Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire Offeror Name:________________________ Contract Title:_______________________________ Contract Value:_______________________ Period of Performance:________________________ Client Name:_________________________ Client POC:_________________________________ Client Phone:_________________________ Client Email:________________________________

Performance Information: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY

RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 IN THE “REMARKS” SECTION BELOW OR IN A SEPARATE

DOCUMENT.

1 2 3 4 5 6

UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL NEUTRAL

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements.

There may have been some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government's benefit. There may have been a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government's benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

I. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

2. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

3. Followed approved quality control plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

5. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

7. Identified problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

8. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

9. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

10. Developed realistic progress schedules. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

11. Met established project schedules. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

12. Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

13. Provided adequate project supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

14. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

15. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

16. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

17. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain outcome in "remarks."

YES/NO

20. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

21. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "remarks” YES/NO

Please include any remarks/comments on outstanding performance:

Please include any remarks/comments on unsatisfactory performance: