P09 Past Performance Questionnairre.docx

DOCX document 58 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DA--689-25-112, AE Replace Underground Storage Tanks Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24125R0025
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 1

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template to be completed for at least three past performance references as part of an A/E services solicitation for replacing underground storage tanks at VA facilities in West Haven and Newington, CT. The questionnaire includes sections for general information about the A/E firm being evaluated, evaluator information, and a detailed performance evaluation matrix rating 21 factors on a 1-5 scale across categories including design services, construction support services, LEED, BIM, and overall performance. The evaluation factors focus on technical competence, design quality, cost control, schedule adherence, and responsiveness. The completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to the VA contracting office by February 14, 2025 at 11:00AM EST via email to cecilia.antwi@va.gov.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to C1DA--689-25-112, AE Replace Underground Storage Tanks, newest first.
File Type Posted
S06 Site EHRM Utility Boring Plan.pdf PDF
S06 Statement of Work 689-25-112 UST Replacements.docx DOCX document
S06 WH M4site UST Plan.pdf PDF
S06 Past Performance Questionnairre.docx DOCX document
S06 Site West Haven-MASTER-utility plan.pdf PDF
36C24125R0025_4.docx DOCX document
S06 08750 Newington W-1 Site.pdf PDF
36C24125R0025_2.docx DOCX document
P11 WH M4site UST Plan.pdf PDF
36C24125R0025_1.docx DOCX document
S02 VA Notice of Limitations on Subcontracting.docx DOCX document
Site West Haven-MASTER-utility plan.pdf PDF
08750 Newington W-1 Site.pdf PDF
Site EHRM Utility boring plan.pdf PDF
P09_SOW_689-25-112 UST Replacements.docx DOCX document
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

Complete one set of letters and forms for at least three projects identified in your firm’s Section F of the SF 330, which will best illustrate proposed team’s qualifications for this contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.Transmittal letter to accompany Past Performance Questionnaire

FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name] SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):

[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to the Department of Veterans Affairs (NCO 1) request for SF 330 request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for the 689-25-112 Replace underground storage tanks, West Haven and Newington. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.

[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to NCO 1 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.

The request for SF 330 instructs that respondent provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and email it by 11:00AM EST on February 14, 2025, directly to the NCO 1 Contracting Office.

E-mail: cecilia.antwi@va.gov The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to [Insert Company Name]. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to the VISN 1 NCO point of contact identified above.

Thank you, [Insert Company Official Name and Title]

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:

Firm Name: Address:

Telephone: Email address: Point of Contact:

Firm Cage Code: Firm Tax ID Number: Firm DUNS Number:

Project Title:

Description of Project:

Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:

Contract Number: Dollar Amount:

Contract Period of Performance:

The A-E Firm performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member

Percent of work performed by A-E Firm: Other (Please describe)

B. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name: Address:

Evaluator’s Name: Title of Evaluator: Telephone: E-mail:

C. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE (SECTIONS B through D) TO:

Email: cecilia.antwi@va.gov

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.

Exceptional (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Marginal (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A
-Performance
-Performance meets
-Performance meets
-Performance
-Performance does
-Not applicable
meets or met
or met contractual
or met contractual
does or did not
or did not meet
or rater has not
contractual
requirements and
requirements. The
meet some
most contractual
observed
requirements and
exceeds or exceeded
contractual
contractual
requirements and
performance in
exceeds or
some of your
performance reflects
requirements.
recovery is not
this area.
exceeded many of
company’s
or reflected some
The contractual
likely or did not
your company’s
expectations. The
minor problems.
performance
occur. The
expectations. The
contractual
Corrective actions
reflects or
contractual
contractual
performance reflects
being taken by the
reflected serious
performance
performance
or reflected some
contractor appear to
problems(s) for
contains or
reflects or reflected
minor problems and
be effective or
which the
contained serious
few minor
corrective actions
Corrective actions
contractor has not
problem (s) for
problems and
being taken by the
taken were effective.
yet identified
which the
corrective actions
contractor appear to
acceptable
contractor’s
taken by the
be effective or
corrective actions
corrective actions
contractor appear
Corrective actions
or did not provide
appear ineffective
to be highly
taken were effective.
acceptable
or were

effective or

corrective
ineffective.

corrective actions actions.

taken were effective.

A-E FIRM’S NAME: PROJECT NAME:

Contract Period of Performance:

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on page 4.

Item

FACTORS TO BE RATED

Exceptional (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Marginal (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A

Design Services:

1.
Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel.
2.
A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously.
3.
A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions.
4.
A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team
5.
A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff
6.
Overall accuracy, completeness, and coordination of final design documents. (Quality)
7.
A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates.
8.
A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule.

Follow-On Construction Support Services:

9.
Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals.
10.
Timely resolution of construction design issues.
11.
Overall quality, responsiveness, and timeliness of A/E follow- on construction support services.

Item

FACTORS TO BE RATED

Exceptional (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Marginal (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A

LEED (If Applicable):

12.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of LEED documentation.
13.
A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process.

BIM (If Applicable):

14.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of BIM documentation.
15.
A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process.

Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):

16.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents.
17.
A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness, and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project.

Overall:

18.
How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost?
19.
How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract?
20.
How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract?
21.
Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary)
YES
NO

Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project:

Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions:

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: PROJECT NAME

Contract Period of Performance:

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous page)

Item
COMMENTS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .