Score_Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection OH|DOT51426-1
- Contract number
- DOT51426-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a score sheet for a technical proposal evaluation by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) for a consulting contract with Tjene Consulting Corp. The evaluation assesses the vendor's capabilities for ServiceNow and Nuvolo software support, with a comprehensive scoring matrix across multiple technical and operational criteria.
The contract appears to be an indefinite delivery vehicle for technical support services focused on ServiceNow and Nuvolo platform management, specifically targeting ODOT's Facilities and Finance user groups. Tjene Consulting Corp submitted a proposal with a total technical score of 1,016 points, which exceeded the minimum required score of 600. The vendor's total submitted price was $1,450.00, resulting in a cost per quality point of $1.43. The scoring criteria extensively cover areas such as organizational experience, staffing capabilities, technology expertise, project management, software upgrade support, and ongoing technical assistance for approximately 165 ODOT users across Facilities and Finance departments.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| _514-26_Pricing__514pricing_-_Tjene.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 514-26.pdf | ||
| Waiver_Approved__Tjene_.pdf | ||
| 514-26_Tjene_Supplement_A_-_Tjene.pdf | ||
| Affirmation_and_Disclosure_signed_by_Tjene.pdf | ||
| Signature.pdf | ||
| Tjene_Technical_Proposal_-_Ohio_Department_Of_Transportation.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Vendor | Tjene Consulting Corp | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceeds 10 |
| WORK REQUIREMENTS | ||||||
| Organizational Experience & Capabilities | ||||||
| 1 | The Offeror must submit a detailed Offeror Profile that describes the company history, past similar project experience and current capability and capacity to perform the work under this RFP | 5 | 40 | |||
| 2 | Number of years’ experience in performing ServiceNow and Nuvolo changes, enhancements, and upgrades similar to work under this RFP | 5 | 40 | |||
| 3 | Staffing plan and resumes | 5 | 40 | |||
| References | Section Subtotals | 0 | 120 | 0 | ||
| 4 | Offeror must provide a minimum of three (3) references (or more) from previous jobs similar to this project and provide details of similarities | 3 | 24 | |||
| Work Plan | Section Subtotals | 0 | 160 | 0 | ||
| 5 | Contractor knowledge, experience, and skills with the following minimum technologies needed to perform the work: |
* ServiceNow
* ServiceNow access roles/groups
* ServiceNow configuration and customization
* ServiceNow Dashboard and Reports
* ServiceNow Inbound/Outbound data integrations
* Nuvolo (all modules)
* Nuvolo Mobile 1.0
| * Nuvolo configuration and customization | 5 | 40 | |||||
| 6 | Assign resource(s) with knowledge and experience with ServiceNow and Nuvolo products including Nuvolo Mobile app and are considered a subject matter expert (SME) in these products | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 7 | Contractor to provide resume’s for all assigned resource(s) | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 8 | Contractor shall have contacts at Nuvolo for product support and/or escalations (if needed) | 3 | 24 | ||||
| 9 | Contractor resource(s) available for ODOT staff to contact regarding ServiceNow/Nuvolo product questions, discuss potential changes, enhancements, upgrades, and/or possible solution options. Contractor to work with a minimum ODOT group (~5 ODOT ServiceNow Technical/Nuvolo Admin/Facility business staff) supporting ~125 ODOT Facilities users and ~40 ODOT Finance users of Nuvolo | 3 | 24 | ||||
| 10 | Create and/or update ServiceNow Agile stories as needed/appropriate in coordination with ODOT resources to track estimates, work, progress, and/or priorities | 3 | 24 | ||||
| 11 | Contractor resource(s) grooming/refining of ODOT Nuvolo stories per ODOT direction (e.g. backlog refinement, is a process that helps agile teams prioritize user stories for development sprints) | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 12 | Contractor resource(s) attend (at a minimum) one (1) day a week meeting to review/update Agile sprint stories, backlog stories, and story priorities. Additional meetings to be scheduled if/as needed | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 13 | Expected need for contractor to create and/or enhance ServiceNow Nuvolo reports per ODOT Facilities direction and Agile story | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 14 | Backup of Dev and Test Nuvolo in-progress changes and data prior to every other month clone downs from PROD to DEV and PROD to TEST and restores of Nuvolo in-progress changes and data after clone downs are done | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 15 | Provide Nuvolo product upgrades support and/or Nuvolo product fixes within ODOT ServiceNow environments and ODOT ServiceNow change control policies | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 16 | Support with testing/validation of Nuvolo as part of annual ODOT ServiceNow platform upgrade | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 17 | Work with ODOT resources to implement Nuvolo software upgrades - expected spring and fall Nuvolo releases/upgrades – recommend n-2 follow of ServiceNow upgrades – coordinate with ODOT resources when to start. Upgrades directed by ODOT stakeholder evaluation and decision | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 18 | Support with testing/validation of Nuvolo software upgrades | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 19 | Implement and unit test Nuvolo changes and enhancements per ODOT direction in ODOT ServiceNow environments (i.e. DEV, TEST) and document and coordinate with ODOT ServiceNow administrator to implement in PRODUCTION environment within ODOT ServiceNow change control policies | 5 | 40 | ||||
| 20 | Implement and support with configuration/testing/validation of Nuvolo Mobile Application Upgrade (per ODOT direction and scoping/timing/value/level of effort estimation) | 5 | 40 | ||||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 0 | ||||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 1016 | ||||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 0 | ||||||
| Grand Total Score | 1016 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 600 points?
| YES | X | No |
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) |
| Cost Per Quality Point | ||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $1,450.00 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 1016 |
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $1.43 | |
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .