Redacted_J A_14-D-0011.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS OMSION

1 ADMINISTRATION CIRCLE

CHINf< t.AKE. CA836S5-8100

575 I AVENUE SUITE 1

POINT MUGU, CA 83042-llo.ll

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

1. Contracting Activity.

Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWC-WD) - China Lake, CA

2. Description of the Action Betng Approved.

IN REPLY REFER '1b I& \_12_ .22S97

This justification and approval seeks authorization and approval for a 3 year Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPF!i) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract on a Sole Source Basis to Raytheon Missile Syst~s (RMS) of Tucson. AZ in the estimated amount of $9,981,810. This action will allow RMS to continue Advanced Technology Insertion & Integration Support currently being performed under NAVAIR Contra t N68936-1 0-D-0009. I

3. Description of Supplies/Services.

' I

This contract will provide a continuation of effort currently being performed by RMS under contract N68~36- 10-D-0009 which provides design and development studies and engineering services to develop and a~ly new technology to ensure battle space dominance utilizing a baseline of systems developed and produqed by Raytheon Missile Systems such as the AIM-9 Sidewinder, AIM-120 AMRAAM, AGM-65 Maverick.

AGM-154 JSOW. R/Ugm-109 Tomahawk, XM982 Excalibur, BGM-71 TOW, RIM-66 Standard Missile, RIM- 162 Evolved SeaSparrow, as well as Line of sight/Non-Line of Sight (LOS/N-LOS) technologies for ~ seekers, tri-mode seekers. and similar applications. Tasking will include technology demonstration effo s, product Improvement initiatives, technology insertion and transition activities, integration of various warf re systems, mission analysis, mission architecture, participate in Concept of Operations (CONOPS) , development, military utility analysis, and more traditional engineenng analysis and studies in support of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons D1vision (NAWCWD) and its customers. The Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Engineenng Department, AIR 4.0, will be the technical lead agent for this contract.

See Appendix A for Estimated Dollar Value

4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition.

10 U S.C. 2304(c)(1), Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Statutory Authority.

The government does not possess technical data reqwred to support engineering development and des~n changes resulting from applying new technology to systems developed and produced by Raytheon.

J&A 12 22~97

- - I

Raytheon M1sslle Systems is the only company with the historical knowledge, weapons specific expertisie and data rights necessary to reliably and cost effectively meet the reqUirements. To require any other contractor to purchase the data rights and technical knowledge would introduce technical uncertainties related to integration support and is cost prohibi~ve.

6. Descnption of Efforts Made to Solicit Offers from as Many Offerors as Practicable.

In accordance with FAR 5.201(b)(1), this requirement was synopsized via the Federal Business Opportunities website on 02 May 2013. No responses or inquiries were received.

7. Determination of Fatr and Reasonable Cost.

In accordance with FAR 15.402, the Contracting Officer shall ensure that all supplies and services prov ed under this contract are procured at a fair and reasonable price The Contractor will submit a formal pri proposal with certified cost or pricing data and sufficient information to support the accuracy and reliabil ty of the estimate Experienced technical analysts and contract specialists with the aid of necessary field pricing support will review RMS's proposal. The Contracting OffiCer will utilize cost and price analysis the basis for negotiating a fair and reasonable price.

8. Actions to Remove Bamers to Future Competition.

As stated in section 5. the duplication of cost to achieve competition would exceed any monetary benefit from future competition and result in unacceptable delays to Navy requirements. Therefore, no action i~ being taken at this t1me to remove barriers to future competition.

J&A 12 22597

Appendix A

Estimated Dollar Value In Thousands

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Tot al f- - -t---- -

Redac ed t---- - -r-- -r--

$99 B1 k -