing and reporting on Federal Grant Projects. | 5 | 40 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 42 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 88 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 240 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 370 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 319 points?
| YES | x | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $1,015,510.00 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 370 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $2,744.62 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
Gannett Fleming, Inc. - 360
| Vendor | Gannett Fleming, Inc. | |||||
| Item #1 | PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | Yes | No | |||
| Does the vendor indicate they have at minimum 10 years Transportation Engineering? | x | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN | ||||||
| 1 | The vendor has included their proposed Project Workplan: This document should outline the steps for completing the project. It should also include a risk assessment. | 5 | 40 | |||
| 2 | Proposed Project Manager, Team, and availability to work on this project. | 5 | 40 | |||
| 3 | The vendor has submitted a timeline that meets all the requirements. | 5 | 40 | |||
| BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| 4 | The vendor has a Minimum 10 years’ experience in Transportation Engineering. | 2 | 20 | |||
| 5 | The vendor has experience in conducting at least similar types of projects/programs within the past 5 years that demonstrate expertise in CV/AV V2X data integration | 3 | 18 | |||
| 6 | The vendor has experience in projects involving data analytics and modeling to address real-world challenges. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 7 | The vendor has experience that shows advanced understanding of transportation engineering principles. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 8 | The vendor has experience in transportation operations. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 9 | The vendor has experience in app development technologies. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 10 | The vendor has experience with performing, managing and reporting on Federal Grant Projects. | 5 | 40 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 18 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 192 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 150 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 360 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 319 points?
| YES | x | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $1,299,991.40 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 360 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $3,611.09 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES - 346
| Vendor | AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC | |||||
| Item #1 | PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | Yes | No | |||
| Does the vendor indicate they have at minimum 10 years Transportation Engineering? | x | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN | ||||||
| 1 | The vendor has included their proposed Project Workplan: This document should outline the steps for completing the project. It should also include a risk assessment. | 5 | 40 | |||
| 2 | Proposed Project Manager, Team, and availability to work on this project. | 5 | 40 | |||
| 3 | The vendor has submitted a timeline that meets all the requirements. | 5 | 40 | |||
| BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| 4 | The vendor has a Minimum 10 years’ experience in Transportation Engineering. | 2 | 16 | |||
| 5 | The vendor has experience in conducting at least similar types of projects/programs within the past 5 years that demonstrate expertise in CV/AV V2X data integration | 3 | 24 | |||
| 6 | The vendor has experience in projects involving data analytics and modeling to address real-world challenges. | 4 | 24 | |||
| 7 | The vendor has experience that shows advanced understanding of transportation engineering principles. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 8 | The vendor has experience in transportation operations. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 9 | The vendor has experience in app development technologies. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 10 | The vendor has experience with performing, managing and reporting on Federal Grant Projects. | 5 | 40 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 24 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 232 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 90 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 346 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 319 points?
| YES | x | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $598,505.60 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 346 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $1,729.78 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
Mindhop, Inc - 318
| Vendor | Mindhop, Inc | |||||
| Item #1 | PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | Yes | No | |||
| Does the vendor indicate they have at minimum 10 years Transportation Engineering? | x | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN | ||||||
| 1 | The vendor has included their proposed Project Workplan: This document should outline the steps for completing the project. It should also include a risk assessment. | 5 | 40 | |||
| 2 | Proposed Project Manager, Team, and availability to work on this project. | 5 | 30 | |||
| 3 | The vendor has submitted a timeline that meets all the requirements. | 5 | 0 | |||
| BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| 4 | The vendor has a Minimum 10 years’ experience in Transportation Engineering. | 2 | 16 | |||
| 5 | The vendor has experience in conducting at least similar types of projects/programs within the past 5 years that demonstrate expertise in CV/AV V2X data integration | 3 | 30 | |||
| 6 | The vendor has experience in projects involving data analytics and modeling to address real-world challenges. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 7 | The vendor has experience that shows advanced understanding of transportation engineering principles. | 4 | 32 | |||
| 8 | The vendor has experience in transportation operations. | 5 | 50 | |||
| 9 | The vendor has experience in app development technologies. | 4 | 40 | |||
| 10 | The vendor has experience with performing, managing and reporting on Federal Grant Projects. | 5 | 40 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 30 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 128 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 160 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 318 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 319 points?
| YES | No | x | ||||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | ||||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | ||||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 318 | ||||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $0.00 | |||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .