OTE Trade Office - Japan 2.15.2024 MH.pdf

PDF 140 KB Posted

Attached to
EFC - Trade Office Representation Agreement for Japan
Solicitation number
372
Issued by
Idaho

About this file

The document is a Request for One Time Exemption from Competition submitted by the Idaho State Department of Agriculture to the Idaho Division of Purchasing. The agency is requesting an exemption to procure a Trade Office Representation Agreement for Japan without a competitive process. The cost of the agreement is to be determined. The Division of Purchasing is offering suppliers the opportunity to review the requested exemption and provide relevant information to help the DOP Administrator make a decision, though the decision remains discretionary and suppliers have no right to appeal. Suppliers are invited to submit information that may support or contradict the claim that competition would be impractical, unreasonable, or disadvantageous to the State.

The document indicates that exemption from competition is allowed under IDAPA 38.05.01.042.10 if the administrator determines that bidding is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. The agency's justification cites special market conditions, the uniqueness of the required services, and the impracticality of competitive solicitation procedures. No other pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or other salient information is provided.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

07-01-16

Request for One Time Exemption from Competition from

Idaho Division of Purchasing (DOP)

E-mail Completed Request Form to: purchasing@adm.idaho.gov

Agency Purchasing Representative (Name):

E-mail/Phone:

Name of Agency:

Request for the Purchase of:

Cost (attach quote):

IDAPA 38.05.01.042.10 provides that the administrator may exempt an acquisition from competitive procurement if the administrator determines that bidding is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. Examples include, but are not limited to: special market conditions; property requiring special contracting procedures due to uniqueness; and services for which competitive solicitation procedures are impractical.

Background and Justification (attach additional sheets as needed):

Agency Certification: The information provided above is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and supports the need for a direct procurement of the described goods or services, in the best interest of the State:

Agency Representative (signature): Date:

Approved Additional conditions apply to this approval.

Rejected

DOP Administrator Signature:

DOP Administrator Printed Name:

Date:

mailto:purchasing@adm.idaho.gov

Agency Purchasing Representative Name: Molly Heiss
EmailPhone: molly.heiss@isda.idaho.gov; 208-332-8641
Name of Agency: Idaho State Department of Agriculture
Request for the Purchase of: Trade Office Representation Agreement for Japan
Cost attach quote: TBD
Background and Justification attach additional sheets as needed: Please see the attached Policy Directive for Trade Offices and ISDA's justification document.

Thank you

Date: 2/15/2024
Approved:
Additional conditions apply to this approval:
undefined:
Rejected:
DOP Administrator Printed Name:
Date_2:
2024-02-15T08:24:53-0700
Molly Heiss

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .