Attachment_2_QASP.pdf
PDF 426 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AIR-4-11 ATC JPALS SHIPBOARD INTEGRATION MAC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00421-18-R-0022
About this file
This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a multiple award contract to provide operational, technical, logistical and systems engineering support services to the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division. Key details include:
-
The contract involves services for programs such as the Joint Precision Approach and Landing System, unmanned aerial refueling, and the Common Automated Recovery System, with a period of performance of five one-year ordering periods.
-
Performance standards and acceptance quality limits are defined for requirements including system certification support, technical assistance, engineering services, provisioning support, and program support. Surveillance methods such as contractor performance reporting and quarterly quality assurance checklists are also outlined.
-
Incentives for acceptable contractor performance include eligibility for further task order awards based on ratings in areas like quality, schedule, cost control and business relations. Ratings will also determine the exercise of additional ordering periods or award terms.
Attachment 2- QASP
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00421-18-R-0022-0002-_RFP_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Response_to_Questions_1.pdf | ||
| N00421-18-R-0022-0001-_RFP_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_CDRLs.pdf | ||
| Attachment_P5_CPAQ_Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_Data_Transmittal_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_P3_PPIF.pdf | ||
| N00421-18-R-0022__ATC_MAC-RFP.pdf | ||
| Attachment_P4_CPAQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_Locator_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_OCI.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N00421-18-R-0022
Attachment 2
Source Selection Information 1 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for
Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems (JPALS), Unmanned and Automated
Aerial Refueling (AAR) Support, Common Automation Recovery System (U-CARS), and other various unmanned program support for the Air Traffic Control and Landing
Systems (ATC&LS) Division
1. Purpose
This QASP is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure the systematic Quality Asuurance
(QA) methods are used in the administration of the performance-based service order. The intent is to ensure that the
Contractor performs In Accordance With (IAW) the performance metrics and the Government receives the quality of services called for in the Task Order (TO).
This acquisition is to provide operational, technical, logistical and system engineering support in system certification; technical assistance; systems analysis and engineering; test and evaluation; installation and maintenance; hardware design; development and technical logistics support; configuration management; training support; equipment manufacturing; quality control and project management for the Naval Air Warfare Center
Aircraft Division (NAWCAD), ATC&LS Division (AD-4.11.7) in support of such ATC&LS efforts as JPALS, AAR, and U-CARS.
This performance-based Multiple Award Contract (MAC) and its subsequent TOs will consist of a Cost Plus Fixed
Fee (CPFF) Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for labor, Cost reimbursable CLINs for Other Direct Costs
(ODC), such as Material and Travel, and a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLIN for firm fixed price ordering. The anticipated Period of Performance (PoP) includes five one-year ordering periods. Commencing upon TO award, a properly executed QASP will assist the Government in achieving the objectives of this procurement.
2. Authority
Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Contract Section E–Inspection and Acceptance which provides for inspections and acceptance of the services and documentation called for in TOs. The QASP is to be executed by the Contracting Officer (KO) or a duly authorized representative.
3. Scope
To fully understand the roles and responsibilities of the parties, it is important to first define the distinction in terminology between Quality Control Plan and the QASP. The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions necessary to meet the quality standards set forth by the TO.
The QASP is put in place to provide Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the TO.
4. Government Resources
The following definitions for Government resources are applicable to this plan:
KO – A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into (Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)) or administer
(Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)) contracts and make related determination and findings on behalf of the
Government. The PCO for this contract is Mr. Frank Douglass, NAVAIR 2.5.1.4. The ACO will be designated in the resulting TO. KOs are designated via a written warrant, which sets forth limitations of authority.
Contracting Officers Representative (COR) – An individual appointed in writing by the PCO to act as their authorized representative to assist in administering the contract. The COR will be appointed in the resulting contract.
The limitations of authority are contained in a written letter of appointment.
Source Selection Information 2 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Alternate Contracting Officer’s Representative (ACOR) – An individual appointed in writing by the PCO to act as their authorized representative, in the absence of the COR, to assist in administering the contract. The ACOR will be appointed in the resulting TO. The limitations of authority are contained in a written letter of appointment.
Government Project Leads (GPL) – The COR designates an individual GPL to assist in administering of specific efforts under the contract.
5. Responsibilities
The following Government resources shall have responsibility for the implementation of this QASP:
KO – The KO ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the KO that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under the contract. The KO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
COR – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the KO for action.
ACOR – The ACOR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The ACOR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract price, terms or conditions shall be referred to the KO for action.
GPL – The GPL is responsible for assisting in administering of specific efforts under the contract. A GPL cannot, in any manner, alter the scope of the contract, make commitments or authorize any changes on the Government’s behalf.
6. Methods of Quality Assurance Surveillance
a. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) – The market place for technical and engineering services is very competitive. As such, the successful offeror has a vested interest in the
Government generated CPARS ratings under this contract. Additionally, the CPARS ratings will be the determinant in exercising an ordering period or award term. For this procurement the Government will address the quality of product or service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management, utilization of small business and other important areas. As this information may affect future source selections throughout DoD and the continuation of the TO, the annual Government assessment will be used appropriately as an additional performance oversight and communication tool with the QASP.
b. QASP – The below listed methods of surveillance will be used by the COR in the technical administration of this QASP. In addition to the below instructions, the form to be used for documentation of quality assurance surveillance is the Surveillance Activity Checklist (SAC).
7. Surveillance
Enclosures (1) and (2), and (3) set forth the performance standards and incentives for the Contractor and COR while enclosure (3) provides the SAC and means for the COR to document the results of the surveillance. Enclosure (3) will be provided to the KO on a quarterly basis.
8. Documentation
In addition to providing quarterly reports to the KO, the COR will maintain a complete QA file. The file will contain copies of all reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any actions related to the Government’s performance of the
QA function, including the originals of the QA Checklists. All such records will be maintained for the life of the TO.
The COR shall forward these records to the KO at termination or completion of the order.
Source Selection Information 3 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
9. Enclosures
Enclosure (1) – Performance-Based Standards
Enclosure (2) – Incentives
Enclosure (3) – Surveillance Activity Checklist
Source Selection Information 4 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE
ONLY
See FAR 3.104 and 2.101
ENCLOSURE 1 – PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARDS
Required Service (Performance
Requirements)
Standard (Performance Standards)/ Maximum Allowable Degree of
Deviation Requirement (AQL)
Method of Surveillance
(QA)
Incentives
Provide System Certification
Services IAW PWS Para 3.1.1.
The contractor shall provide system certification support for certification and verification tests on fielded equipment at shore stations. If any existing certification and verification procedures are outdated because of hardware or software changes, the contractor shall provide recommended changes to the certification and verification procedures IAW PWS Para 3.1.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide System Certification
Services IAW PWS Para 3.1.2.
The contractor shall provide system certification support for certification and verification tests on Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) modifications to fielded equipment at shore stations. If any certification and verification procedures are outdated because of hardware and software changes, the contractor shall provide recommended changes to the certification and verification procedures IAW PWS Para 3.1.2 Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Technical Support
Services IAW PWS Para 3.2.1.
The contractor shall provide engineering and technical services for maintenance testing of fielded equipment and monitor, track, and report any unresolved deficiencies. Contractor shall respond to technical assistance requests on fielded equipment and provide technical services IAW PWS
Para 3.2.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Technical Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.2.2.
The contractor shall provide production engineering and technical services for test and evaluation of modifications to fielded equipment and monitor, track, and report any unresolved deficiencies. Contractor shall respond to technical assistance requests on modified fielded equipment and provide technical services in support of ECP efforts IAW PWS Para 3.2.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Provisioning Support
IAW PWS Para 3.3.1.a-e
The contractor shall provide provisioning support including translating technical requirements and program constraints for inputs into acquisition documentation, ordering, maintaining status accounting, receiving provisioning items, controlling inventory, and distributing equipment IAW PWS Para 3.3.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Supply Support Services
IAW PWS Para 3.3.2.a-e
The contractor shall provide provisioning support including translating technical requirements and program constraints for inputs into acquisition documentation, ordering, maintaining status accounting, receiving provisioning items, controlling inventory, and distributing equipment IAW
PWS Para 3.3.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Supply Support Services
IAW PWS Para 3.3.3.a-e
The contractor shall provide provisioning support including translating technical requirements and program constraints for inputs into acquisition documentation, ordering, maintaining status accounting, receiving provisioning items, controlling inventory, and distributing equipment IAW
PWS Para 3.3.3. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Supply Support Services
IAW PWS Para 3.3.4.a-e
The contractor shall provide provisioning support including translating technical requirements and program constraints for inputs into acquisition documentation, ordering, maintaining status accounting, receiving provisioning items, controlling inventory, and distributing equipment IAW
PWS Para 3.3.4. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Engineering
Services IAW PWS Para 3.4.1.a-h
The contractor shall provide production engineering, integrated logistics support, and technical support for the improvement of production items
IAW PWS Para 3.4.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Engineering
Services IAW PWS Para 3.4.2.a-h
The contractor shall provide engineering, logistic, and technical support for the improvement of modifications to existing systems IAW PWS Para
3.4.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Source Selection Information 5 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Standard (Performance Standards)/ Maximum Allowable Degree of
Deviation Requirement (AQL)
Method of Surveillance
(Quality Assurance)
Incentives
Provide Systems Upgrades &
Development Support IAW PWS
Para 3.5.1.a-f
The contractor shall provide engineering, integrated logistics support, and technical support for system upgrades IAW PWS Para 3.5.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Upgrades &
Development Support IAW PWS Para 3.5.2.a-f
The contractor shall provide engineering, logistic, and technical support for the development of new systems IAW PWS Para 3.5.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Upgrades &
Development Support IAW PWS Para 3.5.3.a-e
The contractor shall provide engineering and technical services in support of testing and evaluation of new SCN equipment IAW PWS Para 3.5.3.
Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Test and Evaluation IAW PWS Para 3.6.1.
a-e
The contractor shall provide engineering and technical services in support of testing and evaluation of equipment under production systems IAW PWS Para 3.6.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Test and
Evaluation IAW PWS Para 3.6.2.
a-e
The contractor shall provide engineering and technical services in support of testing and evaluating new systems IAW PWS Para 3.6.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Systems Test and Evaluation IAW PWS Para 3.6.3.
a-h
The contractor shall make recommendations related to the design and development of new SCN requirements. The contractor shall document, test, fabricate, and install operational hardware IAW PWS Para 3.6.3.
Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Hardware Support
Services IAW PWS Para 3.7.1.a-i
The contractor shall recommend, design and develop in support of ECPs, test, fabricate or assemble, install, and document field changes and modifications to operational hardware IAW PWS Para 3.7.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Services IAW PWS Para 3.7.2.a-i
The contractor shall recommend, design, develop, test, prototype, and document field changes and upgrades to operational hardware IAW PWS
Para 3.7.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Production Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.8.1.a-c
The contractor shall fabricate upgrades for systems IAW PWS Para 3.8.1.
Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Services IAW PWS Para 3.8.2.a-c
The contractor shall design system upgrades IAW PWS Para 3.8.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Repair and Retrofit
Program Support IAW PWS Para 3.9.1.a-d
The contractor shall overhaul and repair equipment in accordance with system specifications and overhaul procedures IAW PWS Para 3.9.1 Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Overhaul and Repair
Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.9.2.a-c
The contractor shall repair equipment in accordance with system specifications and procedures IAW PWS Para 3.9.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Program Support
Services IAW PWS Para 3.10.1
The contractor shall collect, consolidate, and summarize information such as historical summaries, current project status and project milestones to prepare briefing and presentation material for various program reviews.IAW PWS Para 3.10.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, Source Selection Information 6 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Standard (Performance Standards)/ Maximum Allowable Degree of
Deviation Requirement (AQL)
Method of Surveillance
(Quality Assurance)
Incentives
Provide Program Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.10.2
The contractor shall collect, consolidate, and summarize information such as historical summaries, current project status and project milestones to prepare briefing and presentation material for various program reviews
IAW PWS Para 3.10.2. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Program Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.10.3
The contractor shall collect, consolidate, and summarize information such as historical summaries, current project status and project milestones to prepare briefing and presentation material for various program reviews.IAW PWS Para 3.10.3. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Program Support Services IAW PWS Para 3.10.4
The contractor shall collect, consolidate, and summarize information such as historical summaries, current project status and project milestones to prepare briefing and presentation material for various program reviews.IAW PWS Para 3.10.4. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, ACOR, and/or GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Provide Program Support
Services IAW PWS Para 3.10.1
The contractor shall collect, consolidate, and summarize information such as historical summaries, current project status and project milestones to prepare briefing and presentation material for various program reviews.IAW PWS Para 3.10.1. Based upon feedback from the GPL, the services provided are deemed comprehensive, timely and technically acceptable.
100% Inspection by COR, Source Selection Information 7 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Description Standard AQL Surveillance/
Method/Measure Incentives
Trip Report A001
Submission is in
Contractor Format as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Inventory List Report
A002
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Supply Order Status
Accounting Report
A003
Submission is in
Contractor Format as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Receivables
A004 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Shipping Accounting
Report A005 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2.
Recommendations
Report A006 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Engineering and
Technical Services
Accomplishments
Report (Engineering
Report) A007
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Installation Control
Drawings (ICD’s and
Revisions) A008
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Provisioning Parts
List Index A009 accordance with the
DID cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Supplemental Data for Provisioning
(Provisioning
Technical
Documentation)
A010
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Configuration Status
Accounting Report
(Configuration
Drawings) A011
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Source Selection Information 8 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/Measure Incentives
System Operation
Verification Testing
(SOVT) A012
as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Training Systems
Plan A013
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Integrated Logistics
Support Plan A014
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Logistics
Management
Information
Summaries (User
Logistics Support
Summaries) A015
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance
Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index
Pages and Associated
Documentation
(Maintenance Plan)
A016
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Life Cycle
Documentation A017 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance
Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index
Pages and Associated
Documentation
(Preventative
Maintenance/System
Maintenance
Requirement Cards
(MRC)) A018
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Source Selection Information 9 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/Measure Incentives
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance
Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index
Pages and Associated
Documentation
(Preventative
Maintenance/System
Maintenance Index
Pages (MIP’s))
A019
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Test Plan/Test
Procedures
(Acceptance Test
Plans and
Procedures) A020
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Test Plan/Test
Procedures (Test
Plans and
Procedures) A021
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Test Procedures;
Preproduction, Acceptance (Test
Report) A022
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Systems Problem
Report A023
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Engineering
Drawings (Level
I/II/III Drawings)
A024
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Technical Manuals, Operation &
Maintenance
Instructions
(Technical Manual
Revisions) A025
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Evaluation Field
Change Report A026
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Source Selection Information 10 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/Measure Incentives
Fleet Metrics Report
A027 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Production Line of
Balance Status
(Production Program
Plan) A028
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Repair/Modification/
Overhaul Status
Report (Repair Status
Report)
A029
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Repair/Modification/
Overhaul Status
Report (Technical
Repair Standards)
A030
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Briefing and
Presentation Material
A031 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Funds Man Hour
Expenditure Report
(Funds Expenditure
Report) A032
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Government Project
Leads.
See Enclosure 2
Voucher
Reconciliation
Report A033 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Government Project
Leads.
See Enclosure 2
Funds Man Hour
Expenditure Report
(Time Expenditure
Report) A034
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Contractor’s
Progress, Status and
Management Report
A035
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Source Selection Information 11 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/Measure Incentives
Segregation of Costs
Report A036 and IAW the H-1
Clause as cited in the CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Material Tracking
Report A037 as cited in the
CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Operations Security
(OPSEC) Plan A038 with DID cited in the CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Non-disclosure
Agreement (NDA)
A039
Submission is IAW sponsor provided
NDA forms as cited in the CDRL.
95% of required deliverable provided on time. No more than 1 report per year may be inaccurate or require a rewrite.
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Software
Development Plan
A040
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
Submit only when required per individual Task order under this contract
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Configuration Status
Accounting
Information
(Configuration
Documentation)
A041
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
Submit only when required per individual Task order under this contract 100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
GPL.
See Enclosure 2
Version Description
Document
A042
Submission is IAW the DID cited in the
CDRL.
Submit only when required per individual Task order under this contract
100% Inspection by
COR, ACOR, and/or
Source Selection Information 12 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENCLOSURE 2 - INCENTIVES
The following incentives shall apply to performance under this order.
Assessment Period Acceptable Performance Definition How Measured Incentives
Ordering Period 1:
All measurement areas rated “Satisfactory” See below.
Midpoint of the assessment period
(6 month) evaluation using the CPARS format covering the previous 6 months.
(+) Meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.* (-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
Ordering Period 2:
All measurement areas rated “Satisfactory”
See below
Midpoint of the assessment period
(18 month) evaluation using the
CPARS format covering the previous 12 months.
(+) Meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
Ordering Period 3:
All measurement areas rated “Satisfactory”
See below.
Midpoint of the assessment period
(30 month) evaluation using the
CPARS format covering the previous 12 months.
(+) Meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
Ordering Period 4:
All measurement areas rated “Satisfactory”
See below.
Midpoint of the assessment period (30 month) evaluation using the
CPARS format covering the previous 12 months.
(+) Meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for further task order awards.*
Ordering Period 5:
All measurement areas rated “Satisfactory”
See below.
Midpoint of the assessment period (30 month) evaluation using the
CPARS format covering the previous 12 months.
(+) Meet the acceptable performance definition as a condition for Satisfactory or better CPARS rating.
(-) Does not meet the acceptable performance definition which will result in a Marginal or Unsatisfactory CPARS rating.
* The Government will not issue additional TOs unless all regulatory requirements are met and the
Contractor meets the acceptable performance definition.
All PWS/CDRL efforts will be assessed focusing on the following:
Quality of Product or Service – Assess the Contractor’s effort to transform operational needs and requirements into an integrated solution. Areas of focus may include the planning and management of program efforts, the quality of support provided throughout all phases of contract execution, the integration of program management specialties, management of interfaces, and the management of a totally integrated effort of all program management concerns to meet cost, performance, and schedule objectives. Assess how successfully the Contractor meets program quality.
Schedule – Assess the Contractor’s adherence to the required delivery schedule by assessing the
Contractor’s efforts during the assessment period that contribute to or effect the schedule variance. Also address significance of scheduled events (i.e., design reviews), discuss causes and assess the effectiveness of contractor corrective actions.
Cost Control – Assess the Contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. Is the Contractor experiencing cost growth or under run? If so, discuss the causes and contractor-proposed solutions for the cost overruns. For contracts where task or contract sizing is based upon contractor provided person-hour estimates, the relationship of these estimates to ultimate cost should be assessed. In addition, the extent to which the Contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources in each work effort should be assessed.
Business Relations – Assess the timelines, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the Contractor’s reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations and customer satisfaction.
Source Selection Information 13 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Management – Assess the Contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the Contractor met small/small disadvantage and women-owned business participation goals. Discuss the extent to which the Contractor discharges its responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identifies and applies resources required to meet schedule requirements; assigns responsibility for tasks/actions required by contract; communicates appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner. Assess the Contractor’s risk mitigation plans. If applicable, identify any other management areas that are unique to the contract.
Utilization of Small Business – Assess the Contractor’s success in utilizing and meeting small business goals/concerns.
Other areas – Assess additional evaluation areas unique to the contract or that cannot be captured elsewhere.
The evaluation ratings are as follows:
Performance-Based Evaluation: The Government will evaluate contractor performance based on their ability to complete work specified in the scope and PWS paragraphs 3.1 through 3.10. The Contractor shall be evaluated using the following ratings:
Exceptional Performance: Contractor’s performance of virtually all contract requirements consistently exceeds the acceptable standards and in addition provides numerous significant, tangible or intangible, benefits to the Government (e.g., improved quality, responsiveness, increased timeliness, or generally enhanced effectiveness of operations). The few areas for improvement are all minor. There are no recurring problems. Contractor’s management initiates effective corrective action whenever needed.
Very Good Performance: Contractor’s performance of most contract requirements is consistently above acceptable standards and provides significant tangible and intangible benefits to the Government (e.g., improved quality, responsiveness, increased timeliness or generally enhanced effectiveness of operations).
Although some areas require improvement, these areas are minor and are offset by better performance in other areas. Few, if any, recurring problems have been noted and the Contractor takes satisfactory corrective action.
Satisfactory Performance: Contractor’s performance of most contract requirements meets the acceptable standards with some tangible or intangible benefits to the Government (e.g., improved quality, responsiveness, increased timeliness, or generally enhanced effectiveness of operations). Although there are some areas of very good or excellent performance, these are more or less offset by unsatisfactory performance in other areas.
Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed reflect a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory Performance: Contractor’s performance of most contract requirements is inconsistent and frequently does not always meet acceptable standards. Quality, responsiveness and timeliness in many areas require attention and action. Corrective actions have not been taken or are ineffective.
Source Selection Information 14 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE
ONLY
See FAR 3.104 and 2.101
ENCLOSURE 3 - SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY CHECKLIST
Monthly COR Surveillance:
The COR will perform a monthly assessment of Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management and Other Areas as applicable utilizing the CPARS evaluation rating definitions listed in enclosure 2.
Description
Surveillance
Method/
Measure
Date
Planned
Date
Completed Quality Schedule
Cost
Control
Business
Relations Mgmt.
Util. of
Small
Bus.
Other
Systems Certification IAW PWS Para 3.1
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Technical Support IAW PWS Para 3.2
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Provisioning Suport
IAW PWS Para 3.3
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input TBD
Systems Engineering
IAW PWS Para 3.4
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Systems Upgrades and Development Support
IAW PWS Para 3.5
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Systems Test and
Evaluation IAW PWS Para 3.6
100% inspection by COR with GPL Monthly Input
TBD
Hardware and
Software Support IAW PWS Para 3.7
100% inspection by COR with GPL Monthly Input
TBD
Production Support
IAW PWS Para 3.8
100% inspection by COR with GPL Monthly Input
TBD
Repair and Retrofit
Program IAW PWS
Para 3.9
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Program Support IAW PWS Para 3.10
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Trip Report A001 100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Inventory List Report A002
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Supply Order Status
A003
Monthly Input
TBD
Receivables
A004
Monthly Input
TBD
Shipping Accounting
Report A005
Monthly Input
TBD
Recommendations Report A006
Monthly Input
TBD
Engineering and Technical Services
Accomplishments
Report (Engineering Report) A007
Monthly Input
TBD
Source Selection Information 15 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Description
Surveillance
Method/
Measure
Date
Planned
Date
Completed Quality Schedule
Cost
Control
Business
Relations Mgmt.
Util. of
Small
Bus.
Other
Installation Control
Drawings (ICD’s and Revisions) A008
Monthly Input
TBD
Provisioning Parts List Index A009
Monthly Input
TBD
Supplemental Data for
Provisioning (Provisioning
Technical
Documentation) A010
Monthly Input
TBD
Configuration Status
Accounting Report (Configuration
Drawings) A011
Monthly Input
TBD
System Operation
Verification Testing
(SOVT) A012
Monthly Input
TBD
Training Systems Plan
A013
Monthly Input
TBD
Integrated Logistics
Support Plan A014
Monthly Input
TBD
Logistics Management
Information
Summaries (User Logistics Support
Summaries) A015
Monthly Input
TBD
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index
Pages and Associated Documentation
(Maintenance Plan)
A016
Life Cycle
Documentation A017
Monthly Input
TBD
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance
Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index
Pages and Associated
Documentation
(Preventative Maintenance/System
Maintenance
Requirement Cards
(MRC)) A018
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Source Selection Information 16 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/
Measure
Date
Planned
Date
Completed Quality Schedule
Cost
Control
Business
Relations Mgmt.
Util. of
Small
Bus.
Other
Planned Maintenance
System Development of Maintenance
Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index Pages and Associated
Documentation
(Preventative Maintenance/System
Maintenance Index
Pages (MIP’s)) A019
Monthly Input
TBD
Test Plan/Test
Procedures (Acceptance Test Plans and Procedures) A020
Monthly Input TBD
Test Plan/Test Procedures (Test Plans and Procedures) A021
Monthly Input
TBD
Test Procedures;
Preproduction, Acceptance (Test Report) A022
Monthly Input
TBD
Systems Problem
Report A023
Monthly Input
TBD
Engineering Drawings
(Level I/II/III
Drawings) A024
Monthly Input
TBD
Technical Manuals, Operation & Maintenance
Instructions (Technical
Manual Revisions) A025
Monthly Input
TBD
Evaluation Field
Change Report A026
Monthly Input
TBD
Fleet Metrics Report
A027
Monthly Input
TBD
Production Line of
Balance Status (Production Program
Plan) A028
100% inspection by COR with GPL Monthly Input
TBD
Repair/Modification/O verhaul Status Report
(Repair Status Report)
A029
Monthly Input TBD
Repair/Modification/O verhaul Status Report
(Technical Repair Standards)
A030
Source Selection Information 17 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Method/
Measure
Date
Planned
Date
Completed Quality Schedule
Cost
Control
Business
Relations Mgmt.
Util. of
Small
Bus.
Other
Briefing and
Presentation Material A031
Monthly Input
TBD
Funds Man Hour Expenditure Report
(Funds Expenditure
Report) A032
Monthly Input
TBD
Voucher
Reconciliation Report A033
Monthly Input TBD
Funds Man Hour
Expenditure Report
(Time Expenditure Report) A034
Monthly Input
TBD
Contractor’s Progress, Status and
Management Report A035
Monthly Input TBD
Segregation of Costs
Report A036
Monthly Input
TBD
Material Tracking
Report A037
Monthly Input
TBD
Operations Security
(OPSEC) Plan A038
Monthly Input
TBD
Non-disclosure
Agreement (NDA)
A039
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Software Development
Plan A040
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Monthly Input
TBD
Configuration Status Accounting
Information
(Configuration Documentation)
A041
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Version Description Document
A042
100% inspection by COR with GPL
Source Selection Information 18 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Monthly Summary of Ratings:
Quality Schedule
Number of Exceptional ____ Number of Exceptional ____
Number of Very Good ____ Number of Very Good ____
Number of Satisfactory ____ Number of Satisfactory ____
Number of Marginal ____ Number of Marginal ____
Number of Unsatisfactory ____ Number of Unsatisfactory ____
Cost Control Business Relations
Number of Exceptional ____ Number of Exceptional ____
Number of Very Good ____ Number of Very Good ____
Number of Satisfactory ____ Number of Satisfactory ____
Management Other Areas
Number of Exceptional ____ Number of Exceptional ____
Number of Very Good ____ Number of Very Good ____
Number of Satisfactory ____ Number of Satisfactory ____
Source Selection Information 19 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Annual Surveillance:
The COR will perform an annual assessment of overall contract performance utilizing the evaluation rating definitions listed in Enclosure 2. This annual assessment will occur at the midpoint of each year following the award of the contract and cover the previous 12 months, except for the first year of the contract which will cover only the previous six months.
Description Surveillance Method/Measure Date Planned Date Completed Summary Rating/Results
Quality of Product or Service Review of Monthly Ratings. TBD
Schedule Review of Monthly Ratings. TBD
Cost Control Review of Monthly Ratings TBD
Business Relations Review of Monthly Ratings TBD
Management Review of Monthly Ratings TBD
Utilization of Small Business Review of Monthly Ratings TBD
Other Areas Review of Monthly Ratings TBD
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .