18R3011_INDY_AMD09-.pdf

ACQR5164372

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N4008518R3011 NOSC INDIANAPOLIS ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

The purpose of this amendment Provide PPI responses w ith attachmnents, Revise Factor 2: Experience submittal requirement, Extend proposal due date to April 18, 2018 NLG 11am CT, and Add Bid Options to Price Worksheet

See continuation page for detailed information

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008518R3011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Apr-2018

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC PWD GREAT LAKES

PWD GREAT LAKES FEAD

310 SEABEE WAY

GREAT LAKES IL 60088-2814

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008518R3011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT 09

The purpose of this amendment is to

A. Provide responses to all PPIs to include attachments (Due to the size of the attachments, a total of 11 amendments will be issued, to include this one, in order to upload all attachments. Amendments will be numbered 09 through 19)

B. Revise Factor 2: Experience submittal requirement C. Extends the proposal due date to Wednesday, April 18, 2018 NLT 11:00am

CT.

D. Add Bid Option to Price Worksheet (Bid Option descriptions in revised

SOW)

A. The following are the attachments to PPIs for N4008518R3011 NOSC Indianapolis

ATFP Security Upgrades:

1. Indianapolis Part 3 SOW Changes – ALL changes to Part 3 are indicated with red font or with a black strike through. (20 pages) – AMD 09

2. Door_Soil_elev (9 pages) – AMD 09

3. GENERAL (17 pages) – AMD 09

4. Survey (7 pages) – AMD 09

5. Geotechnical (7 pages) – AMD 10

6. Civil (67 pages) – AMD 11

7. Landscape (18 pages) – AMD 12

8. Architectural (197 pages) – AMD 13, AMD 14, AMD 15

9. Interior Design (23 pages) – AMD 16

10. Fire Protection (22 pages) – AMD 16

11. Electrical (111 pages) – AMD 17, AMD 18

12. Telecommunications (24 pages) – AMD 19

13. CAC_CardGuides (180) – AMD 19

B. Factor 2 Experience for Construction and Design experience is amended as follows:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction security projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, projects related specific to geographic locations per the RFP and complexity to the RFP.

The Offeror shall submit a minimum of three (3) renovation projects and a maximum of five (5) total relevant projects. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as projects related to but not limited to Antiterrorism Force Protection Projects and or Security projects. The projects shall outline the following:…

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, projects related specific to geographic locations per the RFP and complexity to the RFP.

The Offeror shall submit a minimum of three (3) renovation projects and a maximum of five (5) total relevant projects. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as projects related to but not limited to Antiterrorism Force Protection Projects and or Security projects. The projects shall outline the following:…

C. The proposal due date for N4008518R3011 NOSC Indianapolis ATFP Security

Upgrades is Wednesday, April 18, 2018 NLT 11:00am CT D. Price Worksheet includes Bid Options as follows. Offeror must submit the attached price sheet as well as Page 31 of the original RFP.

CLIN 0001 NOSC INDIANAPOLIS ATFP Security Upgrades Provide design, all labor, materials, equipment, coordination, transportation, and on-site supervision necessary to enhance force protection and physical security capabilities at Navy Reserve/Marine Corps Training Center Indianapolis, IN in accordance with UFC 4-020-01 Security Engineering for Asset Category “A” People (general population). The primary scope work identified herein will include practical upgrades to existing Physical Security Equipment (PSE), Electronic Security Systems (ESS), infrastructure, and facilities in conformance with UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings.

The enhancements identified in this RFP are the recommended Physical Security Equipment (PSE) and Electronic Security Systems (ESS) mitigation actions to reduce the risk associated with the Asset Category “A” People (general population) at Indianapolis, IN.

Reserve Training Center Indianapolis is a joint facility shared by both Navy and Marine Corps personnel.

CLIN 0001 PRICE $________________________

The Navy intends to award CLIN 0001 and one (01) of the Bid Options below:

ELIN 0001 – Bid Option 01 Provide K4 rated stationary and removable bollards/M30 cabling with 1 meter penetration and with access points 20 m away from both Navy and Army Buildings only at the north end of the site in front of the buildings. Removable pipe bollards, steel, concrete filled and painted, 8'L x 4'D hole, 8" diameter. Provide a solution that is aesthetically pleasing and blends with the site.

ELIN 0001 – Bid Option 01 PRICE $_________________________

ELIN 0002 – Bid Option 02 Provide K4 rated stationary and removable bollards/M30 cabling with 1 meter penetration and with access points 20 m away from both Navy and Army Buildings around both buildings. Removable pipe bollards, steel, concrete filled and painted, 8'L x 4'D hole, 8" diameter. Provide a solution that is aesthetically pleasing and blends with the site.

ELIN 0002 – Bid Option 02 PRICE $_________________________

ELIN 003 – Bid Option 03 Provide K4 rated stationary and removable bollards/M30 cabling with 1 meter penetration and with access points 20 m away from the Navy and around the Navy building only. Removable pipe bollards, steel, concrete filled and painted, 8'L x 4'D hole, 8" diameter. Provide a solution that is aesthetically pleasing and blends with the site.

ELIN 003 – Bid Option 03 PRICE $________________________

(End of Summary of Changes)

PREPOSAL INQUIRY FORM

ATTACHMENT 1

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS,

Paragraph 7- Proposal Due date & Submission Instructions

Considering that RFP documents do not include drawings which show features and equipment critical to this solicitation, it is in the best interest of the government to extend the bids submittal date for at least 21 days. This permit contractors to develop cost competitive, technically complete responsible bids

Please see response to question #1. There are reference drawings in Part 6 of the RFP that pertain to the site as well as general ATFP guidance. See the SF30 Amendment form for revised proposal due date.

Part 3 - 2.0 Project Objectives

Provide K4/M30 w/ 1 meter penetrations (P1) cabling.

Can we utilize M30/P1 DoD certified Post & Beam instead of Post & Cable? It is much more aesthetically sound and provides the same layer of protection.

Yes, as long as there are some areas that can be opened up or are bollard type design to fit maintenance vehicles through. *Note the updated scope for this is to have the K4 rated system in front of both Navy and Army buildings vs around the whole Navy building.

3 ALL

Need drawings of windows & doors that are to receive film.

Drawings are included in Part 6 Attachments of RFP as well as PPI attachments

4 ALL What mil of FRF is to be used and is it tinted?

The windows are rated for ATFP, so we only require reflective tinting, caulked in place and do not require a specific rated film except for interior glazing that the room requires to be "Shelter in Place"

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS,

Paragraph 7- Proposal Due date & Submission Instructions

Considering that RFP documents do not include drawings which are required to develop price for this solicitation, it is in the best interest of the government to extend the bids submittal date for at least 21 days. This will permit contractors to develop cost competitive, technically complete responsible bids. The following information required for pricing : (a) Site Plan drawing that shows the location of security gates, layout and extend of the perimeter fence ,(b) building architectural drawings showing the location and size of windows that will require blast resistance film in order for us to determine number of windows, their size and height,(c)approximate location of CCTVs and work stations in plan and elevation to determine cabling/electrical requirements and routing and

(d) any site work/restrictions that will impact execution.

The RFP does include drawings in Part 6. We are also including additional attachments in PPI Attachments for further guidance, see 02 to 12 of 13 attachments.

INSTRUCTIONS

TO OFFERORS,

Paragraph 5-Per- Proposal Conference/site visit

We recommend that the govt. arrange for a second site visits after providing the information requested in question 1 above so that that we can make measurements.

The RFP does include drawings in Part 6. We are also including additional attachments in PPI Attachments for further guidance, see 02 to 12 of 13 attachments.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

Indianapolis NOSC is of recent construction (2015 approximately) and has an ACS system with Card Readers and perimeter door contacts installed on all perimeter man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of the Government to replace this entire existing investment under this solicitation?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor is to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning.

If anything is not working properly Contractor shall notify the Government.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

If the Government intends to replace the entire ACS system previously installed as part of the recent 2015 construction of the NOSC, please list the specific deficiencies or deviations from the applicable UFC criteria which warrant it's replacement, so that we may submit a proposal that addresses the specific deficiencies that warrant it's replacement in our solicitation technical and price proposals.

We are removing this from the scope. Contractor shall verify that all existing exterior doors are operational with existing door sensors per updated Part 3 and/or CACs.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform Quality Control Fire Protection Engineering (QCFPE) services? If so, will the qualifications of the QCFPE be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal but should be noted that someone will be used.

Part 3, Paragraph D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform any Fire Protection Designer of Record (FPDOR) services? If so, will the qualifications of the FPDOR be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal but should be noted that someone will be used.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph B2030 Exterior Doors

The existing PACS system already monitors all exterior man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of this RFP to replace all of these existing flush mounted contacts located in the door frames with surface mounted balanced magnetic switches and surface mounted conduit on all of these door frames?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor is to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning.

If anything is not working properly Contractor shall notify the Government.

Part 3, Paragraph B2030 Exterior Windows

During the site walkthrough, it was observed that in general, all perimeter window frames have two (2) operable glazing partitions with latches. Is it the intent of the Government to add surface mounted conduit down all perimeter window frames for the installation of surfaced mounted balanced magnetic switches? It appears there could be hundreds of these operable partitions requiring this setup of surface mounted conduit and wiring everywhere. The window partitions do not appear to be large enough to gain physical entry, so please clarify the intent of this security posture improvement in the chance that an alternative technology and less intrusive method of construction may be proposed (if one exists).

We are removing the window sensors from the scope.

Provide motion sensors in the corridors that trigger an alarm after work hours vs providing sensors on all perimeter windows. Motion sensors should be tied into notifying duty cell phone.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph B203008 Exterior Door Hardware

For the existing PACS system currently monitoring all exterior doors, when was it's last software maintenance contract signed and is the software up to date with the manufacturer? Please provide the contact information of the integrator responsible for providing the most recent software maintenance update to ensure the system is capable of receiving the additional points necessary to provide an alert monitor as well as all of the new added window balanced magnetic switch inputs.

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor shall notify the Government.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

With the exception of the new cameras called out to be installed in the interior corridors, the existing cameras currently called to remain in place and be connected to the new system are in the exact same location specified to receive new cameras in the RFP. What is the intent of having two (2) cameras in the same location?

The existing cameras per the RFP are not to be removed, we are adding 5 new cameras. The intent is to have more coverage of the exterior of the building since the fence line is not secured. Tie new cameras with existing and all should be incorporated into monitor workstations. If latitude/longitudes for the new cameras are too close in proximity to the existing ones, move them around the building to ensure there are no void areas without the use of panning.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

Please furnish the security record drawings from the construction of the NOSC (approximately 2015 as would have been required to be turned over to the government at completion of construction). This will provide numerous answers on the existing ACS and CCTV equipment to verify if any of it can be incorporated to the requirements of this solicitation.

They are being provided with PPI attachments, see 02 to 13 of PPI attachments.

Part 4, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

This section says provide and IDS or an ACS to sense all perimeter doors and windows and the interior volume in at least two locations and that the system shall have 90 minutes of battery backup. This directly conflicts with Part 3, where it says to provide an ACS and CCTV system only. What is to be provided and how many hours of battery backup shall be provided for the system the Government clarifies that it wants?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 4, Paragraph D5090 Other Electrical Services

It is mentioned that the Designer of Record shall utilize UFGS Section 26 33 53.00 20 whenever a UPS system is required. Is it a requirement of this RFP to provide all edited UFGS specifications by respective disciplines from Architecture, Civil Engineering, Door Hardware, Security Controls Engineering, and Fire Protection Engineering, or will basic shop drawings and cut sheets suffice for all proposed system design work?

If the intent is to have a (one) UPS for all ESS systems

vs. a UPS per each system of the ESS systems, then UFGS 26 33 53.00 20 will apply. If the latter, then cuts and notes describing the UPS characteristics on the drawings will be acceptable.

On the South side to the building there are (3) driveway leading up to roll-up doors. Please clarify if the Navy is looking for manual open crash gates or removable bollards so the perimeter can be K4 crash rated, yet the roll-up doors still be accessible

The back side of the building and the east and west sides will no longer have bollards/cabling. The cabling/bollards will only now be across the front side of the building but to include Army front side as well.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

19 Section D5020

Section D5020 call for the CCTV and Access Control to have 8 hours of UPS back-up power and in the past that has been enough batteries to fill up (2) 42 U cabinets.

There is not enough room in IDF/Lanroom for (2) full size cabinets, plus any of the security/access control equipment being added, is there another IDF/Lanroom that can be used or can we look into providing a back-up generator which would allow us to use a lot less batteries for the UPS System in order to achieve 8 hours up back up power.

A backup genset is acceptable instead of battery backup. However, the stipulation is the genset will be natural gas and there still will be some battery back up until the genset comes online and transitions.

On the east side of the property there is a drainage ditch running North/south along the building, about 15' of the from the edge, would the navy prefer to the have K4 rated system on the east or west side of the ditch?

Please see above responses as East, South and West cabling is no longer required.

Since the K4 rated crash bollards are going to be impeding on the walk up entrance to main door, does the Navy prefer any sort of decorative/design for K4 crash bollards?

The design shall be aesthetically pleasing for the front façade of Navy and Army buildings as this will have to also be approved by Army.

22 Section G20

Section G20 call for K4 rated bollard system or K4 rated cabling system around the outside of the building and for the solution to be aesthetically pleasing and blends in with the site. Does the Navy prefer a certain type or manufacture of K4 rated that would be aesthetically pleasing?

The design shall be aesthetically pleasing for the front façade of Navy and Army buildings as this will have to also be approved by Army.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Please confirm the extent of Design required of the Prime Contractor and the Deign Disciplines that must seal the Final Design Documents.

It is dependent on the number of design disciplines that are chosen. Section 01 33 10.05 20 defines the requirements. A DOR is required to sign and seal each drawing. "This seal must be the seal of the DOR for that drawing, and who is professionally registered for work in that discipline." Also look at 1.6.6 of this section. " Both the CA and the QC Manager must certify design submittals for compliance with the contract documents. The DOR stamp on drawings indicates approval from the DOR."

Is a Ballistics Engineer required to calculate the required thickness of FRF film to be applied to exterior windows?

The windows are rated for ATFP, so we only require reflective tinting, caulked in place and do not require a specific rated film.

25 Are the existing exterior windows ballistic rated? Yes

26 Can the Project Superintendent also act as SSHO?

Yes they can act as one. SSHO = Superintendent, QCM = SSHO, Superintendent Cannot = QCM

Are we required to perform soil borings as part of our design?

Yes to ensure proper ATFP ratings are met for the cabling/bollards. See PPI attachment 02 to 07 of 13 for further guidance.

With regards to the drawing, please provide the latest As Builts.

See 02 to 13 of 13 PPI attachments.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

In regards to the requested Knox Box installment for key switch override at main vehicular gate entry- has the Fire Department been contacted for coordination to date and if so is there a contact for Fire Marshal/chief or whoever is to review.

This site does not have any new gates

Has the local Indianapolis City authorities been contacted regarding any issues or coordination such as Public Right of Way encroachment?

We are not modifying any access/gates etc at this location

Has there been any preliminary determination or filing regarding State Historic Preservation Officer SHPO in order to asses / determine if there is a Historic Property Affected by the proposed scope of work.

Not required.

RFP designates gate to be vertical pivot arm- is this specification indicating a separate second barrier arm/drop arm gate, in addition to the main perimeter fence line security vehicle gate (i.e. inner crash impact barrier, on the protected side, just behind the operable fence line vehicle gate). Please clarify pivot arm type gate. Also note within Part 6 the vehicle gate is indicated as cantilevered sliding gate type.

This site does not have any new gates

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Can a cantilevered sliding gate that is K-4 rated be utilized as a singular element that is both rated for crash impact and provides perimeter security enclosure?

This site does not have any new gates

Please confirm K-4 anti-ram removable bollards are to be a manual shallow mount removable type (or equivalent) in lieu of any required retractable hydraulic powered units etc.

This site does not have any new gates

Window film attachment identified as mechanical application- Please clarify as to what does “application shall be installed into frame” mean? Is this merely refereeing to fasteners and batten attachment to extrusion?

Film can be installed via wet application and caulk only since the film is only for reflectivity and not ATFP rated.

The windows are ATFP rated.

Previous NOSC facilities scope of worked on relied upon wet glazing system application. Looking to confirm application for this facility to be mechanical application.

Film can be installed via wet application and caulk only since the film is only for reflectivity and not ATFP rated.

The windows are ATFP rated.

Is there any specific direction in the instance of film attachment into windows when either inhibits operable window conditions (due to tight fit as a result of film attachment) or limited capacity to anchor due to minimal window return depth?

Film can be installed via wet application and caulk only since the film is only for reflectivity and not ATFP rated.

The windows are ATFP rated.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Are there any special measure that must be taken given the nature of reflective tinting is dependent on lighting conditions i.e. room lighting brighter than corridor circulation- is there any need to further control of condition?

All interior spaces need to be protected. Films shall have the reflective side facing to the exterior and or the corridors.

For new or modified facility doors, where identified to be compliant with ABA/ADA guidelines, is the compliance limited to the elements modified of the door, such as shelter in place deadbolt locking (i.e. mounted height, compliant thumb-turn etc.) or is it more expansive where approach to door, clearances for push pull of hardware, lever hardware etc. must be met.

Please clarify the intent of; "clearances for push pull of hardware," "lever handware" and "etc." ABA/ADA requirements shall be met where any doors need to be or are required to be replaced and/or any deadbolts need to be replaced/installed. Any new levers, handles etc that are installed will be required to meet ABA/ADA requirements. Existing doors that are not modified including new cores do not need to meet the ABA/ADA requirement, only in cases where CAC readers are installed, new deadbolts, new handles or push/pull hardware do

We are to provide deadbolt locks on Toilet Room and Locker Room Doors as they will be designated as shelter in place. Some of the existing locker room and toilet room have frosted glass lites in the upper half of the door.

Should these doors with glass lites in the door be replaced with new solid doors?

Provide reflective FRF film at these door locations and at doors similar to this that require "shelter in place"

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications

& Security

Indianapolis NOSC is of recent construction (2015 approximately) and has an ACS system with Card Readers and perimeter door contacts installed on all perimeter man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of the Government to replace this entire existing investment under this solicitation?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor shall notify the Government.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications

& Security

If the Government intends to replace the entire ACS system previously installed as part of the recent 2015 construction of the NOSC, please list the specific deficiencies or deviations from the applicable UFC criteria which warrant it's replacement, so that we may submit a proposal that addresses the specific deficiencies that warrant it's replacement in our solicitation technical and price proposals.

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor shall notify the Government.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph

D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform Quality Control Fire Protection Engineering (QCFPE) services? If so, will the qualifications of the QCFPE be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal but should be noted that someone will be used.

Part 3, Paragraph

D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform any Fire Protection Designer of Record (FPDOR) services? If so, will the qualifications of the FPDOR be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal but should be noted that someone will be used.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph

B2030 Exterior Doors

The existing PACS system already monitors all exterior man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of this RFP to replace all of these existing flush mounted contacts located in the door frames with surface mounted balanced magnetic switches and surface mounted conduit on all of these door frames?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

Part 3, Paragraph

B2030 Exterior Windows

During the site walkthrough, it was observed that in general, all perimeter window frames have two (2) operable glazing partitions with latches. Is it the intent of the Government to add surface mounted conduit down all perimeter window frames for the installation of surfaced mounted balanced magnetic switches? It appears there could be hundreds of these operable partitions requiring this setup of surface mounted conduit and wiring everywhere. The window partitions do not appear to be large enough to gain physical entry, so please clarify the intent of this security posture improvement in the chance that an alternative technology and less intrusive method of construction may be proposed (if one exists).

We are removing the window sensors from the scope.

Provide motion sensors in the corridors that trigger an alarm after work hours vs providing sensors on all

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph B203008 Exterior Door Hardware

For the existing PACS system currently monitoring all exterior doors, when was it's last software maintenance contract signed and is the software up to date with the manufacturer? Please provide the contact information of the integrator responsible for providing the most recent software maintenance update to ensure the system is capable of receiving the additional points necessary to provide an alert monitor as well as all of the new added window balanced magnetic switch inputs.

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications

& Security

With the exception of the new cameras called out to be installed in the interior corridors, the existing cameras currently called to remain in place and be connected to the new system are in the exact same location specified to receive new cameras in the RFP. What is the intent of having two (2) cameras in the same location?

The existing cameras per the RFP are not to be removed, we are adding 5 new cameras. The intent is to have more coverage of the exterior of the building since the fence line is not secured. Tie new cameras with existing and all should be incorporated into monitor workstations. If latitude/longitudes for the new cameras are too close in proximity to the existing ones, move

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications

& Security

Please furnish the security record drawings from the construction of the NOSC (approximately 2015 as would have been required to be turned over to the government at completion of construction). This will provide numerous answers on the existing ACS and CCTV equipment to verify if any of it can be incorporated to the requirements of this solicitation.

We are including all drawings

Part 4, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications

& Security

This section says provide and IDS or an ACS to sense all perimeter doors and windows and the interior volume in at least two locations and that the system shall have 90 minutes of battery backup. This directly conflicts with Part 3, where it says to provide an ACS and CCTV system only. What is to be provided and how many hours of battery backup shall be provided for the system the Government clarifies that it wants?

We are removing the window sensors from the scope.

Provide motion sensors in the corridors that trigger an alarm after work hours vs providing sensors on all

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 4, Paragraph D5090 Other

Electrical Services

It is mentioned that the Designer of Record shall utilize UFGS Section 26 33 53.00 20 whenever a UPS system is required. Is it a requirement of this RFP to provide all edited UFGS specifications by respective disciplines from Architecture, Civil Engineering, Door Hardware, Security Controls Engineering, and Fire Protection Engineering, or will basic shop drawings and cut sheets suffice for all proposed system design work?

If the intent is to have a (one) UPS for all ESS systems

vs. a UPS per each system of the ESS systems, then UFGS 26 33 53.00 20 will apply. If the latter, then cuts and notes describing the UPS characteristics on the drawings will be acceptable.

On the South side to the building there are (3) driveway leading up to roll-up doors. Please clarify if the Navy is looking for manual open crash gates or removable bollards so the perimeter can be K4 crash rated, yet the roll-up doors still be accessible

The back side of the building and the east and west sides will no longer have bollards/cabling. The

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

53 Section D5020

Section D5020 call for the CCTV and Access Control to have 8 hours of UPS back-up power and in the past that has been enough batteries to fill up (2) 42 U cabinets.

There is not enough room in IDF/Lanroom for (2) full size cabinets, plus any of the security/access control equipment being added, is there another IDF/Lanroom that can be used or can we look into providing a back-up generator which would allow us to use a lot less batteries for the UPS System in order to achieve 8 hours up back up power.

A backup genset is acceptable instead of battery backup. However, the stipulation is the genset will be natural gas and there still will be some battery back up until the genset comes online and transitions.

On the east side of the property there is a drainage ditch running North/south along the building, about 15' of the from the edge, would the navy prefer to the have K4 rated system on the east or west side of the ditch?

Please see above responses as east, south and west cabling is no longer required.

55 Amendments

There are SF-30 forms for Amendments 1, 5, and 6.

Amendments 2, 3, and 4 are missing these acknowledgement forms. Please clarify which postings are actually Amendments and exactly which Amendment numbers need to be acknowledged in our submission.

Due to the size of the drawings they needed to be broken out. There is no SF30 for Amendments 2, 3, or

4. These amendments were created directly in NECO.

Offerors must submit Amendments 1, 5, 6, and any other amendments thereafter.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

Indianapolis NOSC is of recent construction (2015 approximately) and has an ACS system with Card Readers and perimeter door contacts installed on all perimeter man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of the Government to replace this entire existing investment under this solicitation?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

If the Government intends to replace the entire ACS system previously installed as part of the recent 2015 construction of the NOSC, please list the specific deficiencies or deviations from the applicable UFC criteria which warrant it's replacement, so that we may submit a proposal that addresses the specific deficiencies that warrant it's replacement in our solicitation technical and price proposals.

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform Quality Control Fire Protection Engineering (QCFPE) services? If so, will the qualifications of the QCFPE be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal.

Part 3, Paragraph D40

Will the prospective awardee be required to obtain the services of a licensed and qualified Fire Protection Engineer to perform any Fire Protection Designer of Record (FPDOR) services? If so, will the qualifications of the FPDOR be required to be submitted as part of the respondent's Technical Proposal?

Yes, for the FPQC. Also, an FPDOR will be required.

The FPDOR and FPQC can be one and the same IF they meet the qualifications for FPDOR and FPQC.

Intent is, if the FPDOR serves as the FPQC, the FPDOR cannot have a business relationship with any fire protection equipment device manufacturer, supplier, or installer for any such equip provided for this project.

They are not required to be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal.

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph B2030 Exterior Doors

The existing PACS system already monitors all exterior man doors and overhead doors. Is it the intent of this RFP to replace all of these existing flush mounted contacts located in the door frames with surface mounted balanced magnetic switches and surface mounted conduit on all of these door frames?

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

Part 3, Paragraph B2030 Exterior Windows

During the site walkthrough, it was observed that in general, all perimeter window frames have two (2) operable glazing partitions with latches. Is it the intent of the Government to add surface mounted conduit down all perimeter window frames for the installation of surfaced mounted balanced magnetic switches? It appears there could be hundreds of these operable partitions requiring this setup of surface mounted conduit and wiring everywhere. The window partitions do not appear to be large enough to gain physical entry, so please clarify the intent of this security posture improvement in the chance that an alternative technology and less intrusive method of construction may be proposed (if one exists).

We are removing the window sensors from the scope.

Provide motion sensors in the corridors that trigger an alarm after work hours vs providing sensors on all

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph B203008 Exterior Door Hardware

For the existing PACS system currently monitoring all exterior doors, when was it's last software maintenance contract signed and is the software up to date with the manufacturer? Please provide the contact information of the integrator responsible for providing the most recent software maintenance update to ensure the system is capable of receiving the additional points necessary to provide an alert monitor as well as all of the new added window balanced magnetic switch inputs.

No, we are removing this from the scope. Contractor to ensure what is currently in place is fully functioning. If anything is not working properly Contractor to let the Navy know.

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

With the exception of the new cameras called out to be installed in the interior corridors, the existing cameras currently called to remain in place and be connected to the new system are in the exact same location specified to receive new cameras in the RFP. What is the intent of having two (2) cameras in the same location?

The existing cameras per the RFP are not to be removed, we are adding 5 new cameras. The intent is to have more coverage of the exterior of the building since the fence line is not secured. Tie new cameras with existing and all should be incorporated into monitor workstations. If latitude/longitudes for the new cameras are too close in proximity to the existing ones, move

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 3, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

Please furnish the security record drawings from the construction of the NOSC (approximately 2015 as would have been required to be turned over to the government at completion of construction). This will provide numerous answers on the existing ACS and CCTV equipment to verify if any of it can be incorporated to the requirements of this solicitation.

All drawings are being provided.

Part 4, Paragraph D5030 Electronic Communications & Security

This section says provide and IDS or an ACS to sense all perimeter doors and windows and the interior volume in at least two locations and that the system shall have 90 minutes of battery backup. This directly conflicts with Part 3, where it says to provide an ACS and CCTV system only. What is to be provided and how many hours of battery backup shall be provided for the system the Government clarifies that it wants?

We are removing the window sensors from the scope.

Provide motion sensors in the corridors that trigger an alarm after work hours vs providing sensors on all

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

Part 4, Paragraph D5090 Other Electrical Services

It is mentioned that the Designer of Record shall utilize UFGS

Section 26 33 53.00 20 whenever a UPS system is required. Is it a requirement of this RFP to provide all edited UFGS specifications by respective disciplines from Architecture, Civil

Engineering, Door Hardware, Security Controls Engineering, and Fire Protection Engineering, or will basic shop drawings and cut sheets suffice for all proposed system design work?

If the intent is to have a (one) UPS for all ESS systems

vs. a UPS per each system of the ESS systems, then UFGS 26 33 53.00 20 will apply. If the latter, then cuts and notes describing the UPS characteristics on the drawings will be acceptable.

On the South side to the building there are (3) driveway leading up to roll-up doors. Please clarify if the Navy is looking for manual open crash gates or removable bollards so the perimeter can be K4 crash rated, yet the roll-up doors still be accessible

The back side of the building and the east and west sides will no longer have bollards/cabling. The

ATFP SECURITY UPGRADES

NOSC INDIANAPOLIS, IN

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40085-18-R-3011

Question No.

RFP Reference (Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

ALL PPIs with RESPONSES

68 Section D5020

Section D5020 call for the CCTV and Access Control to have 8 hours of UPS back-up power and in the past that has been enough batteries to fill up (2) 42 U cabinets. There is not enough room in IDF/Lanroom for (2) full size cabinets, plus any of the security/access control equipment being added, is there another IDF/Lanroom that can be used or can we look into providing a back-up generator which would allow us to use a lot less batteries for the UPS System in order to achieve 8 hours up back up power.

A backup genset is acceptable instead of battery backup. However, the stipulation is the genset will be natural gas and there still will be some battery back up until the genset comes online and transitions.

On the east side of the…