HSHQDC-16-R-00086_-_Attachment_J.2_-_Past_Performance_Contractor_Performance_Customer_Survey_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 45 KB Posted

Attached to
NBAF OPTIC
Solicitation number
HSHQDC-16-R-00086
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a customer survey questionnaire for evaluating contractor past performance on a Department of Homeland Security contract. The survey requests ratings on quality, timeliness, business relations, and cost control for a contractor providing unspecified products or services. Respondents are asked to evaluate the contractor's compliance with requirements, personnel capabilities, management effectiveness, reliability, flexibility, cost management, and customer satisfaction. Comments are also solicited. The ratings and guidelines provided define performance as outstanding, good, acceptable, or unsatisfactory.

The related federal contract opportunity notice is for the Operational Planning and Technology Integration Contract in support of the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility. Services required include operational planning, scheduling, assessments, and acquisition support. The solicitation will be issued on September 27th with proposals due 30 days later. The award will be a single cost-plus-fixed-fee contract under NAICS code 541690 resulting from a full and open competition.

Attachment J.2

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HSHQDC-16-R-00086

Attachment J.2

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete the following questionnaire and return it to the attention of the Contracting Officer: wanda.moorman@hq.dhs.gov by October 27, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Eastern Time.

Name

Title

Address

Telephone Number/Fax Number

This survey pertains to: __________________________________________________________ Department/Component: _________________________________________________________

Solicitation Number: ____________________________________________________________

Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________

Name of Person Completing Survey: _______________________________________________

Signature of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________________

Your Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________

Your Role in this Contract: _______________________________________________________

Survey Period of Performance: ____________________________________________________

General description of products/services required under the contract: ______________________

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.

Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

N/A

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

N/A

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

N/A

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

N/A

6. Overall quality of product/service:

N/A

7.

Product performance:

N/A

8.

Spare parts availability:

N/A

9.

Ease of use:

N/A

10.

Quality and timeliness of warranty work:

N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

N/A

2. Responsive to technical direction:

N/A

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

N/A

BUSINESS RELATIONS:

1. Effective management, including subcontracts:

N/A

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

N/A

4. Notification of problems:

N/A

5. Flexibility:

N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

N/A

COST CONTROL:

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

N/A

2.

Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:

N/A

3. Cost efficiencies:

N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1.

The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel

(circle one) Yes No

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel

(circle one) Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Rating Guidelines

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4-Outstanding
There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer.
There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer.
There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations.
3-Good
There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements, and the contractor bettered the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements.
2-Acceptable
The contractor met the contract requirements. Overall compliance required some assistance from the customer.
The contractor met the contract requirements. Customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs.
The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. Customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements.
1-Unsatisfactory
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Nonconformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements.
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively.
The contractor did not meet the agreed upon schedule. Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives.
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Responses to inquiries, technical/service/admin-istrative issues were not timely or effective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .