N6339419R0017-Amendment_0012.pdf
PDF 460 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vertical Launching System (VLS) Launch Sequencer (LSEQ) Production Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6339419R0017
About this file
This amendment to a solicitation from the Department of the Navy seeks production of vertical launching system launch sequencers. The amendment provides responses to additional industry questions and includes a standalone copy of Amendment 0017 and a conformed copy of the solicitation inclusive of all changes through Amendment 0017. The opportunity requires assembly of launch sequencers in accordance with technical data packages and conducting first article and factory acceptance testing. Offerors must demonstrate production, quality assurance, and configuration management plans along with past performance on similar programs. Price proposals are due by the date specified in Block 9 for evaluation of pricing on contract line items for production units and options.
N6339419R0017-Amendment 0012
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to: (1) provide responses to additional industry questions received to date; and (2) revise the Contract Specialist point of contact.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 11
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 08-Sep-2019
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6339419R0017
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
11-Jul-2019
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
08-Sep-2019
CODE
NSWC PHD 022
4363 MISSILE WAY
PORT HUENEME CA 93043
N63394 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N6339419R0017
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0012 Q&A
QUESTION #1: Could you provide the NSN number associated with this procurement?
RESPONSE: The NSN for LSEQ part number 7104340-29 is 4935016247858.
SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
The following have been modified:
G-242-H001 GOVERNMENT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION POINTS-OF-CONTACT AND
RESPONSIBILITIES (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)
(a) The Government reserves the right to administratively substitute any of the points of contact listed below at any time.
(b) The contracting officer is the only person authorized to change this contract or orders issued thereunder. The Contractor shall not comply with any order, direction or request of Government personnel - that would constitute a change - unless it is issued in writing and signed by the Contracting Officer or is pursuant to specific authority otherwise included as part of this contract. If, in the opinion of the contractor, an effort outside the existing scope of this contract is requested, the contractor shall promptly comply with the Notification of Changes clause of this contract.
(c) The points of contact are as follows:
(i) The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) is:
Name: Michael Thompson
Address: 4363 Missile Way, Port Hueneme, CA 93043 Phone: (805) 228-7019 E-mail: michael.d.thompson@navy.mil
(ii) The Contract Specialist is:
Name: Terren Jo Address: 4363 Missile Way, Port Hueneme, CA 93043
Phone: (805) 228-0608 E-mail: terren.jo@navy.mil
(iii) The Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) is:
Name: * Address: * Phone: * E-mail: *
(d) The Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) is the contracting officer’s representative for technical matters when a COR is not appointed. The TPOC is responsible for technical issues of contract administration, such as providing all items of Government Furnished Information (GFI), Government Furnished Material (GFM) and Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) if specified in the contract as well as the inspection and acceptance of all contract deliverables.
The Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) is:
Name: Bonnie Nguyen Address: 4363 Missile Way, Port Hueneme, CA 93043 Phone: (805) 228-0447 E-mail: bonnie.nguyen@navy.mil
(e) The Contractor's point of contact for performance under this contract is:
Name: * Address: * Phone: * E-mail: *
[ * ] To be completed at contract award
(End of text)
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
SECTION L
1.0 GENERAL
The term “shall” in this document explicitly means that the Offeror must comply with the statement of work and provide the information requested by this solicitation. Thus the Offeror shall submit all information required by this solicitation. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being removed from consideration for award. The Offeror’s proposal shall be based on the requirements contained in this solicitation (including those documents, exhibits, and other attachments to the solicitation identified in Section J). All proposals submitted in response to this solicitation become property of the Government and will not be returned.
The Government may schedule Pre-Award Site Surveys of the facilities identified in any or all Offerors' proposals following the proposal submission date using the SF 1405 (Production) and/or SF 1406 (Quality Assurance).
2.1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF OFFERS:
The solicitation response will be contained in two separate volumes:
Volume I: Technical (Non-Price) Proposal (Factors 1-2) Volume II: Price Proposal (Factor 3)
For each volume, the number of copies required and the page limits are shown in the table below. Instructions for paper and electronic files are detailed below in paragraphs 2.2.1 and 2.2.2, respectively. Offerors are hereby notified that the content of electronic copies of the proposal must be identical to the original hard copy proposal submitted in response to this solicitation. In the event of discrepancies between the two, the content of the original hard copy will prevail. All data submitted shall be marked unclassified.
2.2 PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DELIVERY:
Volume Title Page Limit Paper Copies
(Org/Copy) Electronic Files on CD-ROM I Technical (Non-Price) Proposal 100 1/0 1/2 II Price Proposal None 1/0 1/2
Offerors must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposals. Proposals that do not comply shall be considered nonresponsive and shall render the Offeror ineligible for award. In order to maximize efficiency and minimize the effort involved in the proposal evaluation process, all Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the format presented below.
The title page of each volume shall contain:
Cover and title page Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable Offeror’s name, address, and POC Date of Submittal Solicitation Number – N6339419R0017 Launch Sequencer (LSEQ) for MK 41Vertical Launching System
(VLS)
Volume Number and Title (e.g., Volume I – Technical (Non-Price) Proposal) DUNS Number and CAGE Code of the Offeror
The proposal volumes shall include the following information (as well as using tabs and dividers), which is not included in the page limit:
Title Page Table of Contents (Must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements) List of Figures List of Tables Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Duplicated information within a given factor may be included in full once and referenced thereafter, as long as there is a clear reference to the duplicated information. If the duplicated information is for different evaluation factors, then it must be included in full text individually under each factor.
2.2.1 Paper Format:
Each volume shall be bound separately and shall not exceed the page limitation cited above. Each volume of the proposal shall be bound in three ring binders to permit removal of sections with each major part tabbed. The Offeror’s company name shall appear at the top of each page in the header section. Legibility, clarity, and compliance with the requirements of the solicitation are essential. Failure to provide the requested information may adversely affect the Government’s evaluation of the Offeror.
The material in all volumes of the Offeror’s proposal shall be typed or printed in a font with the type no smaller than size 12 Times New Roman font on standard 8-1/2 by 11-inch paper. Text line spacing shall be one line.
One-inch margins on each side, including top and bottom are required. Text within tables, diagrams, pictorial charts, or graphic material may use 8-point font. Fold-out pages may be used for diagrams, charts or graphic material only and may not exceed 11 inches by 17 inches. Fold-out pages will be counted as two pages; double-sided fold-out pages will be counted as four pages.
Unless otherwise specified, fold out pages may only include narrative sufficient to describe the diagram, chart or graphic material. Every figure and table shall be numbered. Paragraphs shall be clearly formatted. Proposal material shall be presented on double-sided pages only. Each double-sided page counts as two pages.
A date shall be placed on each page of the proposal corresponding to the date of the initial proposal in the footer section. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions or correspondence (if required) shall contain revision numbers and dates.
The page count shall include all material (printed matter and figures) except where explicitly stated and does not include cover pages, title pages, Table of Contents (TOC), lists of figures and tables, tab pages, index pages, Integrate Master Schedule, Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms, and the Cross Reference Matrix (CRM).
Pages excluded from the page count must contain only material pertinent to the page heading or be blank and marked "Intentionally Left Blank." Index pages and Tabs are required and shall be cross-referenced to the TOC.
Every page, except those marked as blank, shall be numbered. Pages exceeding the page count shall be removed from the end of the volume that exceeds the page count and will not be evaluated.
The Offeror shall submit a CRM for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the evaluators’ review of the Offeror’s proposal. The CRM should be a single integrated matrix and cross-reference the proposal volumes and paragraphs to specific solicitation requirements, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. The Offeror’s CRM may be identical to the example below or revised such as to add columns to indicate the page number on which information may be found, identify where other relevant information in the proposal is located, or provide other comments. The CRM does not count against any of the proposal page limitations.
Each factor and volume shall be written to the greatest extent possible on a stand-alone basis so that its content may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other factors and volumes of the proposal. Cross-referencing within a given factor is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. In the event an Offeror decides to cross reference information, it is the responsibility of the Offeror to include the information in full and provide clear references to that information in other portions of the factor where the Offeror would like the evaluators to consider any duplicated information. Nevertheless, Offerors are reminded of their burden to present its capability in a manner that is clear for evaluators.
EXAMPLE OF A CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX (CRM)
Section L Proposal
Instruction
SOW Section M Evaluation
Factor
Proposal Reference
CLIN
Reference
Volume I / Technical (Non- Price)
Example: Section C, SOW, Para 4.3, First Article Test
Factor 1, Subfactor 2
Provide reference to Offeror's Proposal Volume I - Technical.
Note: Address applicable paragraphs within the
SOW.
Example: Refer to appropriate page number in Offeror's written proposal.
2.2.2 Electronic Files:
The electronic files shall be uncompressed and shall be submitted on Compact Disc–Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) formatted for Microsoft Office; text shall be prepared using Microsoft Word compatible applications; and spreadsheets, worksheets, or workbooks shall be prepared using Microsoft Excel compatible applications. Electronic files shall only consist of the following extensions:
….docx for Microsoft Word 2016 files, and ….xlsx for Microsoft Excel 2016 files ….pptx for Microsoft PowerPoint 2016 files ….pdf for Adobe Acrobat 9.0 files
….mppx for Microsoft Project 2016 files
Graphics, tables, photographs, and other data beyond the capability of Microsoft Word; or Microsoft PowerPoint may be submitted in Adobe Acrobat 9.0 format. Directory listing of the disk shall accompany the submission with a listing of file names and content of each file. Pricing data and technical data must be provided on separate CD-ROMs. A separate folder shall be used for each proposal volume. One electronic submission of each volume shall be provided on CD-ROM. Each disk shall be labeled as follows:
Solicitation Number Date Volume # Offeror Company Name, City, State Offeror POC Offeror POC Phone # Date of Submission Appropriate Security Classification Markings and Handling Instructions
The electronic spreadsheets shall not be compiled or password protected; all cells and formulas shall be visible, editable, and unprotected. Offerors shall not establish links referencing other spreadsheet files not included with the proposal.
2.2.3 Proposal Submission:
Proposal submission shall be as follows:
Offeror shall provide one original and one CD-ROM of all proposal volumes to the following address at or before the date and time in Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF) 33.
All offers should be marked as follows:
Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division Acquisitions Department/Code 0221 Attention: Terren Jo, Contract Specialist 4363 Missile Way Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4307 Solicitation Number N6339419R0017
DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM
Proposal shall not be submitted via fax or email. No pricing information shall be included in Volume I.
Although legible, neat, orderly, and comprehensive proposals are required, elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond that to present a complete and effective explanation are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired.
The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail to permit evaluation. Information shall be confined to the appropriate volume to facilitate independent evaluation. The proposal should be clear and concise, logically assembled and indexed and cross-indexed to applicable parts of this solicitation as appropriate.
Offerors hand carrying proposals shall email Ms. Terren Jo at terren.jo@navy.mil or call (805) 228-0608 at least 48 hours prior to arriving at the Naval Base Ventura County to make timely delivery arrangements.
Packages may be subject to inspection.
2.3 PROPOSAL CONTENT:
Proposal shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and the proposed method of completing the SOW. To facilitate the evaluation, the proposal should be sufficiently detailed and complete to clearly demonstrate that the prospective Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and the technical and management problems inherent therein. It should also contain sufficient detail to indicate the proposed means for complying with all applicable specifications. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands and can or will comply with all specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications or parts thereof, and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, etc., will be considered insufficient and potentially “Unacceptable.”
Offerors shall comply with all solicitation requirements, terms, and conditions. Any exceptions shall be identified to the Government prior to receipt of the Offeror’s proposal. Failure to comply with all solicitation requirements may result in the Offeror being considered ineligible for award.
a. The below shall be included in Volume II Price Proposal:
SF 33, “Solicitation, Offer, and Award,” with blocks 12 through 18 completed by the Offeror. Block 12 shall be filled in with 180 days to allow for sufficient time to evaluate proposals.
SF33 Section B, “Supplies or Services and Prices,” with all prices for all line items completed by the Offeror, including stepladder pricing.
SF33 Section K, “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors,” completed by the Offeror.
SF33: Offeror must fill in all areas of the solicitation listed as “Offeror fill-ins” and provide any other information or data required by the solicitation.
Volumes I and II in accordance with the requirements identified herein. See paragraph 2.2 in Section L for the number of copies to submit.
Solicitation: Offeror must fill in all areas of the solicitation listed as “Offeror fill-ins” and provide any other information or data required by the solicitation.
Disposition of Technical Data Package (TDP) and Technical Drawings
All Offerors, except the winning Offeror, must destroy all copies/media of TDP and Technical Drawing List within 30 days after contract award, whether electronic or hard copy format. Offerors must provide the Contracting Officer statement certifying that all data is destroyed. Offeror shall not make additional copies, paper or electronic, of the provided data with this solicitation, nor should Offerors transfer the data by any means to a third party.
Offerors shall not download any files from the CD-ROM onto any local area network or integrated digital environment.
2.4 VOLUME I – TECHNICAL (NON-PRICE) PROPOSAL
No price information shall be included in this volume.
Volume I – Technical (Non-Price) Proposal shall consist of the following binder tabs:
Factor 1: Technical Approach
Subfactor 1: Production Assembly in Accordance With SOW and TDP
Subfactor 2: First Article and Factory Acceptance Testing in Accordance With TDP
Subfactor 3: Physical Assets to be Used in Production
Factor 2: Past Performance
FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH
Subfactor 1: Production Assembly in Accordance With SOW and TDP
Volume I shall include the Offeror’s detailed plan to accomplishing the technical tasks specified in the SOW and meeting the following minimum requirements described below:
a. The Offeror shall provide sufficient details for evaluation of its proposed Configuration Management (CM) plan and how it complies in accordance with the SOW paragraph 12 (Section C). The Offeror shall demonstrate through these details an understanding of the CM requirements for this acquisition and describe how it will implement a CM Program. The Offeror shall provide examples of how it has successfully initiated CM on a previous program of similar size and complexity, as compared to the TDP of this solicitation.
b. The Offeror shall provide its process on managing engineering changes or deviations to the TDP that are either requested by the Contractor, or changes provided by the Government in accordance with the SOW paragraph 12.4. The Offeror shall provide examples of instances it has received updated production requirements. Examples should describe how the Offeror’s team successfully dealt with updating production line(s) and processes, interfaced with vendors, met required delivery dates, and ensured quality was maintained.
c. The Offeror shall provide sufficient details for evaluation of its proposed Quality Assurance Plan and address how it intends to ensure the manufacturing quality of its subcontractors and other vendors in accordance with the SOW paragraph 19. The Offeror shall ensure that its approach adheres to the requirements of the SOW. The Offeror shall provide sufficient details for evaluation of the proposed Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Reporting (FACAR) system in accordance with the SOW paragraph 12.5.
Subfactor 2: First Article and Factory Acceptance Testing in Accordance With TDP
a. The Offeror shall explicitly describe its approach in conducting first article and factory acceptance testing in accordance with the associated Government Furnished Information (GFI) test plans and procedures (Section J, TDP). The Offeror shall address personnel, facilities, fixtures, software, and test equipment required to successfully conduct first article testing to objectively verify product compliance to the TDP.
b. The Offeror shall describe how first article and factory acceptance testing will be implemented and conducted in its facility, identify any testing requirements that cannot be performed in the present facility, and provide a contingency plan for any such requirements.
Subfactor 3: Physical Assets to be Used in Production
a. The Offeror shall provide sufficient details for evaluation of the proposed production, assembly, and test facilities (in terms of equipment, personnel, available space) and capital assets in sufficient description as to demonstrate adequate infrastructure, capability, and capacity for the production and test of the proposed sets, as identified by the TDP, at the rates per the delivery requirements identified in Section F. The proposal shall also specifically discuss availability of facilities and assets during the contract period of performance.
b. The Offeror shall explicitly describe availability of necessary production, assembly and test facilities capabilities including access to physical plant facilities, required production and test equipment, special test ranges or facilities and skilled production, test and engineering support personnel.
FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE
a. Offeror shall provide a minimum of one, maximum of three Past Performance References with their proposal for like or similar efforts the company has completed within the last five years from the date of proposal submission. Offeror shall also submit one Past Performance Reference for each proposed subcontract valued at 10% or more of their total proposed price. The contracts identified should demonstrate in-depth knowledge and successful implementation of contracts of similar scope and complexity to this solicitation. Similar scope and complexity means having performed most of the types of support efforts identified in the SOW and TDP for this solicitation. The identified contracts can be with Federal Government, commercial or other customers.
b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), included as Attachment J-S-1 to the solicitation, is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Past Performance. Include with your proposal submission a copy of the PPQ Cover Sheet. In order to expedite the assessment process, the Offeror may complete the “Contract Information” portion of the PPQ for the convenience of the client POC. The Offeror shall not, however, complete any other section of the PPQ on behalf of the client POC. The PPQ shall be provided to the client POC with instructions to complete and submit it directly to the Contracting Office to the Contract Specialist at terren.jo@navy.mil with copy to michael.d.thompson4@navy.mil by the closing date and time specified on the cover page of the solicitation, Block 9. Completed PPQs are to be emailed from the client directly to the PPQs are NOT to be submitted via the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to limit or expand the number of references it decides to contact and to contact other references than those provided by the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to consider any PPQs received after the due date and to contact those clients that do not respond to the PPQ.
c. Submission of Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations in lieu of PPQs is acceptable. An Offeror who has an effort which is covered by one or more CPARS evaluations need not submit a PPQ for that same effort. The narrative submitted with Volume 2 should clearly identify the contract number/task order number for any effort for which the Offeror is relying upon a CPARS evaluation rather than submitting a PPQ.
d. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources, including sources outside the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through CPARS, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) database, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) Report Card using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquires of owner representative (s), points of contact identified by the Offeror in its proposal, personnel knowledge, and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.
Previous Contracting Effort Narratives
The Offeror shall also provide a Previous Contracting Effort Narrative detailing the following information:
a. Description of how the scope for this past contract/task order relates to this effort in scope and complexity.
b. Description of the significant achievements, challenges or obstacles that were encountered during contract performance and the measures taken to overcome challenges and obstacles.
c. If the Offeror cites as a past performance reference a contract that was not awarded to the Offeror as a Prime Contractor but is nevertheless cited by the Offeror as "past performance information regarding predecessor companies, Key Personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement [FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii)]," the proposal shall demonstrate the relevance of the efforts of such predecessor company, Key Personnel and subcontractor both to the overall performance rating of the cited reference contract or Task Order as well as to the instant requirement.
2.5 VOLUME II – PRICE PROPOSAL
Volume II – Price Proposal shall consist of the following factor:
FACTOR 3: TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE
Offerors shall submit a complete price proposal that addresses all information required to evaluate the pricing proposed for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), except CLIN 0002, including pricing for CLIN 0001, stepladder pricing for CLIN 0003, and stepladder pricing for Option CLINs 0004 through 0007. The price proposal shall be a separate volume from the technical (non-price) proposal. It is expected that the resulting contract will be awarded based upon a determination that there is adequate price competition. Therefore, the Offeror is not required to submit or certify cost and/or pricing data with their proposal. However, data other than certified cost data or pricing data is required to be submitted. If after receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition does not exist in accordance with FAR 15.403-1 or that only one offer is received, the Offeror shall provide certified cost and/or pricing data as requested by the Contracting Officer.
The price and cost summaries provided in Volume II must not conflict with the data submitted in Section B schedules. In the event of a discrepancy, prices found in the filled-out Section B shall be utilized.
Volume II shall contain the Offeror’s understanding of and approach to the pricing requirements of the solicitation.
The pricing portion of the proposal shall include:
a. Pricing spreadsheets for all CLINs, for all items (with options) as described in Section B. Spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format with cells containing working formulas that are visible for Government examination of price buildup and methodology.
b. Basis of Estimate (BOE) narrative in Microsoft Word for each CLIN. The BOE narrative shall include estimating methodologies for each proposed priced CLIN.
c. The price proposal should answer the following questions:
i. What is the estimate?
ii. What is it based on?
iii. How was it derived?
iv. Why is it reasonable?
Pricing Support Information:
Offerors shall provide the following information in support of all Section B Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) CLINs requiring pricing, inclusive of all option items:
a. The Offeror shall submit its price summaries in accordance with the Offeror’s accounting structure for the first unit of each FFP line item. The Offeror’s proposal shall provide complete visibility by calendar year (or the Offeror’s calendar year) labor hours, labor costs, material costs, other direct costs, indirect costs, and profit.
The Offeror shall provide detailed analysis to support the proposed FFP pricing at each quantity amount and the adjustments made from the first unit pricing (i.e. production labor learning reductions, quantity reductions, escalation.
b. For each subcontract valued at 10% or more of the total proposed price, the Offeror shall provide a list which includes:
i. Subcontractor name, address, telephone number, and CAGE code;
ii. Description of supplies/services to be subcontracted;
iii. Information as to whether the subcontractor has held any Government contracts/subcontracts;
iv. Place(s) of contract performance;
v. Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;
vi. Type of subcontract (FFP, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee, etc.);
vii. Basis for determining that the proposed subcontractor pricing is fair and reasonable.
c. Provide any price estimating methodology applied to generate pricing. This includes, but is not limited to, price interpolation, escalation, curving, etc.;
d. Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and actual performance for similar work (cost and schedule), shall be explained in the proposal. For example, if the intended use of new and innovative production techniques is the basis for an abnormally low estimate or short manufacturing schedule, the nature of these techniques and their impact on cost shall be explained or, if a corporate policy decision has been made to absorb a portion of the estimated cost, that shall be stated in the proposal. Any significant inconsistency, if unexplained, may be grounds for determining that the proposal is unacceptable.
The burden of proof as to cost credibility rests with the Offeror.
2.6 REQUEST FOR DRAWINGS.
This is a build to print requirement in accordance with the Government furnished TDP. These drawings are restricted and can only be made available to DoD Contractors under the Joint Certification Program, upon request to the Contracting Office. Drawings are made available via FBO.gov.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .