rfq_-_mlk-altama_bicycle_corridor.pdf.pdf

Date Posted: 8/10/2026

Request for Qualifications

To Provide

Engineering Design Services

For

P.I. 0021161

MLK Blvd / Altama Avenue from SR 25 Conn to City LImits

RFQ # 2026 – 01

Qualifications Due: September 18, 2026

City of Brunswick Department of Engineering and Public Works

525 Lakewood Avenue Brunswick, GA 31520

RFQ # - 2026 - 01

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

2026 - 01

Engineering Design Services

I. General Project Information

A. Overview

The City of Brunswick (City) is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified firm(s) or organization(s) to provide consultant services for Engineering Design services related to a Multi-Use Bicycle and Pedestrian trail along Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard / Altama Avenue between State Route 25 Connector and the northern City Limits in the City of Brunswick.

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services for the project/contract listed in Exhibit I. Firms that respond to this RFQ, and are determined by the City to be sufficiently qualified, may be deemed eligible, and invited to offer a technical approach and/or possibly present and/or interview for these services. All respondents to this RFQ are subject to instructions communicated in this document, and are cautioned to completely review the entire RFQ and follow instructions carefully. the City reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications or Technical Approach, and to waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of the City.

B. IMPORTANT- A RESTRICTION OF COMMUNICATION IS IN EFFECT FOR THIS PROJECT.

From the advertisement date of this solicitation until successful respondents are selected and the award is made official and announced, firms are not allowed to communicate about this solicitation or scope with any staff of the City including the City Manager and the City Commission Members, except for the submission of questions as instructed in the RFQ, or with the contact designated in RFQ Section VIII.C., or as provided by any existing work agreement(s). For violation of this provision, the City reserves the right to reject the submittal of the offending respondent.

C. The City of Brunswick has not adopted a specific goal for DBE participation on this project.

For information on the the City’s DBE Program please contact:

Department of Engineering and Public Works 525 Lakewood Ave

Phone: (912) 267-5540

D. Scope of Services

Under the terms of the resulting Agreement, the selected consultant will provide Engineering Design services, for the City Project identified. The anticipated scope of work for the project/contract is included in Exhibit I.

In addition, the City desires that the Consultant have the ability to provide, either with its own forces or through a sub-consultant team member, comprehensive services necessary to fulfill all engineering, permitting, and preliminary construction services which may arise during the project cycle.

E. Contract Term and Type

The City anticipates one (1) Project Specific contract to be awarded to one (1) firm, for the project/contract identified.

The City anticipates that the Contract Type may be Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost per Unit of Work or Specific Rate of Compensation. As a Project Specific contract, it is the City’s intention that the Agreement will remain in effect until successful completion of the engineering phase of the project, and may choose to utilize the selected consultant for use on construction revisions as necessary.

F. Contract Amount

The Project Specific contract amount will be determined via negotiations with the City. If the City is unable to reach a satisfactory agreement and at reasonable rates to be paid for the services to be provided, the City reserves the right to terminate negotiations with the highest scoring finalist and begin negotiations with the next highest scoring finalist.

II. Selection Method

A. Method of Communication

All general communication of relevant information regarding this solicitation will be made via the Georgia Procurement Registry (GPR) under RFQ- E&PW – 2026 - 01. All firms are responsible for checking the GPR on a regular basis for updates, clarifications, and announcements. The City reserves the right to communicate via electronic-mail with the primary contact listed in the Statements of Qualifications. Other specific communications will be made as indicated in the remainder of this RFQ.

B. Phase I - Selection of Finalists

Based on the Statements of Qualifications submitted in response to the project/contract listed in this RFQ, the Selection Committee will review the Experience and Qualifications and Resources and Workload Capacity listed in Section IV. Selection Criteria for Phase I. The Selection Committee will discuss the top submittals and the final rankings of the top submittals will be determined. From the final rankings of the top submittals, the Selection Committee will identify three (3) to five (5) firms which will be shortlisted.

All firms must meet the minimum requirements as listed in Section IV.A. below.

C. Finalist Notification for Phase II

Firms selected and shortlisted as finalists will receive notification and final instructions from the City regarding the Phase II – Technical Approach response.

D. Phase II - Finalists Response on Technical Approach and Past Performance

The City will request a Technical Approach of the three (3) to five (5) finalist firms for the project/contract. The City reserves the right to request a presentation/interview on any project/contract as determined in its best interests;

however, this additional requirement shall typically be reserved for the most complex projects. Each finalist firm shall be notified in writing and informed of the Technical Approach due date. Any additional detailed Technical Approach instructions and requirements, beyond that provided in Section V. Selection Criteria for Phase II, for the finalists will be provided in the Finalist Notification. All members of the Selection Committee will review the Technical Approach (and will attend the presentation/interview if so chosen). Firms shall not address any questions, prior to the award announcement, to anyone other than the designated contact.

E. Final Selection

Final selection will be determined by carrying the scores from Phase I forward for each Finalist and by evaluating the Technical Approach and Past Performance criteria for Phase II. The Selection Committee will discuss the Finalist’s Phase II Responses and the final rankings will be determined.

Negotiations will then be initiated with the top-ranked firm to finalize the terms and conditions of the contract, including the fees to be paid. In the event a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the highest-ranking firm, the City will formally terminate the negotiations and possibly enter into negotiations with the second highest-ranking firm, and so on in turn until a mutual agreement is established and the City awards a contract. The final form of the contract shall be developed by the City.

III. Schedule of EventsFeb

The following Schedule of Events represents the City’s best estimate of the Schedule that will be followed. All times indicated are prevailing times in Brunswick, Georgia. The City reserves the right to adjust the Schedule as the City deems necessary.

IV. Selection Criteria for Phase I - Criteria for Evaluation of Statements of Qualifications

A. Area Class Requirements and Certification

Presented teams must be prequalified in the indicated Area Class(es) in order to be evaluated. Required proof of prequalification shall be submitted as indicated in Section VI.B.4. below. All Submittals will be pre-screened to verify that the Prime consultant has the required Area Class(es) and that the overall team has the required Area Class(es). Any submittal in which the Prime consultant or the overall team area class requirements are not met will be disqualified from further consideration.

Each submittal will require a certification to allow the City to analyze risks in determining if any Firm should be ineligible for award. The certification shall cover a wide variety of information. Any firm which responds in any potentially concerning manner must provide additional information as directed herein for consideration by the City to determine if Firm is eligible for award.

B. Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s) and Prime’s Experience and Qualifications – 30%

The Selection Committee will evaluate all firms on their Experience and Qualifications, which shall account for a total of 30% of the total evaluation. The following criteria for scoring Phase I of the evaluation will be utilized to determine which firms are shortlisted:

1. Project Manager education, registration, relevant engineering experience, relevant project management experience, experience in utilizing the City-specific processes, manuals, or guidance.

2. Key Team Leaders’ education, registration, relevant technical experience, and relevant experience in utilizing the City specific processes, manuals, or guidance.

3. Prime Consultant’s experience in delivering projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function.

PHASE I DATE TIME

a. the City issues public advertisement of RFQ- 2026 - 01 8/10/2026 ----------

b. Deadline for submission of written questions and requests for clarification 8/28/2026 5:00 PM

c. Deadline for submission of Statements of Qualifications

9/18/2026 2:00 PM

d. The City completes evaluation and issues notification and other information to finalist firms 10/2/2026

PHASE II

e. Deadline for submission of written questions from finalists TBD -

f. Phase II Response of Finalist firms due TBD -

C. Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s) and Prime’s Resources and Workload Capacity – 20%

The Selection Committee will evaluate all firms on their Resources availability and Workload Capacity which shall account for a total of 20% of the total evaluation. The following criteria for scoring the Resources and Workload Capacity will be utilized to determine which firms are shortlisted:

1. Project Manager Workload

2. Workload capacity of Key Team Leader(s)

3. Resources dedicated to delivering project

4. Ability to Meet Project Schedule

V. Selection Criteria for Phase II - Criteria for Evaluation of Technical Approach and Past Performance

A. Technical Approach – 40%

The Selection Committee will evaluate the shortlisted firms (Finalists) on their Technical Approach, which shall account for a total of 40% of the total evaluation. The Selection Committee shall utilize the following additional criteria for scoring Phase II of the evaluation to determine the highest ranked/most qualified (NOTE: Scores from Phase I will be carried forward and combined with the scores from the Phase II to determine the final ranking of Finalists):

1. Provide any unique technical approaches your firm offers relative to addressing anticipated design concepts, use of any alternative methods for delivery (if applicable), project permitting, and/or management of the project.

2. Identify any unique challenges of the project and how your firm intends to mitigate these challenges, including quality control and quality assurance procedures.

3. Provide any specific qualifications, skills, knowledge of the project and project area which may uniquely benefit the firm and project, and your ability and willingness to meet time requirements.

B. Past Performance – 10%

The Selection Committee may consider information provided via references provided for relevant projects, knowledge any selection committee member has of performance on relevant projects, and performance evaluations or knowledge presented on the City projects. The Selection Committee will consider all factors in their totality and score from 0 to 10 when arriving at a final score for the Past Performance.

VI. Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements of Qualifications – Phase I Response

The Statements of Qualifications submittal must be submitted in accordance with the instructions provided in Section VIII, and must be organized and categorized using the same headings (in red), and numbered and lettered exactly as outlined below, and must be responsive to all requested information. For the sections in which page number limits are stated, each section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end on the last page allowed for the section. It is not allowed to begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section, if applicable. This will enable the City to ensure compliance with the page limitations.

Cover page – Each project/contract submittal must have a cover page which lists the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm’s full legal name and the name of the specific project contract being submitted on.

A. Administrative Requirements

It is required to submit the information below for each copy of each submittal. This is general information and will not be scored but may be used to determine eligibility for selection. Under Administrative Requirements section, only submit the information requested; additional information will be subject to disqualification of your firm.

1. Basic company information:

a. Company name.

b. Company Headquarter Address.

c. Contact Information - Name and all contact information (telephone number(s) and e-mail address) of primary proposing contact (this will be the individual with whom the City will direct all communications).

d. Company website (if available).

e. Georgia Addresses - Identify and provide addresses for the offices located in the State of Georgia or within

200 miles of the City of Brunswick. Identify the primary office which will service the proposed project/contract.

f. Staff - List the number and disciplines of staff members employed in each office which will provide services related to the proposed project/contract.

g. Ownership - Provide form of ownership, including state of residency or incorporation, and number of years in business. Is the Offeror a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability Corporation, or other structure?

2. Certification Form - Complete the Certification Form (Exhibit “II” enclosed with RFQ), and provide a notarized original within the firm’s Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for the Prime ONLY.

3. Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit – Complete the form (Exhibit “III” enclosed with RFQ), and provide a notarized original within the firm’s Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for the Prime ONLY.

4. Addenda - Signed cover page of any Addenda issued for the Prime ONLY.

B. Experience and Qualifications

1. Project Manager - Provide information pertaining to the project manager, including but not limited to:

a. Education.

b. Registration (if necessary and applicable.)

c. Relevant engineering experience.

d. Relevant project management experience for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function.

e. Relevant experience utilizing the Georgia Department of Transportation processes, manuals, or guidance

(Plan Development Process, Design Policy, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.).

This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.

2. Key Team Leaders - Provide experience of Key Team Leaders (defined as those individuals who oversee project areas determined as particularly important to each area of the project, refer to the Project Description in Exhibit I, specifically Section 7 for the list of Key Team Leaders for each area). For each Key Team Leader identified provide:

a. Education.

b. Registration (if necessary and applicable.)

c. Relevant experience in the applicable resource area of the most relevant projects.

d. Relevant experience utilizing the Georgia Department of Transportation processes, manuals, or guidance

(PDP, Design Policy, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) which may be specific to the key team leader’s area.

This information is limited to one (1) page maximum for each Key Team Leader identified in Section 7 of each Exhibit I. Respondents submitting more than one (1) page for each Key Team Leader identified will be subject to disqualification. Respondents who provide more Key Team Leaders than what is outlined in the requirement will be subject to disqualification as this would provide an advantage over firms who complied with the requirement and had the required number of Key Team Leaders.

Respondents who do not provide the required Key Team Leaders will be subject to disqualification as this does not meet the requirements of the project and therefore would deem the respondent and its team unqualified for the award.

3. Prime Experience - Provide information on the prime’s experience and ability in delivering effective services for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function, which demonstrate the firm's capabilities to provide services for the City. The following information should be provided:

a. Client name, project location and dates during which services were performed.

b. Description of overall project and services performed by your firm.

c. Duration of project services provided by your firm, and overall project budget.

d. Experience utilizing any City-specific or GDOT processes, manuals, or guidance (PDP, Design Policy, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) which may be applicable to this project.

e. Client(s) current contact information including contact names, telephone numbers and email address.

f. Involvement of Key Team Leaders on the projects.

This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.

4. Area Class Summary Form and Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications - Prime Consultants are defined as the firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications and the firm with whom the City will contract. The Team is defined as the Prime Consultant and their sub-consultants, who are considered team members. Prime Consultants and their sub-consultant team members must meet the Area Class requirements listed in Exhibit I.

In regards to the required Area Classes, respondents should submit a summary form (example provided in Exhibit IV) which details the required area classes for the Prime Consultant and all sub-consultants or joint-venture of consultants on the team listed in the Statement of Qualifications. The area classes and firms meeting the area classes listed on the summary form must meet all required area classes or the team will be disqualified.

If a team member’s prequalification will expire prior to the due date of the SOQs, documentation must be provided which shows that the firm has submitted its application for prequalification prior to the SOQ due date.

The team must maintain its prequalification certification in order to be considered eligible for award if selected.

Additionally, respondents should submit the Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications (for the Prime Consultant and all sub-consultants for each project) issued by GDOT and attach after the Area Class summary form.

This information is limited to the one (1) page for the Area Class table (unless the project needs require an extensive list of area classes) and the required Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.

C. Resources/Workload Capacity

1. Overall Resources - Provide information regarding the overall resources dedicated to delivering the specific project, including:

a. Organizational chart which identifies the project manager, prime, Key Team Leaders, support personnel, and reporting structure. This chart may be submitted on a 11” x 17” page. (Excluded from the page count)

b. Primary Office - Identify and discuss the primary office which will be responsible for handling the specific project and the number and types of staff within the office and how this office could benefit the project and promote efficiency. This information to be included on the one (1) page with the Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability.

c. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability – Respondents are to provide information regarding additional resource areas identified as important to the project, to discuss how the key areas will integrate and work together on the project, to discuss any information which is pertinent to these areas, to provide a narrative regarding how the organization of the team, including the PM and Key Team Leaders can deliver the project on schedule given their workload capacity. (the City recognizes that some individuals may be able to meet the schedule while carrying heavier project loads.) Respondents may discuss the advantages of your team and the abilities of the team members which will enable the project to meet the proposed schedule as identified in Exhibit I (where applicable). If there is no proposed schedule, discuss the advantages of the team and the abilities of the team members which will enable the project to move as expeditiously as possible. Respondents submitting more than the one (1) page allowed (combined for C1.b. and C1.c.), will be subject to disqualification.

2. Project Manager Commitment Table - Provide a list of ALL projects (the City, other governments and private contracts – Information may be validated and any firm determined not to be listing all projects may be subject to disqualification) on which the proposed project manager is currently committed, to enable the City to ascertain the project manager’s availability. Utilize a table similar to the following format with a minimum of all criteria indicated to provide the requested information:

Project Manager

Project Name for the City Projects/Name of Customer for Non-the City Projects

Role of PM on Project

Project Description

Current Phase of Project

Current Status of Project

Monthly Time Commitment in Hours

3. Key Team Leader Project Commitment Table - Provide a table similar to the below, with a minimum of all criteria indicated, which identifies ALL projects the Key Team Leaders (refer to the Project Description in Exhibit I, specifically Section 7 for the list of Key Team Leaders for each Project) are committed on to enable the City to ascertain the available capacity.

Key Team

Leader

Project Name for the City Projects/Name of Customer for Non-the City Projects

Role of Key Team Leader on Project

Project Description

Current Phase of Project

Current Status of Project

Monthly Time Commitment in Hours

This information is limited to the organization chart (excluded from page count), [one (1) page of text to include both C1.b. Primary Office and C1.c. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability], and the tables.

VII. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and Past Performance Response – Phase II Response

The following information will only be requested of the shortlisted firms. The Selection Committee will evaluate the shortlisted firms using the information provided as requested below (NOTE: Scores from Phase I will be carried forward to Phase II):

The Phase II response must be submitted in accordance with the instructions provided in Section IX, and must be organized, categorized using the same headings (in red), and numbered and lettered exactly as outlined below, and must be responsive to all requested information. For the sections in which page number limits are stated, each section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end on the last page allowed for the section. It is not allowed to begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section, if applicable. This will enable the City to ensure compliance with the page limitations.

Phase II Cover page – Each submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each Phase II submittal and each must indicate the response is for Phase II, list the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm’s full legal name and the specific project contract being submitted on.

A. Technical Approach

1. Provide any unique technical approaches your firm offers relative to addressing anticipated design concepts, use of any alternative methods for delivery (if applicable), and/or management of the project.

2. Identify any unique challenges of the project and how your firm intends to mitigate these challenges, including quality control, quality assurance procedures.

3. Provide any specific qualifications, skills, knowledge of the project and project area which may uniquely benefit the City and project, and your ability and willingness to meet time requirements.

This information will be limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.

B. Past Performance

No additional information should be submitted to fulfill this requirement. Information from the relevant projects listed as well as information on file with the City will be used to fulfill this requirement.

Past performance may be evaluated through the checking of project references for the proposed project manager as well as the firm. The City will check these references at random. For this reason, attention should be paid to the references provided to ensure that the contact information provided is accurate and the individual references are reachable. Other past performance information which may be utilized includes any knowledge that any member of the Selection Committee has pertaining to the past performance of the firm on any project.

VIII. Instructions for Submittal for Phase I - Statements of Qualifications

A. One (1) electronic version of the submittal is required. The Submittal must follow the format and meet the content requirements identified in Section VI, entitled Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements of Qualifications – Phase I Response. See Attachment 1 for a summary of how the submittals should be prepared.

B. Submittals must be typed on standard (8½” x 11”) paper. The pages should be numbered, however, submittal pages will be counted by section to determine compliance with page limits. Responses are limited to the page counts indicated in each section using a minimum of size 11 font. Page counts will be determined by pages with print on them, not by the physical piece of paper. Each Statement of Qualifications shall be prepared simply and economically as indicated above. Colored displays, and promotional materials are not desired. Emphasis must be on completeness, relevance, and clarity of content.

NOTE: Additional pages other than what has been specified above in each section should not be included and will be grounds for disqualification. Submittals are limited to the information requested in Section VI.

Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statements of Qualifications - Phase I Response only. Hyperlinks or embedded video are not allowed.

Statements of Qualifications must be received by the City prior to the deadline indicated in the Schedule of Events (Section III of RFQ).

No submittals will be accepted after the time and date set for receipt.

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response. The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed in the best interest of the City.

C. Questions and Requests for Clarification

Questions about any aspect of the RFQ, or the project, shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to:

galberson@cityofbrunswick-ga.gov. The deadlines for submission of questions relating to the RFQ are the times and dates shown in the (Schedule of Events- Section III). From the issue date of this solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and the award is made official and announced, respondents are subject to the Restriction of Communication in Section I.B.

IX. Instructions for Submittal for Phase II – Technical Approach and Past Performance Response

THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE INTENDED SOLELY FOR THOSE FIRMS IDENTIFIED AND NOTIFIED AS FINALISTS. Final Instructions will be provided to the Finalists in the notification.

A. One (1) electronic version of the submittal is required. The Submittal must follow the format and meet the content requirements identified in Section VII, entitled Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and Past Performance Response - Phase II Response. See Attachment 1 for a summary of how the submittals should be prepared.

B. Submittals must be typed on standard (8½” x 11”) paper. The pages should be numbered, however, submittal pages will be counted by section to determine compliance with page limits. Responses are limited to the page counts indicated in each section using a minimum of size 11 font. Page counts will be determined by pages with print on them, not by the physical piece of paper. Each Statement of Qualifications shall be prepared simply and economically as indicated above. Colored displays, and promotional materials are not desired. Emphasis must be on completeness, relevance, and clarity of content.

NOTE: Additional pages other than what has been specified above in each section should not be included and will be grounds for disqualification. Submittals are limited to the information requested in Section VII. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach and Past Performance Response-Phase II Response only. Hyperlinks or embedded video are not allowed.

Technical Approach must be received by the City prior to the deadline indicated in Notice to Selected Finalists.

No submittals will be accepted after the time and date set for receipt.

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response. the City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed

Responses submitted via facsimile or e-mail will be rejected. All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response. The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive any technicalities associated with this submittal if deemed

C. Questions and Requests for Clarification

Questions about any aspect of the Phase II Response for Finalists, shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to:

galberson@cityofbrunswick-ga.gov or as directed in the Notice to Selected Finalists, if different. The deadlines for submission of questions relating to the Phase II Response will be identified in the Notice to Selected Finalists. From the issue date of this solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and the award is made official and announced, respondents are subject to the Restriction of Communication in Section I.B.

X. Terms and Conditions of the City

A. Statement of Agreement

With the submission of a SOQ, the respondent agrees that he/she has carefully examined the Request for Qualifications, and agrees that it is the respondent’s responsibility to request clarification on any issues in any section of the Request for Qualifications with which the respondent disagrees or needs clarified. The respondent also understands that failure to mention these items during the question period or in the SOQ will be interpreted to mean that the respondent is in full agreement with the terms, conditions, specifications and requirements in the therein. With submission of a SOQ, the respondent hereby certifies: (a) that this SOQ is genuine and is not made in the interest or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm, or corporation; (b) that respondent has not directly or indirectly included or solicited any other respondent to put in a false or insincere SOQ; (c) that respondent has not solicited or induced any person, firm, or corporation to refrain from sending a SOQ.

The respondent also understands that failure to provide required information may result in disqualification. Failure to provide administrative information may not result in disqualification. At the City’s discretion, the City may notify the respondent that administrative information is not provided or there was an error in the information provided, and the City will allow a respondent to provide an update to the administrative information. However, the exception to this is the provision of the required GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT, which by Georgia Law requires disqualification of the response. The above changes mentioned to administrative information would be considered allowable as these would be limited to changes which do not affect the information which the evaluators use to score the respondents. Failure of a respondent to provide the specific administrative information as required in the notice will result in disqualification. Any respondent who provides changes in addition to the information requested in the notice shall be subject to disqualification. Failure of a respondent’s SOQ to provide any information pertaining to a respondent and its teams qualifications, of any type, will subject the SOQ to disqualification. The City will not allow updates to qualifications to be provided to avoid disqualification as this would allow a respondent to modify its SOQ and alter the information which evaluators would score. The above changes related to qualifications would not be allowable as these would allow changes which do affect the information which the evaluators use to score the respondents SOQ.

B. Joint-Venture Proposals, Sub-Consultants, and Vendors

The City does not generally desire to enter into “joint-venture” agreements with multiple firms. In the event two or more firms desire to “joint-venture”, it is strongly recommended that one incorporated firm propose and maintain status as the Program Management firm with the remaining firms participating as major firms. Any joint-venture, proposed and established as a separate business entity, should have its own set of books and supporting documentation sufficient for an audit trail. Transactions should be recorded consistent with the joint-venture agreement, and care must be taken to ensure that the joint-venture bears its equitable share of the costs. Therefore, “unpopulated joint-ventures” would not have an adequate accounting system suitable for cost reimbursement contracts.

However more traditional “populated joint-ventures” are welcomed. A populated joint-venture is where an alliance is brought to life by infusing it with working capital, employees, and control systems. The alliance implements all necessary business systems, including payroll processing, purchasing, property control, etc. The alliance will develop its own indirect rate structure and calculates its own indirect cost rates, based on the direct and indirect costs it incurs.

Sub-Consultants shall generally be considered any team member which is performing any service which typically requires prequalification, which is subject to the Audit and Accounting System Requirements, and whose services are billed as costs. Sub-Consultant Team Members must be written into the resulting Agreement and are subject to all terms and conditions in the Agreement. Vendors shall be considered any team member which is performing any service which typically does not require prequalification, which is not subject to the Audit and Accounting System Requirements, and whose services are billed as direct expenses. Vendors may not be written into the resulting Agreement and may not be subject to all terms and conditions in the Agreement.

C. Non-Discrimination and DBE Requirements

The City of Brunswick in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d-- 42 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the City of Brunswick issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all proposers that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award.

The City of Brunswick has not adopted a specific goal for DBE participation on this project.

For information on the the City’s DBE Program please contact:

Engineering and Public Works

525 Lakewood Ave

D. Audit and Accounting System Requirements

The City reserves the right to reject any proposal with firms that do not meet the following requirements:

1. Firm(s) should have an accounting system in place to meet requirements of 48 CFR Part 31 and, in the case of non-profit organizations, OMB Circular A-122.

2. Any firm that currently has an aggregate contract amount exceeding $250,000 should have submitted their yearly CPA overhead audit.

3. Firm(s) should have no significant outstanding deficient audit findings from previous contracts with the City that have not been resolved.

4. The prime is responsible for being reasonably assured that all sub-consultant(s) presented as a part of the proposed team are similarly in compliance with the above requirements.

E. Submittal Costs and Confidentiality

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the respondent submitting the response.

The City is not obligated to any respondent to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals as “proprietary” or “confidential”, or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until a final award.

F. Award Conditions

This request is not an offer to contract or a solicitation of bids. This request and any proposal submitted in response, regardless of whether the proposal is determined to be the best proposal, is not binding upon the City and does not obligate the City to procure or contract for any services. Neither the City nor any respondent submitting a response will be bound unless and until a written contract mutually accepted by both parties is negotiated as to its terms and conditions and is signed by the City and a respondent containing such terms and conditions as are negotiated between those parties. The City reserves the right to waive non-compliance with any requirements of this Request for Qualifications and to reject any or all proposals submitted in responses. Upon review of responses, the City will determine the respondent(s) proposal that in the sole judgment of the City is in the best interest of the City (if any is so determined), with respect to the evaluation criteria stated herein. The City then intends to conduct negotiations with such respondent(s) to determine if an acceptable contract may be reached.

G. Debriefings

Following notice of Award, the City will make scores and comments of evaluations available on request. Post-selection discussion regarding scores and comments may be scheduled through the City’s Department of Engineering and Public Works.

H. Right to Cancel or Change RFQ

The City reserves the right to cancel any and all Request(s) for Qualifications where it is determined to be in the best interest of the City to do so. The City reserves the right to increase, reduce, add or delete any item in this solicitation as deemed necessary.

It is the responsibility of all firms interested in submitting Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) for this advertisement to routinely check the posting on the Georgia Procurement Registry for any revisions to this RFQ.

I. Substitutions, Alternates, Exceptions, and Extensions

No substitutions or alternates will be accepted for this solicitation. Any respondent submitting substitutions or alternates will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for award.

EXHIBIT I

PI 0021161

1. Project Name: PI 0021161 – MLK Blvd / Altama Avenue from SR 25 Conn to City Limits

2. City / County: Brunswick / Glynn

3. Description: Engineering and design services for a Multi-Use trail approximately 3.90 miles in total length. The trail will connect on MLK Blvd near the southern right-of-way of Gloucester Street (SR 25 Conn) on the south end, and extend along MLK Blvd / Altama Ave to the northern city limits approximately 480 lf north of Glynn Isles Drive. The project includes a multi-use trail to be located outside the existing curb line, inside the curb line along the paved roadway or within the grassed median at various locations along the corridor. The trail design will include ADA-compliant crossings with appropriate signage and signalization at intersections and road crossings. The trail design shall also include benches with shade structures at multiple locations along the corridor plus landscape design.

4. Required Area Classes:

Prime Consultants are defined as the firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications and the firm with whom the City will contract. The Team is defined as the Prime Consultant and their sub-consultants, who are considered team members. The Prime Consultant must be prequalified in the Area Classes identified below in Section 4.A. The Prime Consultant or sub-consultant team members must be prequalified in the Area Classes identified below in Section 4.B.

Respondents should submit a summary form (example provided in Exhibit IV) which details the required area classes for the Prime Consultant and all sub-consultants or joint-venture of consultants on the team listed in the Statement of Qualifications. The area classes listed on the summary form must meet all required area classes or the team will be disqualified. The Prequalification Expiration Date must be current by the deadline stated for this RFQ.

A. The Prime Consultant MUST be prequalified by the Georgia Department of Transportation in the area classes listed below:

Number Area Class

3.02 Two-Lane or Multi-lane urban Roadway Design

3.07 Traffic Operations Design

3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians

B. The Team (either the Prime Consultant and/or one or more of their sub-consultant team members) MUST be prequalified by the Georgia Department of Transportation in the area classes listed below:

Number Area Class

1.06 (a) NEPA

1.06 (b) History

1.06 (e) Ecology

1.06 (f) Archaeology

3.02 Two-Lane or Multi-lane urban Roadway Design

3.07 Traffic Operations Design

3.10 Utility Coordination

3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians

5.01 Land Surveying

5.02 Engineering Surveying

8.01 Construction Engineering & Supervision

9.01 Erosion, Sedimentation, and Pollution Control Plan

9.03 Field Inspection for Erosion Control

5. Scope:

The project includes design of a multi-use bicycle and pedestrian facility along Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard / Altama Avenue between Gloucester Street (State Route 25 Conn) and the northern city limits (approx. 480 ft. north of Glynn Isles Drive) in Brunswick, Georgia. Portions of the proposed trail may be located within the raised, grassed median along MLK Boulevard. Other portions of the trail may be located behind the existing curb & gutter along one or both sides of the road of Altama Avenue. Still other portions of the trail may be located within the paved portion of Altama Avenue and delineated as shared lanes on one or both sides of the roadway. The City prefers to construct the trail within the existing right-of-way and avoid property or easement acquisition to the extent possible. The scope of the project shall also include design of all signalization, signage and pavement markings necessary at all locations where the proposed trail will intersect existing roadways. Finally, the scope of the project includes design of Erosion, Sedimentation & Pollution Control Plans for the full length of the trail project. GDOT ROW encroachment permits will be required at Gloucester Street (SR 25 Conn), Community Road (SR 303), and Golden Isles Parkway (Spur 25). All deliverables shall be in accordance with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) Specifications, GDOT Construction Standards & Details, GDOT Design Policy Manual, and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) NPDES permit requirements.

The Consultant shall provide:

A. Environmental Documents:

1. All necessary Environmental Special Studies Survey Reports, and Assessment of Effects for Air, Noise, Ecology, Aquatics, Archaeology, History, and NEPA.

2. NEPA Documents including Envrionmental Approval and re-evaluations as required

3. Section 7 Coordination

4. Protected Species Surveys, as required

5. Preparation of Environmental Commitments Table “Green Sheet” and Environmental Resource Impact Table

B. Survey

1. Right-of-way location maps and exhibits based on GIS exhibits, City maps, exhibits and records and obvious markers and monuments

2. Exhibits and maps if required for easements, acquisitions, etc.

3. Existing conditions survey including roadway, curb & gutter, drain inlets, topography, above ground utilities

4. Survey Control package

C. Engineering Design

1. Project design

2. Erosion, Sedimentation & Pollution Control Plan

3. Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost

4. QA / QC Reviews

5. 30%, 60%, 90% Design submittals

6. Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates package

D. GDOT Encroachment Permits

1. Permit Application

2. Coordination with GDOT District personnel

3. Exhibits, Drawings, etc.

4. Final Permit

E. Construction

1. RFI responses

2. Attendance at pre-bid meeting

3. Construction bid evaluation

4. Pre-Construction meeting attendance

5. Shop Drawing review and approval

6. Site Observation visits

7. Change order and pay application review and approval

7. Related Key Team Leaders:

A. Project Design Lead B. Environmental Compliance / NEPA Lead C. Survey Lead D. ESPCP Design Lead

8.The following milestone dates are proposed:

A. Notice to Proceed – Engineering – Dec. 2026 B. Environmental Permit Submittals – Mar. 2027 C. Project Survey Completion– Apr 2027 D. 30% Design Submittal – July 2027 E. 60% Design Submittal – Oct 2028 F. 90% Design Submittal – Jan 2028 G. GDOT Encroachment Permits – Feb 2028 H. Final Design Submittal – Apr 2028 I. Construction Let Date – June 2028

EXHIBIT II

CERTIFICATION FORM

I, __________________________, being duly sworn, state that I am ______________________ (title) of ________

___________________________________ (firm) and hereby duly certify that I have read and understand the information presented in the attached proposal and any enclosure and exhibits thereto.

Initial each box below indicating certification. The person initialing must be the same person who signs the Certification Form. (If unable to initial any box for any reason, place an “X” in the applicable box and attach a statement explaining the non-certification. The City will review and make a determination as to whether or not the firm shall be considered further or disqualified).

I further certify that to the best of my knowledge the information given in response to the Request for Qualifications is full, complete and truthful.

I further certify that the submitting firm and any principal employee of the submitting firm has not, in the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of any crime of moral turpitude or any felony offense, nor has had their professional license suspended, revoked or been subjected to disciplinary proceedings, nor is any team members/principals currently under indictment for any reason related to actions on public infrastructure projects.

I further certify that I understand that Firms included on the current Federal list of firms suspended or debarred are not eligible for selection and that the submitting firm has not, in the immediately preceding five (5) years, been suspended or debarred from contracting with any federal, state or local government agency, and further, that the submitting firm is not now under consideration for suspension or debarment from any such agency.

I further certify that the submitting firm has not in the immediately preceding five (5) years been defaulted in any federal, state or local government agency contract and further, that the submitting firm is not now under any notice of intent to default on any such contract, nor has been removed from a contract or failed to complete a contract as assigned due to cause or default.

I further certify that the firm or any affiliate(s) has not been involved in any arbitration, litigation, mediation, dispute review board or other dispute resolution proceeding with a client, business partner, or government agency in the last five (5) years involving an amount in excess of $500,000 related to performance on public infrastructure projects.

I further certify that there are not any pending regulatory inquiries that could impact our ability to provide services if we are the selected consultant.

I further certify that there are no possible conflicts of interest created by our consideration in the selection process or by our involvement in the project.

I further certify that the submitting firm’s annual average revenue for the past five (5) years is sufficient to…