N0025318Q0079-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the information w ithin Clauses 52.212-2 and C.107.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0025318Q0079

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Mar-2018

CODE

NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER

ATTN: KIRSTEN NEWHARD

KIRSTEN.NEWHARD@NAVY.MIL

610 DOWELL STREET, BLDG 206

KEYPORT WA 98345

N00253 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0025318Q0079

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Offers will be evaluated on the basis of the lowest price, technically acceptable, past performance acceptable offer.

In order to be considered awardable, an offer must be rated “acceptable” in every non-price factor. Offers must meet the specifications in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments.

PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. Technical Acceptability:

The offer must be determined to be technically acceptable before further consideration will be given.

Product Information: Offerors must ensure that any product requirements called out for in the Statement of Work (SOW) are identified by manufacturer name and have the commercial literature to demonstrate the capabilities. In the technical proposal there must be a determination written by the offeror that the supplied material meets or exceeds the Government’s performance requirements as set forth in the SOW, RFQ, and any subsequent amendments.

Compliance/Exceptions: If product literature does not clearly demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the SOW, the offeror must submit a Compliance/Exception document that clearly explains how the proposed product meets the SOW requirements. On a separate sheet of paper state: whether the offer complies or does not comply with the specifications; identify any “exceptions” to the specifications;

and how the offered supplies/services differ from the applicable specification paragraph above. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in rejection of the offer.

2. Past Performance Acceptability:

The offer must be determined to have acceptable technical and past performance before further consideration will be given.

Offerors shall demonstrate past performance by completing the Past Performance Worksheet (See attachment 1) for three (3) of your most recently completed Federal Government contracts (not to exceed three years since completion) for like or similar items under this solicitation. If you do not have any Federal Government contracts, then list state, local, or commercial contracts, in that order, to complete your Past Performance Worksheet. Offerors are encouraged to submit brief and concise responses. Failure to submit the Past Performance Worksheet may be considered certification that the contractor has no past performance for like or similar items for the Government to evaluate.

3. Price - Offerors are required to submit prices for all line items.

EVALUATION INFORMATION:

1. Technical Acceptability:

Offers must meet or exceed the specifications in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments. The offer must be determined to be technically acceptable before further consideration will be given. The product information as specified in the proposal submittal requirements will be evaluated to determine if the proposed product(s) meets or exceeds the technical requirements as specified in the solicitation document.

Should the product information be insufficient to determine technical acceptability, the Government reserves the right to use other options such as internet research on company’s/companies’ website of products offered/proposed.

Technical will be assessed according to the following evaluation ratings and criteria format provided in the below Rating Table.

Technical Evaluation Rating Table

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2. Past Performance Acceptability:

The offeror’s past performance must be determined to be acceptable before further consideration will be given. Based on an analysis of the past performance record of the offeror, the Government must have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. If the offeror’s past performance record is unknown, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably, and will therefore be rated as acceptable. The past performance information will be evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable based on the degree to which the offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. Past performance references for efforts providing applicable experience relative to the solicitation requirements will be given greater consideration. The offeror shall provide a maximum of three (3) references. The Past Performance Worksheet, attachment 1, included in the solicitation may be used for providing information. Offerors shall include an accessible point of contact, including name and telephone number, for each reference provided.

The Government may contact some of each offeror’s customers to ask whether or not they believe: (1) that the offeror is capable, efficient and effective; (2) that the offeror’s performance conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract; (3) that the offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance; (4) that the offeror was committed to customer satisfaction; and (5) that the offeror was able to hire and retain qualified personnel necessary for successful completion of customer requirements. Additionally they may ask if given a chance would they select the same or a different Contractor and/or other questions related to the offeror’s ability in the areas outlined in this Factor.

The Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the offeror, such as published media and electronic databases. Only past performance that is relative to the specified item will be evaluated. It is the responsibility of the offeror to relate past performance to the specifications. Government evaluators may utilize federal, state, and local past performance databases including, but not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and DLA’s Mechanization of Contract Administration Services (MOCAS) system. The Government may research offeror performance on any federal, state, local, and commercial contract performance of the offeror that is known to the Government, but not included on the submitted Past Performance Worksheet, attachment 1; additionally, the personal experience and evaluator knowledge of offeror performance may be utilized.

The Government will consider the relevance of past performance information obtained in relation to the scope of this procurement. Past performance, either positive or negative, which is considered by the Government to be more closely related to the scope of this effort, will be given greater weight in the evaluation process.

Past Performance will be assessed according to the following evaluation ratings and criteria format provided in the below Rating Table.

Past Performance Evaluation Rating Table

Rating Description

Acceptable

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

3. Price: Offerors are required to submit prices for all line items. Failure to submit a price for any line item may result in the offer being rejected as unacceptable. The prices will be compared to the Government Estimate, other offers received and/or other independent price and cost information. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options(s). The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

C. 107 INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING EXPORT-CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA

An offeror may not receive export-controlled technical data, which are specified in this solicitation, unless it is a qualified U.S. contractor as defined in clause C.106. See clause C.106 for instructions on becoming a qualified U.S.

contractor. Questions about this program or DD Form 2345 should be addressed to U.S./Canada Joint Certification Office, Defense Logistics Information Services (DLIS), Federal Center, 74 Washington Avenue North, Battle Creek, MI 49017-3084; or telephone (616) 961-4358, toll free (800) 352-3572; or email jcp-admin@dlis.dla.mil.

If a contractor is requesting qualification, they must submit the request to DLIS within 7 days after the solicitation Amendment 0002 issue date with an email to kirsten.newhard@navy.mil stating they have requested qualification.

If it is determined necessary (and if time permits), an additional 7 days will be added to the closing date if any requests are received. An amendment to this effect will be issued, and if not issued, offerors shall assume no requests were received and the original closing date applies.

If an offeror is a qualified U.S. contractor and needs a copy of the restricted technical data, its appointed Data Custodian must be registered with DLIS (Defense Logistics Info Svc Joint Certification Program (JCP).

Registration instructions and Vendor Guide book can be found on the FedBizOpps homepage https://www.fbo.gov.

(End of Summary of Changes)