M67854-22-R-5000.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until local time

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 71 - 88

89 - 97

X H 98 - 102 christopher.cox1@usmc.mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 102

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

M67854 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 0 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

CHRISTOPHER COX

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 7

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

8 - 44

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

47 - 48 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 49 - 51 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 52 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

53 - 67

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS COMMAND

2200 LESTER STREET

CONTRACTS

QUANTICO VA 22134-6050

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

68 - 70

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

03 Nov 2021

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

M6785422R5000

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 4 Each Tactical Aviation Ground Refuelling Sys.

FFP

The Contractor shall provide Initial Production of a Tactical Aviation Ground

Refueling System (TAGRS) in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), Section C, and the Performance Specification, Section J, Attachment 1. Ordering

Period is from Contract Award through the 24th month after contact award.

Quantity Min 1 - Max 4.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 4320

NET AMT

0002 4 Each TAGRS Refurbishment

FFP

The Contractor shall provide TAGRS Refurbishment in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW) Section 3.4.7.2. Ordering Period is from Contract Award through the 24th month after contact award. Quantity Min 1 - Max 4.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

0003 1 Each Product Verification Testing

FFP

The Contractor shall perform Product Verification Testing in accordance with

Section 3.4.7.1 of the Statement of Work (SOW). Product Verification Testing will be located at Nevada Automotive Test Center, Silver Springs Nevada and

Naval Warfare Center, Patuxent, MD. Ordering Period is from Contract Award through the 24th month after contact award.

0004 1 Each Technical Manual Verification

FFP

The Contractor shall conduct Technical Manual Verification in accordance with

Sections 3.5.15, 3.5.15.1, 3.5.15.2 and 3.5.15.3 of the Statement of Work (SOW).

Ordering Period is from Contract Award through the 24th month after contact award.

DATA – CDRLs

FFP

The Contractor shall provide DATA in accordance with Contract Deliverables

Requirements List - See Exhibits B, E, L and T. Ordering Period is from Contract

Award through the 60th month after contract award, as applicable. THIS CLIN IS

NOT SEPARATELY PRICED (NSP).

1001 74 Each TAGRS Production

FFP

The Contractor shall provide TAGRS in accordance with the Statement of Work

(SOW), Section C, and the Performance Specification, Section J, Attachment 1.

Ordering Period is from the 25th through 36th month after contact award. Quantity

Min 1 - Max 74. NOTE: THE LISTED QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL

FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

1002 2 Each New Equipment Training and I&KPT

FFP

The Contractor shall conduct NET/I&KPT Training in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW) Sections 3.6.4. Ordering Period is from the 25th through 36th month after contact award. Quantity Min 1 - Max 2. NOTE: THE LISTED

QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS

NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

1003 3 Each Spares Block

FFP

The Contractor shall provide Spares Part Block in accordance with Section 3.5.8 of the Statement of Work (SOW). Ordering Period is from the 25th through 36th month after contact award. Quantity Min 1 - Max 3. Delivery locations are Camp

Pendleton, CA, Camp Lejeune, NC and Okinawa, Japan.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

2001 74 Each TAGRS Production

FFP

The Contractor shall provide TAGRS in accordance with the Statement of Work

(SOW), Section C, and the Performance Specification, Section J, Attachment 1.

Ordering Period is from the 37th through 48th month after contact award. Quantity

Min 1 - Max 74. NOTE: THE LISTED QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL

FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

2002 2 Each New Equipment Training and I&KPT

FFP

The Contractor shall conduct NET/I&KPT Training in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW) Sections 3.6.4. Ordering Period is from the 37th through 48th month after contact award. Quantity Min 1 - Max 2. NOTE: THE LISTED

QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS

NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

3001 74 Each TAGRS Production

FFP

The Contractor shall provide TAGRS in accordance with the Statement of Work

(SOW), Section C, and the Performance Specification, Section J, Attachment 1.

Ordering Period is from the 49th through 60th month after contact award. Quantity

Min 1 - Max 74. NOTE: THE LISTED QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL

FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and

Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

3002 2 Each New Equipment Training and I&KPT

FFP

The Contractor shall conduct NET/I&KPT Training in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW) Sections 3.6.4. Ordering Period is from the 49th through 60th month after contact award. Quantity Min 1 - Max 2. NOTE: THE LISTED

QUANTITY IS A MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR THIS ORDERING PERIOD. IT IS

NOT A DEFINITE QUANTITY.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

1 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the work efforts required by the Contractor to design, develop, integrate, test, produce and prepare associated documentation, fabricate, integrate, test, provide logistic support, provide technical support, provide field service support (as required), provide training, provide an Initial Issue Provisioning (IIP) / spares block, develop technical manuals and deliver the Tactical Aviation Ground Refueling System (TAGRS). This SOW also further defines the effort required of the Contractor for the design, engineering development, fabrication, developmental testing, production, and deployment of TAGRS. The goals of the

TAGRS program are to develop and field an integrated system consisting of: a fuel pump, Filter

Separator, trailer, Collapsible Fabric Tanks (CFT), fuel hoses, fuel hose components, fire extinguisher and all necessary adapters, and hazmat material. The TAGRS shall be capable of being towed by its prime mover the Ultralight Tactical Vehicle (ULTV), in and out of a CH-53, and an MV-22. The Contractor shall deliver the required system that can be safely operated within the stated environments to achieve requirements in the Performance Specification. The

Contractor shall provide sufficient evidence that identifies the safety of use for the TAGRS, including safety features, compliance with commercial or industry standards, and any actions to minimize or eliminate hazards associated with its use. The TAGRS shall be tailored and employed as a fully integrated system and when required, the pump, filter separator, hoses, and components shall be capable of being operated independently of the platform system.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents form a part of this SOW. The most recent revision of the referenced documents at the time of contract award shall be used, unless otherwise specified. In the event of a conflict between the applicable documents and this SOW, the SOW shall take precedence.

Unless a specific exemption has been obtained, nothing in this document supersedes applicable laws and regulations. The following Military Standards and Specifications shall have mandatory compliance during this contract.

2.1 Military Standards and Specifications - Mandatory

MIL-STD-129

Military Marking for Shipment and Storage

MIL-STD-130N

Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property

MIL-STD-882

Standard Practice for System Safety

TM 4750-15 Corrosion Prevention and Control Program

2.2 Military Standards and Specifications – Guidance Only

MIL-STD-881E Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materials

(Integrated Master Schedule)

MIL-STD-40051-2D Preparation of Digital Technical Information for Page-Based

Technical Manuals (TMs)

NAVMC 1553.1A Marine Corps Instructional Systems Design/Systems

Approach to Training and Education Handbook

SAE-GEIA-STD-0007 Logistics Product Data

EIA-649C Configuration Management Standard

MCO 5215.17D Marine Corps Technical Publication Management

2.3 Military Handbooks – Guidance Only

MIL-HDBK-502 Product Support Analysis

MIL-STD-3018 Department of Defense Handbook; Parts Management

2.4 Other Government Documents – Guidance Only

MC-ALB-4423/15 Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS)

29 CFR 1910.1200 OSHA Hazardous Communication Standard

48 CFR 252.211-7003 Item Unique Identification and Valuation

The Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG)

2.5 References

Performance Specification for the TAGRS

IEEE 15288.2 Standard for Technical Review and Audits on Defense

Programs

TMCR 1391.001 Technical Manual Contract Requirement for the Tactical

Aviation Ground Refueling System

2.6 Specifications

Requests for waivers to the performance specification requirements, the associated Military

Specifications or Standards shall be made in writing to the Government.

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General

The Contractor shall perform all tasks required and delineated in this SOW to design, develop, integrate, test, manufacture, and deliver TAGRS systems for a production and deployment in accordance with (IAW) delivery orders placed by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall prepare associated documentation, provide logistics, technical, and field service support, Operator/Maintainer training and training material, develop Technical Manuals (TM), and support Government Product Verification Testing (PVT).

3.2 Meetings/Reporting

After contract award, the Contractor shall participate, in person, in the following meetings/events identified in Table 1 below. The Contractor shall plan, host, attend, coordinate, support and conduct meetings, formal reviews, conferences, and audits (hereinafter called “reviews”). The reviews shall be conducted at mutually agreed upon Government and contractor facilities.

Reviews requiring demonstration or examination of equipment shall be conducted at the

Contractor’s facility. All such reviews and any additional meetings shall be included in the program schedule and may be held concurrently with the Government’s approval. The

Contractor shall prepare agendas prior to each review, and provide minutes, reports, and conference presentation materials following each review. The Contractor shall submit the meeting agenda 10 business days prior to any scheduled meeting, event or review. The

Government reserves the right to cancel any review or to require any review to be scheduled at critical points during the period of performance. Action item documentation, assignment of responsibility for completion, and due dates shall be determined prior to the completion of all reviews. A summary of all action items, responsible parties, and estimated completion dates shall be included with the minutes. The Contractor shall provide the Government with a copy of all material presented at any meeting and any referenced documents. The Contractor shall submit all conference minutes 5 business days after meeting, event or review is conducted.

Table 1. Meetings / Events

Purpose Frequency Locations

Start of Work Meeting Once Contractor Facility

Job Task Analysis As Required Silver Springs, Nevada

Maintenance Task Analysis As Required Silver Springs, Nevada

Preliminary Design Review Once Contractor Facility

Critical Design Review Once Contractor Facility

Test Readiness Review Multiple Virtual

Purpose Frequency Locations

Government Product Verification Testing Once Silver Springs, Nevada

Government Product Verification Testing

(Transportability Testing/Certification) Once Patuxent River, Maryland

Provisioning Conference As Required Contractor Facility

Technical Manual Guidance Meeting Once Contractor Facility

Technical Manual Validation and

Verification (V&V) As Required Silver Springs, Nevada

System Verification Review/ Production

Readiness Review Once Contractor Facility

In Process Reviews Quarterly Stafford, VA

Instructor & Key Personnel Training / New

Equipment Training Once Camp Pendleton, California

CDRL B001, DI-ADMN-81249B, Conference Agenda

CDRL B002, DI-ADMN-81250B, Conference Minutes

3.2.1 Start of Work Meeting

The Contractor shall host a Start of Work Meeting at the Contractor's facility within 30 business days after Contract Award. The purpose of this meeting is for the Contractor to review the contract requirements, demonstrate to the Government the management procedures, provide progress assessments, provide technical and other specialty area status, and to establish schedule dates for near term critical meetings or actions. The Contractor shall also present management, key personnel, and program implementation processes to the Government during this meeting.

The Contractor shall present an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that shall include financial execution plans, all design activities, technical performance benchmarks, production activities, and an Integrated Product Support (IPS) schedule covering all logistics events and deliverables under this contract. The schedules must be submitted for Government review and approval prior to the Start of Work meeting. In addition, the contractor shall provide the Government with a complete list of items to be marked with an Item Unique Identification (IUID) marking.

CDRL B003, DI-MGMT-81861B, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis

Report (IPMDAR)

3.2.2 Monthly Status Report (MSR)

The Contractor shall provide a MSR. The MSR shall state as to whether or not the program/project/task and actual budget is on schedule; if not, the effort planned to meet the schedule shall be indicated. The report shall include an overall status of each milestone, task, or unit of work. The report shall include update schedule sheets, milestone charts, or task synopsis sheets identifying phase of task and percentage of completion of each task or technical instruction. The Contractor shall submit the MSR to the Government no later than 5 business days after the start of the following month.

CDRL B004, DI-MGMT-80368A, Status Reports

3.2.3 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

A PDR will be held within 40 business days after contract award. If the contractor cannot meet this schedule, a detailed justification and an alternative date will be provided to the government for approval. The Contractor shall provide an agenda prior to the review and minutes after the

PDR is conducted. At the review, the Contractor shall provide a preliminary review of the hardware design for the TAGRS. The Contractor shall provide a Requirements Traceability

Matrix (RTM) capable of demonstrating that the design furnished implements the performance requirements of the TAGRS, and present the methods that will be used to verify and validate the design. The Contractor shall deliver to the Government all draft information prior to the review.

The Contractor shall provide the Government with all information presented and referenced at each technical review after the review. Topics the Contractor shall cover at the PDR are detailed in IEEE 15288.2 and include, but are not limited to the following:

a. Interface specification/drawings

b. Preliminary Electrical/Mechanical Design

c. Preliminary Reliability/Maintainability (RAM) analysis

d. Preliminary weight analysis

e. Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Analysis

f. Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T)

g. Preliminary test data and test plan documents

h. Interoperability

i. Transportability

j. Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPAC) Process

k. Critical Safety Items (CSIs)

l. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

m. Quality and Producibility for manufacturing

n. Supportability

o. Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)

p. Item Unique Identification (IUID) marking

q. Grounding and Bonding

CDRL E001, DI-SESS-81757A, Design Review Information Package, Preliminary Design

Review

3.2.4 Critical Design Review (CDR)

A CDR will be held within 60 business days after PDR. If the contractor cannot meet this schedule, a detailed justification and an alternative date will be provided to the government for approval. At the review, the Contractor shall provide a detailed review of the hardware design for the TAGRS. The Contractor shall provide a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) capable of demonstrating that the design furnished implements the performance requirements of the TAGRS, and present the methods used to verify and validate the design. The Contractor shall deliver to the Government all draft information prior to the review. The Contractor shall provide the Government with all information presented and referenced at each technical review after the review. Topics the Contractor shall cover at the CDR are detailed in IEEE 15288.2 and include, but are not limited to the following:

a. Interface specification/drawings

b. Detailed Electrical/Mechanical Design

c. Detailed Reliability/Maintainability (RAM) Analysis

d. Detailed weight data

e. Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Analysis

f. Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T)

g. All test data and test plan documents

h. Interoperability

i. Transportability

j. Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPAC) Process

k. Critical Safety Items (CSIs)

l. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

m. Quality and Producibility for manufacturing

n. Supportability

o. Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)

p. Item Unique Identification (IUID) marking

q. Grounding and Bonding

CDRL E002, DI-SESS-81757A, Design Review Information Package, Critical Design

Review

3.2.5 Test Readiness Review (TRR)

The TRR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into formal test. The TRR assesses test objectives, test methods and procedures, scope of tests, and determines if the required test resources, including test articles, have been properly identified and coordinated to support planned tests. The Contractor shall provide all studies, estimates, analyses, designs, and reports to the Government 30 business days prior to the TRR to include technical support availability (on-site, phone and/or email). At a minimum, the Contractor shall cover the following in the TRR:

a. Overview of system operation

b. Results of testing conducted prior to delivery

c. Discrepancies or issues discovered during testing, including changes made as a result

d. Known limitations of the system which may cause issues during government testing

e. Review of the updated RTM for the system

f. A fallback plan should technical issues and or show-stopper arise during testing

CDRL E003, DI-SESS-81757A, Design Review Information Package, Test Readiness

Review (TRR)

3.2.6 In Process Review (IPR)

IPRs will be held on a quarterly basis at the Contractor’s facility on a mutually agreed upon date.

Schedule permitting IPR may be combined with planned Technical Reviews in Table 1. The contractor shall also provide a monthly status report. The Government reserves the right to cancel, combine or reschedule any review. The Contractor’s progress, management, technical support services (if any), assurance of compliance with contract requirements, cost, schedule, program status, funding, problem identification and resolutions shall be addressed. Discrepancies and/or deficiencies found as the result of the IPR shall be corrected within 15 business days. The

Contractor shall prepare presentation materials providing an overview of all agenda items.

CDRL E004, DI-SESS-81757A, Design Review Information Package, In Process Review (IPR)

3.3 Program Management

The Contractor shall establish a program management structure that ensures the overall reliability of the TAGRS and compliance with delivery schedules. The Contractor shall ensure that all task requirements pertinent to contract performance are adequately addressed.

Programmatic documentation shall be readily available to Government representative(s) during planned visits or upon request.

The Contractor shall maintain and publish an accurate IMS and recommend program schedules, including review and evaluation techniques, which provide for the earliest delivery schedule while at the same time satisfying all contract requirements in a cost-effective manner. The IMS shall include all significant events, critical paths and tasks from start to completion of the contract. The Contractor shall notify the Government in writing of any anticipated or projected work stoppages or delays that will impact schedules. The Contractor shall provide the

Government with an IMS 30 days after contract award.

CDRL B005, DI-MGMT-81861B, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis

Report

3.3.1 Technical Proposal

The Contractor’s technical proposal, as negotiated and accepted by the government, may be incorporated by reference (in whole or part) into the resultant contract. In the event of conflict or ambiguity between the Contractor’s technical proposal and the government SOW, the SOW shall take precedence. Programmatic documentation shall be readily available to Government representative(s) during planned visits or upon request.

3.4 Engineering Support

3.4.1 Contractor Compliance with Performance Specification

The Contractor shall propose, design, manufacture, and deliver TAGRS systems in compliance with the criteria identified in the TAGRS Performance Specification. Compliance shall be based upon evidence (e.g., commercial specifications, test or performance data, etc.) of the system’s ability to meet the performance standards set forth in the TAGRS Performance Specification, as well as conformance to the delivery schedule.

3.4.2 Product Specification

The Contractor shall maintain, update, and deliver a Product Specification that describes the technical and functional performance of the TAGRS. The Contractor shall deliver the Product

Specification to the Government 30 business days prior to CDR. Updates to the Product

Specification shall be made as necessary after the technical reviews listed in table 1.

CDRL E005, DI-SDMP-81465A, Performance Specification Documents

3.4.3 Corrosion Prevention and Control

Corrosion prevention and control shall be addressed in the design, assembly, and life cycle planning of the TAGRS. All coatings shall conform to the TAGRS Finish Specification and shall be applied and inspected in accordance with USMC TM 4750-15 unless otherwise agreed upon with the Program Manager. In the design and assembly of the asset, the manufacturer shall use materials that are resistant to corrosion to the extent practical. Designs shall address corrosion mitigation efforts for, or exclude corrosion prone configurations including lap joints, sharp angles and bends, corners, dead ends, occluded spaces, inverted angles, dissimilar metal couplings and uncoated areas. The design shall provide adequate drainage avoiding standing water accumulation.

During assembly, all welds must be applied and inspected in accordance with applicable

American Welding Society (AWS) standards based on the substrate materials. All required finishes, design considerations for corrosion prevention and control, and materials selections shall be documented in a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan and Finish Specification.

Corrosion shall be addressed in any life cycle planning, test and evaluation, and/or Preventive

Maintenance Checks and Services developed for the asset.

The contractor shall develop a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan (CPCP) that describes the specific measures to be implemented and submit the plan to the Government. The purpose of the

CPCP is to document corrosion-related design decision and identify materials and corrosion control methods used to manufacture the TAGRS. The plan shall address the techniques and processes to be applied in assuring that the products to be delivered will meet the requirements contained in the TAGRS performance specification. Changes in materials, coatings, or corrosion prevention methods during the course of production shall be reflected in updated versions of the

CPCP. At a minimum, the CPCP shall provide the following information.

a. Discussion of corrosion prevention techniques employed in design, including measures taken to minimize water collection/entrapment and collection of debris, mitigate corrosion in areas inaccessible to cleaning and maintenance, and minimize dissimilar metal contact.

b. Process instructions detailing application of coatings and other corrosion prevention compounds (if any). Process instructions should address personnel training and qualification, material inspection, surface preparation, and coating or compound application procedures.

c. Any test data developed by the manufacturer for coatings and materials.

d. Identification of coating/substrate combinations for which no testing was required or performed.

e. Recommended corrosion control-specific maintenance.

The Contractor shall submit the System Finish Specification Report and the System Corrosion

Prevention and Control plan 6 business days prior to CDR.

CDRL E012, DI-MFFP-81402B, System Finish Specification Report

CDRL E013, DI-MFFP-81403B, (Tailorable) System Corrosion Prevention and Control

Plan

3.4.4 System Safety Requirements/Criteria Analysis

The Contractor shall determine applicable generic system safety design requirements and guidelines for facilities; hardware and software from federal, military, national and industry regulations, codes, standards, specifications; and other documents for the system under development IAW Military Standard (MIL-STD)-882. The Contractor shall incorporate these requirements and guidelines into the high-level system specifications and design documents as appropriate.

3.4.5 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH)

3.4.5.1 System Safety

The Contractor shall identify and evaluate safety and health hazards, define risk levels, and establish a program that manages the probability and severity of all hazards associated with development, use, and disposal of the system in accordance with MIL-STD-882. The

Government will evaluate residual risks in accordance with Tables A-I through A-IV of MIL-

STD-882 and accept these risks only if deemed to be appropriate. In accordance with MIL-STD-

882, the Contractor shall provide ESOH hazard data as a result of a system safety analysis conducted on the TAGRS based upon the current Department of Defense (DoD) Standard

Practice for System Safety. The minimum data shall include all identified ESOH hazards

(including, but not limited to, system design, toxic chemicals, hazardous materials with associated Material Safety Data Sheets, ozone depleting substances, excessive noise, and intended operational use), the probability and severity of the hazard, the proposed or accomplished fix/procedure to mitigate the risk, and the expected residual risks once the mitigation factors are implemented. The system safety analysis shall include the development, operation, maintenance, and disposal of the TAGRS. This analysis shall include a statement from the Contractor identifying the level to which identified hazards have been eliminated or their associated risks controlled. The contractor shall provide the requested data to the government 60 business days prior to the Test Readiness Review.

CDRL E006, DI-SAFT-80102C, Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

3.4.5.2 Hazardous Material

No asbestos, radioactive materials, mercury, hexavalent chromium (electroplating and coatings processes), cadmium (electroplating), or other highly toxic or carcinogenic materials as defined in 29 CFR 1910.1200 shall be used on the TAGRS without prior approval from the Government.

Class I and Class II Ozone Depleting Substances shall not be used. If hazardous materials are used, the Contractor shall prepare a Hazardous Material Management Report, which, at a minimum, shall identify all hazardous materials required for system production, and sustainment, including the parts or process that requires them. This report shall be prepared in accordance with National Aerospace Standard 411, section 4.4.1 and submitted. The requested data shall be provided to the government 20 business days before TRR.

CDRL E007, DI-MISC-81397C, Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP)

3.4.6 Configuration Management

All products provided shall conform to the producer’s own drawings, specifications, standards, and quality assurance practices. The Government reserves the right to require proof of such conformance prior to first delivery and thereafter as may be otherwise provided for under the provisions of the contract. The Contractor shall not change configuration of deliverable items without Government approval. The contractor shall have a documented configuration management process in place, and provide the government access for review when requested.

3.4.6.1 Product Baseline

The Contractor shall use the performance specification as a basis for design and production. The

Contractor’s product baseline (drawings and assembly instructions) shall be traceable to the requirements in the performance specification. The Contractor shall maintain configuration management of the product baseline using the Contractor’s internal process. A Product Baseline shall be maintained and available for Government review and use. The requested data shall be provided to the Government at CDR. Updates to the product specification shall be made as necessary after the technical reviews listed in Table 1. The Product Baseline shall be delivered as specified in the associated CDRL and shall be described to the following format:

a. A description of each configuration item of the TAGRS

b. Configuration and interface dimensional data applicable to the mounting and interconnection of the related items

c. Complete external interface definitions for each module (mechanical, electrical, electronic, communication and etc.), which affect the physical or functional characteristics of the co-functioning item

d. Any other characteristics that cannot be changed without affecting component interfaces

CDRL E008, DI-SESS-81000F, Product Engineering Design Data and Associated Lists

(Product Baseline)

3.4.6.2 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs)

Any Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) shall be submitted by the Contractor, and shall be limited to those that are necessary or offer significant benefit to the Government. Military

Handbook MIL-HDBK-61B, paragraph 3.3, provides guidance concerning the classification of

ECPs. Class I ECPs shall be approved by the Program Office to:

(a) Correct deficiencies;

(b) Add or modify interface or interoperability requirements;

(c) Make a significant and measurable effectiveness change in the operational capabilities or logistics supportability of the system;

(d) Effect substantial life cycle costs/savings; and

(e) Prevent slippage in an approved production schedule.

Class II changes, i.e. changes that do not impact any of the Class I factors listed above, shall be dispositioned by the Contractor with Government concurrence. Class II changes shall be available for Government review to ensure that they were correctly classified. As a minimum, Class I ECPs shall contain the following information:

(a) Date prepared;

(b) Originator;

(c) ECP Classification;

(d) ECP Number;

(e) Reason/need for change along with supporting evidence;

(f) System designation (nomenclature, model, part number);

(g) Name of part (or lowest assembly) affected to include part numbers;

(h) Baselines affected (to include drawings, specifications, Commercial and Government Entity

(CAGE) code, revision level, etc.);

(i) Title of change;

(j) Description of change;

(k) Effect on interfaces (Interchangeability and Interoperability);

(l) Total costs/savings w/ breakout;

(m) Retrofit information;

(n) Ozone Depleting Substances;

(o) Impact on any engineering disciplines (such as quality, environmental, safety, health, reliability, maintainability, etc.);

(p) Justification for change;

(q) Priority of change;

(r) Impacts to any logistics support elements (such as software, manuals, spares, tools, etc.) being utilized by Government personnel in support of the product; and

(s) Alternatives evaluated or considered.

The contractor shall notify the Government of any ECP. The Government shall have 14 business days to review and provide comment. If approved, the contractor shall submit the final version within 7 business days.

The Contractor shall implement the approved changes to all systems purchased under the contract that have not yet been delivered. All ECPs for systems that are already delivered and fielded shall include as a deliverable modification/installation instructions, the template for which will be provided by the Government.

CDRL E009, DI-SESS-80639E, Engineering Change Proposal

3.4.6.3 Interface Control Document (ICD)

The Contractor shall prepare an ICD. The ICD shall include all mechanical, physical, and electrical interfaces for the TAGRS and assemblies. The ICD shall also contain the entire electrical connection configuration, pin outs of connectors, and any other information needed to operate the system components with each other and outside systems. The report shall be due 6 business days prior to the PDR and updated as necessary after the following technical reviews listed in Table 1. The government shall have 30 business days to review.

CDRL E010, DI-SESS-81248B, Interface Control Document (ICD)

3.4.6.4 Product Quality

The Contractor shall maintain quality standards using the current International Organization for

Standardization (ISO) quality system or equivalent standards.

3.4.7 Testing/Verification

The Government will perform various test on the TAGRS systems to ensure it operates within the parameters described within the performance specification. These tests will provide the data to ensure the system is reliable, maintainable and sustainable within the Marine Forces.

3.4.7.1 Government Product Verification Testing (PVT) Support

The Government will conduct testing on delivered CLIN/SLINs to support programmatic decisions. The Government testing is part of the overall initial qualification testing of the components delivered under this contract to ensure that the contract requirements are satisfied both technically as well as in an operational environment. Government testing will begin subsequent to the delivery of the PVT systems. The Government test locations are anticipated to be Nevada Automotive Test Center, Silver Springs Nevada and Naval Warfare Center, Patuxent, MD. Government testing is anticipated to last approximately six (6) months. During this testing, the Contractor shall provide technical support via telephone, email or onsite during normal business hours, 8-5pm, to include troubleshooting of issues discovered during test, and repair any damages incurred during testing. If necessary, the Contractor is expected to visit the test facilities to bring PVT test article(s) back up and operational. The vendor will be required to deliver four (4) TAGRS for PVT that will be conducted at the Government’s designated test facility.

If more time is required for repair (exceeds 10 day business time period), test articles will be shipped to the Contractor facility for troubleshooting. The Contractor shall pay for the return shipping of the test articles to their facility from the testing facility. The Contractor will have an additional 10 business days to fix the technical issues and repair the test article(s). With time split between any numbers of contractors, the overall combined travel days shall not exceed 60 travel days for PVT support. The Contractor is liable for all damage incurred during PVT, except for damage caused by tests that exceed the system’s design requirements.

3.4.7.2 Vendor Refurbishment of Systems Utilized in PVT

Upon completion of PVT the Contractor shall recover and refurbish systems utilized in PVT into a “ready to issue” condition within 90 business days after recovery. The Contractor will ensure utilization to the maximum extent of existing hardware and/or assemblies of the PVT systems.

The return of the systems shall be facilitated via their incorporation into the delivery schedule.

3.4.7.3 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

The Contractor shall participate in a PRR conducted at the contractor’s facility unless the

Government directs otherwise. The Contractor shall have all studies, estimates, manufacturing processes, quality assurance processes, production facilities, tooling and test equipment capacity, personnel development and certification processes, documentation management, inventory management, and vendor management, designs, and reports available for the Government review

6 business days prior to the PRR. The Government shall have 5 business days to review and provide comment. If approved, the contractor shall submit the final version 5 business days after the PRR. The PRR examines a program to determine if the design is ready for production and if the supplier has accomplished adequate production planning without incurring unacceptable risks that will breach thresholds of schedule, performance, cost, and other established criteria. The

PRR may evaluate the full, production-configured system to determine if it correctly and completely implements all system requirements.

The PRR shall be conducted IAW IEEE 15288.2, but at a minimum, the Contractor shall cover and deliver the following:

a. Overview of System Operation

b. Production/Manufacturing Plan

c. Production Quality Assurance Plan

d. Production Configuration Baseline

e. Technical Review Data Package (TRDP)

CDRL E011, DI-SESS-81757A, Design Review Information Package, Production Readiness

Review (PRR)

3.5 Logistics Support

3.5.1 System Level Data Plate

3.5.1.1 Manufacturer’s Data Plate

Each TAGRS shall have a manufacturer’s data plate affixed to the filter separator and the pump.

The overarching system data plate shall be affixed to the TAGRS trailer. The shipping data plate shall include locations of the lift/tie down provisions, cube, envelope size, and weight maximums for a fully loaded TAGRS. The Shipping Data shall be placed in a plainly visible location on the exterior of the TAGRS in preparation for shipment or storage. The data plate shall meet the requirements set forth in MIL-STD-130N.

The system data plate shall contain the following information, at the minimum.

a. Table of Authorized Materiel Control Number (TAMCN)

b. Item name and model number

c. National Stock Number (NSN)

d. Part number

e. Serial number

f. Government ownership designation (Service Branch)

g. Characteristics

h. Contract number

i. Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code

j. Unique Item Identification (UII) Data Matrix Symbol

k. Date of Manufacture.

The subsystem data plate shall contain the following information:

a. TAMCN for end item

b. Item name and model number

c. Serial number for end item and subsystem

d. National Stock Number (NSN)

e. Part number

f. Unique Item Identification (UII) Data Matrix Symbol

Silhouettes of the TAGRS in transport configuration shall indicate center of gravity of the

TAGRS fully loaded along each axis. The shipping data plate shall include locations of the lift/tie down provisions, cube, envelope size, and weight maximums for a fully loaded TAGRS.

The Shipping Data shall be placed in a plainly visible location on the exterior of the TAGRS in preparation for shipment or storage. The system shipping data plate shall include the following:

a. Center of gravity

b. Locations of the lift/tie down provisions

c. Shipping Dimensions (height, length, width, shipping cubage)

d. Weight maximums for a fully loaded TAGRS (system, axle, and tongue)

3.5.2 Maintenance Planning

The contractor shall conduct maintenance planning to define optimal maintenance activities, which fully support the maintenance concept. Design influence for maintenance planning and ease of maintenance shall be affected. The maintenance concept for the TAGRS is defined below.

3.5.2.1 Field Level Maintenance

Field level maintenance is a combination of operator/crew tasks and intermediate maintenance tasks. The intent of Field level maintenance is to sustain the equipment in a mission capable status and is both preventative and corrective in nature. The tasks associated with this maintenance level is to perform Preventative Maintenance Checks and Services (PMCS), conduct fault isolation, and replacing failed components, assemblies or modules on a weapon system. This ensures that equipment is fully mission capable and in most cases is the first source of identifying equipment problems. This may include limited diagnosis, fault isolation and repair/replacement authorized by applicable manuals.

The TAGRS shall not require any special purpose tools or test equipment to conduct operator/crew maintenance. The Government shall provide a list of all tools, which will be required to conduct maintenance of the TAGRS, to the contractor.

Operator/Crew maintenance includes expeditious assessment and maintenance conducted under battlefield conditions. Operator/Crew level maintenance normally entails inventory, cleaning, inspecting, preserving, lubricating, adjusting and testing as well as replacing parts and components with common shop tools per Individual Training Standards (ITS) and/or Training and Readiness events (TRE) and technical publications.

Preventive maintenance includes visual inspection, testing, cleaning, tightening, and other minor adjustments, making external adjustments on equipment and perform operational checks using authorized tools, manuals and test equipment. Examples would include changing oil in a motor vehicle, checking tire inflation, and checking critical fluid levels if feasible in the front lines of the battle space.

Field level maintenance performed by intermediate activities include inspection, diagnosis (in-depth), modification, replacement, adjustment, and limited repair or evacuation/disposal of principal end items and their selected repairables, and components/sub-components. Field level maintenance also includes calibration and repair of test, measurement and diagnostic equipment

(TMDE). Specially trained mechanics and technicians in accordance with ITSs and/or TRE and

Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), and technical publications perform field level maintenance.

3.5.2.2 Depot Level Maintenance

The Government would like to keep the system at the Field Level of maintenance. If the system requires Depot level maintenance, then Depot level maintenance shall consist of complete repair, major overhaul, or complete rebuild of the parts, assemblies, subassemblies, and end items, including secondary repairables, the manufacture of parts, piece part repair, modification, and testing that is beyond the capability of the Field level of maintenance. If it is determined that the system requires depot maintenance, then the contractor shall provide the appropriate information to allow the Government to develop a Depot Source of Repair Analysis. In the Interim, Depot level maintenance shall be performed by the contractor for TAGRS until organic depot support can be implemented, as required.

3.5.3 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

The Contractor shall establish a program to identify configuration items, including spare parts subject to DMSMS and obsolescence. The program shall include a process to identify when a

DMSMS or obsolescence risk may impact the configuration baseline and develop risk mitigation action(s) to counter any parts obsolescence issues. Upon identification of a DMSMS or obsolescence risk, the Contractor shall develop and provide recommended actions to mitigate the risk impact to system availability, schedule and cost. The Contractor shall deliver all source data from the DMSMS program to support Government forecasting of DMSMS risks. This document shall be delivered to the government 15 business days after the MTA has been conducted.

Source data shall be to the lowest configuration item indenture as detailed within the configuration management baseline.

CDRL L004, DI-MGMT-81899, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material

Shortages (DMSMS) Implementation Plan

3.5.4 Maintenance Analysis

This analysis shall identify the maintenance functions, level of maintenance, manpower, spare and repair parts and support equipment required for each replaceable and repairable item. The maintenance analysis shall be documented with an end item hardware breakdown sequence, using Logistic Support Analysis Control Numbers (LCNs). The Contractor shall recommend repair/discard via Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability (SM&R) Codes per Marine Corps

Order 4400.120, Joint Regulation Governing the use and application of Uniform Source

Maintenance and Recoverability Codes.

The Contractor shall submit a Maintenance Analysis to the Government 120 days after contract award. The Contractor shall conduct and deliver a Level of Repair Analysis (LORA). The

LORA will be performed, for Contractor use in the development of the technical manual and

Repair Parts and Special Tools List (RPSTL) Source, in determining all maintenance procedures required.

CDRL L026, DI-PSSS-81872A, Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) Report, Maintenance

Analysis

3.5.5 Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS)

The contractor shall develop a closed loop failure reporting system, procedures for analysis of failures to determine the root cause, and documentation for recording corrective actions taken.

The FRACAS shall include uniform failure reporting, failure analysis reports and corrective actions. All hardware failures from system level down to the subassembly level shall be subject to these requirements throughout the testing period including production and integration testing, and during the post-production support period (to include warranty and depot, as applicable). In the event where a failed item is returned subject to a Product Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR), traceability of the PQDR shall be integrated into the FRACAS.