Marathon Targets_JA (signed)(DQD).pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Marathon Targets
- Solicitation number
- H92239-23-Q-0006
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - J&A No.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - J&A No. Amendment Page of V1.3, 4 Dec 18 United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Justification and Approval (J&A) Document Template Type J&A: ( or ) Bridge Action: ( or ) Greater than 12 Months: ( or ) J&A No.
Generated when entered in log J&A No.
Amendment No.
This is an interactive form that will auto populate in accordance with the Authority, Office and Estimated Contract Cost. For the form to populate, you will need to input at a minimum of the following: 1) Authority 2) Bridge Action (Yes or No) 3) Greater than 12 Months (Yes or No) 4) Office (This will tell the form what approval levels of authority and document review to use) 5) Estimated Contract Cost (This will tell the form what review/ approval blocks to populate) The POC for this form is SOF ATL-KX @ jason.bufkin@socom.mil (813) 826-2811 and johnny.wong@socom.mil (813) 826-6552. For policy related questions, please contact Nicoele Karas @ nicoele.karas@socom.mil Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition
1. Agency and Contracting Activity: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(1))
2. Description of Action: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(2))
3. Description of Supplies/Services: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(3))
4. Authority Cited: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(4)) 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(1), Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, as implemented by FAR 6.302-1 (NOTE: For a non-competitive follow-on acquisition to a previous award for the same supply or service, supported by a justification for other than full and open competition citing the authority at FAR 6.302-1, follow the procedures at PGI 206.304(a)(S-70))
10 U.S.C 2304(c)(2), Unusual and Compelling Urgency, as implemented by FAR 6.302-2 (NOTE: Performance may not exceed 12 months unless approval by the HCA (see FAR 6.302-2(d)(1)-(2). HCA approval signature for the determination of exceptional circumstances will be done in block 16) 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(3), Industrial Mobilization; Engineering, Developmental, or Research Capability; or Expert Services, as implemented by FAR 6.302-3 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(4), International Agreement, as implemented by FAR 6.302-4 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(5), Authorized or Required by Statute, as implemented by FAR 6.302-5 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(6), National Security, as implemented by FAR 6.302-6 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(7), Public Interest, as implemented by FAR 6.302-7
5. Reason for Authority Cited: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(5))
6. Efforts/Actions to Increase Competition: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(6) & (11))
7. Market Research: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(8))
8. Other Authorities/Factors: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(9)) (If additional authority(ies) for “Other than full and open competition” applies to this J&A, or a secondary authority, identify the additional statutory authority(ies) permitting other than full and open competition, followed by the FAR citation title and FAR citation. If multiple secondary authorities apply, cite the applicability in order of precedence, i.e., 6.302-2 Unusual and Compelling Urgency then 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. Select from the list of seven options below and follow with a full explanation of the facts and circumstances applicable to each of the secondary authority(ies) cited.)
9. Interested Sources: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(10))
NOTICE 1
Prior to approval, J&As will be screened to identify proprietary data and information exempted from disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552, Freedom of Information Act, so that the final J&A may be prepared for required posting to FedBizOpps IAW Section 844 of NDAA 2009 as implemented via DPAP Memo, Public Disclosure of Justification and Approval Documents for Noncompetitive Contracts, dated 13 February 2009. J&As shall be posted to FedBizOpps within 14 days unless 10 U.S.C 2304(c)(2), Unusual and Compelling Urgency is cited. In that particular case the J&A will be posted within 30 days.
10. Technical and Requirements Certification: (FAR 6.303-2(c)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
a. If it does not require USSOCOM Agency Advocate for Competition (AAC) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.)
b. If the AAC or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent.
c. If the Senior Procurement Exectutive (SPE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.)
I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
11. Fair and Reasonable Cost Determination: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(7))
12. Contracting Officer Certification: (FAR 6.303-2(b)(12)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I hereby certify that this J&A is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Limited Sources Justification Under the General Service Administration Federal Supply Schedule Program
1. Agency and Contracting Activity: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(i))
2. Description of Action: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(ii))
3. Description of Supplies/Services: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(iii))
4. Authority Cited Permitting Limited Sources: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(1)(i)) (Identify the citation permitting limited sources. This section is normally the most detailed part of the justification. To assist you in preparing this justification, an introductory sentence for each of the FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i) circumstances for limiting sources are provided below.
5. Efforts/Actions to Increase Competition: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(viii))
6. Market Research: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(vi))
7. Interested Sources:
8. Other Facts Supporting the Justification: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(vii)) (If additional authority(ies) for “Other than full and open competition” applies to this J&A, or a secondary authority, identify the additional statutory authority(ies) permitting other than full and open competition, followed by the FAR citation title and FAR citation. If multiple secondary authorities apply, cite the applicability in order of precedence, i.e., 6.302-2 Unusual and Compelling Urgency then 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. Select from the list of seven options below and follow with a full explanation of the facts and circumstances applicable to each of the secondary authority(ies) cited.)
9. Technical and Requirements Certification: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(x)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
a. If it does not require USSOCOM Agency Advocate for Competition approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.)
b. If the AAC or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent.
c. If the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.)
I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
10. Fair and Reasonable Cost Determination: DFARS 216.505-70(d)(3))
11. Contracting Officer Certification: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(ix)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I hereby certify that this J&A is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Simplified Procedures for Sole Source Justification
1. Agency and Contracting Activity:
2. Description of Supplies/Services:
3. Authority Cited:
FAR 13.106-1(b)(1):
4. Reason for Authority Cited:
5. Technical and Requirements Certification:
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
6. Contracting Officer Certification:
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I hereby certify that this J&A is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items Sole Source Justification
1. Agency and Contracting Activity:
2. Description of Supplies/Services:
3. Authority Cited:
41 U.S.C. 1901 (or 41 U.S.C. 1903 for Special Emergency Procurement) as implemented by FAR Subpart 13.5:
4. Reason for Authority Cited:
5. Technical and Requirements Certification:
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
6. Contracting Officer Certification:
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I hereby certify that this J&A is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Fair Opportunity Exception
1. Agency and Contracting Activity: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(1))
2. Description of Action: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(3))
3. Description of Supplies/Services: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(2))
4. Authority Cited Permitting Fair Opportunity Exception and Rationale: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(4))
5. Efforts/Actions to Increase Competition: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(7))
6. Market Research: (FAR 8.405-6(c)(2)(vi))
7. Interested Sources:
8. Other Facts Supporting the Justification: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(6)) (If additional authority(ies) for “Other than full and open competition” applies to this J&A, or a secondary authority, identify the additional statutory authority(ies) permitting other than full and open competition, followed by the FAR citation title and FAR citation. If multiple secondary authorities apply, cite the applicability in order of precedence, i.e., 6.302-2 Unusual and Compelling Urgency then 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. Select from the list of seven options below and follow with a full explanation of the facts and circumstances applicable to each of the secondary authority(ies) cited.)
9. Technical and Requirements Certification: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(9)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
(This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
a. If it does not require USSOCOM Agency Advocate for Competition approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.)
b. If the AAC or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent.
c. If the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.)
I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which are included in the justification are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
10. Fair and Reasonable Cost Determination: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(5))
11. Contracting Officer Certification: (FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(8)) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I hereby certify that this J&A is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
HCD/FCO Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
Legal Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A legally sufficient to support other than full and open competition:
SOF AT&L-KM/KX/KB Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
N01C/N01C-D Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
ACC Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
DOP Review: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
Procuring Activity Authority for Competition (PAAC) Approval: (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition:
Agency Advocate for Competition (ACC) Approval: (If over Procuring Activity Authority for Competition Authority (PAAC), [see SOFARS 5601-1 for your component's approval authorities], up to $13.5M. Note AAC must also sign above $13.5M. (SOFARS 5601-1) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
I have reviewed this document and find the J&A adequate to support other than full and open competition.
Head of Contracting Authority (HCA) Approval: Over $13.5M to $93M (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval: Over $93M or Bridging Action (any dollar value) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
HCA FAR 6.302-2 Approval: (Required when performance exceeds 12 months, regardless of contract amount) (This should be signed by a Requiring Activity Official (RAO) at a level commensurate with the ultimate approving authority:
| a. | If it does not require USSOCOM Competition Advocate General (CAG) approval, then an RAO commensurate with the Chief of the Contracting Office.) |
| b. | If the CAG or Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) must approve, then the RAO must be an 0-6 or equivalent. |
| c. | If the Acquisition Executive (AE) must approve, then the RAO must be at the level of Program Executive Officer, Director, Commander, Chief of Staff, or equivalent.) |
11.0.1.20130826.2.901444.899636
| JANumber: 23-3637 |
| AmendmentNumber: |
| CurrentPage: |
| PageCount: |
| Classified: |
| SaveBTN: |
| ClearFormBTN: |
| PrintButton1: |
| EmailSubmitButton1: |
| AuthorityList: FAR 8.405-6(b)(1)Brand Name |
| IndividualRB: |
| ClassRB: |
| AmendmentCB: 0 |
| BridgeYes: 0 |
| BridgeNo: 1 |
| Greaterthan12MoYes: 0 |
| Greaterthan12MoNo: 1 |
| GeneralFeedbackBTN: |
| GeneralFeedback: |
| OfficeList: USASOC |
| Project: Sage Eagle |
| Componet: 1st SFC/USASOC/SOCOM |
| EstimatedCost: 62068.00000000 |
| ClassifiedCB: 0 |
| Section1SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section1AgencyText: HQ, USASOC, Contracting Office |
Fort Bragg, NC 28310
Section1CActivityText: (Specify the contracting activity responsible for this action, including complete address(es).)
| Section1SFFeedbackText: |
| Section2SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section2Text: The Requiring Activity (RA) has a need to purchase replacement new parts for the Marathon Target Systems (Autonomous Robots) that are currently in use for Live Fire Training. This target is mobile and responds similarly to a human in combat conditions. These components will be utilized during extensive training exercises at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas With these replacement parts, the RA will be able to replicate live fire action using the Marathon Target Systems that are already in their possession. The objective of this procurement is to acquire the necessary parts to repair and make the targets entirely operational for the May 2023 training exercise. There are no services required for this supply order. |
| Section2SFFeedbackText: |
| Section3SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section3Text: The RA is requesting replacement parts as listed: |
Manufacturer: Marathon Targets Manufacturer Part Number 2263-- Laser Scanner 4 EA Manufacturer Part Number 3566-- Hit-sensor Module 5 EA Manufacturer Part Number 2406-- Anchor nuts 100 EA Manufacturer Part Number 2514 --Anchor bolts 100 EA Manufacturer Part Number 3777-- Thermal Dummy Insert 12 EA Manufacturer Part Number 3426-- Internal GPS Cable 2EA Manufacturer Part Number 1537-- Outdoor Robot Wheel 4 EA Manufacturer Part Number 4180 -- Dummy Paint Detecting 8 EA Manufacturer Part Number 5117 --Trailer Mast- Pump Drain 1 EA Manufacturer Part Number 2671-- T-50 battery 2 EA
| Section3SFFeedbackText: |
| Section4SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section4SFFeedbackText: |
| Section5SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section5Text: (Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s), and include a discussion of the proposed contractors’ unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements. Note, only the one authority cited above may be addressed here, if more than one authority applies, cite and discuss the basis for use of them in Section 8, Other Facts.) |
(NOTE: Agencies shall request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances, otherwise FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, must be cited and justified in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(For guidance, the three authorities used most often are cited in the following general order of precedence: (1) FAR 6.302-6 - National Security; (2) FAR 6.302-2 - Unusual and Compelling Urgency; and (3) FAR 6.302-1 - Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. For example, if all three were to apply to a given procurement, FAR 6.302-6 - National Security would be cited here and the remaining two would be cited in order or precedence in Section 8, Other Facts.)
Section5Text: (a) Address why the proposed acquisition MUST be accomplished through a sole source solution, and why the authority in paragraph 4 applies. Provide a well-reasoned, detailed discussion of the rationale that will make it crystal clear to someone who has never heard of your organization or your requirement to substantiate why full and open competition cannot be used for this procurement. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s) and include a discussion of the proposed contractor's unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements.
| • | Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. |
| • | Describe the circumstances and considerations that result in the determination to utilize a sole source Contractor and discuss the unique qualifications of the proposed Contractor to provide the required supply or service. |
| • | Discuss why no other Contractor has or can be made to have the essential qualifications to meet the government’s requirements or specified delivery date. |
| • | If brand name, describe in detail why a particular brand name product or feature of a product peculiar to one manufacturer must be used and describe why another brand name cannot meet or cannot be modified to meet the requirement. |
| • | Explain why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available. Describe actions taken or planned to remedy this situation. |
| • | If applicable, include an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and not recouped through competition (can include actual or estimated set-up costs, transition costs, etc.), how the estimate was derived, and whether the original contract was competitively awarded. NOTE: The purpose for detailing duplicative costs is to provide a traceable basis for drawing the conclusion that the cost is so high that it would not be recouped through competition. |
If urgency is the determined basis:
| • | Factually establish the urgent need. What were the circumstances leading to the emergency? |
| • | Provide the required performance/delivery schedule, when the requirement was first known and address the lead-time involved; i.e. what is the time difference between using this authority as opposed sole source. |
| • | Explain the serious injury to the Government which would result if not permitted to limit to a sole source. |
| • | Address why other Contractors are unable to meet the Government’s requirements in a timely manner. |
| • | Address any other considerations |
Section5Text: (a) Address why the proposed acquisition MUST be accomplished through a sole source solution, and why the authority in paragraph 4 applies. Provide a well-reasoned, detailed discussion of the rationale that will make it crystal clear to someone who has never heard of your organization or your requirement to substantiate why full and open competition cannot be used for this procurement. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s) and include a discussion of the proposed contractor's unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements.
| • | Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. |
| • | Describe the circumstances and considerations that result in the determination to utilize a sole source Contractor and discuss the unique qualifications of the proposed Contractor to provide the required supply or service. |
| • | Discuss why no other Contractor has or can be made to have the essential qualifications to meet the government’s requirements or specified delivery date. |
| • | If brand name, describe in detail why a particular brand name product or feature of a product peculiar to one manufacturer must be used and describe why another brand name cannot meet or cannot be modified to meet the requirement. |
| • | Explain why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available. Describe actions taken or planned to remedy this situation. |
| • | If applicable, include an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and not recouped through competition (can include actual or estimated set-up costs, transition costs, etc.), how the estimate was derived, and whether the original contract was competitively awarded. NOTE: The purpose for detailing duplicative costs is to provide a traceable basis for drawing the conclusion that the cost is so high that it would not be recouped through competition. |
If urgency is the determined basis:
| • | Factually establish the urgent need. What were the circumstances leading to the emergency? |
| • | Provide the required performance/delivery schedule, when the requirement was first known and address the lead-time involved; i.e. what is the time difference between using this authority as opposed sole source. |
| • | Explain the serious injury to the Government which would result if not permitted to limit to a sole source. |
| • | Address why other Contractors are unable to meet the Government’s requirements in a timely manner. |
| • | Address any other considerations |
Section5_6_302-1: FAR 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source was cited based on extensive research and direct communication with the suggested vendor. During research, it was established that awarding a contract directly to Marathon Target INC. would save the government over $3,000 in total contract costs and expedite delivery due to the company's recent establishment of a new warehouse location in the United States.
Marathon Target is the sole manufacturer of presently owned requiring activities (RA) Autonomous Robotic Targets (ARTs), and Marathon Target owns all replacement parts. Since Marathon Target, Inc has a patent on the requested parts and in order to maintain the warranty on the RA's systems, the requested replacement parts must be manufactured by Marathon Target Inc.
Section5_6_302-1Bridge: (Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s), and include a discussion of the proposed contractors’ unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements. Note, only the one authority cited above may be addressed here, if more than one authority applies, cite and discuss the basis for use of them in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(If the authority FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, is cited for a follow-on acquisition, include the estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived. NOTE: The inability of more than one contractor to meet the required delivery schedule would be justified under this authority. NOTE: If the J&A is for a bridge action, explain the rationale for issuing a bridge action (e.g. protest, inadequate planning, emerging technology, etc…), and the rationale for the length of the bridge action.)
(NOTE: Agencies shall request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances, otherwise FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, must be cited and justified in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(For guidance, the three authorities used most often are cited in the following general order of precedence: (1) FAR 6.302-6 - National Security; (2) FAR 6.302-2 - Unusual and Compelling Urgency; and (3) FAR 6.302-1 - Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. For example, if all three were to apply to a given procurement, FAR 6.302-6 - National Security would be cited here and the remaining two would be cited in order or precedence in Section 8, Other Facts.)
Section5Text6_302-2: (Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s), and include a discussion of the proposed contractors’ unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements. Note, only the one authority cited above may be addressed here, if more than one authority applies, cite and discuss the basis for use of them in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(If the authority FAR 6.302-2, Unusual and Compelling Urgency, is cited, include the required delivery schedule and lead-time involved as well as the discussion of the serious injury to the Government, e.g., loss of life, mission failure, etc., which would result if award of a contract is delayed. NOTE: USSOCOM is required to request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances, otherwise FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, must be cited and justified in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(NOTE: Agencies shall request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances, otherwise FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, must be cited and justified in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(For guidance, the three authorities used most often are cited in the following general order of precedence: (1) FAR 6.302-6 - National Security; (2) FAR 6.302-2 - Unusual and Compelling Urgency; and (3) FAR 6.302-1 - Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. For example, if all three were to apply to a given procurement, FAR 6.302-6 - National Security would be cited here and the remaining two would be cited in order or precedence in Section 8, Other Facts.)
Section5Text6_302-6: (Describe how this action requires the use of the authority cited. If applicable, identify the proposed or potential contractor(s), and include a discussion of the proposed contractors’ unique qualifications for fulfilling the contract requirements. Note, only the one authority cited above may be addressed here, if more than one authority applies, cite and discuss the basis for use of them in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(If the authority FAR 6.302-6, National Security, is cited, outline how disclosure of the Government’s needs would compromise the national security; the explanation should result in the J&A document being classified. When FAR 6.302-6, National Security, is cited, requiring activities should address program protection requirements as it relates to the Acquisition Strategy; relationship with the vendor, Procurement Vehicle (to include logistics tail); and Finance (payments/systems used, etc.). At a minimum, address the following elements related to the aforementioned areas:
What needs to be protected, Why it needs to be protected, At what level, and How will the information be protected)
(NOTE: Agencies shall request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances, otherwise FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, must be cited and justified in Section 8, Other Facts.)
(For guidance, the three authorities used most often are cited in the following general order of precedence: (1) FAR 6.302-6 - National Security; (2) FAR 6.302-2 - Unusual and Compelling Urgency; and (3) FAR 6.302-1 - Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. For example, if all three were to apply to a given procurement, FAR 6.302-6 - National Security would be cited here and the remaining two would be cited in order or precedence in Section 8, Other Facts.)
| Section5SFFeedbackText: |
| Section6SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section6Text: In an effort to increase competition, A Sources Sought was posted on Sam.gov on 17 April 2023 and expired on 24 April 2023. The private sector demonstrated no interest in the government's proposal. The government also contacted Marathon Targets, Inc., which confirmed they are the sole distributor and manufacturer of the requested components. |
| Section6Text: A Sources Sought notice was published on Sam.gov on April 17, 2023, and it was valid until April 24, 2023. Marathon Target is the only manufacturer of the currently owned autonomous robotic targets (ARTs) that are required for demanding activities (RA), and Marathon Target also owns all replacement components. The desired replacement parts must be produced by Marathon Target Inc due to Marathon Target Inc's patent on the parts and to uphold the warranty on the RA's systems. This requirement is of a commercial nature and there are multiple commercial providers supplying equivalent things because to the warranted Marathon Target Autonomous Robots on hand. Previously, DLA Troop Support was awarded this requirement, but the Government has decided that giving Marathon Targets Inc. directly will save over $3,000 in costs. |
| Section6Text: (Describe the extent and the results of the market research (FAR Part 10) conducted to identify qualified sources. Research must have been conducted within the past 6 months and be available in written form within the official contract file. The Desktop Contracting Guide template, Market Research Report is an excellent tool.) |
(Note: Make affirmative statement that the Technical Industrial Liaison Office (TILO) and Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) databases were reviewed as a part of this market research. State the results of this review in the market research narrative.)
(Note: The Use of a chart to depict salient requirements and the ability or inability of prospective offerors to meet these requirements is a useful tool in encapsulating the results of the market research when combined with a narrative explanation.)
Section6TextBridge: A presolicitation notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR 5.2. If a notice will not be or was not publicized, the exception cited under FAR 5.202(a)(1) through (13) was:
(In addition to completing the information above, state the acquisition history. Describe efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable. Also include efforts to procure data rights to ensure future procurements are competitive, or explain why data rights cannot or should not be procured, i.e., excessive costs quoted by the prospective contractor.)
(Note: IAW DFARS 206.304(a)(4)(S-70), for non-competitive follow-on acquisitions previously awarded on a non-competitive basis citing the authority at FAR 6.302-1, follow the procedures at DFARS PGI 206.304(a)(S-70)).
(Include any actions to remove or overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition takes place. For bridge actions, include any actions taken to avoid future bridge actions.)
| Section6SFFeedbackText: |
| Section7SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section7Text: A Sources Sought notice was published on Sam.gov on April 17, 2023, and it was valid until April 24, 2023. Marathon Target is the only manufacturer of the currently owned autonomous robotic targets (ARTs) that are required for demanding activities (RA), and Marathon Target also owns all replacement components. The desired replacement parts must be produced by Marathon Target Inc due to Marathon Target Inc's patent on the parts and to uphold the warranty on the RA's systems. This requirement is of a commercial nature and there are multiple commercial providers supplying equivalent things because to the warranted Marathon Target Autonomous Robots on hand. Previously, DLA Troop Support was awarded this requirement, but the government has decided that giving Marathon Targets Inc. directly will save over $3,000 in costs. |
| Section7Text: Marathon Targets Inc. |
| Section7Text: (List all interested sources here and explain what actions the agency took to vet them for possible participation. If no sources state, “No other potential sources indicated an interest in writing.” Include Name and Address for the sources.) |
| Section7SFFeedbackText: |
| ResetSection8BT: |
| Section8SFFeedbackBTN: |
| OneSourceCB: 1 |
| OneSourceCB: FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B), “Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized.” |
| UnusualCB: 0 |
| IndustrialCB: 0 |
| InternationalCB: 0 |
| StatuteCB: 0 |
| NationalSecurityCB: 0 |
| PublicInterestCB: 0 |
| Section8NA: 0 |
| Section8SFFeedbackText: |
| Section9SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section9Text: Marathon Targets Inc. |
| Section9SFFeedbackText: |
| Section10SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Name: David Q Dawson |
| Name: Sandra Bramble |
| Title: Logistics Planner |
| Title: Contracting Officer |
| SignatureField1: |
| DateField1: 2023-05-10 |
| DateField1: 2023-05-09 |
| Section10SFFeedbackText: |
| Section11SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section11Text: I hereby determine that the anticipated cost or price to the Government for this contract action is fair and reasonable to both parties. The sole provider will save the government over $3,000 in total costs compared to a previous purchase with DLA support while also providing a shorter delivery schedule. |
| Section11SFFeedbackText: |
| Section12SFFeedbackBTN: |
| Section12SFFeedbackText: |
| Section32SFFeedbackBTN: |
| UrgentCB: FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A), “An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays.” |
| When using this exception provide information on the previously competed order under this contract and detail the economies and efficiencies that will be obtained by going sole source for the follow-on order. Describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g. in terms of scope, period of performance, or value). The user/customer typically provides this supporting information. General statements are not acceptable: FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C), “In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.” |
| When using this exception provide information on the previously competed order under this contract and detail the economies and efficiencies that will be obtained by going sole source for the follow-on order. Describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g. in terms of scope, period of performance, or value). The user/customer typically provides this supporting information. General statements are not acceptable: FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C). “The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order”. (When using this exception provide information on the previously competed order under this contract and detail the economies and efficiencies that will be obtained by going sole source for the follow-on order. Describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g. in terms of scope, period of performance, or value). The user/customer typically provides this supporting information. General statements are not acceptable.) |
| BrandName: |
a. Marathon Target is the sole manufacturer of requiring activities (RA) currently owned Autonomous Robotic Targets (ARTs) and all replacement parts are proprietary to the Marathon Target Inc.
b. Marathon Target Inc. has a patent on the requested parts and in order to maintain the warranty on the RA’s systems, replacement parts must manufactured by Marathon Targets Inc.
| BrandName: 0 |
| BrandName: 1 |
| BrandName: FAR 16.505(a)(4). For orders peculiar to one manufacturer. |
| FAR8Section5Text: In an effort to increase competition, A Sources Sought was posted on Sam.gov on 17 April 2023 and expired on 24 April 2023. The private sector demonstrated no interest in the Government's proposal. The government also contacted Marathon Targets, Inc., which confirmed they are the sole distributor and manufacturer of the requested components. |
| FAR8Section5TextBridge: A presolicitation notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR 5.2. If a notice will not be or was not publicized, the exception cited under FAR 5.202(a)(1) through (13) was: |
(Then discuss any actions taken to facilitate competition between all awardees for this acquisition. The discussion should include actions tried or considered even if the actions were unsuccessful. If the actions were unsuccessful, so state and describe why. For bridge actions, include any actions taken to avoid future bridge actions.)
(Note: For justifications citing the authority at FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) or (C), , follow the procedures at DFARS PGI 208.405-6.
| Section8Text: In order to maintain the warranty for the existing Marathon Target Systems, replacement parts must be manufactured by Marathon Target Inc to fit existing systems. Only new replacement parts, no refurbished parts, shall be accepted. |
| Section8Text: If the basic multiple award contract under which the order is to be placed is not a DoD contract, then Section 854 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2005 (P.L. 108-375) applies. Therefore, the justification should address how compliance with DFARS 217.78, Contracts or Delivery Orders issued by a Non DoD Agency, will be accomplished. (Note: DFARS 217.78 requires review and approval in accordance with agency procedures that the order is in the best interests of DoD.) Provide any other facts supporting the use of exceptions to the fair opportunity process. |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .