PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_ITESS_FY18.doc

DOC document 659 KB Posted

Attached to
Information Technology Engineering Support Services (ITESS)
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-1002
Issued by

About this file

REVISED Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation_N32205-18-R-1002_ITESS_Questions-Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-13-Updated.pdf PDF
CDRL_A501_MMP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A601_SVTSP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A708_EACMP.pdf PDF
PAST_PERFORMANCE_DATA_SHEET_ITESS_FY18.doc DOC document
Attachment_4_Price_Proposal_ITESS_Revised.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A110_CMMP_REVISED.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination_No_2015-4341_Rev_8.pdf PDF
CDRL_A216_TR.pdf PDF
DD254.pdf PDF
PAST_PERFORMANCE_DATA_SHEET_ITESS.doc DOC document
PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_ITESS.doc DOC document
Attachment_J_5.pdf PDF
NON_DISCLOSURE_AGREEMENT_FOR_GOV_TECHNICAL_DATA.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J_2.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_J_11.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_12.doc DOC document
Attachment_J_8.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_6.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_J_10.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-14.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_4.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_13.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-15.doc DOC document
Attachment_J_7.pdf PDF
CDRL_A105_Contract_Management_Review_CMR_Minutes.pdf PDF
CDRL_A812_CMS.pdf PDF
CDRL_A102_Program_kick_off_Meeting_Minutes.pdf PDF
CDRL_A108_Performance_cost_report.pdf PDF
CDRL_A502_MCEL_OP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A112_Phase_In.pdf PDF
CDRL_A103_Contract_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A203_PSR.pdf PDF
CDRL_A104_Contract_Management_Review_CMR.pdf PDF
CDRL_A109_Quality_Assurance_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A601_SVTSP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A101_Program_kickoff_meeting.pdf PDF
CDRL_A113_Phase_Out_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A501_MMP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A801_SP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A110_Configuration_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A216_Travel_Request.pdf PDF
CDRL_A217_Trip_Report.pdf PDF
CDRL_A106_Contract_Statue_Report_CSR.pdf PDF
CDRL_A209_SEMP.pdf PDF
CDRL_A201_-_Project_Management_Review_(Agenda).pdf PDF
CDRL_A202_-_Project_Management_Review_(Minutes).pdf PDF
ITESS_Solicitation_N32205-18-R-1002.docx DOCX document
ITESS_Solicitation_N32205-18-R-1002_DRAFT.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO:

FACSIMILE:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (26 April 2018) to James D. Findlay. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, James D. Findlay

Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: James D. Findlay

471 C Street, Building SP-64 Contract Specialist

From:

(Name and Address of Organization)

(Point of Contact Name)

(Facsimile/Phone Number)

(E-mail Address)

To (Point of Contact Name)

James D. Findlay (Facsimile Number)

(757) 443-1190 (E-mail Address)

James.Findlay@Navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD:

DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1.

Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

MSC V1.1 (Solicitation N32205-18-R-1002)

File details come from the government source that posted it.