Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-042726 Batch #1 - 2026 Engineering Design Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000551
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on engineering and design services projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution/Progress. The Management section assesses resource management, consultant independence, scope adherence, and communication and cooperation with agency staff. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates timely completion of deliverables, quality and completeness of invoices and reports, and budget compliance. The evaluation uses a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeds requirements, 3 indicates meets requirements, 1 indicates does not meet requirements, and N/A is available when criteria are not applicable. The form includes fields for the evaluation date, consultant name, project description, project phase, and service dates.

The scoring methodology applies weighted factors based on the number of ratings provided, with formulas that convert individual scores into weighted totals. Scores of 5 receive the highest weighted value, scores of 3 receive mid-range values, and scores of 1 receive the lowest values. The form requires justification from the Agency Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert for all scores and permits consultant response to evaluations. Sign-off sections are included for the Agency Project Manager, consultant Project Manager, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor. This evaluation tool is designed to document consultant performance for potential use in future contract award decisions and performance monitoring for ongoing engineering and design services projects in Georgia.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Consultant Scoring Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ_484_042726 _ Batch _1_ 2026.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .