Score_Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection OH|DOT50026-1
- Contract number
- DOT50026-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a scored evaluation sheet for a state-level weather and pavement forecasting service contract, comparing technical proposals from three vendors: BAM Weather LLC, DTN LLC, and Vaisala Inc. The evaluation is designed to assess vendor capabilities for providing comprehensive weather and road condition monitoring services, likely for a state transportation or highway department, with a minimum technical score requirement of 820 points.
The contract appears to be an indefinite delivery vehicle for weather forecasting and road condition monitoring services, with vendors evaluated across multiple criteria including data acquisition, staffing, training, forecasting processes, consultation services, mobile access, alert notifications, and graphics quality. All three vendors met the minimum technical score, with BAM Weather LLC and DTN LLC scoring 1024 points and Vaisala Inc scoring 928 points. The total submitted prices varied, with BAM Weather LLC at $322,000.08, DTN LLC at $421,289.76, and Vaisala Inc at $398,595.00. The evaluation methodology calculated a "Cost per Quality Point" to determine the most competitive proposal, with the lowest cost per point recommended for contract award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 500-26_Pricing_FINAL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Affirmation_and_Disclosure-2.pdf | ||
| Signature.pdf | ||
| 500-26.pdf | ||
| Response_to_RFP_500-26_ODOT_3.28.25-2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BAM
| Vendor | BAM Weather LLC | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN – |
The vendors proposed work plan should clearly address each of the following criteria.
| 1 | Acquisition of Data | 2 | 16 | |||
| 2 | Continuous Staffing Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 3 | Training | 3 | 24 | |||
| 4 | Description of Pavement Forecasting Process | 3 | 24 | |||
| 5 | Description of Weather & Pavement Forecast Verification Efforts. | 3 | 24 | |||
| 6 | Ohio Weather Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| 7 | Telephone Consultation Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 8 | Online Meteorological Consultation Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 9 | Pre-Storm Briefings Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 10 | Mobile Access | 4 | 32 | |||
| 11 | Common Area Display | 2 | 16 | |||
| 12 | Staff Resumes/Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Weather Condition and Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 13 | Radar Satellite & General Condition Maps, Watches & Updates | 4 | 32 | |||
| 14 | Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 15 | Radar | 3 | 24 | |||
| 16 | Satellite | 2 | 16 | |||
| 17 | NWS Observed Weather Condition Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 18 | Observed Data Mapping Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 19 | Display of RWIS Observed Condition Data | 3 | 24 | |||
| 20 | RWIS Data from CLARUS | 2 | 16 | |||
| 21 | Summary Map Displays | 2 | 16 | |||
| Pavement Condition Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 22 | Location-Specific Weather and Pavement Forecasts | 5 | 40 | |||
| 23 | Forecast and RWIS Histories | 4 | 32 | |||
| 24 | RWIS Observation and Forecast Maps | 4 | 32 | |||
| 25 | Presentation Formats | 3 | 24 | |||
| 26 | Map Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 27 | Weather Elements | 2 | 16 | |||
| 28 | Pavement Parameters | 2 | 16 | |||
| 29 | Meteogram | 2 | 16 | |||
| 30 | Pavement Temperature Overlay Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 31 | Snow and Ice Maps | 3 | 24 | |||
| 32 | Graphical Forecast Loops | 2 | 16 | |||
| 33 | Forecast Accuracy Report | 3 | 24 | |||
| Alert Notification Service Requirements | ||||||
| 34 | Forecast Alerts | 4 | 32 | |||
| 35 | RWIS Observation Alerts | 4 | 32 | |||
| 36 | Alert Update Criteria | 3 | 24 | |||
| 37 | Wind | 2 | 16 | |||
| 38 | Inclusions | 3 | 24 | |||
| 39 | Method of Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 40 | Direct Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 41 | Website Update | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Traffic Management Support | ||||||
| 43 | Pathfinder Initiative Support | 3 | 24 | |||
| 44 | Impact Graphics | 2 | 16 | |||
| 45 | Graphics Quality | 2 | 16 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 0 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 1024 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 0 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 1024 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 820 points?
| YES | X | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $322,000.08 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 1024 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $314.45 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
DTN
| Vendor | DTN LLC | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN – |
The vendors proposed work plan should clearly address each of the following criteria.
| 1 | Acquisition of Data | 2 | 16 | |||
| 2 | Continuous Staffing Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 3 | Training | 3 | 24 | |||
| 4 | Description of Pavement Forecasting Process | 3 | 24 | |||
| 5 | Description of Weather & Pavement Forecast Verification Efforts. | 3 | 24 | |||
| 6 | Ohio Weather Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| 7 | Telephone Consultation Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 8 | Online Meteorological Consultation Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 9 | Pre-Storm Briefings Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 10 | Mobile Access | 4 | 32 | |||
| 11 | Common Area Display | 2 | 16 | |||
| 12 | Staff Resumes/Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Weather Condition and Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 13 | Radar Satellite & General Condition Maps, Watches & Updates | 4 | 32 | |||
| 14 | Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 15 | Radar | 3 | 24 | |||
| 16 | Satellite | 2 | 16 | |||
| 17 | NWS Observed Weather Condition Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 18 | Observed Data Mapping Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 19 | Display of RWIS Observed Condition Data | 3 | 24 | |||
| 20 | RWIS Data from CLARUS | 2 | 16 | |||
| 21 | Summary Map Displays | 2 | 16 | |||
| Pavement Condition Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 22 | Location-Specific Weather and Pavement Forecasts | 5 | 40 | |||
| 23 | Forecast and RWIS Histories | 4 | 32 | |||
| 24 | RWIS Observation and Forecast Maps | 4 | 32 | |||
| 25 | Presentation Formats | 3 | 24 | |||
| 26 | Map Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 27 | Weather Elements | 2 | 16 | |||
| 28 | Pavement Parameters | 2 | 16 | |||
| 29 | Meteogram | 2 | 16 | |||
| 30 | Pavement Temperature Overlay Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 31 | Snow and Ice Maps | 3 | 24 | |||
| 32 | Graphical Forecast Loops | 2 | 16 | |||
| 33 | Forecast Accuracy Report | 3 | 24 | |||
| Alert Notification Service Requirements | ||||||
| 34 | Forecast Alerts | 4 | 32 | |||
| 35 | RWIS Observation Alerts | 4 | 32 | |||
| 36 | Alert Update Criteria | 3 | 24 | |||
| 37 | Wind | 2 | 16 | |||
| 38 | Inclusions | 3 | 24 | |||
| 39 | Method of Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 40 | Direct Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 41 | Website Update | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Traffic Management Support | ||||||
| 43 | Pathfinder Initiative Support | 3 | 24 | |||
| 44 | Impact Graphics | 2 | 16 | |||
| 45 | Graphics Quality | 2 | 16 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 0 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 1024 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 0 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 1024 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 820 points?
| YES | X | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $421,289.76 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 1024 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $411.42 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
Vaisala
| Vendor | Vaisala Inc | |||||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| PROPOSED WORK PLAN – |
The vendors proposed work plan should clearly address each of the following criteria.
| 1 | Acquisition of Data | 2 | 0 | |||
| 2 | Continuous Staffing Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 3 | Training | 3 | 18 | |||
| 4 | Description of Pavement Forecasting Process | 3 | 24 | |||
| 5 | Description of Weather & Pavement Forecast Verification Efforts. | 3 | 24 | |||
| 6 | Ohio Weather Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| 7 | Telephone Consultation Required | 3 | 24 | |||
| 8 | Online Meteorological Consultation Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 9 | Pre-Storm Briefings Required | 4 | 32 | |||
| 10 | Mobile Access | 4 | 24 | |||
| 11 | Common Area Display | 2 | 16 | |||
| 12 | Staff Resumes/Experience | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Weather Condition and Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 13 | Radar Satellite & General Condition Maps, Watches & Updates | 4 | 24 | |||
| 14 | Displays | 3 | 18 | |||
| 15 | Radar | 3 | 18 | |||
| 16 | Satellite | 2 | 12 | |||
| 17 | NWS Observed Weather Condition Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 18 | Observed Data Mapping Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 19 | Display of RWIS Observed Condition Data | 3 | 18 | |||
| 20 | RWIS Data from CLARUS | 2 | 16 | |||
| 21 | Summary Map Displays | 2 | 16 | |||
| Pavement Condition Forecasting Requirements | ||||||
| 22 | Location-Specific Weather and Pavement Forecasts | 5 | 40 | |||
| 23 | Forecast and RWIS Histories | 4 | 32 | |||
| 24 | RWIS Observation and Forecast Maps | 4 | 32 | |||
| 25 | Presentation Formats | 3 | 24 | |||
| 26 | Map Displays | 3 | 24 | |||
| 27 | Weather Elements | 2 | 12 | |||
| 28 | Pavement Parameters | 2 | 16 | |||
| 29 | Meteogram | 2 | 16 | |||
| 30 | Pavement Temperature Overlay Maps | 2 | 16 | |||
| 31 | Snow and Ice Maps | 3 | 24 | |||
| 32 | Graphical Forecast Loops | 2 | 16 | |||
| 33 | Forecast Accuracy Report | 3 | 24 | |||
| Alert Notification Service Requirements | ||||||
| 34 | Forecast Alerts | 4 | 24 | |||
| 35 | RWIS Observation Alerts | 4 | 24 | |||
| 36 | Alert Update Criteria | 3 | 18 | |||
| 37 | Wind | 2 | 12 | |||
| 38 | Inclusions | 3 | 18 | |||
| 39 | Method of Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 40 | Direct Delivery | 3 | 24 | |||
| 41 | Website Update | 3 | 24 | |||
| Item # | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 6 | Meets 8 | Exceed 10 |
| Traffic Management Support | ||||||
| 43 | Pathfinder Initiative Support | 3 | 24 | |||
| 44 | Impact Graphics | 2 | 16 | |||
| 45 | Graphics Quality | 2 | 16 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 240 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 688 | |||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 0 | |||||
| Grand Total Score | 928 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 820 points?
| YES | X | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $398,595.00 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 928 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $429.52 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .