OPM RFR_Addendum No. 2 Q&A.pdf
PDF 83 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Responses - AccRep_OPM - 2024
- Solicitation number
- BD-24-1211-MSBA-MASS-101047
- Issued by
- Suffolk County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Addendum No. 2 to a Request for Responses (RFR) issued by the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) for Owner's Project Management (OPM) services. The RFR, titled "MSBA-RFR-AccRepOPM-2024," is seeking qualified OPM firms to provide management and construction administration services for the MSBA's Accelerated Repair Program. The addendum addresses questions received from potential respondents, including clarification on the proposal submission deadline, mandatory certifications, and the MSBA's commitment to developing and strengthening Minority Business Enterprises (MBE), Women Business Enterprises (WBE), Veteran Business Enterprises (VBE), and other diverse business categories. The MSBA does not award points to prime bidders that are SDO certified, but encourages prime bidders to partner with SDO certified firms to receive favorable consideration.
The addendum also provides a list of the incumbent OPM firms selected from the previous procurement in 2021, which includes Anser Advisory, Arcadis U.S., Inc., Architectural Consulting Group, Inc., and several other firms. The MSBA's goal is to expand equal opportunity in the primary and secondary industries affected by this RFR, and respondents that demonstrate the intent to further the development of diverse business enterprises may receive favorable consideration, even if the Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form is not completed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Massachusetts School Building Authority
Addendum No. 2: Questions and Answers
MSBA-RFR-AccRepOPM-2024
April 25, 2024
1. Question: If this is a recompete OPM agreement, would you please provide a list of the incumbent firms?
Answer: The following OPM firms were selected from the last OPM procurement in
2021:
• Anser Advisory
• Arcadis U.S., Inc.
• Architectural Consulting Group, Inc.
• Colliers Project Leaders
• exPERTcon, Inc.
• Hill International (New England), Inc.
• LEFTFIELD, LLC
• NV5 Consultants, Inc.
• PCA360
• Project Planning Professionals (P-Three, Inc.)
• STV | DPM (STV Construction, Inc.)
• THE VERTEX COMPANIES, INC.
• Watermark
2. Question: We noticed a minor discrepancy on the proposal submission due date within the RFR and request clarification / confirmation. Pg 8 notes response deadline is May
2nd at 3PM. Pg 12 notes proposals are due May 3 by 3PM. The Central Registry includes the May 2nd at 3pm deadline so we presume that is the official date, but we just want to be sure.
Answer: Responses are due by 3:00 PM on May 2, 2024. Please see Addendum No. 1.
3. Question: I just want to make sure that including a signed copy of Attachment B in our submission satisfies the Mandatory Certifications requirements:
1) Certification of Compliance with Massachusetts Child Care Laws
2) Certification of Compliance with the Revenue Enforcement and Protection Program
3) Certification Regarding Companies Doing Business in Northern Ireland
4) Certification of Disclosure
5) Certification of No Conflicting Relationship
6) Certificate Statement Regarding Criminal Actions and Pending Litigation
7) Certification of Solvency
8) Certification of Minimum Qualifications (if applicable)
9) Certification of Good Standing and Licensure
10) Statement of Compliance with RFR Requirements
11) Statement of Confidentiality
Answer: Yes, submitting a completed and signed Attachment B satisfies the Mandatory
Certifications requirement. Please make sure all certifications and statements have an answer associated with them.
4. Question: Could you please confirm that an SDO certified MBE firm like our does not need any other MBE, WBE, VBE, etc., partners/subconsultants to receive full credit of five (5) points for their participation. In other words, can we use ourselves to fulfill the
100% participant requirements. If not, please advise what categories of the OPM work for this RFR can be done by subconsultant(s)?
Answer: The MSBA does not award points to prime bidders that are SDO certified. One of the goals of awarding up to 5 additional points in this procurement is to encourage prime bidders to partner with SDO certified firms. Per the RFR, "The MSBA is committed to developing and strengthening Minority Business Enterprises (MBE), Women Business Enterprises (WBE), Veteran Business Enterprises (VBE), Service-
Disabled Veteran-Owned Business Enterprises (SDVOBE), Disability-Owned Business
Enterprises, LGBT Business Enterprises, Minority Nonprofit Organizations (M/NPO), and Women Nonprofit Organizations (W/NPO) and expanding equal opportunity in the primary and secondary industries affected by this RFR. Please note, completion of a
Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form (Attachment D) by a Respondent is NOT mandatory for the purposes of the MSBA’s review of a Response. However, if a
Respondent is a certified SDO business or has an SDO partner, the Respondent should complete the form to the extent possible. Respondents that clearly demonstrate the intent to further the development of the business enterprises and organizations listed above or the existence of a relationship which does further those goals may receive favorable consideration. If the Form is not completed or provided with a
Response, the MSBA will assume that it was omitted intentionally."
END OF ADDENDUM NO. 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .