Master Plan and Rerating Analysis for Water Reclamation Facility.pdf

v.04.15.24

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

RFQ #354-UT27-12

Project Title: Master Plan & Rerating Analysis for the North Cary Water Reclamation Facility

Issue Date: September 30, 2026

Due Date: November 18, 2026, at 3pm ET

Issuing Department: Utilities

Direct all inquiries concerning this RFQ to:

Jamie Bissonnette, PE

Senior Project Manager

Email: jamie.bissonnette@carync.gov v.04.15.24

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Background

1.3 RFQ Timeline

1.4 Pre-Submittal Conference ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.5 Questions

1.6 Submittal Requirements and Contact Information

1.7 Rights to Submitted Material

1.8 Communications

1.9 Lobbying

1.10 Gifts and Favors

1.11 Proposer Expenses

1.12 Proposer Acceptance

2 QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE

2.1 Request for Qualifications Required Document Format

2.2 Hourly Rates

2.3 Qualifications Package Documents

3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

3.1 Evaluation Criteria

3.2 Final Selection

3.3 Notice to Proposers

4 SCOPE OF SERVICES

5 EXECUTION OF PROPOSAL

APPENDIX I

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX III …….…..………………………………………………...…………….………..19

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The Town of Cary (Cary) is seeking one or more qualified firm(s) with which to contract for the following services:

• Development of a master plan for the expansion of the North Cary Water Reclamation Facility, including a re-rating analysis to increase capacity from 12.0 to 15.0 million gallons per day (MGD).

A detailed scope of services is provided in Section 4 of this solicitation.

Information related to this solicitation, including any addenda, will be posted to the North Carolina electronic Vendor Portal (eVP) at https://evp.nc.gov/solicitations/.

1.2 Background

The North Cary Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) was originally constructed in 1984 with a design capacity of 4.0 MGD using an extended aeration process, discharging to Crabtree Creek. The facility was subsequently expanded in 1997 and again in 2005 to its current capacity of 12.0 MGD and upgraded to a Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) facility utilizing the Veolia–Kruger BioDenipho® Phased Isolation Ditch process to meet increasingly stringent nitrogen and phosphorus limits.

Figure 1- NCWRF Overall Picture https://evp.nc.gov/solicitations/

In 2002, the facility was further enhanced to produce and distribute reclaimed water for irrigation and other non-potable uses. Most recently, in 2021, the plant underwent significant process improvements, including conversion from mechanical brush rotor aerators to a fine bubble diffused aeration system and implementation of real-time nutrient analyzers integrated with the Veolia–Kruger BioDenipho® Superior Tuning and Control (STAC) system. These upgrades improved process control, increased energy efficiency, and optimized oxygen transfer, positioning the facility to better support biological nutrient removal and accommodate future increases in loading.

The BioDenipho® process is a phased isolation ditch BNR process that removes carbon (BOD), ammonia, nitrogen, and phosphorus by alternating two oxidation ditches between aerobic and anoxic conditions. Instead of having fixed aerobic and anoxic basins, the process changes the operating mode of each ditch on a timed or analyzer derived nutrient level (ammonia and nitrate) cycle, allowing each basin to perform multiple biological functions.

Wastewater treatment begins at the NCWRF controlled raw influent pump station located adjacent to Crabtree Creek. The influent is screened through a half- inch diameter bar screen before being pumped up to the plant The influent pump station is equipped with eight 200-horsepower (HP) centrifugal pumps, each rated at 5.0 MGD, providing a total capacity of 40.0 MGD and a firm capacity of 35.0 MGD. Raw influent is pumped to the plant’s headworks via two 20-inch diameter force mains and then flows by gravity through the remainder of the facility.

The headworks consists of two center flow quarter inch diameter band screens and a bypass channel containing a manual bar rack. From the influent screens, the wastewater flows through a dual train aerated grit and grease removal unit before moving to a distribution box that splits flow to the three BioDenipho® BNR Treatment Process Trains (Trains A, B and C). Each BNR train has a four-stage anaerobic selector, two oxidation ditches, a three-stage post anoxic zone and reaeration zone.

Figure 2- BNR Phasing Schematic

Each process train has its own secondary clarifier and return activated sludge (RAS) and waste activated sludge (WAS) pump station. Flow is conveyed to each clarifier via 30-inch piping for Trains A and B, with wall pumps to enhance flow, and a 36-inch pipe in Train C, which does not require a wall pump. Each Clarifier is 130-foot diameter with a side water depth of 14 feet. Each RAS and WAS pump station consists of two RAS pumps, and one WAS pump each equipped with variable frequency drives (VFD). Each RAS pump has a pumping capacity of 4.0 MGD. The plant typically operates the RAS pumps at an average return rate of approximately 55 percent of the influent flow. Each WAS pump is designed for a capacity of 500 gallons per minute.

WAS is thickened to 2.7-2.8% using a gravity belt thickener (GBT) and the thickened WAS is then stored in one of two 750,000-gallon aerated sludge holding tanks prior to being hauled to the South Cary Water Reclamation Facility for drying into a Class A Biosolids product. Under our current operational scheme, the solids reside in the holding tank for approximately 12-15 days before being hauled. This short detention time results in a minimal amount of biological nutrient and mass reduction within the holding tank. Biosolids are hauled using contracted trucks that can hold 6000 gallons with each load. Due to travel and loading and unloading time, one truck can generally haul 7 loads per day between 7 am and 5 pm. A typical hauling week would be 48-56 loads hauled by two trucks over four days, generally Monday through Thursday. A fifth day of hauling or additional trucks can be added if the loads need to exceed 56 per week. Biosolids can also be hauled to the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility for drying into Class A biosolids, but due to current storage capacity limitations, only 4-5 loads per day can be hauled and processed there.

Secondary effluent from the clarifiers flows by a common 42-inch gravity line to the continuous backwash up flow sand filters. The sand filters have twelve filter cells with four individual backwash risers per filter cell. Discharge from each filter cell flows over a

Figure 3- NCWRF Simplified Process Flow sharp crested weir into an effluent channel and is combined and routed to the effluent Parshall flume.

After flowing through the Parshall flume, the water is directed to one of two medium pressure ultra-violet (UV) systems for disinfection. Water from the UV system flows over a serpentine weir and down cascade steps which provides effluent aeration. Aerated effluent is conveyed to Crabtree Creek through a 36-inch pipe that eventually reduces to 30-inches.

One of the workshops proposed as part of this project will evaluate alternatives for expanding the grit and grease removal facility constructed in 1994. Wastewater enters a specially designed channel where the flow velocity is controlled to allow heavy inorganic materials such as sand, gravel, coffee grounds, and other dense particles (grit) to settle to the bottom. Mechanical collection equipment then moves the accumulated grit to a hopper or collection point where it is removed for washing and disposal. Removing grit protects downstream pumps, piping, and treatment equipment from excessive wear and abrasion.

At the same time, grease, oils, and other floatable materials are separated from wastewater. Air or hydraulic flow patterns create conditions that allow these lighter materials to rise to the surface while the heavier grit settles. Surface skimmers collect the floating grease and direct it to a trough for removal and disposal. By removing both grit and grease early in the treatment process, the plant improves operational efficiency and reduces maintenance requirements for downstream treatment facilities.

Figure 4- Existing Grit & Grease Removal Structure

The project includes preparation of a comprehensive 25-year master plan for the expansion of the NCWRF, emphasizing the strategic utilization of existing facilities and infrastructure to accommodate future growth and operational needs.

1.3 RFQ Timeline

Provided below is a list of the anticipated schedule of events related to this solicitation.

The Town of Cary reserves the right to modify and/or adjust this schedule to meet the needs of the project. All times shown are Eastern Time (ET):

1.4 Questions

Requests for clarification and questions to this RFQ must be received by the Town not later than the date shown above in Section 1.3, entitled “RFQ Timeline”, for the submittal of written inquires. The Town will not entertain any further questions after the due date.

All questions related to this solicitation must be submitted in writing (via email) to the following individual:

Contact Name Email Address

Jamie Bissonnette, Sr Project Manager Jamie.bissonnette@carync.gov

Indicate “RFQ #354-UT27-12– Questions” in the subject of the email. Questions submitted via telephone will not be answered.

The Town shall issue addenda reflecting questions and answers to this RFQ, if any, which shall be posted to the NC eVP website. No information, instruction or advice provided orally or informally by any Town personnel, whether made in response to a question or otherwise in connection with this RFQ, shall be considered authoritative or binding.

Respondents shall be entitled to rely only on written material contained in an Addendum to this RFQ.

It is important that all Respondents submitting to this RFQ periodically check the NC eVP website for any Addenda. It is the Respondent’s responsibility to ensure that all addenda have been reviewed and, if required, signed and returned.

1.5 Submittal Requirements and Contact Information

Electronic responses ONLY will be accepted through the NC eVP website. Interested parties must be logged in to submit proposals electronically. Registration information is available at NC Electronic Vendor Portal (eVP). Proposals must be clearly marked with name of the submitting company, the RFQ number and RFQ title (Your Company Name 354-UT27-12 RFQ Name).

Proposers must submit one (1) electronic version, submitted as a viewable and printable Adobe Portable Document File (PDF), on or before the submittal due date and time

RFQ Process Date and time

RFQ Advertisement Date September 30, 2026

Deadline for written questions October 28, 2026

Town Response to Questions (anticipated)

November 11, 2026

Submittal Due Date and Time November 18, 2026 at 3pm https://evp.nc.gov/solicitations/ https://evp.nc.gov/ provided in Section 1.3. Submissions that do not comply with the stated submission method will be deemed non-responsive.

Cary reserves the right to reject any or all proposals for any reason and to waive any informality it deems in its best interest. Any requirements in the RFQ that cannot be met must be indicated in the proposal. Proposers must respond to the entire Request for Qualifications (RFQ). An incomplete proposal may be eliminated from consideration at the discretion of Cary.

It is the responsibility of the Firm to ensure that their response arrives at the designated location specified in this Section by the due date and time specified in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline.

1.6 Rights to Submitted Material

All proposals and supporting materials, as well as correspondence relating to this RFQ, shall become the property of the Town. The content of all submittals will be held confidential until the selection of the firm is made. Proposals will be reviewed by the Evaluation Team, as well as other Town staff and members of the general public who submit public record requests. Any proprietary data must be clearly marked. In submitting a Proposal, each Prospective Proposer agrees that the Town may reveal any trade secret materials contained in such response to all Town staff and Town officials involved in the selection process and to any outside consultant or other third party who serves on the Evaluation Team or who is hired by the Town to assist in the selection process. Proposals marked entirely as “confidential”, “proprietary”, or “trade secret” will be considered non-responsive and will be removed from the evaluation process.

1.7 Communications

All communications of any nature regarding this RFQ with any Town staff, elected Town officials, evaluation committee members are strictly forbidden from the time the solicitation is publicly posted until award. Questions must be submitted in writing to the individual designated in Section 1.5 prior to the deadline provided in Section 1.3.

Violation of this provision may result in the Firm’s proposal being removed from consideration.

1.8 Lobbying

By responding to this solicitation, the Firm certifies that it has not and will not pay any person or firm to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of the Town or the State of North Carolina, or any elected official in connection with obtaining a contract as a result of this RFQ.

1.9 Gifts and Favors

Contractor shall become aware of and comply with laws related to gifts and favors, conflicts of interest and the like, including N.C.G.S. §14-234, N.C.G.S. §133-1, and N.C.G.S. §133-32

1.10 Proposer Expenses

The Town of Cary will not be responsible for any expenses incurred by any Firm in the development of a response to this Request for Qualifications or any other activities associated with this procurement including but not limited to any onsite (or otherwise) interviews and/or presentations, and/or supplemental information provided, submitted, or given to Town of Cary and/or its representatives. Further, the Town of Cary shall reserve the right to cancel the work described herein prior to issuance and acceptance of any contractual agreement/purchase order by the recommended Firm even if the awarding authority for each entity has formally accepted a recommendation.

1.11 Proposer Acceptance

Submission of any proposal indicates a Proposer’s acceptance of the conditions contained in this RFQ. The Town of Cary has the sole discretion and reserves the right to cancel this RFQ, and to reject any and all proposals, to waive any and all informalities and/or irregularities, if it is deemed to be in the Town’s best interests to do so. The Town of Cary reserves the right to accept or reject any or all of the items in the proposal, and to award the contract in whole or in part and/or negotiate any or all items with individual Firms if it is deemed in the Town of Cary’s best interest. Moreover, the Town of Cary reserves the right to make no selection if proposals are deemed not in the best interest of the Town of Cary.

2 QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE

Responses must follow the format outlined below. The Town may reject as non-responsive at its sole discretion any submittal that does not provide complete and/or adequate responses or departs in any substantial way from the required format.

2.1 Request for Qualifications Required Document Format

All responses shall be no longer than 40 total .pdf sheets.

Section 1: Cover Letter Provide an introduction letter summarizing the unique qualifications of your Firm to meet the needs of this project. This letter should be presented on the Firm’s official letterhead and signed by an authorized representative who has the authority to enter into a contract with the Town on behalf of the Firm. Include the name, title, address, telephone and email address of the individual who serves as the point of contact for this solicitation.

Section 2: Corporate Background and Experience Include background information on the Firm and provide detailed information regarding the Firm’s experience illustrating similar projects or work related to the technical aspects and processes described in the scope of work. Include sub-consultant (if any) capabilities as related to the scope of work. Cite specific projects of a similar nature to the Project described herein and list a reference with contact information for each project cited.

Section 3: Reference Projects Provide a list of all similar contracts performed in the past ten (10) years, accompanied by a minimum of three (3) references, including contact persons, firm, telephone number and email address (see Appendix I).

Include the total amount invoiced for each listed project, the length of the project, and list of personnel involved in the project who are also proposed for the subject project named in this solicitation. Failure to provide a list of all similar contracts in the specified period may result in the rejection of the Firm’s proposal. The evaluation team reserves the right to contact any or all listed references, and to contact other public entities regarding past performance on similar projects.

Section 4: Project Understanding, Approach and Schedule Provide a comprehensive narrative, outline, and/or graph demonstrating the Firm's understanding and approach to accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Scope of Work section of this RFQ. Include sufficient discussion of proposed methodologies, techniques, and procedures for each work item. Provide a breakdown and description of tasks assigned per project team member. Describe the hierarchy of project management. Provide suggestions for any additional services which may enhance the value and/or affect the overall economy and effectiveness of the Project. Include a proposed time schedule for completion of the key tasks in each phase and the method and person responsible to assure that the time schedule and the Town’s budget will be met.

Section 5: Team Firm, Experience and Certifications/Qualifications This section must include the proposed staffing, deployment, and firm of personnel to be assigned to this project. Identify the Project Manager for the firm who shall coordinate providing services under this Agreement. The Project Manager shall be the primary point of contact to initiate work under the Agreement with the necessary authority to execute agreements and negotiate compensation. Provide an Organizational Chart of the project team specifying the dedicated Project Manager, key personnel, and sub-consultants assigned to the team and the availability of backup personnel that will support this Project.

Include a brief summary identifying roles and responsibilities and general qualifications (i.e., professional registrations, certifications and/or licenses) of each team member (including sub-consultants) in disciplines appropriate to the Project, as well as education, availability to work on this Project, years of experience (with current firm and other firms).

Please do not list firm staff not directly working on the Project team. If more than one Project Manager or team is desired, please include this information and describe why this is necessary and how it is anticipated to work.

2.2 Hourly Rates

This solicitation is being issued in accordance with NCGS 143-64.31, otherwise known as the Mini-Brooks Act, and therefore price cannot and will not be a determining factor in the selection of the successful contractor. One copy of the hourly rates for all proposed project personnel should be uploaded as a separate file using the same naming format described in Section 1.6. Appendix II provides an example hourly rate schedule.

2.3 Qualifications Package Documents

This RFQ is comprised of the base RFQ document, any attachments, and any addenda released before Contract award. All attachments and addenda released for this RFQ in advance of any Contract award are incorporated herein by reference.

REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.

3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

3.1 Evaluation Criteria

This is not a bid. There will not be a public opening. Proposals will be evaluated based solely on the following criteria:

Criteria (a)

Weight (b)

Score (0-3)

(a) x (b) Weighted

Score

Corporate Background and Experience 20

Project Understanding 20

Project Approach 35

Team Firm, Experience, and Qualifications 25

Final Score

Score Points 0- Missing or Does Not Meet Expectation 2- Meets Expectation 1- Partially Meets Expectation 3- Exceeds Expectation

3.2 Final Selection

Proposals will be reviewed after opening and will be ranked in order of choice, at which point contract negotiations will begin with the most qualified firm. If negotiations are unsuccessful, the Town will then pursue negotiations with the next most qualified firm.

The Town shall not be bound or in any way obligated until both parties have executed a contract. The Town also reserves the right to delay the award of a contract or to not award a contract.

The general conditions and specifications of the RFQ, including the Contractor’s fee proposal, and/or written correspondence applicable to the RFQ, may become part of the contract documents. Failure of the awarded Contractor to perform as represented may result in contract cancellation.

3.3 Notice to Proposers

It shall be the Proposer’s responsibility to read the Instructions, all relevant exhibits and attachments, and any other components made a part of this RFQ, and to comply with all requirements and specifications provided herein. Proposers are responsible for obtaining and complying with all Addenda and other changes that may be issued in connection with this RFQ.

4 SCOPE OF SERVICES

Awarded Contractor shall provide services, all as set forth in this RFQ and more particularly described in this Section 4.

The Master Plan outlined for this RFQ is intended to be a minimum 25-year Master Planning exercise with buildout potential additionally indicated. The proposed Master Plan should align with Cary’s values for environmental protection, sustainable practices, and high-quality wastewater treatment services. It is suggested that prospective consultants review Section 8 of the Cary Community Plan for more information. Cary prefers innovative and sustainable solutions that conserve energy and minimize greenhouse gas emissions along with our traditional wastewater treatment parameters such as exceptional nutrient removal and providing high-quality treated water to the natural environment.

The project will include eight (8) primary tasks. Proposers shall confirm their ability to provide the scope of services for each task. The tasks are described below:

1. Data Collection and Review

• Compile and review available record drawings, specifications, design reports, and previous studies.

• Review historical influent/effluent flow data, loading conditions, and treatment performance.

• Evaluate current permit limits and regulatory requirements within the Neuse River Basin.

• Prepare a No-Alternative Analysis that evaluates the maximum practical use of existing facilities and demonstrates the need for expansion based on future flow projections, treatment requirements, operational reliability, and regulatory compliance.

2. Facility Capacity Evaluation

• Perform a comprehensive process evaluation of all treatment units, including:

o Influent pumping station o Headworks (flume, screening, grit and grease removal) o Flow equalization and EQ grit removal o Biological treatment (BNR processes) o Secondary clarification o Tertiary filtration, effluent flume, and UV disinfection system o Solids handling and residuals management o Chemical feed

• Assess hydraulic and process capacity of each unit to identify bottlenecks and limiting factors.

https://www.townofcary.org/home/showpublisheddocument/14049/636222755747570000

• Evaluate redundancy, reliability, and operational flexibility at higher flow conditions.

3. Hydraulic Modeling and Analysis

• Develop a hydraulic model of the facility.

• Evaluate peak flow conditions, including wet weather events and equalization impacts.

• Develop a hydraulic grade line (HGL) through all treatment processes at 15.0

MGD and peak flows.

4. Process Modeling and Performance Assessment

• Conduct process modeling (Bio Win, Sumo, or equivalent; verified to be acceptable modeling software per the EPA modeling toolbox) to evaluate treatment performance at 15.0 MGD.

• Assess nutrient removal capabilities (nitrogen and phosphorus) under increased loading conditions.

• Identify operational and capital improvements necessary to achieve each flow capacity (15.0 MGD)

5. Re-Rating Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis

• Evaluate the feasibility of increasing the facility’s rated capacity to 15.0 MGD

• Identify and assess potential alternatives to achieve re-rating, including:

o Operational modifications o Equipment upgrades and process optimizations o Implementation of new or emerging treatment technologies o Targeted capital improvements, if necessary

• Evaluate applicable new treatment technologies for compatibility with existing processes, regulatory compliance, and long-term operational efficiency.

• Leverage existing facilities to the maximum extent practicable, avoiding a complete demolition and replacement approach while identifying targeted improvements and expansions to meet future capacity and operational needs.

• Develop planning-level capital cost estimates for recommended improvements and alternatives necessary to expand and support treatment capacity from the current permitted capacity to 15.0 MGD over a 25-year planning horizon.

• Analyze and update the existing facility space plan map to allocate space to any infrastructure that would need to be added to reach a capacity of 15.0 MGD.

6. Technical Memorandum and Reporting

• Prepare a Re-Rating Technical Memorandum summarizing:

o Existing conditions and capacity evaluation o Hydraulic and process modeling results o Identified constraints and recommended capital improvements o Basis and recommended timing for re-rating to 15.0 MGD

• Include supporting calculations, modeling documentation, and exhibits.

7. Stakeholder Coordination and Meetings

• Conduct a formal project kickoff meeting with Cary staff to confirm project goals, scope, schedule, communication protocols, data needs, and key project milestones.

• Prepare meeting agendas, presentation materials, exhibits, and supporting documentation for all project meetings.

• Facilitate periodic progress meetings with Cary staff throughout the project to review completed work, discuss technical findings, identify project risks or challenges, and confirm upcoming activities and action items.

• Provide meeting summaries and action item logs following each meeting documenting key decisions, responsibilities, and follow-up items.

8. Workshops and Technical Coordination Sessions

A. Process Evaluation and Capacity Workshop o Review current plant performance, hydraulic and process limitations, and operational challenges.

o Evaluate all unit processes (to include the influent pump station) for treatment capacities and identify bottlenecks affecting plant capacity, reliability, redundancy, and future expansion potential.

o Discuss regulatory requirements, projected loading conditions, and operational goals influencing future facility planning.

o Evaluate biosolids wasting, thickening, storage, and hauling options to include onsite biosolids drying.

o Present preliminary process evaluation findings and obtain feedback from Cary staff and operations personnel.

B. Influent Pumping, Screening and Grit Removal Workshop o Review the performance and operational issues of all existing influent pump station equipment.

o Evaluate the impact of course screening and pumping equipment to meet normal and max daily flow requirements.

o Review the performance and operational issues associated with existing fine screening, grit removal, handling, washing, and disposal systems.

o Evaluate impacts of grit accumulation on downstream equipment, process efficiency, maintenance, and operational costs.

o Discuss potential improvements, replacement strategies, and technologies for pumping equipment, course and fine screening and enhanced grit removal and handling.

o Coordinate with operations staff to incorporate maintenance and operational considerations into recommendations.

C. Capital Projects Review Workshop o Review recently completed, ongoing, and planned capital improvement projects that may impact facility planning, process performance, hydraulic capacity, or future expansion.

o Coordinate project assumptions and recommendations with current Cary capital improvement initiatives to avoid conflicts and maximize long-term value.

o Identify opportunities to integrate future improvements with planned infrastructure upgrades and operational initiatives.

5 EXECUTION OF PROPOSAL

By submitting this proposal, the potential contractor certifies the following:

• This proposal is signed by an authorized representative of the Firm.

• The potential contractor has read and understands the conditions set forth in this RFQ to include any addenda and all attached exhibits and agrees to them with no exceptions.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

APPENDIX I

References

Offeror must supply at least (3) three Governmental Agency or Private Company references for which Engineering Master Plan / Rerating services have been performed during the past (10) ten years. Offerors are cautioned to provide accurate reference information. References will be checked during evaluation period.

OFFEROR:

CITY, STATE, ZIP:

Reference #1

Agency or Firm Name: __________________________________________________

Business Address _____________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: __________

Phone Number: (____) _______________ Fax Number: (____) _______________

Email Address: ________________________________________________________

Reference #2

Agency or Firm Name: __________________________________________________

Business Address _____________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: __________

Reference #3

Business Address _____________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: __________

Reference #4

Agency or Firm Name: __________________________________________________

Business Address _____________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: __________

Reference #5

Business Address _____________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip Code: __________

APPENDIX II

Hourly Rate Schedule

Awarded Contractor shall perform the services to be performed as set forth in this RFQ and more particularly described in Section 5 utilizing the following hourly rate schedule below.

Position Title Hourly Rate

Firm Name: ____________________________________________________________

Authorized Signature: _________________________________Date_______________

Signed by: _____________________________________________________________

[Type or Print Name]

Title of Signer: __________________________________________________________

APPENDIX III

Additional Materials:

North Cary Water Reclamation Facility

• NCWRF Loading Projections

• 1984 Original Plant Record Drawings

• 1995 Main Plant Expansion Record Drawings

• 1996 Influent PS Record Drawings

• 1997 Sludge Facilities Improvements Record Drawings

• 2019 Aeration Improvements Record Drawings

• January 2025 – Master Space Plan

Additional Material can be accessed electronically at the following location:

https://carync.box.com/s/phj6pwpdld4jvdtvsh67y67vbyha515h https://carync.box.com/s/phj6pwpdld4jvdtvsh67y67vbyha515h