Attachment_10_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Computerized Deployment System -Version 7 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC711-14-R-D006
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

From the source

Attachment 10 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Integrated Computerized Deployment System -Version 7, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_15_Tech_Data_-_Comp_SW_Rights_Private_Expense.docx DOCX document
RFP_HTC711-14-R-D006_Amend_3_ICODES-V7.pdf PDF
Round_3_(86-96)_Q As_ICODES-V7_23_Dec_2014.pdf PDF
RFP_HTC711-14-R-D006_Amend_3_ICODES-V7_Conformed_.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Past_Performance_Log.doc DOC document
Attachment_14_Tech_Data-Comp_SW_Rights.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_Financial_Information_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment_15_Tech_Data_-_Comp_SW_Rights_Private_Expense.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_Past_Performance_Reference_Sheet.doc DOC document
Round_2_(43-85)_Q As_ICODES-V7_(18_Dec_14).pdf PDF
Round_1_Q A's_ICODES-V7_(11_Dec_14).pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal_Breakout.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5a_Labor_Rates_-_Cost_Proposal_Breakout.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_PWS_ICODES-V7_(9_Dec_14).pdf PDF
RFP_HTC711-14-R-D006_Amend_2_ICODES-V7.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_Tech_Data_-_Comp_SW_Rights_Private_Expense_.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_Tech_Data-Comp_SW_Rights.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-D006_ICODES-V7_RFP_Amendment_1-_Released_Version.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_DD_Form_254.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_Subcontracting_Plan_Template.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_Financial_Information_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_Proposal_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_5A.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_3_QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_PWS_ICODES-V7.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_CDRLS_21_Nov_14.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-D006_ICODES-V7_RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Architectual_Docs_.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal_Breakout.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4-_Staffing_Matrix_16_Oct_14.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_6_Past_Performance_Reference_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Past_Performance_Log.pdf PDF
FINAL DRAFT PWS ICODES NG APR 2014 - Copy.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

HTC711-14-R-D006

ATTACHMENT 10

RECENT AND RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE

Integrated Computerized Deployment System-Version 7

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings (i.e. Satisfactory, Exceptional, etc.) should include comments for any question rated exceptional or lower than satisfactory. Definitions for ratings are provided on page 5. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below. Please complete and submit no later than 2:00 pm Central Time on 22 December 2014.

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-D
ATTN: Linda Murphy
E-mail: linda.k.murphy.civ@mail.mil and belfield.c.collymore.civ@mail.mil
Phone: 618-220-7101 DSN : 770-7101

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:____________________________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work Performed:________________________________________________________

Dollar value:____________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance:____________________________________________________________________

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:____________________________________________________________________________ Position/Title:______________________________________________________________________ Business Address:___________________________________________________________________ Relation to Program:_________________________________________________________________ Phone:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ FAX:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________________ Other suggested points of contact:___________________________________________________________

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

1. Staffing

a. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. Did the contractor provide personnel meeting the DOD 8570.01M requirement?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

2. Technical Approach

a. How would you rate the contractor's capability, knowledge, and expertise in developing, testing, and documenting software solutions?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. How would you rate the level/quality of security engineering certification and accreditation support, if applicable?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

d. How effectively did the contractor develop and document solutions to interface with other systems such as via database to database, XML, XSLT, XSD, Text-delimited, excel spreadsheets , MS Access Databases, WSDL, Win Mobile and other mobile device operating systems?

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

e. How effectively did the contractor develop, maintain, and administer complex software applications such as CAD, C++, JAVA, JavaScript, MS SQL, .NET, Macromedia Flash, ActionScript (FLEX) and Oracle databases adhering to Government and industry standards?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

f. Did the contractor perform tasks in support of transportation related requirements such as load planning activities or similar commercial activities and if so how would you rate the contractor?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

g. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?

3. Cost Control.

a. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

4. Contractor’s Overall performance

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes___________ No_________ If “no”, why?_____________________________________________________________________________

6. Small Business Subcontracting Utilization?

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING UTILIZATION
Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Exceptional
Unknown
A.
Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.
B.
Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
C.
Contractor met small business subcontracting goals as established in the contract.

DOD uses a common DOD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional”.

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the governments benefit.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .