Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

27 KB Posted

Attached to
Venue / Hosting: EXIM Annual Conference (Wash. DC)
Solicitation number
83310123R0002
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This past performance questionnaire from the Export Import Bank of the United States requests feedback on a contractor's prior work. The questionnaire covers contract number, award and completion dates, value, type of contract, project description, and evaluation criteria including quality, performance, schedule, technical requirements, cost control, subcontracting, customer satisfaction, likelihood of repeat business, strengths, weaknesses, and other projects. The related solicitation seeks proposals for hosting EXIM's annual conference in Washington D.C. in 2023 as the base year and 2024 as the option year, with more specific requirements included in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Instructions to Offerors.pdf PDF
83310123R0002 SF 1449.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Past PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection

Please complete this questionnaire and return it via email, mail or fax

Mark Jefferson, Contracting Officer Desired Response Date April 12, 2022 811 Vermont Ave, NW RFQ No: 83310122R0006 Washington, DC 20571 Email: mark.jefferson@exim.gov Fax: (202) 565-3527

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

A. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

3. CONTRACT No. :

4. AWARD DATE :

5. COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE $

B. PROJECT NAME:
7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

9. EVALUATION

a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION AND NAME OF ORGANIZATION

b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very GoodS = SatisfactoryMG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services- Assess the contractor’s conformance to BPA requirements.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
B. Overall Performance- Assess the contractor’s overall performance for the project.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
C. Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
D. Technical Requirements- Assess the contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the BPA.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
E. Cost Control- Assess the contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the BPA budget and control costs.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
F. Subcontracting- Assess the contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
G. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
H. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
I. Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another BPA for you in the near future.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O

J. List Contractor’s Weak Points:

K. List Contractor’s Strong Points:

L. List any other projects this contractor has completed for you:

M. If an award fee BPA, what was the average award fee % earned?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .