Attachment_4.doc

PAST PERFORMANCE (if Corporate Experience is a factor)

Past Performance – Neutral (if Corporate Experience is a factor) The proposal is rated Neutral. The offeror failed to demonstrate relevant past performance. As discussed under Corporate Experience, the offeror did not demonstrate performance under contracts or efforts, within the past [insert number of years indicated in solicitation] years, that is of similar scope, magnitude and complexity to that which is described in the solicitation. As the offeror did not demonstrate relevant past performance, points of contact (POCs) were not called. A review of the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) revealed [describe results of CPARS search]. A review of the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) revealed [describe results of PPIRS search].

Past Performance – Unacceptable (b) (if Corporate Experience is a factor)

The proposal fails to meet requirements of the solicitation; the quality of the offeror’s past performance is deficient to the extent that the level of performance risk associated with the proposal it is so significant that it is unlikely the proposal would result in satisfactory contract performance.

As discussed under Corporate Experience, the offeror demonstrated relevant past performance. However, the quality of the offeror’s past performance is substantially deficient.

The TEB [contacted or attempted to contact] all points of contact (POCs) provided by the offeror for relevant contracts/efforts. The following is the result of those contacts: [address each relevant contract/effort, listing contracts/efforts in same order as under Corporate Experience].

1. Under contract [identify contract number], the POC stated [describe quality of the offeror’s past performance as stated by the POC or describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the POC].

[If the evaluation of Past Performance considered information obtained from sources outside the proposal, explain source of information and address in the same manner as references provided in proposal.]

A review of the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) revealed [describe results of CPARS search]. A review of the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) revealed [describe results of PPIRS search].

[If some POCs provided positive references, discuss the positive references and provide justification as to why overall rating is unacceptable (b).] Past Performance – Unacceptable (a) (if Corporate Experience is a factor) The proposal is rated Unacceptable (a). The level of performance risk associated with the proposal is greater than the level normally expected from a competent offeror, but that risk may be reduced through further explanation of past performance problems,.

As discussed under Corporate Experience, the offeror demonstrated relevant past performance. However, the quality of the offeror’s past performance is deficient.

The TEB [contacted or attempted to contact] all points of contact (POCs) provided by the offeror for relevant contracts/efforts. The following is the result of those contacts: [address each relevant contract/effort, listing contracts in same order as under Corporate Experience].

1. Under contract [identify contract number], the POC stated [describe quality of the offeror’s past performance as stated by the POC or describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the POC].

[If the evaluation of Past Performance considered information obtained from sources outside the proposal, explain source of information and address in the same manner as references provided in proposal.]

A review of the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) revealed [describe results of CPARS search]. A review of the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) revealed [describe results of PPIRS search].

[If some POCs provided positive references, discuss the positive references and provide justification as to why overall rating is unacceptable (a).] Past Performance – Acceptable (if Corporate Experience is a factor) The proposal is rated Acceptable. The proposal meets all the requirements of the solicitation with no deficiencies or affirmative exceptions to the solicitation requirements. A good probability of success in contract performance is demonstrated as the level of performance risk associated with the proposal is no more than the level expected from a competent offeror.

As discussed under Corporate Experience, the offeror demonstrated relevant past performance.

The TEB [contacted or attempted to contact] all points of contact (POCs) provided by the offeror for relevant contracts/efforts. The following is the result of those contacts: [address each relevant contract/effort, listing contracts in same order as under Corporate Experience].

1. Under contract [identify contract number], the POC stated [describe quality of the offeror’s past performance as stated by the POC or describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the POC].

[If the evaluation of Past Performance considered information obtained from sources outside the proposal, explain source of information and address in the same manner as references provided in proposal.]

A review of the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) revealed [describe results of CPARS search]. A review of the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) revealed [describe results of PPIRS search].

[If applicable, add: “While the quality of the offeror’s past performance is excellent, the Past Performance rating is Acceptable rather than Highly Acceptable due to a lesser degree of relevance of the contracts/efforts as discussed under Corporate Experience.”]

Past Performance – Highly Acceptable (if Corporate Experience is a factor) The proposal is rated Highly Acceptable. The proposal meets and exceeds the requirements for an acceptable rating; a high probability of success in contract performance is demonstrated as the level of performance risk associated with the proposal is substantially less than the level expected from a competent offeror.

As discussed under Corporate Experience, the offeror demonstrated relevant past performance.

The TEB [contacted or attempted to contact] all points of contact (POCs) provided by the offeror for relevant contracts/efforts. The following is the result of those contacts: [address each relevant contract/effort, listing contracts in same order as under Corporate Experience].

1. Under contract [identify contract number], the POC stated [describe quality of the offeror’s past performance as stated by the POC or describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the POC].

[If the evaluation of Past Performance considered information obtained from sources outside the proposal, explain source of information and address in the same manner as references provided in proposal.]

A review of the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) revealed [describe results of CPARS search]. A review of the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) revealed [describe results of PPIRS search].

The proposal otherwise meets all the requirements of the solicitation with no deficiencies or affirmative exceptions to the solicitation requirements.