Attachment 001 SOW (REVISED).pdf
PDF 109 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cost Allocation and Rate Design Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6247024Q9000
About this file
This combined synopsis and solicitation requests quotes from qualified sources to provide professional services pertaining to Cost Allocation and Rate Design in support of the Utility Rates and Studies Office. The solicitation will result in an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, Time and Material contract with a base year and two one-year option periods not to exceed $1,200,000 or 36 months in total. The NAICS code is 541618 with a small business size standard of $19 million average annual receipts, and the procurement is 100% set aside for small businesses. Interested contractors shall submit quotes electronically or via mail by the specified due date to the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment0004.pdf | ||
| Amendment0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 003 PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 002 PricingExhibit.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 001 SOW.pdf | ||
| N6247024Q9000 Combined SYNSOL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 001 SOW (REVISED)
STATEMENT OF WORK
C.1 DEFINITIONS
The following acronyms or words shall have the corresponding meanings:
NAVFACSYSCOM: Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Headquarters
FEA: Federal Executive Agencies
COTR: Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative
SOW: Statement of Work
T.O.: Task Order - A task order is a document (DD Form 1155) prepared by the Contracting Officer that is issued to the contractor and unilaterally orders work to be performed.
C.2 INTRODUCTION
a. The Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command
(NAVFACSYSCOM) purchases utility services (electricity, water, gas; excluding telecommunications) in excess of $1 billion annually. From time to time, NAVFACSYSCOM through its Utility Rates and Studies Office, intervenes in the utility regulatory ratemaking process before various federal, state or local authorities. A major part of Utility Rates and
Studies Office's mission is to provide effective effort in the protection of the Navy’s interests in utility cases, to supply technical support for Navy representation before regulatory bodies, and to participate in regulatory proceedings to ensure that the utility rates are reasonably close to the utility’s cost of providing the service, that they are not unduly discriminatory, and that the rates are just and reasonable. Frequently, Utility Rates and Studies Office encounters situations where its participation in the regulatory proceedings concerning utility rate applications is impeded because of manpower, time or specific technical limitations. On occasion, Utility Rates and
Studies Office contracts for professional expertise in certain disciplines in support of its own capabilities. The area in which expert assistance may be required is Cost Allocation and Rate
Design. Because of the substantial changes in the utilities industries, the regulatory environment, and the actions within the Department of Defense (DOD), many new issues such as deregulation, unbundling of cost of capital, asset securitization, rate freeze, post rate freeze rate design, privatization and other similar issues may also have to be dealt with through the Utility
Rates and Studies Office efforts.
b. Accordingly, it is our intent to establish, in advance, the services which the contractor will be required to provide. Offerors must explicitly state how they are capable of providing the required analysis, testimony, exhibits schedules and work papers or studies within a period not in excess of thirty calendar days from the date of receiving the assignment and pertinent original case data. Offerors should present in detail their technical and managerial plans for accomplishing such tasks in a timely manner.
C.3 SCOPE OF WORK
The following tasks are representative of work the contractor may be required to perform.
Each task order (T.O.) will include a Statement of Work (SOW) which specifically identifies the requirements of each case.
a. Review and analyze the utility’s application including its filing, testimony, exhibits, and other rate case data, work papers, studies, and submit discovery questions if necessary, as they relate to Cost Allocation and Rate Design.
b. Prepare suggested cross-examination questions for all witnesses of adversary parties.
c. Prepare testimony and attend hearings if the regulatory authority requires oral presentation of the testimony. If such is required, the Contractor’s witness shall also provide case counsel with the technical support. The witness will also be subject to cross-examination by any party to the proceedings. Testimony is to be presented on behalf of the Navy, DOD, and all other FEA’s for consideration by the regulatory authority.
d. Provide technical notes for the preparation of legal briefs,
e. Analyze orders of the regulatory body, and prepare a final report identifying the treatment of the issue presented by the Navy and its resultant cost reduction.
C.4 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY
None
C.5 CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS
The contractor shall provide all equipment, materials, and services to perform the requirements of this contract.
C.6 STUDIES AND ANALYSIS REPORTS
a. Certain utility issues may require a preliminary analysis report to be performed for a determination to be made as to whether there is a need for intervention or other Navy action.
b. The Contractor may, on his own, identify potential issues that can be challenged in testimony, an estimate of the cost savings if the challenged issues are successfully litigated and a commentary regarding the likelihood of success in the challenge of each issue and bring them to the attention of the Utility Rates and Studies Office without being solicited.
c. The Contractor shall perform utility-related studies as may be required by the government. The deliverable item shall be a report.
C.7 ANALYSIS, DISCOVERY, TESTIMONY, CROSS-EXAMINATION, HEARINGS,
BRIEFS AND ORDER EVALUATIONS
a. DISCOVERY
(1) The Contractor shall provide in writing, one copy each, to the COTR and the case counsel, simultaneously. All requests for data, documents and information to be served on the utility or other parties shall be provided within the time constraints established in the procedural order and paragraph C.8.
(2) The Contractor shall avoid “canned” data requests as much as possible and shall restrict the requests to those that would assist in the preparation of the Navy’s case.
(3) The Contractor shall integrate responses to discovery requests in developing Navy’s testimony and brief preparation.
(4) The Contractor shall prepare proper responses to discovery requests served on the
Navy. Two copies of the responses shall be provided to the COTR unless otherwise directed.
The address for the COTR is:
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command – Washington
ATTN: Utility Rates and Studies Office
1322 Patterson Ave, SE, Bldg 33 Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20374-5065
b. TESTIMONY. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver testimony, exhibits and schedules, and, if required, surrebuttal testimony on issues within the scope of the contract. A draft of the prepared testimony shall be presented by the Contractor to the COTR for review, discussion, and modification where needed. The Contractor may be directed to submit a second draft, if necessary. When the COTR is satisfied with the testimony, the Contractor shall be instructed to proceed with the final version. No changes of any nature shall be made to the testimony subsequent to the COTR approval without his express authorization. Draft and final testimony shall be submitted in strict adherence to the dates as will be communicated to the
Contractor. Final testimony shall be prepared in the format and in the number of copies as required by the particular regulatory authority and will be communicated to the Contractor.
Information will be communicated by the Utility Rates and Studies Office analysts via e-mail or telephonically within the time constraints established in the procedural order and paragraph C.8.
c. CROSS EXAMINATION. The Contractor shall prepare proposed cross-examination questions with anticipated answers based on the testimony, exhibits and schedules filed by witnesses to be examined. The prepared cross-examination questions shall identify the ultimate point to be developed as a result of a successful cross-examination, the detailed reasons for asking them, expected responses, and alternative and follow-up questions. Questions are not to be restricted only to those issues addressed in Navy’s case. A copy of the proposed cross-examination questions shall be submitted to the COTR and case counsel simultaneously. The
Contractor shall be informed of the dates and places of examination of witnesses. The
Contractor’s attendance at the cross-examination hearings may or may not be required depending on the particulars of each rate case as will be communicated to the Contractor by the Utility
Rates and Studies Office analysts via e-mail or telephonically within the time constraints established in the procedural order and paragraph C.8.
d. HEARINGS. The Contractor’s expert witnesses shall appear before the regulatory body to support their testimony. For this phase, the Contractor shall prepare a summary of the testimony to be delivered at the hearings. The summary shall be reduced to writing and forwarded to the COTR at least five working days prior to the delivery of the testimony on the witness stand. The summary may be waived if such is not the practice of the regulatory authority. The witnesses shall be available to present the testimony and undergo the examination by other parties or to attend Navy’s cross-examination of its adversaries at the times and places set by the cognizant regulatory body.
e. BRIEF PREPARATION. After the conclusion of the evidentiary hearings, the
Contractor shall review the pertinent transcripts and provide technical notes for the Navy brief preparation. Depending on the regulatory body’s practices, the briefing material may be in the form of either a simultaneous brief, or opening and reply briefs. In either form, the Contractor shall include the necessary rebuttal to arguments and criticisms of the Navy’s positions addressed in opening briefs or expected to be addressed in reply or simultaneous briefs submitted by adversary parties. The brief proposed by the Contractor shall be in the following format, and shall address, but not be limited to, the following, after a brief introduction and background:
(1) A statement of the objectives of Navy’s testimony.
(2) A complete coverage of every essential point raised with emphasis placed on contested issues.
(3) An explanation and reconciliation of conflicting evidence to discredit opposing parties, evidence and to highlight the persuasiveness of Navy’s proof, and to answer any criticism raised during cross-examination of Navy witnesses.
(4) The misconceptions and defects in the proof, testimony, or rebuttal offered by other parties’ witnesses.
(5) A showing of why the regulatory authority should grant the particular approach offered by the Navy’s testimony.
(6) The Contractor shall cite the commission’s, other commissions’, or courts’ authority in granting the same or comparable approaches, where applicable.
(7) The Contractor shall not repeat arguments made in its testimony except in a summarized manner and shall rely exclusively on the record developed during the hearing.
Reference to transcript pages shall be made in presenting the discussions dealing with items (3), (4), and (5) above.
(8) The proposed brief shall be typewritten and provided, one copy each, to case counsel, and the COTR on the date to be communicated by Utility Rates and Studies Office analysts via e-mail and telephonically within the time constraints established in the procedural order and paragraph C.8.
(9) BECAUSE EXPERIENCE INDICATES THAT BRIEFS IN MANY INSTANCES
MAKE OR BREAK THE CASE, SUBMISSIONS THAT FAIL TO COMPLY WITH ANY OF
THE ABOVE MAY BE CONSTRUED AS FAILURE TO PERFORM REQUIRED
SERVICES.
f. EVALUATION OF ORDERS. Upon receipt of an interim or final opinion and order of the regulatory body in the case, the Contractor shall analyze it and prepare the order evaluation report. The report shall include a synopsis of the case as it relates to Cost Allocation and Rate Design. It shall identify the issues the Contractor had presented and contrast them with the regulatory authority’s treatment in the order. The Contractor shall also provide the calculated dollar impact of each issue separately on the FEA, DOD, or the Navy, as appropriate.
If the impact cannot be calculated, the Contractor shall provide an estimate of the dollar impact, citing the assumptions made. The Contractor may make recommendations for changes in use pattern to be undertaken by the Navy to reduce its utilities costs. Two copies of the Order
Evaluation report shall be provided to the COTR within twenty-five calendar days from the date of the Contractor’s receipt of the regulatory authority’s order.
C.8 TIME CONSTRAINTS
Constraints are imposed by the regulatory bodies in all rate case proceedings. These limitations vary considerably from one jurisdiction, as well as from one rate case, to another.
The Contractor explicitly accepts those constraints acknowledging that they do not constitute, in any way, a valid reason for not performing any of the services required by the terms of this contract or by properly executed T.O. issued under its provisions. The deadline dates shall be conveyed promptly to the Contractor as the particular case develops. The COTR shall have the right to modify the regulatory body’s imposed deadline dates to allow for review, redrafting, printing or mailing time. The COTR shall maximize the time available for the Contractor to perform within these limitations. The Contractor shall, upon reasonable notice, be available for meetings with the COTR and case counsel as needed for proper performance of the intervention effort.
C.9 SETTLEMENTS
Occasionally, an applicant utility company or other parties to a rate case propose a partial or complete settlement of issues involved in the proceeding. In such situations, the Contractor whether approached directly by such parties or by the Navy case counsel shall assess the proposal and its impact on the Navy but shall not, either explicitly or implicitly, indicate acceptance or rejection to anyone, including a case counsel, before receiving direct instruction from the Director, Utility Rates and Studies Office who must personally authorize all settlements.
C.10 KEY PERSONNEL
The Contractor shall assign to this contract the following key personnel:
Labor Category Name
Expert Witness
Rate Consultant
Technical Analyst
Administrative Assistant
(Additional Labor Category(s) and Name(s) may be inserted by Offeror at time of proposal submission.)
C.11 SUBSTITUTION OF PERSONNEL
a. The Offeror shall assign to the contract only those persons whose names were submitted with its proposal and were accepted by the Government. Substitutions shall only be made in accordance with this paragraph.
b. During the contract performance period no personnel substitutions will be permitted unless such substitutions are approved by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer if personnel substitution is needed and shall provide the information required by paragraph c. below. If the substitute is unacceptable, the T.O. may be cancelled.
c. All requests for substitutions must provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitution, a complete resume for the proposed substitute, and any other information as may be required by the Contracting Officer to approve or disapprove the proposed substitution. The Contracting Officer will promptly notify the Contractor of his determination concerning the proposed name.
C.12 MINIMUM PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
EXPERT WITNESS
--Fifteen (15) years experience which demonstrates knowledge of multi-state public utility commission (state public service commission) regulations and procedures on a national level
--Fifteen (15) years experience which demonstrates expertise in presentation of testimony to the state utility commissions and/or public service commissions
--Fifteen (15) years experience which demonstrates expertise in presentation of testimony pertaining to electric and/or water cases to the state utility commissions and/or public service commissions
RATE CONSULTANT
--Five (5) years experience which demonstrates knowledge of multi-state public utility commission (state public service commission) regulations and procedures on a national level
--Five (5) years experience which demonstrates expertise in presentation of testimony to the state utility commissions and/or public service commissions
--Five (5) years experience which demonstrates expertise in presentation of testimony pertaining to electric and/or water cases to the state utility commissions and/or public service commissions
TECHNICAL ANALYST
--Ten (10) years experience in analyzing utility rates and incremental costs, conducting cost of service studies and rate assessments, and evaluating utility cost allocation models
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
--High school diploma or its equivalent
--2-5 years experience in the field or in a related area
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .