DRAFT N00024-20-R-5500 2019-12-13.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
FY21-25 AN/SPY-6 Radar Hardware Production
Solicitation number
N00024-20-R-5500
Issued by

About this file

This is a draft solicitation for the production and sustainment of AN/SPY-6 radar hardware from fiscal years 2021 through 2025. The Naval Sea Systems Command intends to award up to two fixed-price contracts, with one contractor as leader and one as challenger. The leader scope includes sustainment of fielded AN/SPY-6 systems. Key details include production of AN/SPY-6 variants for various ship classes. Sustainment is included for replacement of line replaceable units. Pricing uses target cost incentives. The period of performance spans five fiscal years. Responses are due by January 2020, with awards to follow. Offerors must have a secret facility clearance and be a U.S. company or subsidiary. The solicitation will be available electronically on the Naval Systems Engineering Resource Center website.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00024-20-R-5500 Q and A 2020-04-02.pdf PDF
Attachment J-01 - DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Question Submittal Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until local time

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 143 - 145

146 - 172

X H 173 - 186

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 186

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00024 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 47

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

48 - 94

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

96 - 98

99 - 105 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 106 - 110 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 111 - 113 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

114 - 140

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

141 - 142

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N0002420R5500

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

Each

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production - Leader Only

Over Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 5840

TARGET COST

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

CLIN 0001 STEPLADDER PRICING

STEPLADDER PRICING

STEPLADDER NAME ITEM NO FROM QUANTITY TO QUANTITY UNIT PRICE

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-

6(V)1)

0001 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00 4.00

1 Each

OPTION DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) Backfit

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit - Leader Only

Over Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION Second Source Qualification

Second Source Qualification (TRIMMs)

FOB: Origin (after Loading)

FFP

NET AMT

Second Source Qualification (DREX APCC)

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

OPTION Enhanced Data Rights in AN/SPY-6

FFP

Enhanced Data Rights in AN/SPY-6

1 Bundle

OPTION Provisioned Item Order (PIO)

FFP

Provisioned Item Order (PIO) - Leader Only - $125,000,000 EST

AN/SPY-6 Data Items

DATA for all base and option CLIN(s) (if exercised). Not Separately Priced (NSP)

Second Source Qualification (DREX DC)

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)1 FAQT and dPCA AMDR

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)1 First Article Qualification Testing (FAQT) and delta Physical

Configuration Audit (dPCA) AMDR Over

Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)2 FAQT and dPCA EASR Rotator

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)2 FAQT and dPCA EASR Rotator

Over Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)3 FAQT and dPCA Fixed Face

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)3 FAQT and dPCA EASR Fixed Face Over

Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)4 FAQT and dPCA AMDR Backfit

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)4 FAQT and dPCA AMDR Backfit

Over Target Share Ratio: 70/30 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

Second Source Qualification

12 Months

Engineering and Production Support

FFP

Engineering and Production Support (Challenger Only)

FOB: Origin (after Loading)

OPTION AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0020 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM

SUSTAINMENT

SEE NOTE B SEE NOTE B

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0021 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0022 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC

OPTION AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 0023 STEPLADDER PRICING

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC

OPTION DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1)

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production

Over Target Share Ratio: 60/40 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling:

120%

(See Section B Note A)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

1001 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1 Each

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator Production Over

Target Share Ratio: 60/40 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling: 120%

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

OPTION AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1003 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

1003 1.00 1.00

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 1004 STEPLADDER PRICING

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-

6(V)4)

1004 1.00 1.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Note B - Leader Only

CLIN 1023 STEPLADDER PRICING

OPTION DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production

(See Section B Notes A and D)

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

2001 1.00 1.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2002 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR Rotator (AN/SPY-

6(V)2)

2002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

4.00

5.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2003 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)3)

2003 1.00 1.00

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 2004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

2004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 2022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader

Only

CLIN 2023 STEPLADDER PRICING

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production

Over Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Under Target Share Ratio: 50/50 Ceiling:

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

3001 1.00 1.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3002 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)2)

3002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3003 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)3)

3003 1.00 1.00

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 3004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

3004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 3022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Section B Notes B and C - Leader

Only

CLIN 3023 STEPLADDER PRICING

FPI

DDG 51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1) AMDR Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4001 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)1)

4001 1.00 1.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)2 EASR Rotator Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4002 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)2)

4002 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

FPI

AN/SPY-6(V)3 EASR Fixed Face Production

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4003 STEPLADDER PRICING

EASR 3 Fixed(AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

4003 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

FPI

DDG 51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4) AMDR Backfit

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 4004 STEPLADDER PRICING

6(V)4)

4004 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

FFP

AN/SPY-6 TRIMM Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4020 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX FS Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4021 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX DC Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4022 STEPLADDER PRICING

FFP

AN/SPY-6 DREX APCC Sustainment - See Notes B and C - Leader Only

CLIN 4023 STEPLADDER PRICING

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-215-H002 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (excluding economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR

52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor.

Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid.

If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the

Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "Disputes" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor shall make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the

Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment if the

Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

(End of text)

B-227-H001 PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION – WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT

(NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For the purpose of paragraph (c) of the "Progress Payments" clause of this contract, if included, the requirement that the Contractor develop and deliver Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) is considered to be a "material requirement of this contract," and Contractor failure to make adequate progress in the development of PTD, or to deliver acceptable PTD on a timely basis, may result in reduction or suspension of Progress Payments as provided in said paragraph.

(b) The PTD is considered to be a part of the "Technical Data" specified to be delivered under this contract for the purposes of the "Technical Data--Withholding of Payment" (DFARS 252.227-7030) clause. The terms and conditions of the clause entitled "Limitation On Withholding of Payments (FAR 52.232-9), if included in this contract, shall not apply to withholding of payment for failure to make timely delivery of the PTD or delivery of deficient PTD.

(End of text)

NOTE A - OPTION EXERCISE

All Production CLINs 0001, 0004, 1001-1004, 2001-2004, 3001-3004, 4001-4004:

The Government will only award up to the maximum quantities combined between both the

Leader and Challenger of each variant as follows in Table A.1:

Table A.1 – Max Quantities

Variant CLINs BY OY1 OY2 OY3 OY4 Total

AN/SPY-6(V)1 X001 4 3 3 3 3 16

AN/SPY-6(V)2 X002 0 1 5 5 5 16

AN/SPY-6(V)3 X003 0 3 3 3 5 14

AN/SPY-6(V)4 X004 1 2 4 4 4 15

Note: “X” is 0 for base year (BY), and otherwise is the option year (i.e. for OY2, X=2)

Production CLINs 1001-1004:

Even number of units will be distributed equally between the Leader and Challenger for CLINs

1001-1004. After the equal distribution of even units, all odd units will be awarded to the

Leader.

Production CLINs 2001-2004, 3001-3004, and 4001-4004:

Even number of units will be distributed equally between the Leader and Challenger for CLINs

2001-2004, 3001-3004, and 4001-4004, in each ordering year, only if each contractor is meeting all contract requirements, including Section F deliveries, for at least one (1) previously awarded

N00024-20-R-5500 CLIN.

After the equal distribution of units, determination of award of any remaining unit will be based on total combined price of all exercised unit(s) per variant per year.

Option Exercise Example:

Assume exercise quantities are as follows: .

CLIN Total QTY Leader QTY Challenger QTY

DDG51 FLT III (AN/SPY-

6(V)1

3* 1 1

DDG51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-

6(V)4

3* 1 1

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-

6(V)3)

4** 2 2

*Odd unit for this AN/SPY-6(V) variant will be allocated between the Leader and Challenger based on total combined price. The even number of units within the total quantity will be distributed equally between the two awardees.

**Even number of units for this AN/SPY-6(V) variant will be distributed equally between the two awardees.

CLIN Total

QTY

Leader

Stepladder

Pricing

Challenger

Stepladder Pricing

DDG51 FLT III (AN/SPY-6(V)1 3 QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $16/EA

QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $18/EA

DDG51 FLT IIA (AN/SPY-6(V)4 3 QTY 1 - $20/EA

QTY 2 - $15/EA

QTY 1 - $23/EA

QTY 2 - $16/EA

EASR 3 Fixed (AN/SPY-6(V)3) 4 QTY 1 - $8/EA

QTY 2 - $6/EA

QTY 1 - $10/EA

QTY 2 - $8/EA

AN/SPY-6(V)1 Quantity Determination-–The award of one (1) unit to the Challenger and two (2) units to the Leader results in the lowest total price for the total FY quantity of three

(3) units.

AN/SPY-6(V)4 Quantity Determination- While the Leader has a lowest unit price for a quantity of two (2) the lowest total price for the total FY quantity of three (3) is the award of two (2) units to the Challenger and one (1) unit to the Leader.

AN/SPY-6(V)3 Quantity Determination- Both the Leader and Challenger are awarded a quantity of (2) for the AN/SPY-6(V)3 based on the equal division of the even number of units.

Although the Government intends to unilaterally exercise odd-numbered option unit(s) with either the Leader or the Challenger based upon the lowest option unit(s) target price established as a result of competitive solicitation N00024-20-R-5500; prior to the latest option exercise date, the Contracting Officer may issue a letter to the Contractors requesting submission of revised pricing. Revised pricing shall be submitted within 30 days of the issuance of the Contracting

Officer request. In the event of requested pricing revision(s):

a. Any revised target price shall not exceed the awarded target price of the applicable option(s); any revised ceiling price shall not exceed the awarded ceiling price of the applicable option(s).

b. The Navy will unilaterally modify Section B pricing using the Contractor provided revised pricing for the CLINs as applicable.

c. The Government intends to unilaterally exercise options in accordance with this Note utilizing the revised pricing. The exercise of any option unit is contingent upon congressional appropriation.

In the event either Leader or Challenger is not meeting all contract requirements, including

Section F deliveries, for at least (1) previously awarded production CLIN(s) 0001, 0004, 1001-

1004, 2001-2004, 3001-3004, and 4001-4004, limited to only those CLIN(s) with Section F deliveries within the past 450 calendar days, the above distribution methodology will not apply.

Instead, distribution of units will be based on the following:

Element 1: Total combined price of all exercised unit(s) per variant per year Element 2: The Contractors’ production and delivery history under this contract for each variant Element 3:The then-available production capacity of each Contractor

Element 1 is significantly more important than either Element 2 or 3. Elements 2 and 3 are approximately equal. As competing prices approach equality in Element 1, Elements 2 and 3 will increase in importance.

Second Source Qualification CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and 0016:

The Government may exercise Second Source Qualification CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and 0016 to just the Leader, just the Challenger, or both the Leader and the Challenger. In the event the

Government is to exercise any of CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and 0016 to just the Leader or just the Challenger, the Government will consider each contractor's second source qualification plan and price in addition to the option exercise criteria contained in FAR 17. In selecting between

Leader and Challenger, the Government is more concerned with development of a low risk second source at reasonable price than total price. However, as competing second source qualification plans approach technical parity, price increases in importance.

Although the Government intends to unilaterally exercise CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and 0016 based upon the price established as a result of competitive solicitation N00024-20-R-5500; prior to the latest option exercise date, the Contracting Officer may issue a letter to the Contractors requesting submission of revised pricing. Revised pricing shall be submitted 30 days of the issuance of the Contracting Officer request. In the event of requested pricing revision(s):

a. Any revised price shall not exceed the awarded price of CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and

0016;

b. The Navy will unilaterally modify Section B pricing using the Contractor provided revised pricing for CLINs 0006, 0007, 0011, and 0016 as applicable.

c. The Government intends to unilaterally exercise options in accordance with this Note utilizing the revised pricing. The exercise of any option unit is contingent upon congressional appropriation."

NOTE B - SUSTAINMENT QUANTITY

Table B.1 includes the stepladder quantity breaks and pricing per Sustainment CLIN up to the specified maximum RMA Line Replicable Unit (LRU) quantities provided in Table B.2.

Table B.1 –Sustainment RMA LRU Stepladder (Offeror to propose; Rows shall be added to the table for each stepladder break.)

BY OY1 OY2 OY3 OY4

From

Quantit y

To

Quantit y

Unit

Pric e

From

Quantit y

To

Quantit y

Unit

Pric e

From

Quantit y

To

Quantit y

Unit

Pric e

From

Quantit y

To

Quantit y

Unit

Price

From

Quantity

To

Quantity

Unit

Price

TRIM

s

CLIN

s

X020

DRE

X FS

CLIN

X021

X DC

CLIN

X022

X

APC

C

CLIN

X023

Table B.2 – Sustainment Maximum RMA LRU Quantities

BY OY1 OY2 OY3 OY4

TRIMMs

CLINs 0020, 1020, 2020, 3020, and 4020 151 314 833 1332 1854

DREX FS

CLINs 0021, 1021, 2021, 3021, and 4021 13 28 74 119 166

DREX DC

CLINs 0022, 1022, 2022, 3022, and 4022 31 66 174 279 388

DREX APCC

CLINs 0023, 1023, 2023, 3023, and 4023 11 22 60 96 133

For all Sustainment option CLINs with stepladder pricing, the Government may unilaterally exercise a given line item more than once prior to the latest option exercise date identified in clause FAR 52.217-7 (see Section I, below). Sustainment option CLINs with stepladder pricing may be exercised until the total quantity purchased equals the maximum quantity listed for that option CLIN in Section B. Any exercised option shall be in accordance with the latest drawing revision unless otherwise specified in the modification.

If any Sustainment option CLIN is exercised more than once within a 60 day period, the unit price shall be adjusted downward to reflect the appropriate stepladder unit price for the entire quantity purchased within that 60 day period. The following hypothetical example illustrates how pricing will be adjusted for option CLIN 1020 if the line item is unilaterally exercised more than once within a 60 day period:

CLIN 1020 Sample Stepladder Pricing:

OY1 QTY OY1 Unit Price

0-100 $175

101-200 $150

201-300 $125

301-314 $100

The first option exercise is for a quantity of 150. $22,500 is obligated to subline item

(SLIN) 1020AA to provide funds at a unit price of $150.

150 * $150 = $22,500 SLIN 1020AA Total Price

A second option exercise is for an additional quantity of 164, for a total quantity of 314 exercised within 60 days. $16,400 is obligated to SLIN 1020AB to provide funds to acquire an additional quantity of 164 at a unit price of $100.

164 * $100 = $16,400 SLIN 1020AB Total Price

In order to provide for a unit price of $100 for the total quantity of 314, the unit price for

SLIN 1020AA is adjusted from $150 to $100 and any excess funds are deobligated.

150 * $100 = $15,000 Adjusted SLIN 1020AA Total Price

$22,500 - $15,000 = $7,500 SLIN 1020AA deobligation

NOTE C - SUSTAINMENT METRICS

Prices for CLINs 2020-2023, 3020-3023, and 4020-4023 are based upon the Contractor achieving the total Contractor Response Time (CRT), Requisition Fill Rate (RFR), and

Maximum Contractor Fill Time (MaxCFT) requirements in Section C 3.4. If the Contractor performs below the CRT, RFR, and MaxCFT requirements, assessed independently for each metric, and within levels stated in Tables C.1, and C.2 below, downward price adjustments shall apply.

Calculation of the downward adjustment (i.e. Total Price Adjustment) to each RMA LRU CLIN price is provided below. This downward adjustment will be calculated annually. Total awarded

CLIN price will be based on the total awarded quantities within the requisition period for each

RMA LRU CLIN. The actual RMA LRU Demands are provided in the Sustainment Execution

Report (CDRL A060).

Table C.1

If CRT Achieved is: CRT Price Adjustment Factor

(per requisition period)

CRT≥0.9 0

0.9>CRT≥0.85 0.5 * (0.9 - CRT)

0.85>CRT≥0.8 0.6 * (0.85 - CRT) + 0.025

CRT<0.8 0.85 * (0.8 - CRT) + 0.055

CRT Price Adjustment = CRT Price Adjustment Factor * Total Awarded CLIN Price

Example:

Total Awarded CLIN Price = $750,000

CRT Achieved = 82%

CRT Price Adjustment Factor = 0.6 * (0.85 - 0.82) + 0.025 = 0.043

CRT Price Adjustment = 0.043 * $750,000 = $32,250

Note:

The CRT Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated CRT Price Adjustment.

Table C.2

If RFR Achieved is: RFR Price Adjustment Factor

(per performance period)

RFR≥0.9 0

0.9>RFR≥0.85 0.5 * (0.9 - RFR)

0.85>RFR≥0.8 0.6 * (0.85 - RFR) + 0.025

RFR<0.8 0.85 * (0.8 - RFR) + 0.055

RFR Price Adjustment = RFR Price Adjustment Factor * Total Awarded CLIN Price

RFR Achieved = 60%

RFR Price Adjustment Factor = 0.85 * (0.8 - 0.6) + 0.055 = 0.225

RFR Price Adjustment = 0.225 * $750,000 = $168,750

The RFR Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated RFR Price Adjustment.

To calculate Price Adjustment for MaxCFT, the calculation is as follows:

MaxCFT Price Adjustment = (# Actual RMA LRU Demands that exceed MaxCFT requirements

/ # LRU Quantities Placed in Requisitions) * (Total Awarded CLIN Price) * 0.5 + (# Actual

RMA LRU Demands that exceed 3*MaxCFT requirements / # LRU Quantities Placed in

Requisitions) * (Total Awarded CLIN Price) * 0.5

# LRU Quantities Placed in Requisitions = 200

# Actual RMA LRU Demands that exceed MaxCFT requirements: three (3) C1 CASREP RMA

LRUs at 17 Calendar Days, one (1) IPG 1 RMA LRU at 92 Calendar days

MaxCFT Price Adjustment = [((3+1)/200)*$750,000*0.5] + [((1)/200)*$750,000*0.5] = $9,375

The MaxCFT Price Adjustment is performed for each RMA LRU CLIN and is summed to determine the Aggregated MaxCFT Price Adjustment.

Total Price Adjustment = Aggregated CRT Price Adjustment + Aggregated RFR Price

Adjustment + Aggregated MaxCFT Price Adjustment

Example Total Price Adjustment: $32,250+ $168,750+ $9,375 = $210,375

New Total CLIN Price After Adjustment: $750,000 - $210,375=$539,625

NOTE D - PRODUCTION METRICS

Prices for CLINs 2001-2004, 3001-3004, and 4001-4004 are based upon the Contractor completing Section C scope and delivering Government-accepted equipment on time in accordance with Section F. If the Contractor does not complete Section C scope and deliver

Government-accepted equipment on time IAW Section F, the following adjustment will be made for each affected CLIN:

0-29 Days Late = No adjustment to CLIN

30-179 Days Late = The Government Share of the Above Target Ratio is reduced by 20

180+ Days Late = The Government Share of the Above Target Ratio is reduced by 50

For early deliveries of Government-accepted equipment IAW Section F, the following adjustment will be made for each affected CLIN:

0-29 Days Early = No adjustment to CLIN

30-59 Days Early = The Government Share of the Below Target Ratio is reduced by 10

60+ Days Early = The Government Share of the Below Target Ratio is reduced by 20 and the Government Share of Above Target Ratio is increased by 10

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

1 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required for production, assembly, inspection, testing, delivery and sustainment of AN/SPY-6(V) Radar Systems and supporting equipment.

This effort is to build AN/SPY-6(V) systems in accordance with the Technical Data Package

(TDP), provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI) and as referenced in Section J.

The efforts defined by this SOW are in support of Hardware Production and Sustainment.

1.1 Background

The scope of this effort is divided between two Contractor roles that may be awarded as two contracts by the Government: a “Leader” role and “Challenger” role. Each role is responsible for production, assembly, inspection, testing, and delivery of its assigned AN/SPY-6(V) quantities

(defined in Section B of the contract). The Leader additionally is responsible for RMA Line

Replaceable Units (LRUs) sustainment support of all fielded (post-delivery) AN/SPY-6(V) systems.

AN/SPY-6(V) is a Family of Radars (FoRs) which are designed to be scalable and adaptable across multiple ship classes and mission requirements.

Developed under the AMDR program, the AN/SPY-6(V)1 is the Navy’s next generation radar system that will address Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and Air Defense (AD) capability gaps identified in the Maritime Air and Missile Defense of Joint Forces (MAMDJF) Initial

Capabilities Document (ICD). The MAMDJF ICD was reviewed and validated by the Joint

Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) on 1 May 2006, culminating in the designation of the

Navy as the lead component. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and

Logistics (USD(AT&L)) directed the Navy to proceed with an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for MAMDJF on 16 June 2006. The Director of Program Analysis and Evaluation endorsed the radar portion (Phase I) of the AoA on 27 Oct 2008, finding the AoA sufficient. The AMDR

Capability Production Document (CPD) was approved by the JROC in March 2018. AN/SPY-

6(V)1 is an Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) radar providing sensitivity for long range detection and engagement of advanced threats. The AN/SPY-6(V)1 is currently planned to be deployed on the DDG 51 FLT III with four arrays each populated with 37 Radar Modular

Assemblies (RMAs).

A variant of the AN/SPY-6(V) is currently planned to replace the AN/SPY-1D(V) radar on existing DDG 51 FLT IIA ships. This variant includes four arrays each populated with 24

RMAs. The nomenclature has not yet been assigned, but the program anticipates it being designated as AN/SPY-6(V)4. The U.S. Navy is proceeding with the modernization of DDG 51

FLT IIA ships by replacing the existing AN/SPY-1D(V) with a scaled AN/SPY-6(V) radar to increase IAMD performance against raids of air and ballistic missile threats in adverse environments. The goal of this radar back fit is to significantly improve operational capability, while taking into account the constraints imposed by the existing FLT IIA hull (e.g., power, weight, and equipment space). The back fit of the scaled AN/SPY-6(V) will be installed during planned FLT IIA shipyard availabilities in order to minimize cost. The Navy plans to capitalize on the Aegis Weapons System Baseline 10 (BL10) and integrate with the AN/SPY-6(V)4.

Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (EASR) is two scaled variants of AN/SPY-6(V) for non-DDG platforms. Two array configurations will be fielded. The configurations are a single rotating array with 9 RMAs (AN/SPY-6(V)2) and three arrays each populated with 9 RMAs (AN/SPY-

6(V)3 and, notionally, AN/SPY-6(V)5). EASR is one sensor in a new sensor suite that is designed to meet the performance needs contained in the Battlespace Awareness ICD. The specific system performance requirements are documented in the Enterprise Radar Suite Naval

Capabilities Document (ERS NCD). EASR variants utilize AN/SPY-6(V) radar technology to meet the air surveillance requirements of multiple ship classes. AN/SPY-6(V)2 radars are planned to replace the AN/SPS-48 and AN/SPS-49 radars aboard CVN (Nimitz), Landing

Helicopter Assault (LHA) hulls, and Landing Platform/Dock (LPD) hulls with Ship Self-Defense

System (SSDS) ACB20. AN/SPY-6(V)3 replace Dual Band Radar (DBR) on CVN(Ford) class platforms and are the primary surveillance and fire control radars for FFG(X) class platforms with the Frigate Weapon System (FWS) (FFG(X) variants may become AN/SPY-6(V)5). The architecture for EASR is intended to drive a lower recurring cost by utilizing the same core technology for variants on multiple ship classes.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents of issue in effect on the execution date of the contract are applicable to this Statement of Work and attached appendices to the extent specified herein or as modified under the contract.

2.1 Mandatory Documents

The following documents form a basis for the work to be performed under this SOW:

a. Air and Missile Defense Radar External (Logical) Interface Requirements

Specification (IRS)

b. Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (Logical) Interface Requirements Specification

(IRS)

c. Department of Defense Security Classification Specification (DD-254), included as Attachment J-01.

d. Air and Missile Defense Radar Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E)

Interface Requirements Document, included as Attachment J-15.

e. Air and Missile Defense Radar Back Fit Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical

(HM&E) Interface Requirements Document, included as Attachment J-16.

f. Department of the Navy (DON) Chief Information Officer (CIO) Memorandum

02-10, Information Assurance Policy Update for Platform Information

Technology, dated 26 April 2010

g. DoD Instruction (DoDI) 8500.01 Cybersecurity, dated 13 March 2014

h. DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information

Technology (IT), dated 28 June 2017

i. NSTISSAM COMPUSEC/1-99, dated 11 March 1999

j. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Program Protection Plan (PPP), Tailored

Contract Version, included as Attachment J-17

k. MIL-STD-31000B – Technical Data Packages, dated 31 October 2018

l. IEEE 12207.2017 – Standard for Systems and Software Engineering - Software

Life Cycle Processes, dated 28 Sept 2017

m. MIL-STD-882E Safety, dated 11 May 2012

n. NAVSEA S9310-AQ-SAF-010, Technical Manual for Batteries, Navy Lithium

Safety Program and Procedures, dated 19 Aug 2004

o. NAVSEAINST 9310.1B, Naval Lithium Battery Safety Program, dated 13 Jun

p. MIL-HDBK-189C, Reliability Growth Management, dated 14 June 2011

q. GEIA-STD-0009 - Reliability Program Standard For Systems Design, Development And Manufacturing, dated 13 Nov 2008

r. ASQC Q9001-2008, Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance In-Depth, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing

s. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) included as Attachment J-11

t. Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan - Leader, included as Attachment

J-04

u. AN/SPY-6(V) Resource Distribution Table, included as Attachment J-05

v. Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan - Challenger, included as

Attachment J-09

w. AN/SPY-6(V) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), Tailored Contract Version, included as Attachment J-19

x. PEO IWS / Naval Sea Systems Command Research & System Engineering

Warfare System Engineering and Human Systems Integration Directorate

Technical Review Manual (TRM), Version 2, dated 18 December 2009

y. OPNAVINST 5100.24B, Navy System Safety Program Policy, dated 06 Feb 2007

z. NAVSEAINST 5100.12B, Requirements For Naval Sea Systems Command

System Safety Program For Ships, Shipborne Systems And Equipment, dated 03

Aug 2011

aa. Executive Order (EO) 12856, 03 Aug 1993

bb. Executive Order (EO) 13148, 21 April 2000

cc. National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411, dated July 1993

dd. SAE-GEIA-STD-0007B - Logistics Product Data, dated 01 May 2013

ee. MIL-STD-1472G, Change 1 – Human Engineering, dated 17 Jan 2019

ff. ASTM F1166-07(2013), Marine Systems, Equipment and Facilities, Human

Engineering Design for, dated 2013

gg. MIL-STD-130N, Change 1, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, dated 16 November 2012

hh. OPNAVINST 1500.57B, Surface Warfare Training Strategy, 26 September 2011

ii. ANSI/EIA-748, Earned Value Management ?Systems, dated 17 Aug 1999

jj. CSDR Manual DoD 5000.04, Change 1, dated 18 April 2018

kk. MIL-STD-881D – Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, dated

09 April 2018

ll. USD(AT&L) Memorandum, Use of Acquisition Program Transition Workshops, dated 01 April 2011

mm. NFPA70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2018 Edition.

nn. Technical Data Package (TDP), Attachment J-02

oo. MIL-STD-1568D - Materials And Processes for Corrosion Prevention And

Control In Aerospace Weapons Systems, date 31 Aug 2015

pp. Government Furnished Material List (Leader Only), attached as J-12

2.2 Guidance Publications

The following publications are available as guidance:

a. AN/SPY-6(V)1 System Requirements Document

b. AN/SPY-6(V)2&3 System Requirements Document

c. Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) Programmatic, Environmental, Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE) Plan

d. SAE-GEIA-HB-0007A: Handbook For GEIA-STD-0007- Logistic Product Data, dated 10 Feb 2014

e. PEO IWS 2.0 Risk Management Policy

f. Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy, NAVSEAINST 5000.8, dated 21 Jul

g. Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, Version 1.0, dated August 2006

h. DoD Directive 5200.39, Change 2, Critical Program Information (CPI)

Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and

Evaluation (RDT&E), 15 Oct 2018

i. NAVSEAINST 9400.2, Implementation of Naval Sea Systems Command

(NAVSEA) Afloat IA Governance and Guidance, dated 18 Aug 2010

j. MIL-DTL-901E – Shock Tests, H.I. (High-Impact) Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and Systems, Requirements for, dated 20 June 2017

k. MIL-HDBK-2155, Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action Taken, 11

Dec 1995

l. NAVSEAINST 8020.6E - Department of the Navy Weapon Systems Explosive

Safety Review Board, dated 11 March 2008

m. NAVSEA SW020-AH-SAF-010, Weapons System Safety Guidelines Handbook, 01 Feb 2006

n. DoDI 5000.02, Change 4, dated 31 Aug 2018

o. MIL-HDBK-217F-2 – Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, dated 28

Feb 1995

p. MIL-HDBK-472-1 – Maintainability Prediction, dated 12 Jan 1984

q. MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance, dated 07 Feb 2001

r. ANSI/EIA 649B, National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management, dated 01 Apr 2011

s. SAE-GEIA-HB-649A, Configuration Management Standard Implementation

Guide, 01 March 2016

t. PEO IWS 2.0 Above Water Sensors Configuration Management Plan/Procedures

u. NAVSEA A Program Manager’s Guide to the Application of Performance Based

Logistics (PBL), Revision A, dated 08 October 2008

v. Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD

(AT&L)) Corrosion and Prevention Control Planning Guidebook of September

w. DoD Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

Guidebook: A Guidebook of Best Practices for Implementing a Robust DMSMS

Management Program (SD-22A), 01 Jan 2016

x. DoN Automatic Identification Technology (AIT) Implementation Manual, dated

June 2006

y. RAMSC Plan

z. HP&S Configuration Management Process Document, attached as J-10

2.3 Precedence

In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in Section 2.1, Mandatory Documents, and Section 2.2, Guidance Publications, the documents in Section 2.1 shall take precedence.

3 Requirements

In the following subparagraphs of Section C paragraph 3, scope applies to both Leader and

Challenger contractors, unless denoted as “LEADER ONLY” or “CHALLENGER ONLY” in the subparagraph header. Subparagraph headers also denote which CLINs scope is included within.

3.1 General Requirements (CLINs 0001, 0004, 1001-1004, 2001-2004, 3001-3004, 4001-

4004)

3.1.1 Post Award Conference (CLIN 0001 only) (LEADER ONLY)

A post award conference shall take place at the contractor’s facility no later than 30 days after award of the contract. The purpose of this conference is to review the initial production plans.

The contractor shall deliver a conference Agenda (CDRL A010) no later than one week before the date of the post award conference. The contractor shall deliver Presentation Materials (CDRL

A011) and Meeting Minutes/Actions (CDRL A012) no later than one week after completion of the post award conference.

3.1.2 Technical Data Package

The Contractor shall support the maintenance of the Technical Data Package (TDP) (initial HW

Product Baseline included in Attachment J-2) in accordance with the configuration management processes in Section 3.1.6. The TDP will be maintained in the Government’s Product Data

Management (PDM) system during execution of this contract (description of this system is provided in Attachment J-10).

Any required updates to the TDP for producibility and obsolescence shall be accounted for underneath the AN/SPY-6(V) production CLINs. No further costs of design changes are authorized.

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver updates to the TDP sufficient to detail the as-built product baseline at a production level (Level 3) in accordance with MIL-STD-31000B. The

Contractors’ as-built TDP updates shall describe any and all subsequent changes to the baseline product including revisions up to the time of Government acceptance to reflect the final as-built configuration. The Contractors’ as-built TDP updates shall include any software products, including source code necessary for diagnostic and troubleshooting purposes and source code for any other software and firmware developed for the radar under this contract. The Contractor shall submit updates to the Contractors’ as-built TDP in accordance with CDRLs A001 through

A008:

A001 HW Interface Design Description (IDD)

A002 Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) Data File Exchange

A003 Interface Control Document (ICD)

A004 Logistics Product Data (LPD)

A005 Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

A006 Second Source Lowest Replacement Unit (LRU) Description Document

A007 Special Packaging Instructions

A008 Software and Firmware

3.1.3 Plan Execution

The Contractor shall generate, maintain, and execute the System Engineering Management Plan

(SEMP) (CDRL A009). The SEMP shall address all efforts within the HP&S contract. The

SEMP shall describe how a fully integrated production and sustainment effort will be managed and conducted. The Contractor shall generate, maintain, and execute the Risk Management Plan

(RMP) as part of the SEMP. The Contractor shall implement and maintain a risk management program in accordance with the approved RMP to identify and manage risks associated with achievement of the program’s technical (including performance), cost, and schedule requirements. Risks shall be reported to the Government during IPT/WG meetings as well as In-

Progress Reviews (IPRs). PEO IWS 2.0 Risk Management Policy, NAVSEAINST 5000.8

(Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy), and Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, Version 1.0, dated August 2006, are available as guidance.

The Contractor shall form Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and Working Groups (WGs) to support an integrated product development process. The Contractor shall generate the organizational structure and document it in the SEMP. The Government will assign representatives to participate in IPT/WG meetings as necessary. Government participation will be coordinated through the COR.

The Contractor shall attend IPT/WG meetings and Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs), and coordinate meetings with the Government. The Contractor shall post Presentation Materials

(CDRL A011) and Action Items (CDRL A012) on the Government IDE. The Contractor shall perform analysis and respond to Action Items resulting from IPT/WG meetings.

The Contractor shall participate in the following Government / Industry Teams established by the Government.

a) Radar/Ship Integration Working Group (RSIWG) is established to manage and maintain the interfaces with the Ship Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E) systems. The

RSIWG is anticipated to meet monthly in the Washington, DC area.

b) System Safety Working Group (SSWG) is established to study and manage system and software safety issues. The Government will identify an AMDR Principal For Safety

(PFS), who will co-chair the SSWG. The SSWG will also interface with the CMS PFS.

During this phase, the SSWG is anticipated to meet quarterly in the Washington, DC area.

c) Waterfront IPT is established to manage and resolve issues related to delivery and installation of equipment at HP&S delivery destinations. The Waterfront IPT is anticipated to meet monthly in the Washington, DC area.

d) Sustainment IPT is established to study and manage issues related to sustainment of

AN/SPY-6(V) systems, including cross-impacts from production status and decisions.

The Sustainment IPT is anticipated to meet monthly in the Washington, DC area.

These Government / Industry Teams will include members from Navy and other industry partners.

The Contractor shall generate and execute a Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP)

(CDRL A013) in accordance with the AMDR Program Protection Plan (PPP). DoDI 5000.02, DoDI 5200.39 and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Systems Engineering PPP Outline and Guidance Template are available as guidance. The PPIP shall cover production for both

Leader and Challenger as well as sustainment for the Leader.

The PPIP shall be prepared in order to ensure effective and efficient protection of essential program information, technologies and systems. The PPIP is derived from the PPP and will not only restate what is written in the PPP. The PPIP shall include:

a. Description of the security management structure;

b. Description of the Contractor’s Information Security Program (ISP) as a part of their

PPIP. As an integral part of the ISP, describe the Contractor and subcontractors procedures for identifying, reporting and resolution of Facility Security Breaches;

Classified Information Compromises, and Spillages including notification of DSS, DCMA, and Government Program Security Manager

c. Describe how the contractor’s Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security is addressed in the contractor’s facility and addressed in subcontracts and how incidents are addressed and reported to DSS / DCMA

d. Identification of CPI physical locations under the Contractor’s or Subcontractors’ control;

e. Assessment of the vulnerability of the CPI to intelligence collection in the following areas: Human Intelligence (HUMINT); Open Source Intelligence (OSINT); Signals

Intelligence (SIGINT); Imagery Intelligence (IMINT); Computer Network Operations

(CNO);

f. Identification of the countermeasures to be implemented at each site where CPI is held;

g. Special handling procedures required for CPI, and procedures for recovering CPI in the event of a mishap;

h. Identification of risk mitigation techniques to counter threats and counterfeit parts to the

Contractor’s supply chain; and

i. Procedures for ensuring compliance with U.S. Government export statutes and regulations.

The Contractor shall generate a Manufacturing Plan (CDRL A014). The Manufacturing Plan documents methods by which the design is to be built. The Manufacturing Plan contains sequence and schedule of events at contractor and subcontractor levels that define use of materials, fabrications flow, test equipment, tools, facilities, and personnel. It reflects consideration and incorporation of manufacturing requirements in the design process and includes identification and assessment of design facilities.

In addition, the Manufacturing Plan shall identify production metrics for the key subsystems.

Key subsystems include the Transmit/Receive channels and other array and Receiver/Exciter

LRUs of costs greater than 10% of the total system production cost per shipset.

The Contractor shall generate, implement and maintain a Hazardous Material Management

Program (HMMP) Plan (CDRL A015). The Contractor shall document that consideration has been given to eliminating and reducing the use of Hazardous Materials (HM) in processes and products consistent with the requirements of EO 12856, EO 13148 and NAS 411. The HMMP shall address requirements for hazardous materials and elimination, minimization, substitution and handling of hazardous materials and potentially hazardous materials. The HMMP shall describe the HM analysis that will be used to identify HM risks, the strategy for integrating HM considerations into the systems engineering process, HM responsibilities and the method for tracking progress of the HM analysis. The Contractor shall manage the selection, use, and disposal of hazardous materials so that the DoD incurs the lowest cost necessary to protect human health and the environment over the life cycle. The Contractor shall generate HMMP

Reports (CDRL A016) that identify the characteristics, quantity and location of all hazardous materials.

The Contractor shall generate, implement, maintain a QA Program that is integral to the overall production process. The Contactor shall generate a QA Program Plan (CDRL A017). The QA

Program shall be comprised of management, technical resources, plans, procedures, schedules and controls necessary to ensure conformance to contractual requirements. The QA Program shall address the requirements of ASQC Q9001-2008. The QA Program shall also address the software and firmware quality provisions of IEEE 12207. The software and firmware design, documentation and review process shall be in accordance with current standard business practices that represent the approved processes for the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) level

IV. For validation of 3D Model Data, MIL-STD-31000B, Appendix C, is available for guidance.

The Contractor shall generate and implement a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan (CDRL

A018) IAW MIL-STD-1568D and using the DoD Corrosion and Prevention Control Planning

Guidebook of September 2007 as guidance.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .