Past_Performance_Quesionnaire.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SEKI - Rehab Cedar Grove Water System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P17PS00749
About this file
Past Performance Questionaire Sec J 008
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_P17PS00749.pdf | ||
| A06_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| P17PS00749_General_References.docx | DOCX document | |
| A06_-_CG_WS_-_DRAWINGS.pdf | ||
| P17PS00749_Key_Personnel_Qualifications.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF_24_Bid_Bond.pdf | ||
| P17PS00749_Subcontractor_Reference.docx | DOCX document | |
| SEKI_203630_-_Directions_to_Site_Visit.pdf | ||
| B03_-_DOL_Wage.pdf | ||
| Bid_Pricing_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B01_-_PRESOLICITATION_NOTICE.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
P17PS00749 Rehab Cedar Grove Water System
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this questionnaire and email to: tom_tobin@nps.gov Desired Response Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 When complete, the information in this form is SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (FAR 2.101 & 3.104 and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT (Fixed Price, FPI, etc.):
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
1a: NAME OF PRIME CONTRACTOR (if this questionnaire is for a team member on the SRI Ranch House project):
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
| Pease add a continuation page if additional space is necessary. | |
| TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE |
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/COR/Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NO: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A-G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
| A. Quality of Products and Services – Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specification, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). | EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O | ||
| B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or A/E (as appropriate) for the project. | EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O | ||
| C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract. | EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O |
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budge and control costs.
| EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O | ||||
| F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and user “friendliness”. | EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O | |||
| G. Overall Assessment. | EX | VG | S | MG | US | N/O |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .