View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Support services for existing Evaluation efforts of Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance(C4ISR) systems., newest first.
File Type Posted
16-R-0005 Industry Engagement Brief.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0005 E3 RFP Final.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - CAP.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 -Small Business Subcontracting Plan Matrix - Updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N65236-16-R-0005 Pre-Solicitation Notice.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - CDRLs DD Form 1423.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - NDA Form.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Calibration List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - Pricing Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 -Small Business Subcontracting Plan Matrix - Copy.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Small Business Participation Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - SCA WD Charleston SC 2015-4427 Rev. No. 4.pdf PDF
16-R-0005 Industry Engagement Q&A.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0005-0001 (Conformed Copy).pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Estimated Travel Requirements.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0005-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Small Business Particpation Data.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7A and 7B Mainenance Schedule - Planned Maintenance.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - DD 254.pdf PDF
Attachment 1A and 1B - Reference Information Sheet - Summary and Contract Specific Data.docx DOCX document
N65236-16-R-0005 Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0005 E3 Industry Engagement Annoucement.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

N65236-16-R-0005

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 1 of 4
SPAWAR Systems Center – Atlantic
KRISTEN ADAMS, CODE 22420

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,

P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022

TO: AGENCY:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

PAST PERFORMANCE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

c.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

d.) Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

e.) Key Personnel - How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.

f.) Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, along with any other pertinent information, NOT LATER THAN Noon Eastern Time (EST) on 04 December 2017 to kristen.adams@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Respectfully, Kristen Adams Contract Negotiator

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N65236-16-R-0005

2-1

ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
N65236-16-R-0005
Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 2 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER: _______

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print)

Code

Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

2-2

N65236-16-R-0005

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 3 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.

6. SMALL BUSINESS:

(a) Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

2-3

N65236-16-R-0005

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 4 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

2-4

File details come from the government source that posted it.