ATTACHMENT_10_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Heat Gun Tool Set
- Solicitation number
- N68335-16-R-0356
About this file
Attachment 10 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N68335-17-R-0010-0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| PMA275_CMP_2014_09_01.pdf | ||
| N68335-17-R-0010-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| N68335-17-R-0010.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT_9_CPARS_Update_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| A001_ECP_Heat_Gun_SERD_2522_(1).docx | DOCX document | |
| A002_RFV_Heat_Gun_SERD_2522_(1).docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRL_Email_Address_List_26_Oct_16.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N68335-16-R-0356 N68335-16-R-0356
ATTACHMENT 10
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire form shall be returned to Alice Tornquist at the following address:
Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Hwy 547, Bldg 562-3C Attn: Alice Tornquist Code 25222 Joint Base MDL, NJ 08733-5082
1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION
a. Contractor: _______________________
b. Program Title: _____________________
c. Contract Number: __________________
| d. Type of Contract: ____________ | Percent Complete: ____________ | |
| e. Award Fee (if applicable): _________ | Percent of Award Fee Received: _________ |
Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.
2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
a. Name: ________________________________________________
b. Agency: _______________________________________________
c. Position: _______________________________________________
d. Relation to Program: _____________________________________
e. Phone/Fax Number/Email Address: _________________________
3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS
4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).
Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet many contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear to be or were ineffective.
4.2 QUESTIONS
4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE
a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?
b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?
c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.
d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.
4.2.2 SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE
a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?
b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?
c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.
d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.
4.2.3 OTHER
Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.
4.3 SUMMARY
If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), 1) definitely would not, 2) probably would not, 3) might, 4) might not, 5) probably would, 6) definitely would award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .