PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_Attachment_2_-_20160321.docx

DOCX document 36 KB Posted

Attached to
Pharmacy Inpatient Authomation Solution - Automated Dispensing Cabinet
Solicitation number
HT0011-16-R-0021
Issued by

About this file

PIAS - ADC - PWS Attachment 2

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_Attachment_1_-_20160321.docx DOCX document
PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_Attachment_4_-_20160321.docx DOCX document
PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_Attachment_3_-_20160321.docx DOCX document
PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_Attachment_5_-_20160323.docx DOCX document
PIAS_-_ADC_-_PWS_-.docx DOCX document
Souces_Sought_PIAS_ADC.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PWS ATTACHMENT 2

RFP #

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (DRAFT)

PHARMACY INPATIENT AUTOMATION SOLUTION – AUTOMATED DISPENSING CABINET (PIAS-ADC)

Contractor’s name: (hereafter referred to as the contractor):

PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored.

· How monitoring will take place.

· Who will conduct the monitoring.

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

The following FAR clauses may apply depending on contract type: 52.246-4 Inspection of Services – Fixed-Price

GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

Contracting Officer (CO) The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO:

Organization or Agency:

Telephone:

Email:

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. At the conclusion of the contract or when requested by the CO, the COR shall provide documentation to the CO. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes they deem may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the CO for action.

Assigned COR:

Telephone:

Email:

CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Task Manager for this contract.

Program Manager Assigned Program Manager:

Telephone:

Email:

Task Manager Assigned Task Manager:

Telephone:

Email:

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Task
Indicator
Performance Standard
Acceptable Quality Level
Monitoring Method
System Availability
Systems are running and available
Systems are continuously available (365/24/7) and operational from the perspective of the end user outside of scheduled downtime/maintenance.
99.9% enterprise operational availability of all deployed equipment from the end user’s perspective per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

Maintenance & Support Response time

Provide technical support to individual sites
On-site or remote connection technical support shall be provided within 12 hours of an issue being reported or identified
99% of support requests shall receive initial response within 12 hours of notification per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

Maintenance & Support Contractor Resolution Time (Inside the U.S.)

Support resolution inside the U.S.
All support issues will be addressed, and resolved NLT 24 hours from the time the issue is reported or identified
99% of support calls shall be resolved to OEM operational specifications per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

Maintenance & Support Contractor Resolution Time (Outside the U.S.)

Support resolution outside the U.S.
All support issues will be address, and resolved NLT 48 hours from the time the issue is reported or identified
99% of support calls shall be resolved to OEM operational the site’s satisfaction per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office
Information Assurance Compliance
Applicable IAVA and IAVB notices
Continuous cybersecurity management of the solution
99.5% of applicable IAVA and IAVB notifications will be tested an applied to the deployed production solution per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office
Annual Preventative Maintenance
Preventative maintenance performed
Annual preventative maintenance visits and activities will be accomplished at each site or sooner when indicated by OEM specifications
99.9% of preventive maintenance is performed on schedule per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office
Site Workflow Assessment
Performance impact of vendor activities on solution in use
Coordinate tasks (e.g. repairs, updates, maintenance) and schedules with individual sites for all activities which potentially impact a user’s negative perception of solution performance
99.9% of tasks and schedules will be coordinated with the individual sites which have the potential to negatively impact the user perception of the solution performance per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office
Deliverables
Completed in a timely manner
Completed in accordance with Government schedule
99.5% of all deliverables are completed. submitted and accepted on time per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

Advanced Repair Training (Outside the U.S.)

Train Government authorized personnel
Provide on-site training to Government authorized personnel for advanced repair procedures and techniques
95% of Government authorized personnel stationed outside the U.S will be trained biannually
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

Hot Swappable Spares (Outside the U.S.)

Provision of replacement parts
Provide and replenish replacement parts utilized in the advanced repair procedures and techniques training, as well as any mutually agree upon hot swappable spares components
95% of defined parts and components are available in defined quantities and locations at the time of need from the end user’s perspective per quarter
Metric in MSR reviewed by Program Office

INCENTIVES

Not applicable for this task.

METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

Regardless of the surveillance method, the COR shall always contact the contractor's task manager or on-site representative when a defect is identified and inform the manager of the specifics of the problem. The COR, with assistance from the AM, shall be responsible for monitoring the contractor’s performance in meeting a specific performance standard/AQL.

Validated User/Customer Complaints Relies on the user of the service to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated. Highly applicable to services provided in quantity and where quality is highly subjective.

Performance Reporting Evaluate metrics for a specific time period.

Surveillance results may be used as the basis for actions (to include payment deductions) against the contractor. In such cases, the Inspection of Services clause in the Contract becomes the basis for the CO’s actions.

RATINGS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

RATING
DESCRIPTION
Exceptional
Performance significantly exceeds contract requirements to the Government’s benefit.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet contractual requirements.

DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

Acceptable Performance The Government shall document positive performance. A report template is attached. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for fixed fee payments, award fee payments, or other actions.

Unacceptable Performance When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's task manager or on-site representative. A CDR template is attached to this QASP.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for contract payment deductions, fixed fee deductions, award fee nonpayment, or other actions deemed necessary by the CO.

FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT

During contract/order performance, the COR shall take periodic measurements, every 6 months, as specified in the Performance Standards, and shall analyze whether the negotiated frequency of measurement is appropriate for the work being performed.

Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings The COR shall meet with the contractor as needed to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .