LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 484-090826 Government Estimator Contract Services (State Funded)
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2027-000000620
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state-funded contract projects. The evaluation form is designed to rate consultants across two primary categories: Management and Prosecution/Progress. Under the Management section, consultants are evaluated on four factors including appropriate resource management, independent work performance, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT staff. The Prosecution and Progress section contains three evaluation factors assessing whether consultants completed deliverables by agreed-upon dates, whether all invoices, reports, and design requirements are complete and accurate with minimal revisions, and whether work was completed within the assigned budget. Ratings are scaled from 1 (Does Not Meet Requirement) to 5 (Exceeds Requirement), with a score of 3 representing meeting requirements and expectations. The form accommodates N/A responses where applicable.

The evaluation form requires signatures and acknowledgments from the GDOT Project Manager, Supervisor, Consultant Project Manager, and Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, with additional acknowledgment required from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head if any factor receives a rating of 1. The scoring methodology applies weighted calculations based on the number of factors rated, with scores of 5 valued at 50 points, scores of 3 at 30 points, and scores of 1 at 10 points per factor. Prime consultants awarded Government Estimator contracts under this program are granted exclusivity with GDOT and are prohibited from competing on Design-Bid-Build contracts during the contract term, though sub-consultants may be released from this restriction at GDOT's discretion.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ_484_090826 Government Estimator Contract .pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .