N4019220R7091 Amendment 003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise proposal submission requirements from paper copies to electronic only (i.e. via email).

Proposals shall be emailed to the follow ing individuals:

Tanya Santos tanya-marie.santos@us.af.mil Jessica Sanchez jessica.sanchez.15@us.af.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Aug-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4019220R7091

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Aug-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Aug-2020

CODE

COMMANDING OFFICER - NAVFAC MARIANAS

36 CONS LGCB

UNIT 14040

BLDG 22026

FPO AP 96543

N40192 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4019220R7091

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

PROPOSAL FORMAT

The technical proposal and the price/cost proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The technical proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information, except for salary information provided on resumes. The technical proposal presented by the offeror to whom the award is made will be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

Volume I – Price Proposal Volume II – Technical Proposal

The offeror shall submit the following information electronically only (i.e. via email submittal):

(1) Completed signed solicitation packages, including executed representations and certifications, and cost/prices in Section B and any accompanying exhibits.

(2) Technical proposal.

(3) Cost/price proposal.

Volume I – Price Proposal

1. The following information is required to be submitted with your offer;

(i) Complete Schedule B and accompanying exhibits from Section J of the solicitation with all CLIN and ELIN unit pricing and amounts completed that will become the prices effective at contract award.

(ii) Name title, e-mail address, phone, and facsimile number of the person or persons authorized to negotiate and bind your firm and/or address proposal clarifications;

(iii) Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors (Section K of the solicitation) with all representations and certifications executed.

(iv) Evidence of financial capability for the previous three fiscal years, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. In addition, submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

(v) Joint Venture agreements, if applicable, a copy of their joint venture shall be submitted with this solicitation

2. Price Information Rating Criteria. Each price/cost proposal shall contain a breakdown of direct labor costs; direct material cost (identifying the quantity, type and unit price); subcontracting costs; overhead costs; general and administrative costs; and profit. Proposal shall include price and amounts of Section B and Attachment J-0200000- 09 (CLIN and ELIN) of the solicitation.

Volume II – Technical Proposal

Offers are solicited on an “all or none” basis. Failure to submit offers for all line items/Elins listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

(End of clause)

Notes:

1. Offerors shall limit their proposal to no more than 10 pages per factor. Pages that exceed 10 per factor shall not be considered. Pages are defined as one sided.

2. The proposal shall be clear, concise and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation. Responses to this solicitation shall strictly adhere to the requirements set forth in the solicitation. Submissions that do not adhere to format and content requirements may be considered non-compliant. The Government reserves the right to eliminate any such proposals from consideration for award.

4. Offeror should note that unnecessarily elaborate presentation beyond those sufficient to present a complete and effective response to the solicitation are not desired. Elaborate art work and other presentation aids are neither necessary nor wanted.

5. In each proposal, it shall reflect Offeror's name, address, and telephone number CAGE code and DUNS number; the full address, phone, and facsimile numbers of the Offeror; points of contact (POCs) authorized to negotiate with the Government on the Offeror's behalf; the solicitation number; a statement confirming the Offeror is willing to hold its prices firm for at least 90 days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

Proposals shall be submitted no later than 1500 hours, 28 August 2020. All offers received after the time and date shall not be considered for award.

Proposals shall be emailed to the following individuals:

Tanya Santos tanya-marie.santos@us.af.mil Jessica Sanchez jessica.sanchez.15@us.af.mil TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Volume II). Each technical proposal shall be precise, detailed, and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements. As a minimum, the proposal must contain sufficient detail so that it may be evaluated in accordance with the EVALUATION FACTORS provision, Section M.

Each factor and sub factor will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable. A rating of unacceptable for any factor or sub factor will result in an overall unacceptable rating. If an offeror fails to meet the minimum requirements outlined in one of the four (4) subfactors below, the subfactor, and overall proposal will be rated “unacceptable” and will not be eligible for award.

(1) Technical Approach.

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

a. The Offeror shall submit a narrative describing its technical approach which clearly demonstrates its understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

b. Offerors shall describe the staff, skills, techniques, equipment, supplies and other resources proposed to accomplish the objectives and standards detailed in the Performance Work Statement.

c. Offerors shall submit with their offer a copy of at least one Master Electrician licensed by the Government of Guam Contractors licensed board.

(2) Corporate Experience.

The offeror shall submit evidence of a minimum two (2)years of experience within the last five (5) years in providing electrical services for the types of equipment listed in the PWS. The offer shall provide a narrative that discusses this experience and provide a list of relevant past projects completed within the past five (5) years. The experience of a subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor’s experience. The offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Contract number for the Government/Commercial Performance

- The title of the contract/project

- Award date

- A brief description of work completed

- Length of contract/project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact (POC) at

Client Organization (Company) or Requiring Activity (RA)

Offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant projects that are similar in terms of size, scope, and complexity to the requirements in the solicitation. ALL

PROJECTS SUBMITTED MUST CORRESPOND TO THE SAME PROJECTS LISTED IN

FACTOR 4, PAST PERFORMANCE.

(a) The Government will only review five (5) projects. Projects submitted in excess of the maximum of five (5) will not be considered.

(b) Projects submitted beyond the five (5) year period, measured from the date proposals are due, will not be considered.

(c) Offerors may include the experience of a subcontractor or teaming partner that will perform major or critical aspects of the work. If the experience of a subcontractor or teaming partner is proposed, submit evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which provides a legal responsibility of the subcontractor or teaming partner. Such agreement must also include an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor or teaming partner will have in the performance of the contract.

(3) Safety

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal, requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(a) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (Jan

– Dec, 2017-2019). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(b) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and

Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (Jan – Dec, 2017-2019). If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(c) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self- performed and subcontractor performed work.

The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total

Recordable Case (TRC)Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The R to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case(TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS),Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(4)Past Performance

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION

IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF

THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will be provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal. AN OFFEROR

SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Tanya Santos, via email at tanya-marie.santos@us.af.mil prior to proposal closing date.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.”

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment C.

PROJECTS SUBMITTED MUST CORRESPOND TO THE SAME PROJECTS LISTED IN

FACTOR 2, CORPORATE EXPERIENCE.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand”

- A respect for stewardship of Government funds

Each project submitted must be for work performed within the past five (5) years, as measured from the date proposals are due. The base and each exercised option period for a multi-year contract constitutes an individual project.

An offeror will be considered “Acceptable” for this factor based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required efforts, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. An offeror will be considered “Unacceptable” for this factor based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required efforts.

PRICE/COST PROPOSAL (Volume I). Each price/cost proposal shall contain a breakdown of direct labor costs; direct material cost (identifying the quantity, type and unit price);

subcontracting costs; overhead costs; general and administrative costs; and profit. Proposal shall include price and amounts of Section B and Attachment J-0200000-09 (CLIN and ELIN) of the solicitation.

(End of Clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)