Final_Mexico_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 58 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA16R0086
About this file
Updated Pricing Sheet in line with answers to questions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico_Solicitation_Questions_and_Answers_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Final_Mexico_Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Mexico_Solicitation_Questions_and_Answers_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Foreign_Assistance_Act_Procurement_Restrictions.pdf | ||
| Sample_Task_Order_Final_2-26.doc | DOC document | |
| Sample_Task_Order_SOW.doc | DOC document | |
| Final_Mexico_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PP_Customer_Satisfaction_Survey.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Past_Performance_Contract_Profile_.docx | DOCX document | |
| SAQMMA16R0086.pdf | ||
| Foreign_Assistance_Act_Procurement_Restrictions.pdf | ||
| Final_Mexico_Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Final_Mexico_Labor_Categories.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Compliance Checklist IDIQ
| Pricing Table 1 | |
| Price Volume Compliance Checklist |
| RFP | ||
| Reference | Requirement | Comply |
| (Yes/No) | Proposal Reference | |
| L.19.3.2 (1) | The electronic price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection: |
a. Narrative (in Word or PDF)
b. Pricing Tables 1-8 (in one folder containing one Excel workbook)
c. Detail Pricing Tables (in a second folder containing one Excel workbook)
d. Supporting Information (in Word or PDF)
Offerors shall prepare on a CD-ROM one electronic file for each of the above sections. Therefore, offerors shall prepare four files on each CD-ROM.
L.19.3.2 (2) The hard-copy price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection:
a. Narrative
b. Pricing Tables 1-8
c. Detail Pricing Tables
d. Supporting Information
Offerors shall separate each of the above sections by a distinct tab divider.
| L.19.3.2 (3) | The content of the electronic price proposal and hard-copy price proposal shall match. If differences exist between the two proposals, the hard-copy proposal shall take precedence. |
| L.19.3.2 (4) | Pricing Tables 1-8 are provided by the Government and shall be completed by the offerors. Detail Pricing Tables shall be provided and completed by the offerors. |
| L.19.3.2 (5) | Offerors shall not add, delete, or otherwise alter the existing format or content in Pricing Tables 1-8. Offerors shall complete the required areas only. |
| L.19.3.2 (6) | Offerors shall use for pricing purposes the following period of performance: |
Base Period: November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2016 Option Period 1: November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017 Option Period 2: November 1, 2017 through October 31, 2018 Option Period 3: November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019 Option Period 4: November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2020 Six-Month Option to Extend: November 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021
| L.19.3.2 (7) | In Pricing Table 1, offerors shall complete the “Comply (Yes/No)” and “Proposal Reference” columns. |
| L.19.3.2 (8) | In Pricing Table 2, offerors shall identify their most current indirect cost rates that would be used as the proposed provisional billing rates. If applicable, these indirect cost rates should be reflected in the most current indirect cost rate agreement that has been negotiated between the offeror and its cognizant Federal agency official. |
| L.19.3.2 (9) | In Pricing Table 2, the proposed provisional billing indirect cost rates shall not exceed the ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. |
| L.19.3.2 (10) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose only their own indirect cost rates. Indirect cost rates for subcontractors and/or other entities not proposed as the offeror shall not be included in part or in whole. |
| L.19.3.2 (11) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall add or delete rows as necessary. The number (e.g., “1)”) in the “Indirect Cost Rate Description” column signifies a specific indirect cost rate description. For example, an offeror may elect to propose “Fringe Benefits” next to “1)”, “Overhead” next to “2)”, and “G&A” next to “3).” |
| L.19.3.2 (12) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, each row will apply to a different Contractor Fiscal Year Period, which offerors shall identify with month, day, and year in the right-most column. |
| L.19.3.2 (13) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose a Contractor Fiscal Year Period for each of its fiscal years through the life of the contract. Offerors shall assume that the life of the contract, including any extension, is November 1, 2015 through April 30, 2021. |
| L.19.3.2 (14) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) factors shall be separately identified if the offeror allocates FCCOM costs as part of its established cost accounting practices. |
| L.19.3.2 (15) | In Pricing Table 4, offerors shall propose one fixed profit percentage and one fixed fee percentage per contract period. |
| L.19.3.2 (16) | In Pricing Table 4, the proposed fixed profit percentages and fixed fee percentages shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (17) | In Pricing Table 4, each proposed fixed fee percentage shall not exceed 10%. |
| L.19.3.2 (18) | In Pricing Table 5, offerors shall propose one not-to-exceed (NTE) fully-loaded hourly labor rate per labor category/CLIN per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 (19) | In Pricing Table 5, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall be based on the corresponding labor category description provided in Section J, Attachment 7 – Labor Categories. |
| L.19.3.2 (20) | In Pricing Table 5, the respective proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance in the continental United States (CONUS), and 48 hours (8 hours per day x 6 days per week) for performance outside the continental United States (OCONUS). “CONUS” means the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii, and the District of Columbia. |
| L.19.3.2 (21) | In Pricing Table 5, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., any direct fringe benefits, any direct bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 (22) | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 (23) | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (24) | In Pricing Table 5, offerors shall not complete the cells shaded in gray. The Government has determined the labor category located on the same row as the gray cells is not expected to perform normally under the workweek schedule identified with such cells. |
| L.19.3.2 (25) | In Pricing Table 6, offerors shall propose one not-to-exceed (NTE) unit price per CLIN per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to provide the equipment. |
| L.19.3.2 (26) | In Pricing Table 6, each proposed NTE unit price shall be based on a quantity of one per unit of measure (e.g., one each hat, one pair of boots), and otherwise as described in the Equipment Description column and in Attachment 3 – Equipment List in Section J. |
| L.19.3.2 (27) | In Pricing Table 6, each proposed NTE unit price shall consist of the equipment’s direct costs, applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including direct shipping/transportation costs. |
| L.19.3.2 (28) | In Pricing Table 6, the proposed NTE unit prices shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (29) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to transfer automatically the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates from Pricing Table 5 to the respective cells in the “NTE Rate” column. However, offerors shall verify the transfer. |
| L.19.3.2 (30) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the labor section. Each formula is “FTE” multiplied by “NTE Rate” multiplied by “Hours.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (31) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to transfer automatically the proposed NTE unit prices from Pricing Table 6 to the respective cells in the “NTE Unit Price” column. However, offerors shall verify the transfer. |
| L.19.3.2 (32) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the Equipment section. Each formula is “NTE Unit Price” multiplied by “Units.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (33) | In Pricing Table 7, the estimated indirect costs in the “Ind $” column shall reflect the product of the applicable proposed ceiling indirect cost rate(s) proposed in Pricing Table 3 and the RFP-specified estimated direct cost. |
| L.19.3.2 (34) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed estimated fee in the “Fee $” column. Each formula is the applicable fee percentage proposed in Pricing Table 4 multiplied by the sum of “Dir $” and “Ind $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (35) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” section. Each formula is “Dir $” plus “Ind $” plus “Fee $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (36) | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price. However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (37) | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price shall be in whole numbers (i.e., no decimals). |
| L.19.3.2 (38) | In Pricing Table 8, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per period for each RFP-specified labor category (as applicable) proposed to be performed only by employees not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). We note that FLSA does not apply in Africa. |
| L.19.3.2 (39) | In Pricing Table 8, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per applicable labor category per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 (40) | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on performance exceeding a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance inside the continental United States (CONUS). |
| L.19.3.2 (41) | In Pricing Table 8, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, overtime premium, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., any direct fringe benefits, any direct bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 (42) | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 (43) | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (44) | In Pricing Table 8, the overtime premium included in each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall be listed in the “Premium” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (45) | In Pricing Table 8, the overtime premium listed in the “Premium” column shall include any indirect costs and profit associated with such premium, and which were included in the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (46) | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates and premium costs shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (47) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall show for each contract period the breakdown of the information required under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. The breakdown shall consist of the following: |
a. RFP-specified estimated direct cost (represented by Travel)
b. Each applicable indirect cost rate description (e.g., G&A)
c. Each applicable ceiling indirect cost rate
d. Each ceiling indirect cost
e. Each fee percentage
f. Each fee dollar amount
g. Subtotal
| L.19.3.2 (48) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall ensure that the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) (see "47" immediately above) are for the contractor fiscal year(s) that coincides with the contract performance period. When a given performance period traverses two contractor fiscal years, the offeror shall show and compute accordingly for the given performance period the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) for each of the two contractor fiscal years. |
| L.19.3.2 (49) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rates (see "47" above) shall match the respective ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. For award of the IDIQ contract, ceiling indirect rates are required to be applied only to the RFP-specified estimated direct cost (represented by Travel) identified under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (50) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed ceiling indirect cost subtotals (see "47" above) shall match the respective proposed “Ind $” costs in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (51) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed fee percentages (see "47" above) shall match the respective fee percentages proposed in Pricing Table 4. For award of the IDIQ contract, fee percentages are required to be applied only to the sum of the RFP-specified estimated direct cost and proposed ceiling indirect costs identified under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (52) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed fee subtotals (see "47" above) shall match the respective “Fee $” amount proposed in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (53) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (in electronic submission only), offerors shall show with formulas the arithmetic process by which they calculated their proposed ceiling indirect costs, fee, and subtotal (see "47" above). |
| L.19.3.2 (54) | In Pricing Tables 1-8 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall complete all applicable data cells. |
| L.19.3.2 (55) | In Pricing Tables 1-8 and the Detail Pricing Tables (in electronic submission only), offerors shall not hide or lock any rows, columns, or cells that contain proposed data. |
| L.19.3.2 (56) | In Pricing Tables 1-8 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall propose all rates, costs, and prices in United States currency. |
| L.19.3.2 (57) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the number of hours in their normal workweek. |
| L.19.3.2 (58) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify, based on the Overall Proposed Price in Pricing Table 7, their: |
a. Proposed subcontractors;
b. Total dollars estimated to be subcontracted to each proposed subcontractor;
c. Total dollars estimated to be performed by the offeror; and
d. Percentage of work (based on estimated total dollars) to be performed by the offeror and each proposed subcontractor.
| L.19.3.2 (59) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal auditor (e.g., local Defense Contract Audit Agency branch). |
| L.19.3.2 (60) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO). The CFAO works in the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency, which is normally the agency with which the offeror has the largest dollars in negotiated contracts, including option periods. See FAR 42.003. |
| L.19.3.2 (61) | In the Narrative, pursuant to FAR 52.246-6(f) (Inspection – Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour), offerors shall identify the percentage of the proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rates attributable to profit. See Section B.4(s). |
| L.19.3.2 (62) | In the Supporting Information, offerors shall submit evidence to support the provisional billing indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 2. Offerors shall submit such at least one of the following pieces of evidence, pursuant to the following order of Government preference: |
a. Current forward pricing rate agreement with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
b. Current other negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (that contains forward pricing indirect cost rates) with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
c. Current forward pricing rate recommendation letter issued by the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
d. Current provisional billing rate agreement with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
e. Current provisional billing rate recommendation letter issued by the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official.
f. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other qualified external auditor
g. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from a qualified internal auditor
h. Current indirect cost rate proposal submitted to the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official and cognizant auditor
i. Identification of the indirect cost pools and respective allocation bases, and breakdown of the cost elements/costs comprising such pools and bases. The Government prefers that the offeror submit such evidence in a format similar to the applicable schedules in Enclosure 6 (Incurred Cost Proposals) of DCAA’s Information for Contractors, which may be found on DCAA’s Web site (www.dcaa.mil) under the “Audit Process Overview – Information for Contractors” link under the Guidance tab at the top of the homepage.
L.19.3.2 (63) In the Supporting Information, offerors, in accordance with FAR 15.404-3(b) (Subcontract Pricing Considerations), shall conduct appropriate cost or price analyses to establish the reasonableness of proposed subcontract prices, and shall include the results of these analyses.
a. Results shall be in the form of the offeror’s cost/price analysis report(s).
b. The report(s) shall include:
1. Cost/price analysis technique(s) used (e.g., comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation);
2. Summary findings;
3. Detailed findings; and
4. Basis for the determination of fair and reasonable proposed subcontract prices.
c. For award of the IDIQ contract, “proposed subcontract prices” shall mean:
1. Fully-loaded hourly labor rates proposed by the subcontractor offeror to the (prime) offeror, or fully-loaded hourly labor rates negotiated between the subcontractor offeror and (prime) offeror; and
2. Equipment unit prices proposed by the subcontractor offeror to the (prime) offeror, or equipment unit prices negotiated between the subcontractor offeror and (prime) offeror.
1. Compliance Checklist IDI
| Pricing Table 1 | |
| Price Volume Compliance Checklist |
| RFP | ||
| Reference | Requirement | Comply |
| (Yes/No) | Proposal Reference | |
| L.19.3.2 | The electronic price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection: |
a. Narrative (in Word or PDF)
b. Pricing Tables 1-7 (in one folder containing one Excel workbook)
c. Detail Pricing Tables (in a second folder containing one Excel workbook)
d. Supporting Information (in Word or PDF)
Offerors shall prepare on a CD-ROM one electronic file for each of the above sections. Therefore, offerors shall prepare four files on each CD-ROM.
L.19.3.2 The hard-copy price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection:
a. Narrative
b. Pricing Tables 1-7
c. Detail Pricing Tables
d. Supporting Information
Offerors shall separate each of the above sections by a distinct tab divider.
| L.19.3.2 | The content of the electronic price proposal and hard-copy price proposal shall match. If differences exist between the two proposals, the hard-copy proposal shall take precedence. |
| L.19.3.2 | Pricing Tables 1-7 are provided by the Government and shall be completed by the offerors. Detail Pricing Tables shall be provided and completed by the offerors. |
| L.19.3.2 | Offerors shall not add, delete, or otherwise alter the existing format or content in Pricing Tables 1-7. Offerors shall complete the required areas only. |
| L.19.3.2 | Offerors shall use for pricing purposes the following period of performance: |
Base Period: November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2016 Option Period 1: November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017 Option Period 2: November 1, 2017 through October 31, 2018 Option Period 3: November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019 Option Period 4: November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2020 Six-Month Option to Extend: November 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 1, offerors shall complete the “Comply (Yes/No)” and “Proposal Reference” columns. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 2, offerors shall identify their most current indirect cost rates that would be used as the proposed provisional billing rates. If applicable, these indirect cost rates should be reflected in the most current indirect cost rate agreement that has been negotiated between the offeror and its cognizant Federal agency official. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 2, the proposed provisional billing indirect cost rates shall not exceed the ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose only their own indirect cost rates. Indirect cost rates for subcontractors and/or other entities not proposed as the offeror shall not be included in part or in whole. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall add or delete rows as necessary. The number (e.g., “1)”) in the “Indirect Cost Rate Description” column signifies a specific indirect cost rate description. For example, an offeror may elect to propose “Fringe Benefits” next to “1)”, “Overhead” next to “2)”, and “G&A” next to “3).” |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, each row will apply to a different Contractor Fiscal Year Period, which offerors shall identify with month, day, and year in the right-most column. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose a Contractor Fiscal Year Period for each of its fiscal years through the life of the contract. Offerors shall assume that the life of the contract, including any extension, is November 1, 2015 through April 30, 2021. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) factors shall be separately identified if the offeror allocates FCCOM costs as part of its established cost accounting practices. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 4, offerors shall propose one fixed profit percentage and one fixed fee percentage per contract period. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 4, the proposed fixed profit percentages and fixed fee percentages shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 4, each proposed fixed fee percentage shall not exceed 10%. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, offerors shall propose one not-to-exceed (NTE) fully-loaded hourly labor rate per labor category/CLIN per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall be based on the corresponding labor category description provided in Section J, Attachment – Labor Categories. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, the respective proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance in the continental United States (CONUS). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., any direct fringe benefits, any direct bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to transfer automatically the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates from Pricing Table 5 to the respective cells in the “NTE Rate” column. However, offerors shall verify the transfer. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the labor section. Each formula is “FTE” multiplied by “NTE Rate” multiplied by “Hours.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the estimated indirect costs in the “Ind $” column shall reflect the product of the applicable proposed ceiling indirect cost rate(s) proposed in Pricing Table 3 and the RFP-specified estimated direct cost. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed estimated fee in the “Fee $” column. Each formula is the applicable fee percentage proposed in Pricing Table 4 multiplied by the sum of “Dir $” and “Ind $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” section. Each formula is “Dir $” plus “Ind $” plus “Fee $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price. However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price shall be in whole numbers (i.e., no decimals). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per period for each RFP-specified labor category (as applicable) proposed to be performed only by employees not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). We note that FLSA does not apply in Africa. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per applicable labor category per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on performance exceeding a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance inside the continental United States (CONUS). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, overtime premium, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., any direct fringe benefits, any direct bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 8, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 8, the overtime premium included in each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall be listed in the “Premium” column. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, the overtime premium listed in the “Premium” column shall include any indirect costs and profit associated with such premium, and which were included in the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Table 6, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates and premium costs shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall show for each contract period the breakdown of the information required under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. The breakdown shall consist of the following: |
a. RFP-specified estimated direct cost (represented by Travel)
b. Each applicable indirect cost rate description (e.g., G&A)
c. Each applicable ceiling indirect cost rate
d. Each ceiling indirect cost
e. Each fee percentage
f. Each fee dollar amount
g. Subtotal
| L.19.3.2 (48) | In the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall ensure that the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) (see "47" immediately above) are for the contractor fiscal year(s) that coincides with the contract performance period. When a given performance period traverses two contractor fiscal years, the offeror shall show and compute accordingly for the given performance period the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) for each of the two contractor fiscal years. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rates (see "47" above) shall match the respective ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. For award of the IDIQ contract, ceiling indirect rates are required to be applied only to the RFP-specified estimated direct cost (represented by Travel) identified under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed ceiling indirect cost subtotals (see "47" above) shall match the respective proposed “Ind $” costs in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed fee percentages (see "47" above) shall match the respective fee percentages proposed in Pricing Table 4. For award of the IDIQ contract, fee percentages are required to be applied only to the sum of the RFP-specified estimated direct cost and proposed ceiling indirect costs identified under “Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs” in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables, the proposed fee subtotals (see "47" above) shall match the respective “Fee $” amount proposed in Pricing Table 7. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Detail Pricing Tables (in electronic submission only), offerors shall show with formulas the arithmetic process by which they calculated their proposed ceiling indirect costs, fee, and subtotal (see "47" above). |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall complete all applicable data cells. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables (in electronic submission only), offerors shall not hide or lock any rows, columns, or cells that contain proposed data. |
| L.19.3.2 | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall propose all rates, costs, and prices in United States currency. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the number of hours in their normal workweek. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify, based on the Overall Proposed Price in Pricing Table 7, their: |
a. Proposed subcontractors;
b. Total dollars estimated to be subcontracted to each proposed subcontractor;
c. Total dollars estimated to be performed by the offeror; and
d. Percentage of work (based on estimated total dollars) to be performed by the offeror and each proposed subcontractor.
| L.19.3.2 | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal auditor (e.g., local Defense Contract Audit Agency branch). |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO). The CFAO works in the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency, which is normally the agency with which the offeror has the largest dollars in negotiated contracts, including option periods. See FAR 42.003. |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Narrative, pursuant to FAR 52.246-6(f) (Inspection – Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour), offerors shall identify the percentage of the proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rates attributable to profit. See Section B.4(s). |
| L.19.3.2 | In the Supporting Information, offerors shall submit evidence to support the provisional billing indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 2. Offerors shall submit such at least one of the following pieces of evidence, pursuant to the following order of Government preference: |
a. Current forward pricing rate agreement with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
b. Current other negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (that contains forward pricing indirect cost rates) with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
c. Current forward pricing rate recommendation letter issued by the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
d. Current provisional billing rate agreement with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
e. Current provisional billing rate recommendation letter issued by the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official.
f. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other qualified external auditor
g. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from a qualified internal auditor
h. Current indirect cost rate proposal submitted to the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official and cognizant auditor
i. Identification of the indirect cost pools and respective allocation bases, and breakdown of the cost elements/costs comprising such pools and bases. The Government prefers that the offeror submit such evidence in a format similar to the applicable schedules in Enclosure 6 (Incurred Cost Proposals) of DCAA’s Information for Contractors, which may be found on DCAA’s Web site (www.dcaa.mil) under the “Audit Process Overview – Information for Contractors” link under the Guidance tab at the top of the homepage.
L.19.3.2 In the Supporting Information, offerors, in accordance with FAR 15.404-3(b) (Subcontract Pricing Considerations), shall conduct appropriate cost or price analyses to establish the reasonableness of proposed subcontract prices, and shall include the results of these analyses.
a. Results shall be in the form of the offeror’s cost/price analysis report(s).
b. The report(s) shall include:
1. Cost/price analysis technique(s) used (e.g., comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation);
2. Summary findings;
3. Detailed findings; and
4. Basis for the determination of fair and reasonable proposed subcontract prices.
c. For award of the IDIQ contract, “proposed subcontract prices” shall mean:
1. Fully-loaded hourly labor rates proposed by the subcontractor offeror to the (prime) offeror, or fully-loaded hourly labor rates negotiated between the subcontractor offeror and (prime) offeror; and
2. Equipment unit prices proposed by the subcontractor offeror to the (prime) offeror, or equipment unit prices negotiated between the subcontractor offeror and (prime) offeror.
2. Provisional Billing Rates Pricing Table 2
Proposed Provisional Billing Indirect Cost Rates
| Indirect Cost Rate Description (e.g., Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A) | Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | |
| (e.g., Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with Cognizant FAO) | Allocation Base | ||
| (e.g., Direct Labor Dollars, Total Cost Input) | Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
(e.g., January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015) 1)
2)
THE FOLLOWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY:
| Indirect Cost Rate Description | Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Allocation Base |
| Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
1) G&A 6.27% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 G&A 6.25% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 G&A 6.00% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 G&A 5.95% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
3. Ceiling Indirect Cost Rates
| Pricing Table 3 | |
| Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rates |
| Indirect Cost Rate Description (e.g., Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A) | Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate | |
| (e.g., Indirect Cost Budget Estimate) | Allocation Base | ||
| (e.g., Direct Labor Dollars, Total Cost Input) | Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
(e.g., January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015) 1)
2)
THE FOLLOWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY:
Indirect Cost Rate Description Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate Basis of Estimate of Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate Allocation Base Contractor Fiscal Year Period
1) G&A 6.27% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 G&A 6.25% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 G&A 6.00% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 G&A 5.95% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 G&A 5.80% June 1, 2015 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
4. Profit and Fee Percentages
| Pricing Table 4 | |
| Proposed Fixed Profit Percentages and Fixed Fee Percentages |
| Proposed Fixed Profit Percentages | |||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend |
(see FAR 52.217-8)
| Proposed Fixed Fee Percentages | |||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend |
(see FAR 52.217-8)
5.NTE Labor Rates Pricing Table 5
Proposed Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Fully-Loaded Hourly Labor Rates
Base Year Option Year 1 Option Year 2 Option Year 3 Option Year 4 Six-Month Option to Extend (see FAR 52.217-8)
| CLIN | RFP-specified Labor Category | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| X001 | Program Manager | ||||||
| X002 | Deputy Program Manager | ||||||
| X003 | Systems Administrator | ||||||
| X004 | Logistics Manager | ||||||
| X005 | Logistics Specialist | ||||||
| X006 | Supply Technician | ||||||
| X007 | Police Advisor I | ||||||
| X008 | Police Advisor II | ||||||
| X009 | Police Advisor III | ||||||
| X010 | Police Advisor IV | ||||||
| X011 | Corrections Advisor I | ||||||
| X012 | Corrections Advisor II | ||||||
| X013 | Corrections Advisor III | ||||||
| X014 | Corrections Advisor IV | ||||||
| X015 | Specialist Advisor I | ||||||
| X016 | Specialist Advisor II | ||||||
| X017 | Specialist Advisor III | ||||||
| X018 | Specialist Advisor IV | ||||||
| X019 | Information Technology Advisor I | ||||||
| X020 | Information Technology Advisor II | ||||||
| X021 | Information Technology Advisor III | ||||||
| X022 | Information Technology Advisor IV | ||||||
| X023 | Administrative and Support I | ||||||
| X024 | Administrative and Support II | ||||||
| X025 | Administrative and Support III | ||||||
| X026 | Administrative and Support IV |
| Notes |
| 40 = The number of hours in a normal workweek at which the NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates in that column are being proposed. |
6. NTE Overtime Labor Rates
| Pricing Table 6 | |
| Proposed Not-To-Exceed (NTE) Fully-Loaded Hourly Labor Rates and Premiums for Overtime Performance |
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend | ||||||||
| (see FAR 52.217-8) | |||||||||||||
| CLIN | RFP-specified Labor Category | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium |
| Notes |
| Rate = Proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rate for performance exceeding a normal workweek of 40 hours. |
| Premium = Portion of proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly overtime rate attributable to the overtime premium (includes associated indirect costs and profit). |
7. IDIQ Pricing Pricing Table 7 IDIQ Proposed Prices
Proposed Labor Prices
| Six-Month Option to Extend | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | (see FAR 52.217-8) | ||||||||||||||||
| CLIN | RFP-specified Labor Category | FTE | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | Total |
| X001 | Program Manager | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X002 | Deputy Program Manager | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X003 | Systems Administrator | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X004 | Logistics Manager | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X005 | Logistics Specialist | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X006 | Supply Technician | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X007 | Police Advisor I | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X008 | Police Advisor II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X009 | Police Advisor III | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X010 | Police Advisor IV | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X011 | Corrections Advisor I | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X012 | Corrections Advisor II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X013 | Corrections Advisor III | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X014 | Corrections Advisor IV | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X015 | Specialist Advisor I | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X016 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | ||
| X017 | Specialist Advisor II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X018 | Specialist Advisor III | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X019 | Specialist Advisor IV | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X020 | Information Technology Advisor I | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X021 | Information Technology Advisor II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X022 | Information Technology Advisor III | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X023 | Information Technology Advisor IV | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X024 | Administrative and Support I | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X025 | Administrative and Support II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X026 | Administrative and Support III | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
| X027 | Administrative and Support IV | ||||||||||||||
| Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | ||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials Costs
Base Year Option Year 1 Option Year 2 Option Year 3 Option Year 4 Six-Month Option to Extend
| RFP-specified Description | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ |
| Travel | 10,000 | - 0 | 10,000 | - 0 | 10,000 | - 0 | 10,000 | - 0 | 10,000 | - 0 | 10,000 | - 0 |
| Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | |
| 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 60,000 |
Sub-total Base Year ERROR:#REF! Sub-total Option Year 1 ERROR:#REF! Sub-total Option Year 2 ERROR:#REF! Sub-total Option Year 3 ERROR:#REF! Sub-total Option Year 4 ERROR:#REF! Six-Month Option to Extend (see FAR 52.217-8) ERROR:#REF!
OVERALL PROPOSED PRICE 60,000
| Notes |
| CONUS = Continental United States |
| OCONUS = Outside the Continental United States |
| FTE = RFP-specified estimated maximum number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees that may be required |
| NTE Rate = Proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rate |
| Hours = RFP-specified estimated number of productive hours |
| Subtotal (Labor) = FTE x NTE Rate x Hours |
| NTE Unit Price = Proposed not-to-exceed unit price |
| Units = RFP-specified estimated maximum number of units that may be required |
| Subtotal (Equipment) = NTE Unit Price x Units |
| Dir $ = RFP-specified estimated direct costs |
| Ind $ = Estimated ceiling indirect costs |
| Fee $ = Estimated fee dollars |
| Subtotal (ODCs/Materials) = Direct $ + Ind $ + Fee $ |
| Total = Sum of Subtotals |
| Overall Proposed Price = Sum of Totals |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .