2.05 Amendment_A0001.pdf

1301190828

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Update questions due date from 19 September 2024 to 13 September 2024

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Sep-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6883624Q0220

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Sep-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Sep-2024

CODE

NAVSUP FLC JACKSONVILLE CONTRACTS DIV

YAYNEL YAMBO

110 YORKTOWN AVE 3RD FLOOR

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0097

N68836 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6883624Q0220

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

ADDENDUM 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

The following provisions are incorporated into 52.212-1 as an addendum to this solicitation:

The Government intends to post solicitation N6883624Q0220 and all amendments to the Government Point of Entry via SAM.gov.

QUESTIONS

All questions and clarifications regarding this solicitation must be submitted via email to YAYNEL YAMBO at Yaynel.c.yambo.civ@us.navy.mil and Kenneth Parker at kenneth.l.parker16.civ@us.navy.mil; subject line to read:

Questions/Clarifications for N6883624Q0220.Each question or comment should reference the applicable document, page number, and paragraph number. Offerors shall not include any proprietary information in a question, because the Government will provide the question and answer to all potential offerors. All questions must be submitted no later than 13 September 2024 NLT 1200.

The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the questions receipt date above. Accordingly, offerors are encouraged to carefully review all solicitation requirements and submit questions to the Government early in the proposal timeframe.

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. This procurement is being solicited in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 19.5 - Small Business programs. See block 10 of the SF1449 for the type of Small Business Set Aside, the North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS), and the Small Business Size Standard.

(b) Submission of offers. Offerors shall submit offers in PDF format by volume as described below. Each volume shall contain a cover sheet with #1 and #3 below.

The offer shall contain the following information:

1. Solicitation number as indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 5 and the Title of the procurement.

2. Time specified for receipt of offers: Offerors shall ensure that offers are received by the Government point of contact no later than the date and time indicated on page one (1) of the SF1449, Block 8.

3. Name, title, e-mail address, and telephone number of the individual(s) with authority to bind the company.

Offeror’s POC information for contractual questions/discussions. CAGE Code, Unique Entity ID (UEI), Business Size, and GSA Contract Number if applicable.

4. Technical Description: See volumes below.

5. Terms of any express warranty: Not modified.

6. Provide Price and any discount terms as described in Price Volume.

7. “Remit to” address: The Offeror shall submit all volumes of its offer electronically via YAYNEL YAMBO at Yaynel.c.yambo.civ@us.navy.mil.

8. Representations and certifications: See Contractor Responsibility Volume.

9. Acknowledgment solicitation amendments: All amendments issued with signatures to acknowledge terms and conditions of amendments. Acknowledgement of all amendments issued to the solicitation shall be signed, and dated.

10. Past performance information , when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information ).

11. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

Offers shall be submitted in volumes as follows:

Volume I – Price There is no page limit for Volume I submission Offerors shall submit the following:

1. Standard Form (SF) 1449. Blocks 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c of page one (1) of SF 1449 shall be completed and signed to show the Offeror has read and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions, and instructions provided in the solicitation document.

2. Price Offer. The Offeror shall fill in the price schedule and include unit prices for CLINS 0001, 1001, 2001, 3001 & 4001. The unit price should be evenly incremented so that it adds up to the total price without rounding past the second digit right of the decimal point for total prices for all contract line items (CLINs). Pricing shall be structured in accordance with the contract line items identified in the SF 1449 bid schedule.

Volume II – Technical Capability Volume II is limited to 5 pages Offerors shall demonstrate an understanding of the solicitation requirements by providing the following:

1. Provide proposed plan to meet required tasks as per PWS Part 5.

Each technical capability element must provide sufficient evidence that the Offeror has a clear understanding of the solicitation and are able to meet the minimum requirements and qualifications set forth in the PWS.

Volume III – Past Performance Volume III is limited to XX pages

The Offeror shall provide a maximum of three (3) relevant past performance evaluations of similar size, scope and complexity to services set forth in the PWS and completed within the past three (3) years prior to the solicitation closing date (See Block 8 of the SF1449). If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available which meets the requirements identified above, it shall be submitted with the offer.

If a CPARS is not available, then the Offeror shall submit a completed Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 1) for each reference submitted. At the PPQ customer/client’s request, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Yaynel Yambo at Yaynel.c.yambo.civ@us.navy.mil and Kenneth Parker at kenneth.l.parker16.civ@us.navy.mil by the date and time offers are due. Offers shall not incorporate by reference PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Offeror is responsible for providing the Past Performance Questionnaire to their references for completion.

Offerors may submit a combination of delivery orders (DOs), task orders (TOs), technical direction letters (TDLs), and/or technical area tasks (TATs) placed under an Indefinite Delivery type contract or BPA as one of the examples of past performance, however, no more than five (5) total will be reviewed. Each individual example in the combination must meet the requirements listed above.

If no recent (within the past three years prior to solicitation closing date), relevant past performance is available the Offeror shall affirmatively state that it possesses no recent or relevant past performance.

Note: An incomplete PPQ may not be evaluated.

Volume IV Contractor Responsibility There is no page limit for Volume V submission

1. Representation and Certifications. Offerors shall either complete the following provisions contained in the solicitation OR provide a statement that certification in System for Award Management (SAM) is current, complete, and accurate as of the date of the Offeror’s signature, or list any changes as they relate to the following provisions:

FAR 52.212-3

FAR 52.209-11

DFARS 252.204-7016

2. No Exception. Include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

3. Limitations on Subcontracting. Offeror shall affirmatively state that they intend to meet the requirements outlined in FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Sep 2021) (Deviation 2021-O0008).

4. Financial Letter. A letter from the Offeror’s financial institution that indicates that the Offerr has adequate financial resources to perform the contract;

5. Organization. A description of the Offeror organization, accounting, and operational controls to meet the requirement.

Note: After the solicitation closing date, the Contracting Officer may require an Offeror to promptly submit additional information to demonstrate the Offeror is responsible.

AWARD NOTICE TO SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR

A written notice of award or acceptance of an Offer will be emailed to the successful Offeror. Before the Offeror’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Failure to submit all required documentation may render an offer non-responsive and the offer may not be considered for award.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. Offeror agrees to hold their prices firm for a period of 120 calendar days from date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. Not modified.

(e) Multiple offers. The Government IS NOT accepting multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions, including alternative line items, or alternative commercial products or commercial services for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. The offeror must submit prices for every priced contract line item. The Government intends to make a single award.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers. Not modified.

(g) Contract award. Not modified.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government WILL NOT accept any item or group of items of an offer. The Government WILL NOT accept quantities less than those specified in the schedule. The Government WILL NOT make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered. The offeror must submit prices for every priced contract line item. The Government intends to make a single award.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. Not modified.

(j) Unique entity identifier. Not modified.

(k) Reserved.

(l) Debriefing. Not modified.

ATTACHMENTS: The following documents are provided as attachments and are considered part of this solicitation:

Attachment 1: Past Performance Reference Questionnaire Basis of Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services per FAR Subpart 13.106 The Government intends to award a firm-fixed-price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be the most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered. Initially the Government will evaluate all quotes for technical capability. All quotes rated technically unacceptable shall be ineligible for award and removed from any further consideration. The Government will then evaluate all technically acceptable quotes for past performance and price, and assign appropriate adjectival ratings for past performance. The Government will then conduct a trade-off between past performance and price where past performance is more important than price.

Each offer shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to, each of the areas identified in the solicitation provision entitled “FAR provision 52.212-1 Addendum, Instructions to Offeror’s- Commercial Products and Commercial Services.”

The type of source selection utilized in this procurement is the Best Value Trade-Off IAW Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, and Part 13 Simplified Acquisition Procedures. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offer or other than the highest technically rated offer. The Government reserves the right to make award solely on initial offer received.

Initially, offerors shall be listed in order of price from lowest to highest, inclusive of all option pricing.

Technical Capability and Past Performance will be evaluated and appropriate adjectival ratings will be assessed in order from lowest priced to highest priced.

Once an offeror is found to have an Acceptable rating in Technical Capability with an overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating of “Substantial Confidence” the evaluation process will stop.

Further consideration will not be given to other offers and the Government shall then make an integrated Best Value award decision amongst the offers evaluated.

Note: Price has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the offers in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based.

Price - The Government will evaluate price in accordance with FAR 13.106-3(a), Award and Documentation. The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the offeror to support the reasonableness of the prices offered. The method of evaluation used is solely within the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Price will be evaluated by multiplying the estimated quantities by the offered unit price for each line item and then adding the totals together thereby identifying the offeror’s total estimated price for each line item.

The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options including FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option (s).

Note: Offerors that do not offer all items (including options) or which offer only partial CLIN pricing will be considered non-responsive. Failure to furnish the price in accordance with the instructions above shall render the offer unacceptable.

Technical Capability: The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements. For an offer to be found technically acceptable, the offer must clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Failure to provide the following will result in an unacceptable rating:

1. Provide proposed plan to meet required tasks as per PWS Part 5.

If the offeror is found to be “Unacceptable”, then the offeror will be removed from further consideration of the award.

Acceptable (A)

The offer meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Unacceptable (U)

The offer does not meet requirements of the solicitation and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Offer is unawardable.

Past Performance - The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying services that meet the contract’s requirements as described in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1. The recency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in Contractor’s performance shall be considered. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. Submitted Past Performance project relevancy will be rated as either “relevant” or “not relevant”.

Rating Definition Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar size, scope complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the size, scope and complexities this solicitation requires.

A review of all past performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information will be incorporated into an overall performance confidence assessment rating. The past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy and quality of performance and will be rated as stated below.

Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of offerors for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance is not available, the offerors may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance. In this case, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a confidence rating of “neutral.” Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” and “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

(End of Summary of Changes)