Past_Performance_Quesionnaire_1_page.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MACA-REPLACE SLOAN'S POND BOARDWALK
- Solicitation number
- 140P5323R0045
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor seeking to replace the Sloan's Pond boardwalk under solicitation number 140P5323R0045 issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past performance on contracts such as quality, schedule, cost control and customer satisfaction to support a source selection. It asks the contractor to provide its name and address and details of relevant prior contracts including contract numbers, values, types, initiation and completion dates. The evaluating organization is asked to provide commentary on the contractor's performance in areas such as quality, schedule and cost control, and an overall assessment, to assist in the source selection for the MACA-REPLACE SLOAN'S POND BOARDWALK requirement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_A__0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5323R0045_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5323R0045.pdf | ||
| dba_ky20220040_14_pages.pdf | ||
| SOW_Sloan_s_Crossing_Pond_Boardwalk_7_pages.pdf | ||
| Price_Schedule_cc_1_page.pdf | ||
| Relevant_Prior_Experience_3_pages.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this questionnaire and email to: (insert email) Desired Response Date: (insert response date)
When complete, the information in this form is SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (FAR 2.101 & 3.104 and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
Pease add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/COR/Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NO: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A-G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory
VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services – Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specification, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). EX VG S MG US N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or A/E (as appropriate) for the project. EX VG S MG US N/O
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract. EX VG S MG US N/O
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budge and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and user
“friendliness”. EX VG S MG US N/O
G. Overall Assessment. EX VG S MG US N/O
2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT (Fixed Price, FPI, etc.):
1a: NAME OF PRIME CONTRACTOR (if this questionnaire is for a team member on the SRI Ranch House project):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .