Evaluation_Criteria_-_Serena_MONO__Project_(1).docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rehab Thomas Farm Tenant House
- Solicitation number
- P15PS00134
About this file
Evaluation Criteria
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section M.
| 1. | A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) comprised of Government personnel, with assistance from non-Government advisors when required, will evaluate the proposals. The technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. The number and identities of offerors will not be revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based only on the factors described herein. |
| 2. | Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation requirements and provides the best value to the Government. |
| 3. | Proposals will be evaluated against the factors set forth in evaluation factors below. The TEP will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The TEP will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation. |
| 4. | Proposals will receive a preliminary review to determine whether the proposal contains sufficient information to allow the Government to perform a meaningful evaluation. If the results of this preliminary review indicate that the proposal lacks sufficient information to allow a meaningful evaluation to be conducted, the Source Selection Authority (SSA) may eliminate the proposal from further evaluation and consideration for an award. Any offeror's proposal eliminated at this stage from further evaluation or consideration for an award will be notified with the reasons why its proposal was eliminated from further evaluation or consideration for award. |
| 5. | After completion of the technical and price evaluations, the TEP will report the results to the SSA. The SSA will then consider all technical and price factors, including assessing the degree of risk associated with the proposal, to determine the offer that provides the overall best value to the Government. The SSA's decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection factors specified in the solicitation. |
| 6. | The Government may elect to accept other than the lowest priced proposal when the perceived benefits of a higher priced proposal merit the additional cost. |
EVALUATION FACTORS: The factors to be evaluated are as follows:
Technical Factors: The technical capability of the offeror will be evaluated using the following factors:
1. Personnel & Methodology: Key personnel must have at least three (3) years of successful experience in comparable work. Must have previous experience working on historic buildings. Employ skilled personnel (and sub-contractors) that have the capability to accomplish work required in drawing and specifications. Provide a brief one page description identifying method in accomplishing project.
2. Past Performance: The past performance of the offeror and/or its proposed subcontractors on projects similar in scope and complexity will be evaluated in the areas of quality, timeliness, and business relations. Offerors demonstrating a higher level of successful past performance in the evaluated areas will be more favorably rated. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.
3. Price: A price evaluation will be performed to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price. Reasonableness will be determined considering other competitive prices received and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate. If multiple contract line items are included in the price schedule, prices will also be evaluated to determine whether any line items are unbalanced. Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .