Pier 2 Hazmat Report2.pdf

CDW CONSULTANTS, INC.

CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY REPORT

Electric and Water Utilities Repair

Pier 2 at Naval Station Newport, RI

Prepared by

CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive

Natick, MA 01760

Prepared for

Symmes Maini & Mckee

1000 Massachusetts Avenue

Cambridge, MA 02138

January 2019

CDW Project # 1816.0

Pier 2, Navy Base Newport, RI

CDW Project # 1816.0

CDW CONSULTANTS, INC. ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

3.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

4.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

4.1 Methods

4.2 Findings

4.3 Recommendations

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT

5.1 Methods

5.2 Findings

5.3 Recommendations

6.0 POLYCHLORATED BIPHENYLS

6.1 Methods

6.2 Findings

7.0 DUST WIPE SAMPLING

7.1 Methods

7.2 Findings

7.3 Recommendations

8.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

8.1 Methods

8.2 Findings

8.3 Recommendations

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Tables

Appendix B: Asbestos Laboratory Reports

Appendix C: Lead Laboratory Reports

Appendix D: PCB Laboratory Reports

Appendix E: Dust Wipe Laboratory Reports

CDW Project #1816.0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

CDW Consultants, Inc. (CDW) is pleased to present this letter report summarizing the findings of the suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint (LBP), polychlorinated biphenyls

(PCBs), metal and mercury in dust inspection of portions of Pier 2, Naval Base Newport, Rhode

Island (“Site”). In November and December 2018, Ms. Susan Cahalan (Rhode Island Asbestos

Inspector #AAC-1023) conducted an inspection for suspect materials. An inspection is required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prior to scheduled building/structure renovations.

Additionally, the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) and Rhode Island Department of

Environmental Management (RIDEM) regulate ACM associated with renovation, demolition, and asbestos abatement projects. Samples of suspect materials were collected to confirm the presence or absence of ACM, LBP, PCBs and mercury and metals in dust. Suspect materials were grouped into homogenous areas. A homogenous area is an area that is similar in color, texture and date of application. Hand tools were used to collect bulk samples which were promptly placed in sealed plastic bags using a unique numbering system. Samples were not collected of non-suspect materials, including wood, fiberglass, plastic/vinyl, ceramic, concrete, neoprene/rubber, glass, and carpeting.

2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

The hazardous materials survey was conducted in support of proposed renovations to portions of Pier

2, the northernmost of two piers at Naval Station Newport in Newport, RI. The pier is the home of various ships, as well as several buildings. The utilities that serve the ships and buildings, specifically the water and electric utilities are currently in poor condition, with some areas being unusable and out of service. This project will repair and upgrade specific utilities as described below.

• Water system: replacement of a 12-inch main (below pier only), service lines and valves, backflow preventers, pier fire hydrants, pipe hangars and supports and heat trace system.

• Electrical distribution: replace switches and transformers, replace metal clad switchgear, replace oil switches with sulfur hexafluoride gas switches, demolish CMU wall which separates the transformer area from the switchgear area and replace roll up pedestrian access doors in Load centers 1 and 2. In addition, Load Center 2 will also have circuits, outlet assemblies, and communication system infrastructure replaced.

3.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

Pier 2 is a concrete pier constructed on steel pilings. According to information provided by the Navy, all utilities on the pier are suspended on the underside. Piping consists of a 3,220 linear foot looped type main system hung below the pier deck that feeds service lines around the 1,529 linear foot pier.

Portions of the pier water main distribution system are constructed of uncoated welded steel pipe with expansion loops, and portions were constructed of uncoated ductile iron pipe with expansion fittings. The entire pier water distribution pipe system is insulated with 1-1/2-inch thick poly foam insulation with a protective polyethylene or PVC jacket and a self-regulating electric wire heat trace system served via under pier conduits from the pier’s power Load Center No. 2. The pier deck has a limited number of manhole openings through the deck in which to access the water system and primary access to the water main is by small boat from below the pier. Water pipes are hung below the pier deck by threaded steel rods suspended from galvanized angle iron bolted to the underside of the deck installed new or restored circa 1994. The rods support the pipe on hangers with rollers and pipe saddles to allow the pipe to expand and contract with temperature changes.

Neoprene pads separate the pipes from the hangars. A large sewer pipe is also suspended under the pier, however, is not proposed to be replaced as part of this project. Load Centers 1 and 2, are concrete and CMU buildings, with concrete floors and built up rubber roofs.

4.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

4.1 Methods

The investigative work for the asbestos survey included conducting a visual inspection of physically accessible areas of the subject areas. The roofing materials were also sampled with the assistance of a contractor to core and repair roofing. Once the visual inspection was completed, the building components were categorized into homogeneous areas. CDW collected bulk samples of different homogeneous suspect materials for asbestos analysis. The bulk samples were delivered under chain of custody to Asbestos Identification Laboratory, Inc. (AIL) located in Woburn, Massachusetts. AIL is a state licensed (#AAL-121) and NVLAP-accredited laboratory (lab code #200919-0) for asbestos analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed for asbestos content by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using EPA Method 600/R-93/116. A positive stop method was used – if one sample in a homogeneous group is positive then additional samples of the same material are not analyzed.

Samples analyzed to contain greater than 1% asbestos are to be treated as ACM as defined by the

USEPA and Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM). The laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B.

4.2 Findings

The results of the laboratory analysis are provided in the below tables:

Table 1: Under Pier 2

Field ID \

Laboratory ID

Material Location Result

1A Black Brittle Tar On Steel Piers ND

410256

Table 1: Under Pier 2

Material Location Result

1B Black Brittle Tar On Steel Piers ND

410257

1C Black Brittle Tar On Steel Piers ND

410258

1D Black Brittle Tar On Steel Piers ND

410259

1E Black Brittle Tar On Steel Piers ND

410260

2A Black Tar Top of Piers to Concrete ND

410261

2B Black Tar Top of Piers to Concrete ND

410262

2C Black Tar Top of Piers to Concrete ND

410263

2D Black Tar Top of Piers to Concrete ND

410264

2E Black Tar Top of Piers to Concrete ND

410265

3A Black Material

Covering

Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier ND

410266

3B Black Material

Covering

Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier ND

410267

3C Black Material

Covering

Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier ND

410268

3D Black Material

Covering

Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier ND

410269

3E Black Material

Covering

Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier ND

410270

ND = Not Detected

Table 2: Pier 2, Load Center 1

Material Location Result

1A White Caulk At Base of Building

Exterior

ND

410256

1B White Caulk At Base of Building

Exterior

ND

426829

1C White Caulk At Base of Building

Exterior

ND

426830

2A White Caulk Exterior Louver + Garage ND

426831

2B White Caulk Exterior Louver + Garage ND

426832

2C White Caulk Exterior Louver + Garage ND

426833

3A White Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426834

3B White Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426835

3C White Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426836

3D White Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426837

3E White Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426838

Roof-1A Gray Paper Roof Core ND

426839

Roof-1B Black Brittle Tar Roof Deck ND

426840

Roof-2A Gray Paper Roof Core ND

426841

Roof-2B Black Brittle Tar Roof Deck ND

426842

Roof-3 Glue Under Rubber at Curb Cut ND

426843

ND = Not Detected

Table 3: Pier 2, Load Center 2

Material Location Result

1A White-Gray Caulk Exterior at CMU + Metal

Frame to Garage Doors

ND

426853

1B White-Gray Caulk Exterior at CMU + Metal

Frame to Garage Doors

ND

426854

1C White-Gray Caulk Exterior at CMU + Metal

Frame to Garage Doors

ND

426855

2A White Caulk Bottom CMU at Garage 3% Chrysotile

426856

2B White Caulk Bottom CMU at Garage NA

426857

3A Gray Caulk Exterior at Louvers ND

426858

3B Gray Caulk Exterior at Louvers ND

426859

4A Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426860

4B Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426861

4C Skim Plaster Interior on Concrete Walls ND

426862

5A Gray Penetration

Sealant

Interior Walls ND

426863

5B Gray Penetration

Sealant

Interior Walls ND

426864

6A White Transite Board Switch Gear Boxes on

Floor

10% Chrysotile

426865

6B White Transite Board Switch Gear Boxes on

Floor

NA

426866

Roof-1A Gray Paper Roof Core ND

426867

Roof-1B Black Brittle Tar On Roof Deck ND

426868

Roof-2A Gray Paper Roof Core ND

426869

Roof-2B Black Brittle Tar On Roof Deck ND

426870

Table 3: Pier 2, Load Center 2

Material Location Result

Roof-3A Gray Paper Roof Core ND

426871

Roof-3B Black Brittle Tar On Roof Deck ND

426872

Curb-1A Black Tar Behind

Wood

Curb Cut Roof 10% Chrysotile

426873

Curb-1B Gypsum Board Behind Tar Curb Cut ND

ND = Not Detected

NA = Not Analyzed

Chrysotile = Asbestos Mineral

Refer to attached quantity tables in Appendix A for ACM and presumed asbestos containing materials quantities. The laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix B.

4.3 Recommendations

Prior to disturbance, the ACM identified must be abated by a Rhode Island licensed asbestos abatement contractor following all federal, state & local regulations governing asbestos abatement. A copy of the asbestos Waste Shipment record must be received within 30 days of removal from the

Site. Asbestos air quality sampling must be conducted under USEPA regulations following asbestos abatement and prior to re-occupancy of the spaces. If additional materials are discovered that have not been sampled, those materials should be considered ACMs until laboratory analysis determines otherwise. Additionally, all abatement programs must follow the requirements outlined in the

Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (See Attachment 6 of Appendix A UFGS-02 82 13.00 10).

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT

5.1 Methods

CDW performed a visual inspection of painted surfaces. CDW collected samples from different color paints on various types of building component substrates. Samples were submitted to EMSL

Laboratories in Cinnaminson, New Jersey for analysis via Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS).

5.2 Findings

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US Department of Housing and Urban

Development definitions defines LBP as any paint or surface coating that contains lead equal to exceeding one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or 0.5% by weight. Paint containing lead at or above a concentration of 0.06% by weight meets the Consumer Product Safety

Commission definition of “lead-containing paint”. The OSHA lead-in-construction standard defines lead containing paint (LCP) as a paint or coating containing any detectable level of lead. Based on the EPA and OSHA criteria listed above, samples that meet the criteria for LBP include: blue paint on metal garage door frame in Load Center 1 and white-gray paint on steel beams in Load Center 2.

The lead paint analytical results are provided in the below tables. The laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix C.

Pier 2, Load Center 1

Sample ID Location Lead Concentration

(% Weight)

LP-1 Blue Paint, Garage Door Metal Frame 1.8

LP-2 Gray Paint on Garage Door 0.71

LP-3A Green Paint Interior Walls 0.077

LP-3B Green Paint Interior Walls 0.069

LP-4A Gray Paint Interior Walls 0.18

LP-4B Gray Paint Interior Walls 0.092

LP-5 Gray Paint on Elec Hood on Pier 0.10

Pier 2, Load Center 2

Lead Concentration

(% Weight)

LP-1 Gray Paint on Elec Hood on Pier 0.081

LP-2 Blue Door Frame Paint <0.0080

LP-3A

White Over Blue/Green Paint on Interior

Concrete 0.10

LP-3B

White Over Blue/Green Paint on Interior

Concrete 0.081

LP-3C White Over Blue/Green Paint Interior Concrete 0.029

LP-4A

White Over Bright Green Paint Interior

Concrete <0.0080

LP-4B

White Over Bright Green Paint Interior

Concrete <0.0080

LP-5A White/Gray Paint Over Beams 4.4

Lead Concentration

(% Weight)

LP-5B White/Gray Paint Over Beams 3.1

5.3 Recommendations

Based on the conclusions of this testing, the following recommendations are offered:

• Removal of the LBP is not required. However, in accordance with the EPA Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) Rule 40 CFR 745, workers, visitors and the public must be protected from lead dust generated during the demolition of LBP or LCP coated surfaces.

• Components identified to contain the presence of lead should not be disturbed in an uncontrolled manner. Disturbance of these materials should only be done by properly trained personnel in a controlled and documented manner to allow for the safety of the workers, bystanders and disposal of waste materials.

• During demolition or renovation, paint materials containing lead should not be sanded, scraped, drilled, or otherwise altered unless proper engineering controls are used to prevent migration of fugitive lead containing dust from the work area. Under OSHA regulations, any demolition or renovation to be performed at a structure where lead in paint and dust is present must be performed in accordance with a worker protection policy, including, but not limited to, appropriate training, medical monitoring, respiratory protection, and other protective equipment. Comply with guidelines outlined in specifications UFGS-02 83 13.00 20 and

UFGS-02 83 19.13 10.

6.0 POLYCHLORATED BIPHENYLS

6.1 Methods

CDW conducted a visual inspection CDW conducted a visual inspection for suspect PCB containing building materials at the load centers and under the subject pier, and collected bulk samples for laboratory analysis. The samples were submitted to Phoenix Environmental Laboratories in

Manchester, Connecticut for analysis via EPA Method 8082 with Soxhlet extraction 3540C. A copy of the PCB laboratory report is provided in Appendix D.

6.2 Findings

The PCB analytical results are summarized in the below tables.

Under Pier 2

Concentration

(mg/kg)

PCB-1

White Caulk at Seams on PVC Covering at

Water Line

ND

PCB-2

White Caulk at Seams on PVC Covering at

Water Line

ND

PCB-3A Black Tar on Steel Piers ND

PCB-3B Black Tar on Steel Piers ND

PCB-3C Black Tar on Steel Piers ND

PCB-4A Black Covering on Sewer Pipe ND

PCB-4B Black Covering on Sewer Pipe ND

PCB-4C Black Covering on Sewer Pipe ND

Pier 2, Load Center 1

Concentration

(mg/kg)

PCB-1A Caulk at Base of Building ND

PCB-1B Caulk at Base of Building ND

PCB-2A Caulk at Garage Doors ND

PCB-2B Caulk at Garage Doors ND

PCB-3A Green/Gray Interior Paint on Walls ND

PCB-3B Green/Gray Interior Paint on Walls ND

Concentration

(mg/kg)

PCB-1A

White-Grey Caulk at CMU and Metal Frame to

Garage Doors

ND

PCB-1B

White-Grey Caulk at CMU and Metal Frame to

Garage Doors

ND

PCB-2A Gray Caulk at Louvers ND

PCB-2B Gray Caulk at Louvers ND

PCB-3A White Over Light Blue Interior Paint 9.4

PCB-3B White Over Light Blue Interior Paint 1.4

PCB-4A White Over Light Green Interior Paint 2.0

PCB-4B White Over Light Green Interior Paint 1.8

The analytical results are compared to the USEPA standard of 50 parts per million (ppm), which is the threshold for bulk product waste, as defined by USEPA 40 CFR § 761.3, and regulated under the

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). None of the samples collected had concentrations of PCBs above the TSCA limit of 50 parts per million (ppm). Four of the samples from Load Center 2 (paint on concrete) contained low levels of PCBs (1-10 ppm).

7.0 DUST WIPE SAMPLING

7.1 Methods

Wipe sample collection were collected at Load Center 1 and Load Center 2. The wipe samples were collected utilizing Ghost Wipes, which meet ASTM E 1792 Standards. Eight wipe samples were collected from each of the load centers. The wipe samples were sent with chain of custody to

Spectrum Analytical of Agawam Massachusetts for analysis of RCRA 8 metals. Samples were analyzed using lead in dust by SW 846 3050B methodology.

7.2 Findings

A summary of the results from each load center are compared with health-based risk criteria, including the WTC criteria and EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria, are included in the below tables, and locations are described below.

Load Center 1 Wipe Sample Locations

• Wipe-1: Face of transformer #2

• Wipe-2: On CMU divider wall, five feet up from ground

• Wipe-3: Floor, right side of front entrance

• Wipe-4: Top of garage door controller near ceiling

• Wipe-5: Floor, rear room left side

• Wipe-6: Top of switch gear unit

• Wipe-7: On CMU wall, rear room, middle

• Wipe-8: Floor, right side of rear room

Analyte Units EPA RSL

Industrial

Air - Wipe

Equivalent

(TR=10^-

4;

THQ=1)

Settling

Dust

Screening

Values, WTC

IEA

(TR=10^-

4;

THQ=1)

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Arsenic

(C) µg/wipe 2.9 3.9 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 6.91* 5.22* <5.00 <5.00 5.81*

Barium

(N) µg/wipe 22 1,097 64.7* 17.1 48.0* 135* 108* 19.2 55.7* 102*

Cadmium

(C [RSL])

µg/wipe 6.8 15.6 17.0* 0.521 12.3* 9.68* 14.8* 1.72 6.04 37.7*

Chromium

(N) µg/wipe 0.0015 47 17.1* 3.74* 27.3* 187* 45.6* 2.56* 22.7* 63.5*

Lead (N) µg/wipe NA 2.7 187 77.8 484 2,760 1,520 39.7 267 1,770

Mercury

(N) µg/wipe 13 1.57 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400

Selenium

(N) µg/wipe 880 78.4 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 6.13 8.05 <5.00 <5.00 7.29

Silver (N) µg/wipe NA 78.4 6.55 <1.00 187 4.54 8.98 1.40 1.07 5.14

Bold = exceeds WTC criteria.

Bold* = exceeds EPA/RSL criteria

C = Carcinogen

N = Non Carcinogen µg/wipe (µg/100cm2) µg = micrograms per kilogram

In Load Center 1, Arsenic exceeded both EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria and WTC criteria in three samples. Barium exceeded EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria six samples. Cadmium exceeded both EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria and WTC criteria in five samples, and chromium exceeded both in two samples. Lead was detected above

WTC criteria in all samples. Silver exceeded the WTC criteria in one sample. The laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix E. Sample locations are depicted on the attached figure.

Load Center 2 Wipe Sample Locations

• Wipe-1: Face of transformer #2

• Wipe-2: On CMU wall, between door and louver, five feet up from ground

• Wipe-3: Floor, right side of front entrance

• Wipe-4: Top of garage door controller near ceiling

• Wipe-5: Floor, between switch gear and newer transformer

• Wipe-6: Top of switch gear unit

• Wipe-7: On CMU wall, rear room, middle

• Wipe-8: Floor, right side of rear room

Analyte Units EPA RSL

Industrial

Air - Wipe

Equivalent

(TR=10^-

4;

THQ=1)

Settling

Dust

Screening

Values, WTC

IEA

(TR=10^-

4;

THQ=1)

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Wipe

Arsenic

(C) µg/wipe 2.9 3.9 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 7.93*

Barium

(N) µg/wipe 22 1,097 138 14.3 42.9 68.1 157 16.5 7.22 7.93

Cadmium

(C [RSL])

µg/wipe 6.8 15.6 12.7* 0.554 45.2* 18.3* 18.6* 3.28 1.44 67.0*

Chromium

(N) µg/wipe 0.0015 47 56.4* 3.15* 20.6* 26.6* 57.8* 5.79* 4.06* 93.0*

Lead (N) µg/wipe NA 2.7 1,070 119 4,210 1,100 2,030 941 1,620 5,600

Mercury

(N) µg/wipe 13 1.57 <4.00 <0.400 <4.00 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400 <0.400

Selenium

(N) µg/wipe 880 78.4 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 6.38

Silver (N) µg/wipe NA 78.4 1.23 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 4.36 4.11 1.50 4.20

Bold = exceeds WTC criteria.

Bold* = exceeds EPA/RSL criteria

C = Carcinogen

N = Non Carcinogen µg/wipe (µg/100cm2) µg = micrograms per kilogram

Notes:

1. Health-based risk values are based on a target cancer risk (TR) of 10^-4 and a non-cancer target hazard quotient

(THQ) of 1.

2. EPA RSL = EPA Regional Screening Level; calculates health based risk values for air based on a TR of 10^-6 and

THQ of 1. This air criteria is converted to a wipe equivalent using the guidance provided in the OSHA Technical

Manual, Section II: Chapter 2, III, A. The EPA RSL 10^-4 values were calculated by multiplying the EPA RSL 10^-6 values by 100 where the pollutant is a carcinogen (several metals are identified as carcinogens for inhalation only). If the pollutant is not a carcinogen; the risk is based on the THQ.

3. WTC IEA = World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment; calculates health based risk values for wipe samples based on dermal contact and ingestion based on a TR of 10^-4 and THQ of 1. Only arsenic was identified as a carcinogen in that study.

In Load Center 2, Arsenic exceeded both EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria and WTC criteria in one sample. Barium exceeded EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria six samples. Cadmium exceeded both EPA RSL Industrial Air-Wipe Equivalent criteria and WTC criteria in four samples, and chromium exceeded both in three samples. Lead was detected above

WTC criteria in all samples. The laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix E.

7.3 Recommendations

CDW recommends:

• Clean out all loose material and debris to expose the full floor area.

• HEPA vacuum all surfaces.

• Clean all flat, surfaces with an aggressive cleaner such as ALARATM 1146 or equivalent, capable of removing metal particles from the surfaces. Follow manufacturer’s instructions for application. Wear Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) recommended by a Certified

Industrial Hygienist (CIH) engaged in the project.

• Test surfaces again using wipe samples; if concentrations exceed the risk-based standards, the decontamination procedures shall be repeated until concentrations meet the standards.

8.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

8.1 Methods

CDW visually inspected the Site building for universal, special and hazardous wastes associated with building materials. These included but were not limited to the following:

• Mercury-containing devices (fluorescent light tubes, thermostats, gauges, etc.);

• Polychlorinated bi-phenyl (PCB)-containing articles, equipment and devices (light ballasts, electrical switches, etc.);

• Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-containing equipment (refrigerants, air conditioners/HVAC equipment, water bubblers, etc.)

• Tritium-containing devices (exit signs);

• Lead-Acid batteries (emergency lights, etc.); and

• Pressurized-cylinders (fire extinguishers, etc.).

8.2 Findings

The visual survey for hazardous materials identified mercury-containing light tubes, remnant DEHP-containing light ballasts, mercury containing switches, lead and tritium batteries, oil containing garage door retractors, PCB oil fuse and other hazardous materials. No hazardous materials sampling or analysis was conducted as part of this preliminary survey. A list of OHMs identified are included in the tables in Appendix A.

8.3 Recommendations

Prior to removal, light tubes, ballasts, compact florescent bulbs, lead and tritium batteries, thermostats and switches will require proper handling, removal, transportation and off-site recycling/reclamation. Transformer fluid, and PCB containing items must be transported and disposed in accordance with state, federal and military regulations. Additionally, all items identified in the tables in Appendix A shall be collected and properly disposed of prior to renovation activities at the Site and comply with guidelines outlined in the USGS specifications.

Limitations

The conclusions are limited to the information available at the time of the field survey and the scope of services, as defined. No subsurface soil or groundwater sampling and analysis was performed.

Where access to portions of the Site or to structures on the site was unavailable or limited, CDW renders no opinion as to the presence of hazardous material or the presence of indirect evidence related to hazardous material in that portion of the site or structure. This report cannot be solely relied upon for renovation or demolition. The sampling performed forms the basis for conclusions expressed and areas inaccessible for testing limits those conclusions. No other conclusions, interpretations or recommendations are contained or implied in this report other than those expressed. While CDW followed industry standards during the inspection, we do not warrant that all suspect hazardous building materials were identified in or on the buildings and shall not be held liable related to future abatement costs related to hazardous materials that are either not discovered or not appropriately characterized. This is due in part to inherent problems with every building inspection, such as, but not limited to:

• Seemingly homogeneous materials that are not in fact homogeneous;

• Seemingly representative locations that are not in fact representative;

• Layered materials that are not uniformly present or are isolated;

• Materials that are present and accessible but were not considered to be hazardous,

• Materials that are present in an isolated and limited quantity; and

• Material that is present in locations that are unsafe or otherwise difficult to access.

Client acknowledges that CDW's inspection is limited and all hazardous materials may only become apparent during the course of future renovation or demolition. During the course of future renovation/demolition work, it is likely that additional hazardous materials or materials suspected of being hazardous will be identified. Such materials should be assumed to be hazardous unless appropriate evaluation or sampling and analysis demonstrate otherwise. No other use of this report is warranted without the written consent of CDW Consultants, Inc.

CDW appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project.

Very truly yours, CDW CONSULTANTS, INC.

Susan Cahalan, PG, ISSP-SA

Senior Environmental Geologist

FIGURE

1A ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL SAMPLE

LP-1 PAINT CHIP SAMPLE LOCATION

PCB-1 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS SAMPLE

WIPE -1 WIPE SAMPLE LOCATION

ROOF-1 ROOF CORE SAMPLE LOCATION

CURB-1 ROOF CORE AT ROOF CURB SAMPLE

WIPE-6

C D

W

H

A Z

M A

T

S

A M

P L E

L O

C A

T I O

N S

WIPE-7

WIPE-8

WIPE-5

WIPE-4

WIPE-3

WIPE-1

WIPE-2

1B

1A

3B

2A

3D

1C

3A

3C

3E

PCB-1A

2C

LP-3B

LP-4A

PCB-1B

WIPE-5

WIPE-8

WIPE-7

WIPE-6

ROOF-2

ROOF-3

ROOF-1

PCB-2A

2B

PCB-2B

LP-4B

LP-2

LP-1

LP-3A

ROOF-1

ROOF-3

ROOF-2

CURB-1

4A 4B

4C

5A & 5B

WIPE-3

WIPE-1

LP-3B

PCB-3B

WIPE-2

LP-4B

PCB-4B

3A & 3B

LP-3B

LP-3A

PCB-2A,2B

LP-4A

LP-5A

2A & 2B

1B

LP-5B

1C

PCB-1B

1B

PCB-1A

LP-1 HOOD @ PIER

WIPE-4

LP-2

PCB-3A

LP-4A PCB-4A

JAN. 18, 2019

PHOTOGRAPHS

Black Brittle Tar on Piers – No PCBs or ACM

Tar at Top of Pier to Concrete – No PCBs or ACM

White Rubber Caulk on PVC Under Pier = No PCBs

Black Coating on Sewer Pipe = No PCBs or ACM

It is Unknown if There is ACM is Gasket Packing, Not Assessible

Transformer with Non-PCB Sticker

Subsurface Wires from Old Transformers are suspect for PCB inner Wrap and ACM

ACM Transite panels in Switchgear

PCB Fuses

Close up of PCB (1-10 PPM) White Over Light Blue Paint in Load Center 2

APPENDIX A

TABLE 1

ACM Quantities

Pier 2

Navy Base, Newport RI

HA No. Material Description Laboratory

Sample No.

NESHAP Cat. Location Est. Quantity Units

1 Gaskets/Expansion Fittings on Water Line PACM Suspect ACM, Not

Assessable Water Line Under Pier 300 EA

2 Exterior White Caulk 2A, 2B Cat. 2 Non-friable ACM Load Center 2, Bottom Garage Doors and CMU 50 LF

3 White Transite Panels 6A, 6B Cat. 2 Non-friable ACM

Interior of Switchgear in Load Centers 1 and 2, Each Switch

Contains Three Boxes of Transite Panels, with 20 (6"x4") Panels in Each Box

1,200 EA

4 Black Tar on Roof Curb Cut Curb-1A Cat. 1 Non-Friable ACM Load Center 2, West Side Curb Dividing Load Center 2 Roof to

Rest of Building 68

60 SF

5 Fire Doors PACM Suspect ACM Doors Separating Transformer Rooms from Switch Gear Rooms 2 EA

6 Transite Board PACM Suspect ACM Electric Service Hoods at Pier, Associated with Load Centers 1 and 2

40 SF

7 ACM Coated Wires PACM Suspect ACM Leading from Transformers to Trench and Subsurface in Load

Centers 1 and 2

200 LF

8 Subsurface Transite Pipe and/or Insulated Pipe PACM Suspect ACM Subsurface 1,500 LF

NA = Not Applicable

HA = Homogenous Area

PACM = Presumed Asbestos Contain Material

TABLE 2

Oil and Hazardous Materials

Pier 2

Navy Base, Newport RI

Material Description Location Est.

Quantity Units

Ballasts (DPHE) Load Centers 1 and 2 20 EA

Fluorescent Bulbs (Mercury) Majority 4', Some 6' 50 Tubes

Emergency Light Batteries (Lead) Load Centers 1 and 2 4 EA

Exit Sign Batteries (Tritium) Load Centers 1 and 2 4 Ampules

Thermostats and Switches (Mercury) Load Centers 1 and 2 and

Electric Service Hoods 60 Ampules

Batteries Inside Battery Box in Load

Center 1

2 EA

Oils Associated with Overhead Door

Controllers Load Center 1 and 2 2 EA

PCB Fuses Load Centers 1 and 2 200 EA

PCB Gel Wrap inside Wires/Cables Load Centers 1 and 2, Electric

Service Hoods

400 LF

15 KV Oil Switches (S-386 and S-387) Load Center 1 2 EA

Transformer Fluid

(4) Transformers (T-272 and T-

273) and (T-274 and T-275)

Transformers with 154-Gallons of Oil Each will be Removed from Load Centers 1 and 2

616 Gallons

APPENDIX B

Batch: 38695

165 New Boston St., Ste 227 Woburn, MA 01801

781-932-9600 Web: www.asbestosidentificationlab.com

Email: mikemanning@asbestosidentificationlab.com

Asbestos Identification Laboratory

Dear Susan Cahalan, Thank you Susan Cahalan for your business.

Michael Manning Owner/Director

Asbestos Identification Laboratory has completed the analysis of the samples from your office for the above referenced project .

The information and analysis contained in this report have been generated using the EPA /600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Materials or products that contain more than 1% of any kind or combination of asbestos are considered an asbestos containing building material as determined by the EPA. This Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) technique may be performed either by visual estimation or point counting. Point counting provides a determination of the area percentage of asbestos in a sample. If the asbestos is estimated to be less than 10% by visual estimation of friable material, the determination may be repeated using the point counting technique. The results of the point counting supersede visual PLM results. Results in this report only relate to the items tested. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other U.S. Government Agency.

Laboratory results represent the analysis of samples as submitted by the customer. Information regarding sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the customer. Asbestos Identification Laboratory is not responsible for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Unless notified in writing to return samples, Asbestos Identification Laboratory discards customer samples after 30 days. Samples containing subsamples or layers will be analyzed separately when applicable. Reports are kept at Asbestos Identification Laboratory for three years. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Asbestos Identification Laboratory.

Work Received:

2019-01-07

2019-01-03

Pier 2, Load Center 1, Navy Base Newport, RI

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-12-20

Project Number:

Project Name:

January 08, 2019

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

• NVLAP Lab Code: 200919-0

• Massachusetts Certification License: AA000208

• State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health Approved Environmental Laboratory Registration Number: PH-0142

• State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection Asbestos Analytical Laboratory License Number: LB-0078(Bulk) LA-0087(Air)

• State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. Department of Health Certification: AAL-121

• State of Vermont, Department of Health Environmental Health License AL934461

Work Received:

2019-01-07

2019-01-03

Pier 2, Load Center 1, Navy Base Newport, RI

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-12-20

Project Number:

Project Name:

January 08, 2019

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID white Non-Fibrous 100

426828

1A At Base of Building ExteriorWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426829

1B At Base of Building ExteriorWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426830

1C At Base of Building ExteriorWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426831

2A Exterior Louver + GarageWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426832

2B Exterior Louver + GarageWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426833

2C Exterior Louver + GarageWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426834

3A Interior on Concrete WallsWhite Skim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426835

3B Interior on Concrete WallsWhite Skim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426836

3C Interior on Concrete WallsWhite Skim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426837

3D Interior on Concrete WallsWhite Skim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426838

3E Interior on Concrete WallsWhite Skim Plaster None Detected multi Fiberglass 10 Cellulose 70 Non-Fibrous 20426839

Roof-1A Roof CoreGray Paper None Detected black Fiberglass 3 Non-Fibrous 97

426840

Roof-1B Roof DeckBlack Brittle Tar None Detected multi Fiberglass 10 Cellulose 70 Non-Fibrous 20426841

Roof-2A Roof CoreGray Paper None Detected

Page 1 of 2Tuesday 08 January

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID black Fiberglass 3

Non-Fibrous 97 426842

Roof-2B Roof DeckBlack Brittle Tar None Detected brown Non-Fibrous 100

426843

Roof-3 Under Rubber at Curb OutGlue None Detected

Analyzed by: 38695Batch:

Page 2 of 2Tuesday 08 January End of Report

Batch: 38696

Woburn, MA 01801

781-932-9600 Web: www.asbestosidentificationlab.com

Email: mikemanning@asbestosidentificationlab.com

Asbestos Identification Laboratory

Dear Susan Cahalan, Thank you Susan Cahalan for your business.

Michael Manning Owner/Director

Asbestos Identification Laboratory has completed the analysis of the samples from your office for the above referenced project .

The information and analysis contained in this report have been generated using the EPA /600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Materials or products that contain more than 1% of any kind or combination of asbestos are considered an asbestos containing building material as determined by the EPA. This Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) technique may be performed either by visual estimation or point counting. Point counting provides a determination of the area percentage of asbestos in a sample. If the asbestos is estimated to be less than 10% by visual estimation of friable material, the determination may be repeated using the point counting technique. The results of the point counting supersede visual PLM results. Results in this report only relate to the items tested. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other U.S. Government Agency.

Laboratory results represent the analysis of samples as submitted by the customer. Information regarding sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the customer. Asbestos Identification Laboratory is not responsible for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Unless notified in writing to return samples, Asbestos Identification Laboratory discards customer samples after 30 days. Samples containing subsamples or layers will be analyzed separately when applicable. Reports are kept at Asbestos Identification Laboratory for three years. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Asbestos Identification Laboratory.

Work Received:

2019-01-07

2019-01-02

Pier 2, Load Center 2, Navy Base Newport, RI

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-12-20

Project Number:

Project Name:

January 08, 2019

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

• NVLAP Lab Code: 200919-0

• Massachusetts Certification License: AA000208

• State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health Approved Environmental Laboratory Registration Number: PH-0142

• State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection Asbestos Analytical Laboratory License Number: LB-0078(Bulk) LA-0087(Air)

2019-01-07

2019-01-02

Pier 2, Load Center 2, Navy Base Newport, RI

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-12-20

Project Number:

Project Name:

January 08, 2019

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID multi Non-Fibrous 100

426853

1A @ CMU + Metal Frame to Garage Doors

White-Gray Caulk None Detected multi Non-Fibrous 100

426854

1B @ CMU + Metal Frame to Garage Doors

White-Gray Caulk None Detected multi Non-Fibrous 100

426855

1C @ CMU + Metal Frame to Garage Doors

White-Gray Caulk None Detected

Detected Chrysotile 3 multi Non-Fibrous 97

426856

2A Bottom CMU @ GarageWhite Caulk

426857

2B Bottom CMU @ GarageWhite Caulk Not Analyzed multi Non-Fibrous 100

426858

3A @ LouversGray Caulk None Detected multi Non-Fibrous 100

426859

3B @ LouversGray Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426860

4A On Concrete WallsSkim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426861

4B On Concrete WallsSkim Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

426862

4C On Concrete WallsSkim Plaster None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

426863

5A InteriorGray Penetration Sealant None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

426864

5B InteriorGray Penetration Sealant None Detected

Detected Chrysotile 10 gray Non-Fibrous 90

426865

6A Switch Gear Boxes on Floor

White Transite Board

426866

6B Switch Gear Boxes on Floor

White Transite Board Not Analyzed

Page 1 of 2Tuesday 08 January gray Fiberglass 10

Cellulose 75 Non-Fibrous 15426867

Roof-1A Roof CoreGray Paper None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

426868

Roof-1B On Roof DeckBlack Brittle Tar None Detected gray Fiberglass 10 Cellulose 75 Non-Fibrous 15426869

Roof-2A Roof CoreGray Paper None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

426870

Roof-2B On Roof DeckBlack Brittle Tar None Detected gray Fiberglass 10 Cellulose 75 Non-Fibrous 15426871

Roof-3A Roof CoreGray Paper None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

426872

Roof-3B On Roof DeckBlack Brittle Tar None Detected

Detected Chrysotile 10 black Non-Fibrous 90

426873

Curb-1A Curb Cut RoofBlack Tar Behind Wood multi Non-Fibrous 100

426874

Curb-1B Behind Tar Curb CutGypsum Board None Detected

Analyzed by: 38696Batch:

Page 2 of 2Tuesday 08 January End of Report

Batch: 37267

Woburn, MA 01801

781-932-9600 Web: www.asbestosidentificationlab.com

Email: mikemanning@asbestosidentificationlab.com

Asbestos Identification Laboratory

Dear Susan Cahalan, Thank you Susan Cahalan for your business.

Michael Manning Owner/Director

Asbestos Identification Laboratory has completed the analysis of the samples from your office for the above referenced project .

The information and analysis contained in this report have been generated using the EPA /600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Materials or products that contain more than 1% of any kind or combination of asbestos are considered an asbestos containing building material as determined by the EPA. This Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) technique may be performed either by visual estimation or point counting. Point counting provides a determination of the area percentage of asbestos in a sample. If the asbestos is estimated to be less than 10% by visual estimation of friable material, the determination may be repeated using the point counting technique. The results of the point counting supersede visual PLM results. Results in this report only relate to the items tested. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other U.S. Government Agency.

Laboratory results represent the analysis of samples as submitted by the customer. Information regarding sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the customer. Asbestos Identification Laboratory is not responsible for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Unless notified in writing to return samples, Asbestos Identification Laboratory discards customer samples after 30 days. Samples containing subsamples or layers will be analyzed separately when applicable. Reports are kept at Asbestos Identification Laboratory for three years. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Asbestos Identification Laboratory.

Work Received:

2018-11-06

2018-11-05

Pier 2, Newport Navy Base

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-11-01

Project Number:

Project Name:

November 07, 2018

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

• NVLAP Lab Code: 200919-0

• Massachusetts Certification License: AA000208

• State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health Approved Environmental Laboratory Registration Number: PH-0142

• State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection Asbestos Analytical Laboratory License Number: LB-0078(Bulk) LA-0087(Air)

2018-11-06

2018-11-05

Pier 2, Newport Navy Base

Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants, Inc.

6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

2018-11-01

Project Number:

Project Name:

November 07, 2018

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID black Non-Fibrous 100

410256

1A On Steel PiersBlack Brittle Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410257

1B On Steel PiersBlack Brittle Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410258

1C On Steel PiersBlack Brittle Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410259

1D On Steel PiersBlack Brittle Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410260

1E On Steel PiersBlack Brittle Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410261

2A Top of Piers to ConcreteBlack Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410262

2B Top of Piers to ConcreteBlack Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410263

2C Top of Piers to ConcreteBlack Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410264

2D Top of Piers to ConcreteBlack Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410265

2E Top of Piers to ConcreteBlack Tar None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410266

3A Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier

Black Material Covering None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410267

3B Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier

Black Material Covering None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410268

3C Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier

Black Material Covering None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

410269

3D Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier

Black Material Covering None Detected

Page 1 of 2Wednesday 07 black Non-Fibrous 100

410270

3E Over Sewer Pipe Under Pier

Black Material Covering None Detected

Analyzed by: 37267Batch:

Page 2 of 2Wednesday 07 End of Report

APPENDIX C

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants 6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

Received: 01/02/19 9:30 AM

Pier 2 Load Cent 1, Navy Newpo

Fax:

Phone: (508) 875-2657

Project:

12/20/2018Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201900020 CustomerID: CDWC26 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2527 Site: Blue Paint Garage Door Metal Frame

201900020-0001LP-1 1.8 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2751 Site: Gray Paint on Garage Door

201900020-0002LP-2 0.71 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2568 Site: Green Paint Interior Walls

201900020-0003LP-3A 0.077 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2889 Site: Green Paint Interior Walls

201900020-0004LP-3B 0.069 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2705 Site: Gray Paint Interior Walls

201900020-0005LP-4A 0.18 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2648 Site: Gray Paint Interior Walls

201900020-0006LP-4B 0.092 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2853 Site: Gray Paint on Elec Hood on Pier

201900020-0007LP-5 0.10 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 1/7/2019 9:04:54 AM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 01/07/2019 09:04:54 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201900020

OrderID: 201900020

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Susan Cahalan CDW Consultants 6 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760

Received: 01/02/19 9:30 AM

Pier 2 Load Cent 2, Navy Newpo

Fax:

Phone: (508) 875-2657

Project:

12/20/2018Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201900022 CustomerID: CDWC26 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2559 Site: Gray Paint on Hoodbox on Pier

201900022-0001LP-1 0.081 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2784 Site: Blue Door Frame Paint

201900022-0002LP-2 <0.0080 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2567 Site: White over Blue/Green Paint on Interior Concrete

201900022-0003LP-3A 0.10 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2660 Site: White over Blue/Green Paint on Interior Concrete

201900022-0004LP-3B 0.081 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2665 Site: White over Blue/Green Paint on Interior Concrete

201900022-0005LP-3C 0.029 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2625 Site: White over Bright Green Paint Interior Concrete

201900022-0006LP-4A <0.0080 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2651 Site: White over Bright Green Paint Interior Concrete

201900022-0007LP-4B <0.0080 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2728 Site: White/Gray Paint over Beams (Steel)

201900022-0008LP-5A 4.4 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

0.2591 Site: White/Gray Paint over Beams (Steel)

201900022-0009LP-5B 3.1 % wt1/3/2019 g12/20/2018

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 1/7/2019 9:06:25 AM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 01/07/2019 09:06:25 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201900022

OrderID: 201900022

APPENDIX D

CB88045 - CB88052

Friday, November 09, 2018

Sample ID#s:

Ms. Kathy Campbell, PE, LSP, LEED, AP

CDW Consultants, Inc

6 Huron Dr

Natick, MA 01760

Project ID: PIER 2 NAVY BASE NEWPORT

Sincerely yours, Laboratory Director

Phyllis Shiller

If you have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact

Phoenix Client Services at ext. 200.

NELAC - #NY11301

CT Lab Registration #PH-0618

MA Lab Registration #M-CT007

ME Lab Registration #CT-007

NH Lab Registration #213693-A,B

NJ Lab Registration #CT-003

NY Lab Registration #11301

PA Lab Registration #68-03530

RI Lab Registration #63

UT Lab Registration #CT00007

VT Lab Registration #VT11301

This laboratory is in compliance with the NELAC requirements of procedures used except where indicated.

This report contains results for the parameters tested, under the sampling conditions described on the Chain Of Custody, as received by the laboratory. This report is incomplete unless all pages indicated in the pagination at the bottom of the page are included.

All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments.

A scanned version of the COC form accompanies the analytical report and is an exact duplicate of the original.

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040

Telephone (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Sample Information Custody Information

Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:

Collected by:

Received by:

Analyzed by:

BULK

CDW

Standard

11/01/18

CP

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

PCB-1 WHITE CAULK WATER LINE

Phoenix ID: CB88045

11/05/18 10:50

Parameter Result

RL/

PQL Units Date/Time By Reference

FOR: Ms. Kathy Campbell, PE, LSP, LEED, AP

CDW Consultants, Inc

6 Huron Dr

Natick, MA 01760

Analysis Report November 09, 2018

Date Time

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045

Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

SDG ID: GCB88045

Client ID:

Project ID: PIER 2 NAVY BASE NEWPORT

Dilution

CompletedCaulk Extraction for PCB 11/05/18 XX/KL/AK SW3540C

PCB (Soxhlet SW3540C) NDPCB-1016 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1221 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1232 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1242 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1248 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1254 780 11/06/18 AW SW8082Aug/Kg 5

NDPCB-1260 780 11/06/18 AW…