HSTS01-16-R-ENV003__amendment_a00001.pdf
PDF 615 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HSTS01-16-R-ENV003
About this file
HSTS01-16-R-ENV003 AMENDMENT A00001
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.
IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Acceptance of this amendment shall be included with the proposal submission.
An authorized official must complete blocks 15A, 15B and 15C and return one (1) copy to the issuing office.
See page 2 for amendment details.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
A00001
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
Evelyn Tyndell
TSA Office of Acquisition Workforce and Enterprise Operations Division 701 S. 12th Street Attn: Charlotte Brooks-Dale Arlington, VA 20598
TSA Office of Acquisition Workforce and Enterprise Operations Division 701 S. 12th Street Attn: Charlotte Brooks-Dale Arlington, VA 20598
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION
NO.
HSTS01-16-R-ENV003
09/23/2016
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
09/09/2016
X
RFP No. HSTS01-16-R-ENV003 Amendment No. A00001
Attachment 1 – Questions and Answers
1. Please confirm that should the estimated hazardous waste quantities provided in Technical Exhibit 2 increase over the life of the contract, a modification to the monthly unit price would be granted.
Government Response: No. Historical information provided in Attachment II to the RFP is for informational purposes only. In the event there is regulatory or policy change that impacts performance under the contract it will be negotiated in accordance the “Changes” clause.
2. Will the Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan (3.2.8) be considered a deliverable?
Government Response: No, the continuity of Operations Plan (3.2.8) is not listed as a separate deliverable in the deliverables table because it is to be included in the Quality Control Plan, which is due 30 days after contract award.
3. Is TSA Form 251 required for contractor supplied hazardous materials storage containers?
Government Response: No.
4. In PWS Technical Exhibit 1, please define what “on-time” means with respect to collection and disposition of waste.
Government Response: PWS Technical Exhibit 1 “Performance Requirement Summary” first performance objective for collection and disposition of waste; the acceptable quality level of “on time” refers to compliance with the established and mutually agreed upon schedule between the vendor and the Government which may be specific to the location.
5. Please confirm that should the estimated number of pickups and pounds for Special Hazardous Materials – Ammunition, Special Hazardous Materials – Fireworks increase over the life of the contract, a modification to the monthly unit price would be granted.
Government Response: See response #1.
6. Please clarify the maximum number of pickups required for airports not listed in the page 14 table of the PWS.
Government Response: There is no defined maximum number of pickups required.
The schedules are determined by rate of materials accumulated, storage space at location, and regulatory limits.
7. Are there airport-specific security requirements associated with pickups?
Government Response: Airport Security Requirements vary depending on location of the Accumulation area. Accumulation Areas located in sensitive areas will need higher levels of credentialing. If the Accumulation Area is in a public space there are no additional security requirements. If the Accumulation Area is TSA Only space TSA badging would be required unless escorted by a TSA employee. If the Accumulation Area is located in Airline Operations Area, Airport credentialing will be required.
8. What is the approximate time for final fitness adjudication for staff performing on the contract?
Government Response: The approximate time for final fitness adjudication for staff performing on the contract is estimated to be 2-3 months, however, suitability determinations by the Office of Personnel Security will vary based on the individual staff.
9. Will the Government require that specific GFE hardware be incorporated into and used to access the Automated Reporting and Tracking System in order to support referenced security requirements?
Government Response: The Government does not anticipate providing GFE hardware for the Automated Reporting and Tracking System however compliance with Federal, DHS and TSA information security/cybersecurity may require the use, purchase incorporation and/or access of specific hardware and/or software. Additionally, the systems must be accessible to all required TSA employees (Field and Headquarters) via TSA equipment.
10. Is a COOP required for the Automated Reporting and Tracking System?
Government Response: Yes, as required in RFP Section 3.2.8.
11. Is the government able to provide an example Requests for Change and the typical timeframe for approval and implementation?
Government Response: No.
12. Per 3.2.9, is an alternate processing site required for the Automated Reporting and Tracking System?
Government Response: RFP Section 3.2.9 does not require an alternate site for the system however, if the Offeror proposes such in response to this clause that is a business decision.
13. Does the Government contemplate requiring an oral presentation as part of the procurement process?
Government Response: No.
14. Is the proposal due date of October 4, 2016 listed on page 71 of the Draft RFP valid?
Government Response: Yes, please reference Section 5.4 (page 71) of the RFP.
15. Is there a requirement for the contractor’s program management office to be within the Washington, DC area, in close proximity to TSA HQ?
Government Response: No, however there is a requirement to attend quarterly meetings in person.
16. Are there any locations that require special equipment to access the waste streams?
Government Response: The evaluation of equipment needs should be assessed during transition site visits.
17. Which locations require a hand cart for drum removal?
Government Response: Most airport locations require hand carts. The evaluation of equipment needs should be assessed during transition site visits.
18. Please confirm that should the estimated hazardous waste quantities provided in Historical Contract Data Attachment 2 increase over the life of the contract, a modification to the monthly unit price would be granted.
Government Response: See response #1.
19. Please clarify the maximum number of pickups required for airports not listed in Attachment II page 2 (“Current Regularly Scheduled Airport Pickups”).
Government Response: See response #6.
20. Per the RFP, SECTION V – SOLICITATION PROVISIONS instructs the offeror to present Small Business Participation in the Volume II Business Proposal, yet SECTION VI – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD instructs the offeror to address Small Business Participation in Volume I, Factor 2. Are we to address the Small Business Participation in Volume I, Factor 2 or within Volume II?
Government Response: See updated RFP.
21. PWS Section 1.04 includes two sections 1.4.G (“Contractor Emergency and Spill Response Support” AND “Training Support”). Please confirm that “Contractor Emergency and Spill Response Support” is a sub level to 1.4.F (Emergency and Spill Response Support)?
Government Response: Yes.
22. In addition to completing the “Schedule of Services,” do offerors also need to provide additional breakdown of costs per “Item No.” or “CLIN” identifying direct/indirect costs, labor categories, labor rates, ODCs, and subcontracting costs proposed?
Government Response: No, additional breakdown of costs is not required.
23. Subcontracting Plan, c), Page 78: Does TSA intend for the subcontracting percentage goals listed to be percentages of total subcontracting dollars?
Government Response: See updated RFP.
24. Past Performance Subcontracting Goals Achievement, a), Page 78: Does TSA intend for offerors to demonstrate past performance achieving subcontracting goals in relation to the offeror’s (1) overall company performance for the last three years, or (2) in relation to the three past performance references provided in the RFP response?
Government Response: Each Offeror shall demonstrate their past performance achieving subcontracting goals in relation to individual (contract) subcontracting plans for the references provided which must be in the last three (3) years.
(End of Amendment)
Solicitation Number: HSTS01-16-R-ENV003 Amendment A00001 Attachment 2
HSTS01-16-R-ENV003
SECTION I– SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES /SERVICES
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
Once the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) accepts prohibited and hazardous items voluntarily abandoned by passengers at security checkpoints, it must properly dispose of those items. TSA Occupational Safety, Health, and Environment (OSHE) Division is responsible for protecting communities and the natural environment affected by our transportation security activities. Hazardous materials management and disposal services at security screening checkpoints at TSA airport locations may include providing containers, ensuring proper container identification, marking, labeling, packaging, shipping, and final treatment/disposal of collected materials to ensure environmental safety requirements are being met.
1.1 SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
ITEM
NO.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Base Period – 12 Months 00001 Transition 1 JB $ $
00002 Hazardous Materials Management Support – CONUS
9 MO $ $
00003 Hazardous Materials Management Support – OCONUS
9 MO $ $
00004 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) 1 NTE $100,000 $100,000 Option Period 1 – 12 Months
10001 Hazardous Materials Management Support – CONUS 12 MO $ $
10002 Hazardous Materials Management Support – OCONUS 12 MO $ $
10003 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) 1 NTE $100,000 $100,000 Option Period 2 – 12 Months 20001 Hazardous Materials Management
Support – CONUS 12 MO $ $
20002 Hazardous Materials Management Support – OCONUS 12 MO $ $
20003 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) 1 NTE $100,000 $100,000 Option Period 3 – 12 Months
30001 Hazardous Materials Management Support – CONUS 12 MO $ $
30002 Hazardous Materials Management Support – OCONUS 12 MO $ $
30003 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) 1 NTE $100,000 $100,000 Option Period 4 – 12 Months 40001 Hazardous Materials Management
Support – CONUS 12 MO $ $
40002 Hazardous Materials Management Support – OCONUS 12 MO $ $
40003 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) 1 NTE $100,000 $100,000
1.2 CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLIN) SUMMARY
1.3 FUNDING
The Government reserves the right to modify and/or partially exercise the base and/or the optional periods of the contract at the convenience of the Government.
1.4 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The total period of performance for this Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract shall not exceed five (5) years if all options are exercised.
CLIN DESCRIPTION TYPE NOTE
Hazardous Materials Management Support -
CONUS
Firm Fixed Price
This CLIN shall fund the execution of all activities outlined in the Performance Work Statement in support of CONUS operations to include all travel and payment of regulatory fees.
Hazardous Materials Management Support -
OCONUS
Firm Fixed Price
This CLIN shall fund the execution of all activities outlined in the Performance Work Statement in support of OCONUS operations to include all travel and payment of regulatory fees.
Other Direct Costs Not To Exceed
(NTE)
This CLIN shall fund activities associated with training support only to include curriculum development and training aids and material development for field distribution and training facilitation as specified by the Government.
SECTION II – PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
2.0 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT – ATTACHMENT 1
SECTION III - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3.0 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
3.0.1 5200.243.001 CONTRACTING OFFICER (CO) (JUL 2015)
The Contracting Officer is the only person authorized to make any changes, approve any changes in the requirements of this contract, issue orders, obligate funds and authorize the expenditure of funds, and notwithstanding any term contained elsewhere in this contract, such authority remains vested solely in the Contracting Officer. (For further information, the Contracting Officer is a federal government employee who is specifically authorized and appointed in writing under specified agency procedures and granted the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings.) In the event, the Contractor makes any changes at the direction of any person other than the Contracting Officer, the change will be considered to have been without authority and no adjustment will be made in the contract price to cover any increase in costs incurred as a result thereof.
The following Primary Contracting Officer is assigned to this contract. Alternate Contracting Officers may be assigned:
TSA Contracting Officer:
NAME: Evelyn S. Tyndell
PHONE NUMBER: 571-227-1539
EMAIL: Evelyn.Tyndell@tsa.dhs.gov
(End of clause)
3.0.2 5200. 242.001 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR) AND
TECHNICAL MONITORS (JUL 2015)
1. The principle role of the COR is to support the Contracting Officer in managing the contract.
This is done through furnishing technical direction within the confines of the contract, monitoring performance, ensuring requirements are met within the terms of the contract, and maintaining a strong relationship with the Contracting Officer. As a team the Contracting Officer and COR must ensure that program requirements are clearly communicated and that the agreement is performed to meet them. The principle role of the Technical Monitor (TM) is to support the COR on all work orders, tasks, deliverables and actions that require immediate attention relating to the approved scope and obligated funding of the contract action.
2. The Contracting Officer hereby designates the individual(s) named below as the Contracting Officer's Representative(s) and Technical Monitor(s). Such designations(s) shall specify the scope and limitations of the authority so delegated.
TSA CORs: (Will be provided at time of award)
NAME:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
3. The COR(s) and TM(s) may be changed at any time by the Government without prior notice to the Contractor, but notification of the change, including the name and phone number of the successor COR, will be promptly provided to the Contractor by the Contracting Officer in writing.
4. The responsibilities and limitations of the COR are as follows:
• The COR is responsible for the technical aspects of the project and technical liaison with the Contractor. The COR is also responsible for the final inspection and acceptance of all reports and such other responsibilities as may be specified in the contract.
• The COR may designate assistant COR(s) to act for him/her by naming such assistant in writing and transmitting a copy of such designation through the Contracting Officer to the Contractor.
• The COR will maintain communications with the Contractor and the Contracting Officer.
The COR must report any observed fraud, waste, or opportunities to improve performance of cost efficiency to the Contracting Officer.
• The COR will immediately alert the Contracting Officer to any possible Contractor deficiencies or questionable practices so that corrections can be made before the problems become significant.
• The COR is not authorized to make any commitments or otherwise obligate the Government or authorize any changes which affect the contract’s price, terms or conditions.
Any Contractor request for changes shall be referred to the Contracting Officer directly or through the COR. No such changes shall be made without the expressed prior authorization of the Contracting Officer.
• The COR is not authorized to direct the Contractor on how to perform the work.
• The COR is not authorized to issue stop-work orders. The COR may recommend the authorization by the Contracting Officer to issue a stop work order, but the Contracting Officer is the only official authorized to issue such order.
• The COR is not authorized to discuss new proposed efforts or encourage the Contractor to perform additional efforts on an existing contract or order.
5. The responsibilities and limitations of the TM are as follows:
• Coordinating with the COR on all work orders, task, deliverables and actions that require immediate attention relating to the approved scope and obligated funding of the contract action.
• Monitoring the Contractor’s performance in relation to the technical requirements of the assigned functional area of the contract to ensure that the Contractor’s performance is strictly within the contract’s scope and obligated funding.
• Ensuring that all recommended changes in any work under the contract are coordinated and submitted in writing to the COR for consideration.
• Informing the COR if the Contractor is not meeting performance, cost, schedule milestones.
• Performing technical reviews of the Contractor’s proposals as directed by the COR.
• Performing acceptance of the Contractor’s deliverables as directed by the COR.
• Reporting any threats to the health and safety of persons or potential for damage to
Government property or critical national infrastructure which may result from the Contractor’s performance or failure to perform the contract’s requirements.
(End of clause)
3.0.3 5200.242.003 SUBMISSION OF INVOICES (JUL 2015)
(a) Background: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) partners with the United States Coast Guard Finance Center for financial services in support of TSA operations, including the payment of contractor invoices. Therefore, all monthly contractor invoices must be submitted to, and will be paid by, the U.S. Coast Guard Finance Center (FinCen) following monthly contractor performance review and acceptance.
(b) Invoice Submission Method: Invoices may be submitted via facsimile, U.S. Mail, or email.
Contractors shall utilize ONLY ONE method per invoice submission. The submission information for each of the methods is as follows in order of preference:
1) Facsimile number is: 757-413-7314
The facsimile number listed above shall be used by contractors for ORIGINAL invoice submission only. If facsimile submission is utilized, contractors shall not submit hard copies of invoices via the U.S. mail. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verify that invoices are received, regardless of the method of submission used. Contractors may inquire regarding the receipt of invoices by contacting the U.S. Coast Guard Finance Center via the methods listed in subparagraph (d) of this clause.
2) U.S. Mail:
United States Coast Guard Finance Center TSA Commercial Invoices P.O. Box 4111 Chesapeake, VA 23327-4111
3) Email Invoices
FIN-SMB-TSAInvoices@uscg.mil or www.fincen.uscg.mil
(c) Invoice Process: Upon receipt of contractor invoices, FinCen will electronically route invoices to the appropriate TSA Contracting Officer’s Representative and/or Contracting Officer for review and approval. Upon approval, the TSA will electronically route the invoices back to FinCen. Upon receipt of certified invoices from an Authorized Certifying Official, FinCen will initiate payment of the invoices.
Note for discounts offered:
Discounts on invoices. If desired, the Contractor may offer discounts directly upon the invoice submitted, clearly specifying the terms of the discount. Contractors can structure discounted amounts for payment for any time period less than the usual thirty day payment period specified under Prompt Payment requirements; however the Contractor should not structure terms for payment of net amounts invoiced any sooner than the standard period required under FAR Subpart 32.9 regarding prompt payments for the specified deliverables under contract.
Discounts offered after invoice submission. If the Contractor offers a discount on a specific invoice after its submission for payment, the Contractor shall submit a letter to the Finance Center identifying the specific invoice for which a discount is offered and specify the exact terms of the discount offered and what time period the Government should make payment by in order to receive the discount. The Contractor should clearly indicate the contract number, invoice number and date, and the specific terms of the discount offered. Contractors should not structure terms for net amount payments any sooner than the standard period required under FAR Subpart 32.9 regarding prompt payments for the specified deliverables under contract.
(d) Payment Status: Contractors may inquire on the payment status of an invoice by any of the following means:
(1) Via the internet: https://www.fincen.uscg.mil Contacting the FinCen Customer Service Section via telephone at 1-800-564-5504 or (757) 523-6940 (Voice Option #1). The hours of operation for the Customer Service line are 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
However, the Customer Service line has a voice-mail feature that is available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
(2) Via the Payment Inquiry Form: https://www.fincen.uscg.mil/secure/payment.htm
(e) Invoice Elements: Invoices will automatically be rejected if the information required in subparagraph (a)(2) of the Prompt Payment Clause, contained in this Section of the Contract, including EFT banking information, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), and DUNS number are not included in the invoice. All invoices must clearly correlate invoiced amounts to the corresponding contract line item number and funding citation. The Contractor shall work with the Government to mutually refine the format, content and method of delivery for all invoice submissions during the performance of the Contract.
(f) Supplemental Invoice Documentation: Contractors shall submit all supplemental invoice documentation (e.g. copies of subcontractor invoices, travel vouchers, etc.) necessary to approve an invoice along with the original invoice. The Contractor invoice must contain the information stated in the Prompt Payment Clause in order to be received and processed by FinCen. Supplemental invoice documentation required for review and approval of invoices may, at the written direction of the Contracting Officer, be submitted directly to either the Contracting Officer, or the Contracting Officer’s Representative. Note for “time-and-material” type contracts: The Contractor must submit the following statement with each invoice for labor hours invoiced under a “time-and-materials” type contract, order, or contract line item: “The Contractor hereby certifies in accordance with paragraph (c) of FAR 52.232-7, that each labor hour has been performed by an employee (prime or subcontractor) who meets the contract’s specified requirements for the labor category invoiced.”
(g) Additional Invoice Preparation Instructions for Software Development and/or Hardware.
The Contractor shall clearly include a separate breakdown (by CLIN) for any software development activities (labor costs, subcontractor costs, etc.) in accordance with Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards Number 10 (Preliminary design costs, Development costs and post implementation costs) and cite payment terms. The contractor shall provide make and model descriptions as well as serial numbers for purchases of hardware and software (where applicable.)
(h) Frequency of Invoice Submission. Invoices shall be submitted on a monthly basis for the prior month’s services.
3.2 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
3.2.1 TECHNICAL INSTRUCTION
(a) Performance of the work hereunder may be subject to written or oral technical instructions issued by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) specified in Section III of this contract. As used herein, technical instructions are defined to include the following:
(1) Directions to the Contractor which suggest pursuit of certain lines of inquiry, i.e., shift work emphasis, fill in details or otherwise serve to accomplish the contractual statement of work.
(2) Guidelines to the Contractor which assist in the interpretation of specifications or technical portions of work description.
(b) Technical instructions must be within the general scope of work stated in the contract.
Technical instructions may not be used to: (1) assign additional work under the contract; (2) direct a change as defined in the "CHANGES" clause of this contract; (3)increase or decrease the contract price or estimated contract amount (including fee), as applicable, the level of effort, or the time required for contract performance; or (4) change any of the terms, conditions or specifications of the contract.
(c) If, in the opinion of the Contractor, any technical instruction calls for effort outside the scope of the contract or is inconsistent with this requirement, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing within ten (10) working days after the receipt of any such instruction. The Contractor shall not proceed with the work affected by the technical instruction unless and until the Contractor is notified by the Contracting Officer that the technical instruction is within the scope of this contract.
(d) Failure of the Contractor and the CO to agree on whether Government direction is technical direction or a Change within the purview of the "Changes" clause shall be a dispute concerning a question of fact within the meaning of the Clause of the General Provision entitled, "Disputes."
(a) Nothing in the foregoing paragraph shall be construed to excuse the Contractor from performing that portion of the contractual work statement which is not affected by the disputed technical instruction.
3.2.2 DHS AND TSA ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE COMPLIANCE
a) The Contractor shall ensure that all solutions, products, deliverables, and services are aligned and compliant with the current DHS and TSA Enterprise Architecture, and the Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (OMB Reference Models).
b) All solutions and services shall meet DHS and TSA Enterprise Architecture policies, standards, and procedures. Specifically, the contractor shall comply with Homeland Security Enterprise Architecture (HLS EA) requirements.
c) Description information for all data assets, information exchanges and data standards, whether adopted or developed, shall be submitted to the TSA Enterprise Architecture Data Management Team, who will be responsible for coordination with the DHS Enterprise Data Management Office (EDMO) for review, approval and insertion into the DHS Data Reference Model and Enterprise Architecture Information Repository.
i. Development of data assets, information exchanges, and data standards will comply with the DHS Data Management Policy MD 103-01 and all data-related artifacts will be developed and validated according to DHS and TSA data management architectural guidelines and subject to the TSA Enterprise Architecture Data Management Team (EDM) approval.
ii. In addition to the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) Subpart 27.4 – ‘Rights in Data and Copyrights’ and Section 35.011 detailing technical data delivery, the contractor shall provide all TSA-specific data in a format maintaining pre-existing referential integrity and data constraints, as well as data structures in an understandable format to TSA. Examples of data structures can be defined as, but not limited to
a. Data models depicting relationship mapping and, or linkages
b. Metadata information to define data definitions
c. Detailed data formats, type, and size
d. Delineations of the referential integrity (e.g., primary key/foreign key) of data schemas, structures, and or taxonomies
iii. All TSA-specific data shall be delivered in a secure and timely manner to TSA.
Data security is defined within the ‘Requirements for Handling Sensitive, Classified, and/or Proprietary Information’, section of this SOW. This definition complies with not only the delivery of data, but also maintaining TSA-specific data within a non- TSA or DHS proprietary system. Alternative data delivery techniques may also be defined by TSA Enterprise Data Management (EDM) team.
iv. All metadata shall be pre-defined upon delivery to TSA. Metadata shall be delivered in a format that is readily interpretable by TSA (e.g. metadata shall be extracted from any metadata repository that is not utilized by TSA and delivered in a TSA approved manner). Metadata shall also provide an indication of historical verses the most current data to be used, as well as frequency of data refreshes.
3.2.3 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 508)
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L.
105-220) requires that when Federal agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology (EIT), they must ensure that it is accessible to people with disabilities.
Federal employees and members of the public who have disabilities must have equal access to and use of information and data that is comparable to that enjoyed by non-disabled Federal employees and members of the public.
Any applicable EIT deliverables within this work statement shall comply with the applicable technical and functional performance criteria of Section 508 unless exempt. Specifically, the following applicable EIT accessibility standards have been identified:
A. Section 508 Applicable EIT Accessibility Standards
36 CFR 1194.21 Software Applications and Operating Systems, applies to all EIT software applications and operating systems procured, developed or used under this work statement including but not limited to GOTS and COTS software. In addition, this standard is to be applied to Web-based applications when needed to fulfill the functional performance criteria. This standard also applies to some Web based applications as described within 36 CFR 1194.22.
36 CFR 1194.22 Web-based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications, applies to all Web-based deliverables, including documentation and reports procured or developed under this work statement. When any Web application uses a dynamic (non-static) interface, embeds custom user control(s), embeds video or multimedia, uses proprietary or technical approaches such as, but not limited to, Flash or Asynchronous Javascript and XML (AJAX) then 1194.21 Software standards also apply to fulfill functional performance criteria.
36 CFR 1194.24 Video and Multimedia Products, applies to all video and multimedia products that are procured or developed under this work statement. Any video or multimedia presentation shall also comply with the software standards (1194.21) when the presentation is through the use of a Web or Software application interface having user controls available.
36 CFR 1194.31 Functional Performance Criteria, applies to all EIT deliverables regardless of delivery method. All EIT deliverable shall use technical standards, regardless of technology, to fulfill the functional performance criteria.
36 CFR 1194.41 Information Documentation and Support, applies to all documents, reports, as well as help and support services. To ensure that documents and reports fulfill the required 1194.31 Functional Performance Criteria, they shall comply with the technical standard associated with Web-based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications at a minimum. In addition, any help or support provided in this work statement that offer telephone support, such as, but not limited to, a help desk shall have the ability to transmit and receive messages using TTY.
B. Section 508 Applicable Exceptions
Exceptions for this work statement have been determined by DHS and only the exceptions described herein may be applied. Any request for additional exceptions shall be sent to the COR and determination will be made in accordance with DHS MD 4010.2. DHS has identified the following exceptions that may apply: 36 CFR 1194.3(b) Incidental to Contract, all EIT that is exclusively owned and used by the contractor to fulfill this work statement does not require compliance with Section 508. This exception does not apply to any EIT deliverable, service or item that will be used by any Federal employee(s) or member(s) of the public. This exception only applies to those contractors assigned to fulfill the obligations of this work statement and for the purposes of this requirement, are not considered members of the public.
C. Section 508 Compliance Requirements
36 CFR 1194.2(b) (COTS/GOTS products), When procuring a product, each agency shall procure products which comply with the provisions in this part when such products are available in the commercial marketplace or when such products are developed in response to a Government solicitation. Agencies cannot claim a product as a whole is not commercially available because no product in the marketplace meets all the standards. If products are commercially available which meet some but not all of the standards, the agency must procure the product that best meets the standards. When applying this standard, all procurements of EIT shall have documentation of market research that identify a list of products or services that first meet the agency business needs, and from that list of products or services, an analysis that the selected product met more of the accessibility requirements than the non-selected products as required by FAR 39.2. Any selection of a product or service that meets less accessibility standards due to a significant difficulty or expense shall only be permitted under an undue burden claim and requires authorization from the DHS Office of Accessible Systems and Technology (OAST) in accordance with DHS MD 4010.2.
All tasks for testing of functional and/or technical requirements must include specific testing for Section 508 compliance, and must use DHS Office of Accessible Systems and Technology approved testing methods and tools. For information about approved testing methods and tools send an email to accessibility@hq.dhs.gov.
3.2.4 5200.204.001 MAJOR BREACH OF SAFETY OR SECURITY (DEC 2015)
(a) Safety is the freedom from those conditions that can cause death, injury, occupational illness, damage to or loss of equipment or property, or damage to the environment. Safety is essential to TSA and compliance with safety standards and practices is a material part of this contract. A major mailto:accessibility@hq.dhs.gov breach of safety may constitute a breach of contract that entitles the Government to exercise any of its rights and remedies applicable to material parts of this agreement, including termination for default. A major breach of safety must be related directly to the work on the agreement. A major breach of safety is an act or omission of the Contractor that consists of an accident, incident, or exposure resulting in a fatality, serious injury, or mission failure; or in damage to equipment or property equal to or greater than $1 million; or in any "willful" or "repeat" violation cited by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or by a state agency operating under an OSHA approved plan.
(b) Security is the condition of safeguarding against espionage, sabotage, crime (including computer crime), or attack. A major breach of security may constitute a breach of contract that entitles the Government to exercise any of its rights and remedies applicable to material parts of this agreement, including termination for default. A major breach of security may occur on or off Government installations, but must be related directly to the work on the agreement. A major breach of security is an act or omission by the Contractor that results in compromise of classified information or sensitive security information or sensitive but unclassified information, including contractor proprietary information, illegal technology transfer, workplace violence resulting in criminal conviction, sabotage, compromise or denial of information technology services, equipment or property damage from vandalism greater than $250,000, or theft greater than $250,000.
NOTE: Breach of Security for the purposes of this definition should not be confused with breach of security in screening operations.
(c) In the event of a major breach of safety or security, the Contractor shall report the breach to the Contracting Officer. If directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall conduct its own investigation and report the results to the Government. The Contractor shall cooperate with the Government investigation, if conducted.
3.2.5 5200.204.002 PERSONNEL ACCESS (MAR 2016)
(a) All Contractor personnel requiring access to TSA facilities, information systems, or information will be subject to security vetting and related procedures set forth in this contract.
(b) Whenever personal identity verification (PIV ) cards or access badges are required for issuance or re-issuance to contractor personnel for authorized access to Government facilities, under the guidance of the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), the Contractor is responsible for making all arrangements for affected Contractor personnel to report in-person at the nearest Government issuing facility to initiate and complete procedures for PIV card issuance. The Government will not be able to provide PIV card issuance at any other locations than those officially designated as available. PIV card issuing facilities that are available for the completion of this requirement for TSA contractors are as listed by the TSA Personnel Security Section, and the COR will advise the Contractor about Government PIV card issuing facility locations that are nearby the contractor’s location(s) of performance that will be potentially available for card issuance when required.
3.2.6 5200.209.004 STAFF-LIKE ACCESS DETERMINATION FOR CONTRACTOR
EMPLOYEES (FEB 2016)
All contractor employees seeking to provide services to TSA under a TSA contract are subject to a fitness determination to assess whether their initial employment or continued employment on a TSA contract protects or promotes the efficiency of the agency. TSA, by and through the Office of Security, Personnel Security Section (PerSec), will allow a contractor employee to commence work on a TSA contract only if a review of the contractor employee’s preliminary background check is favorable. Contractor employees with unfavorable preliminary background checks will not be allowed to work on a TSA contract.
A fitness determination involves the following three phases:
Phase 1: Enter-On-Duty (EOD) Fitness Determination: a review of a contractor employee’s consumer credit report, criminal history records, and submitted security forms to determine, to the extent possible, if the contractor employee has bad debt and/or criminal offenses and/or falsification issues that would prohibit employment as a TSA contractor. This determination may include verification of citizenship for contractor employees born outside of the United States. A favorable Enter-On-Duty (EOD) Suitability Determination is not a final fitness determination;
rather, it is a preliminary review of external data sources that allows the contractor employee to commence work prior to the required background investigation being completed.
When a contractor employee is deemed eligible to commence work on a TSA contract, TSA PerSec will notify the appropriate Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) of the favorable determination. Similar notifications will be sent when a contractor employee has not passed the preliminary background check and has been deemed unsuitable.
Phase 2: Background Investigation: Once the contractor employee commences work on a TSA contract, TSA PerSec will process all submitted security forms to determine whether the contractor has previously been the subject of a federal background investigation sufficient in scope to meet TSA minimum investigative requirements. Contractor employees who have a federal investigation sufficient in scope will immediately be processed for final fitness adjudication. Those contractor employees who do not have a previous federal background investigation sufficient in scope will be scheduled for the appropriate level background investigation through the submission of their security forms to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
Phase 3: Final Fitness Adjudication: TSA PerSec will complete the final fitness determination after receipt, review, and adjudication of the completed OPM background investigation. The final fitness determination is an assessment made by TSA PerSec to determine whether there is reasonable expectation that the continued employment of the TSA contractor will or will not protect or promote the efficiency of the agency. An unfavorable final fitness determination will result in a notification to the COR that the contractor employee has been deemed unfit for continued contract employment and that he/she shall be removed from the TSA contract.
3.2.7 5200.212.001 COMMERCIAL APPLICABILITY (JUL 2015)
This contract is/ is not for a commercial item, as defined by FAR 2.1.
(End of clause)
3.2.8 5200.218.001 CONTINGENCY AND/OR CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS SUPPORT
OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS (DEC 2015)
(a) Background. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and is responsible for the security of the nation’s transportation system. This includes not only the security screening operations conducted for passenger air travel, but also security operations protecting air cargo and shipping, surface and other transportation modes including rail, and pipelines and other transportation infrastructure. To those ends, the TSA must be able to respond quickly to incidents, and increase and re-constitute its operational posture (“continuity of operations”) in response to threats and the possibility of actual attacks upon or disruption to government operations or national infrastructure. The TSA has an internal capacity to establish and operate Critical Incident Management Groups in response to a specific, TSA-only incident, or as a part of larger DHS operation due to orders from the DHS Secretary, or due to increased threat levels under the National Terrorism Advisory System, or federal operations up to and including responsibilities assigned under the National Response Framework. To these ends, the TSA must be able to count upon a correlated contractor capability to surge capacity in response to incidents or quickly re-constitute capability to recover from a catastrophe. Accordingly, TSA contractors must be prepared and able to provide surge capacity and to reconstitute operational capability to perform under contract as required in response to an emergency.
(b) Definitions. The meaning of specific contingency or emergency-related terms herein proceeds from those definitions within the National Response Framework and are available from the National Response Framework Resource Center glossary at http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nrf/.
(c) Force and effect of this clause. Without regard to the extent that the Contractor’s actual responses in order to meet the requirements of this clause may be necessitated by occurrences or conditions as described in the “Excusable Delays” paragraph of FAR 52.212-4, “Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items” clause or those described in the FAR 52.249-14, “Excusable Delays” clause (or such related conditions as described in other clauses, such as the FAR 52.249-8 “Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service),” 52.249-9 “Default (Fixed-Price Research and Development),” and/or FAR 52.249-10 (Fixed-Price Construction),” if included in the contract), the Contractor shall provide surge capacity, re-establish functions, and reconstitute capability and performance under this contract as quickly as possible in response to an incident and/or as ordered by the Contracting Officer.
(d) Response functions and capabilities. The Contractor shall establish and maintain the following capabilities as a requirement of this contract.
(1) Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan. The Contractor shall establish a written continuity of operations plan in accordance with “Continuity Guidance Circular 1 (CCG1), Continuity Guidance for Non-Federal Agencies” of January 2009. In general, COOP plans must be designed in order to:
i. Minimize loss of life, injury, and property damage.
ii. Mitigate the duration, severity, or pervasiveness of disruptions that do occur.
iii. Achieve the timely and orderly resumption of essential functions and the return to normal operations.
iv. Protect essential facilities, equipment, records, and assets.
v. Be executable with or without warning.
vi. Meet the operational requirements of the TSA. Continuity plans need to be operational within minutes of activation, depending on the essential function or service, but certainly should be operational no later than 12 hours after activation.
vii. Meet the sustainment needs of the TSA. An organization may need to plan for sustained continuity operations for up to 30 days or longer, depending on resources, support relationships, and the respective continuity strategy adopted.
viii. Ensure the continuous performance of essential functions and operations during an emergency, including those such as pandemic influenza that require additional considerations beyond traditional continuity planning.
ix. Provide an integrated and coordinated continuity framework that takes into consideration other relevant organizational, governmental, and private sector continuity plans and procedures.
The Contractor’s COOP Plan is intended to be executed in response to an incident, and the COOP Plan shall address each of the following requirements in depth, in addition to the essential functions described in CCG1:
(A) Communications. In the case of an applicable incident or a notification per paragraph (e) “Response Requirement” below, the Contractor shall maintain or be able to re-establish active, real-time communication with its employees under the contract during the 24-hour day period on all days during the week such that the Contractor can ensure performance under the contract will continue at such alternate locations under the contract to meet specified deliverables and/or response to surge capacity. Likewise, the Contractor shall ensure that effective communication about its contract performance can continue with the Contracting Officer, taking into account the operational profile or location of TSA facilities or assets in response to an incident in order to meet specified deliverables and/or response to surge capacity orders from the Contracting Officer.
(B) Facilities. In the case of an applicable incident or a notification per paragraph (e) “Response Requirement” below, the Contractor shall be able to re-constitute contractor presence at self-provided facilities or at Government-provided facility space as may be required in order to meet specified deliverables and/or response to surge capacity orders from the Contracting Officer.
(C) Information Systems/Network. In the case of an applicable incident or a notification per paragraph (e) “Response Requirement” below, the Contractor shall maintain and be able to re-constitute an information systems network at its facilities or for use at alternate facilities as may be necessary in order to meet specified deliverables and/or respond to surge capacity orders from the Contracting Officer.
(D) Annual or Periodic COOP Exercise. Under the monitoring of the Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), the Contractor shall conduct an annual exercise to test…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .