Attachment_3-Addendum_to_52.212-2-West_Coast.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Evinrude Repair/Refurbishment
- Solicitation number
- N6133119R0008
About this file
Evaluation Factors
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6133119R0008-WEST_COAST_OBM.pdf | ||
| N6133119R000800001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3-Addendum_to_52.212-2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2-Addendum_to_52.212-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_Statement_of_Work-West_Coast_Rev_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2-Addendum_to_52.212-1-West_Coast.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_Statement_of_Work-West_Coast.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 -- EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)
Evaluation Factors:
Factor 1 - Evinrude Certification Factor 2 - Past Performance Factor 3 - Price
Factors 1, 2 and 3 are equal in importance.
Evaluation Rating
The Government will evaluate the proposal for whether or not the proposal met the requirements as specified in 52.212-, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items and Addendum to 52.212-1. Factor 1 will be evaluated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis as shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Factor 1 (Evinrude Certification) Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
Factor 2 will be evaluated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Factor 2 (Past Performance) Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Acceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s past performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s past performance record is unknown |
| Unacceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s past performance record, the Government has no reasonable expecttion that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”
Factor 3 Price:
The Government will derive the evaluated price by adding the total amount of all proposed CLINS.
Basis of Award:
Award will be on the basis of the lowest evaluated price proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-price factors.
File details come from the government source that posted it.