Consultant Scoring Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000551
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This is a Consultant Scoring Template document from the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) for use in evaluating consultant qualifications submitted in response to RFQ-484-042726 Batch #1 for 2026 Engineering Design Services. The template is designed to assess the qualifications and performance history of consultant teams across multiple key team lead disciplines including Project Manager, Deputy Project Manager, NEPA lead, Bridge lead, and Roadway lead positions. Consultants must document all active GDOT projects and relevant experience from their Statement of Qualifications, with scoring based on performance against baseline schedules and milestone deliverables including Concept Report submissions, Preliminary Field Plan Review (PFPR) submissions, and Final Field Plan Review (FFPR) submissions. The scoring framework requires completion of fields for each project including Project Identification Number, project description, project type, individual role, let date, baseline schedule adherence, and detailed performance scores from GDOT Design Policy and Support and Engineering Services divisions.
The template requires Project Managers, Deputy Project Managers, and each Key Team Lead to provide scores from GDOT Concept and Field Plan Review documentation for all applicable projects. Scoring categories for PFPR and FFPR evaluations include Presentation, Judgment, Environmental, Right of Way, Utility, and Constructability components. Where GDOT scores are unavailable, consultants may submit equivalent scores from other agencies or clients with documented relevance explanations. The scoring template is based on the Plan Development Process (PDP) manual published by GDOT, which establishes standardized project delivery procedures and baseline milestone dates. Consultants must include the RFQ number and Prime Consultant name in their submittal file and provide comments justifying scores and noting any circumstances affecting baseline schedule performance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ_484_042726 _ Batch _1_ 2026.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
| INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES SUBMITTAL: |
| The Plan Development Process (PDP) is the bedrock of the Georgia Department of Transportation’s project delivery process. The manual can be found at: https://www.dot.ga.gov/PartnerSmart/DesignManuals/PDP/PDP.pdf#search=PDP. The Definitions section of the manual is referred to in this scoring spreadsheet. |
Place the Request for Qualifications number (RFQ #) and the Prime Consultant’s name in the file name for submittal.
All projects in the pre-construction phase at Georgia DOT have a Baseline Schedule (BL) with target dates for milestones known as Concept Report submittal, Preliminary Field Plan Review (PFPR) submittal and Final Field Plan Review (FFPR) submittal.
| The Project Manager (PM), Deputy PM and each Key Team Lead (KTL) will provide scores for All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL as well as all GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) as experience. |
| Active projects are defined as any projects with an open contract with the Department. |
| Scores are defined as: |
| · Concept report score located at the bottom of the approval of the concept report distributed by Design Policy and Support |
| · Preliminary field Plan Review (PFPR) scores are at the bottom of the PFPR report distributed by Engineering Services |
| · Final field Plan Review (FFPR) scores are at the bottom of the PFPR report distributed by Engineering Services |
| If Project Managers and Key Team Leads do not have GDOT Concept and Field Plan Review scores, they can offer similar scores from other agencies / clients and explain relevance. |
| P.I. No. – This is the GDOT Project Identification Number |
| Description – This is the GeoPI description (see http://mygdot.dot.ga.gov/applications/geopi/Pages/Search.aspx) |
| Project Type – This is the GeoPI designation (i.e. Bridge, Roundabout, Widening, etc.) |
| Role in the Project – This is the role the individual played in that project (i.e. PM, Designer, Ecologist, etc.) |
| Let Date of the Project – This is the Baseline Let Date in the P6 schedule |
| Milestone BL (Baseline) on time? – This is the Baseline Date established prior to the phase of the project (i.e. did the concept make the original established P6 date). |
| Design Policy Score for Concept – This score is located at the bottom of the approval of the concept report distributed by Design Policy and Support. |
| Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores – These scores are at the bottom of the PFPR and FFPR reports distributed by Engineering Services. List those scores. |
| PFPR = Preliminary Field Plan Review |
| FFPR = Final Field Plan Review |
| There is a comment section for each milestone score to provide additional information or justification for the scores based on that individual’s involvement. |
| If scores were not provided or are not available, the project should still be included in the table and reason scores are not provided noted in the comments column. |
| If there are projects from similar agencies, please provide milestone equivalencies and explanations. |
PM KTL
| Project Manager Key Team Lead: | <<NAME>> | |
| Firm: | <<FIRM NAME>> | |
| RFQ# | <<REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS #>> |
| All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL / All GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the SOQ | Design Policy Score | Comments on Concept | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | |||||
| P.I. No. | Description | Project Type | Role in the Project | Let Date of the Project | Concept BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
| Concept Score | PFPR BL on time? Y/N | ||||||
| Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. | PFPR Presentation | PFPR Judgement | PFPR Environmental | PFPR Right of Way | PFPR Utility | PFPR Constructability | FFPR BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the FFPR request to Engineering Services.
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. FFPR Presentation FFPR Judgement FFPR Environmental FFPR Right of Way FFPR Utility FFPR Constructability Other Scores? Other Scores? Comments related to the project
Deputy PM KTL
| Deputy Project Manager Key Team Lead: | <<NAME>> | |
| Firm: | <<FIRM NAME>> | |
| RFQ# | <<REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS #>> |
| All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL / All GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the SOQ | Design Policy Score | Comments on Concept | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | |||||
| P.I. No. | Description | Project Type | Role in the Project | Let Date of the Project | Concept BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
| Concept Score | PFPR BL on time? Y/N | ||||||
| Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. | PFPR Presentation | PFPR Judgement | PFPR Environmental | PFPR Right of Way | PFPR Utility | PFPR Constructability | FFPR BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the FFPR request to Engineering Services.
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. FFPR Presentation FFPR Judgement FFPR Environmental FFPR Right of Way FFPR Utility FFPR Constructability Other Scores? Other Scores? Comments related to the project
NEPA KTL
| NEPA Key Team Lead: | <<NAME>> | |
| Firm: | <<FIRM NAME>> | |
| RFQ# | <<REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS #>> |
| All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL / All GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the SOQ | Design Policy Score | Comments on Concept | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | |||||
| P.I. No. | Description | Project Type | Role in the Project | Let Date of the Project | Concept BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
| Concept Score | PFPR BL on time? Y/N | ||
| Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. | PFPR Environmental | Comments | FFPR BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the FFPR request to Engineering Services.
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. FFPR Environmental Comments Other Scores? Other Scores? Comments related to the project
Bridge KTL
| Bridge Key Team Lead: | <<NAME>> | ||
| Firm: | <<FIRM NAME>> | If a bridge replacement project, give all scores, if a bridge in a widening only give applicable scores | |
| RFQ# | <<REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS #>> |
| All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL / All GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the SOQ | Design Policy Score | Comments on Concept | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comment | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comment | |||||
| P.I. No. | Description | Project Type | Role in the Project | Let Date of the Project | Concept BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
| Concept Score | PFPR BL on time? Y/N | ||||||
| Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. | PFPR Presentation | PFPR Judgement | PFPR Environmental | PFPR Right of Way | PFPR Utility | PFPR Constructability | FFPR BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the FFPR request to Engineering Services.
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. FFPR Presentation FFPR Judgement FFPR Environmental FFPR Right of Way FFPR Utility FFPR Constructability Other Scores? Other Scores? Comments related to the project
Road KTL
| Roadway Key Team Lead | <<NAME>> | |
| Firm: | <<FIRM NAME>> | |
| RFQ# | <<REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS #>> |
| All Active GDOT Projects that involve the KTL / All GDOT or other client projects listed in the KTL's resume in the SOQ | Design Policy Score | Comments on Concept | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | Engineering Services Field Plan Review Scores | Comments | |||||
| P.I. No. | Description | Project Type | Role in the Project | Let Date of the Project | Concept BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the concept report to Design Policy and Support
| Concept Score | PFPR BL on time? Y/N | ||||||
| Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. | PFPR Presentation | PFPR Judgement | PFPR Environmental | PFPR Right of Way | PFPR Utility | PFPR Constructability | FFPR BL on time? Y/N |
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the FFPR request to Engineering Services.
Shelby, Albert: This baseline date is submittal of the PFPR request to Engineering Services. FFPR Presentation FFPR Judgement FFPR Environmental FFPR Right of Way FFPR Utility FFPR Constructability Other Scores? Other Scores? Comments related to the project
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .