Attachment_C_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Evacuation Planning and Operational Support for Motor Coaches Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSFE90-13-R-0013
About this file
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| All_Questions_and_Answers_Document_1-21.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_B_Performance_Work_Statement_(1_24_2014).docx | DOCX document | |
| HSFE90-13-R-0013_Solicitation_1-24-2014.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_B_Performance_Work_Statement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_D_Hurricane_Alex_Scenario_for_Louisiana_and_Texas.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_E_Past_Performance_Survey.doc | DOC document | |
| HSFE90-13-R-0013_Solicitation_1-6-2014.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_F_Past_Contractual_Peformance.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_A__Excel_Spreadsheet_for_Labor_Categories_and_Rates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT C
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Evacuation Planning and Operational Support for Motor Coach
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) describes how government personnel will evaluate and assess contractor performance. The QASP is based on the premise that the Contractor, not the Government, is responsible for managing and ensuring that quality controls meet the terms of the contract. The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services the Contractor is required to furnish.
This QASP has been developed to evaluate Contractor actions while implementing the Performance Work Statement (PWS). It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring Contractor performance for each listed objective on the Performance Requirements Matrix (PRM).
Definition of Terms in the PRM:
· Minor deficiency is any error in the deliverable product resulting from clerical or administrative errors.
· Major deficiency is any error that would cause the deliverable product to be determined unacceptable.
· Non-Compliance is an outcome that does not meet the requirements detailed in the Contract and Task Order
Performance Requirements Summary Matrix
Performance Objective
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 1-A1 (CONPLAN) and 1-A2 (OPLAN)
Draft deliverable(s) shall be submitted by the due date(s) set forth in the Task Order.
Draft deliverable(s) shall be submitted by the due date(s) set forth in the Task Order.
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) |
| If all draft deliverable(s) are submitted on or before the due date(s), the Contractor will receive a rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Schedule rating as long as the final deliverable(s) are also submitted on time. |
Final deliverable(s) shall be submitted by the due date(s) set forth in the Task Order.
Final deliverable(s) shall be submitted by the due date(s) set forth in the Task Order.
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) |
| If all final deliverable(s) are submitted on or before the due date(s), the Contractor will receive a rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Schedule rating. |
| Final deliverable(s) shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance, and final deliverable(s) shall satisfactory meet 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order. |
| Final deliverable(s) shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance, and final deliverable(s) shall satisfactory meet 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) |
| If no deficiencies or non-compliance are found and final deliverable(s) satisfactory meets 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order, the Contractor shall receive rating of “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Quality rating. |
Contractor shall fix all deficiencies and non-compliance at no additional cost to the Government within 10 business days unless otherwise specified in the Task Order.
If deficiencies and non-compliance are not fixed within 10 business days, or unless otherwise specified in the Task Order, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Unsatisfactory” in CPARS under the Quality rating.
| Identify key stakeholders needed to participate in the planning process |
| Correctly identify key stakeholders needed to participate in the planning process |
| 95% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) by COR and site monitoring by the COR or COR representative |
| If deliverable falls below 95% compliance, the contractor will receive a rating of “Marginal” or less in the CPARS under the Quality rating |
Sub Task 1-A3 Market Survey of Motor Coach Availability
Market Survey(s) shall be submitted within 48 hours of Task Order issuance or by the date(s) set forth in the Task Order
Market Survey(s) shall be submitted within 48 hours of Task Order issuance or by the date(s) set forth in the Task Order
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection deliverable(s) |
| If any Market Survey is not submitted on or before the due date, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Unsatisfactory” in CPARS under Schedule Rating. |
Market Surveys shall include number and location of preferred motor coach type, passenger capacity, and time required to conduct operations.
Market Surveys shall include number and location of preferred motor coach type, passenger capacity, and time required to conduct operations.
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) |
| If any Market Survey does not contain the necessary information identified in Sub Task 1-A3, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Unsatisfactory” in CPARS under Quality Rating. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 1-A4 Pre-Hurricane Season Annual Strategy Assessment Meeting
| Contractor shall conduct the meeting to address the requirements detailed in Section 1-A4 of the PWS effectively. |
| Post meeting evaluation survey on the effectiveness of the conference |
| 70% of the participants finds the meeting to be effective based on the surveys collected |
| Average of all surveys collected will be measured |
| If 80% of the participants finds the meeting to be effective based on the surveys collected, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under Quality Rating. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 1-B Training
| Draft Training Package deliverable(s) submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| Draft Training Package deliverable(s) submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable |
| If all draft Training Package deliverable(s) are submitted on or before the due date, the Contractor will receive a rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Schedule rating. |
| Final Training Package deliverable(s) submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| Final Training Package deliverable(s) submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable |
| If all final Training Package deliverable(s) are submitted on or before the due date, the Contractor will receive a rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Schedule rating. |
| Final Training Package deliverable(s) shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance, and Final Training Plan |
| Final Training Package deliverable(s) shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance, and Final Training Package deliverable(s) shall satisfactory meet 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable |
| If no errors or non-compliance are found, the Contractor shall receive rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Quality rating. |
Contractor shall fix all errors and non-compliance at no additional cost to the Government within 3 business days unless specified in the Task Order.
If errors and non-compliance are not fixed within 3 business days or unless otherwise specified in the Task Order, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Unsatisfactory” in CPARS under the Quality rating.
| Training shall effectively educate participants. |
| Training evaluation survey on the effectiveness of the training |
| 70% of the trainees finds the training to be effective based on the surveys collected |
| Average of all surveys collected will be measured |
| If 80% of the trainees finds the training to be effective based on the surveys collected, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under Quality Rating. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 1-C Exercise
| Deliver a Table Top, Functional or Full-Scale Exercise accurately addressing the tasks identified in the OPLAN |
| Deliver a Table Top, Functional or Full-Scale Exercise accurately addressing the tasks identified in the OPLAN |
| 100% compliance with the State OPLAN for evacuation |
| 100% inspection of final deliverable(s) by COR. 100% monitoring of conference by COR or designee |
| If deliverable is not accurately address the tasks identified in the OPLAN, a rating of ‘Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category |
| Final Test Plan deliverable shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance; and final Test Plan deliverable shall satisfactory meet 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order. |
| Final Test Plan deliverable shall contain no deficiencies or non-compliance; and final Test Plan deliverable shall satisfactory meet 100% of all technical requirements detailed in the Task Order. |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable |
| If no errors or non-compliance are found, the Contractor shall receive rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Quality rating. |
Contractor shall fix all errors and non-compliance at no additional cost to the Government within 3 business days unless specified in the Task Order.
If errors and non-compliance are not fixed within 3 business days or unless otherwise specified in the Task Order, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Unsatisfactory” in CPARS under the Quality rating.
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 2-A1 Activation
| Deploy to designated locations within 24 hours of Task Order issuance or Notice to Proceed. |
| Fully Deployed to designated locations within 24 hours of Task Order issuance Notice to Proceed. |
| 100% deployment of all personnel stated on the task order within 24 hours of notification |
| Random monitoring by COR or designee |
| If performance objective is not met, a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Schedule rating category. |
| Provide overall fleet command and communication services for activation within 24 hours of Task Order issuance Notice to Proceed. |
| All command and communication services for activation must be operational within 24 hours of Task Order issuance Notice to Proceed. |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 2-A1 Central Dispatch Operations
| CDO will maintain continuous communication with operation centers and their staff assigned to the operational sites in accordance with Task 2-A1 of the PWS |
| CDO will maintain continuous communication with operation centers and their staff assigned to the operational sites in accordance with Task 2-A1 of the PWS |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| CDO shall perform all tasks detailed in Task 2-A1 of the PWS |
| All tasks detailed in Task 2-A1 of the PWS shall be performed in accordance with the Contractor’s proposed methodologies to carry out these operations. |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 2-A2 Adaptive Planning and Crisis Action Planning
| Develop and/or update to meet specific planning objectives and criteria established in the Task Order |
| Develop and/or update to meet specific planning objectives and criteria established in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% monitoring by COR |
| If performance objectives and criteria in the Task Order are not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category. |
| Final deliverable submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| Final deliverable submitted by the due date set forth in the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection of deliverable by COR |
| If all final deliverable is submitted on or before the due date, the Contractor will receive a rating “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under the Schedule rating. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 2-A3 Operational Sites
| All operational staff deployed shall manage and operate their assigned field sites |
| All operational staff deployed shall manage and operate their assigned field sites |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or the designee |
| If performance objective is not met, a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| All Operational Sites identified in Task 2-A3 of the PWS shall adhere to all standards detailed for the particular Operational Site |
| All Operational Sites identified in Task 2-A3 of the PWS shall adhere to all standards detailed for the particular Operational Site |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or the designee |
| If performance objective is not met, a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category. |
Sub Task 2-A4 Fleet Management
| Provide accurate and timely information to the fleet of motor coaches and Contractor staff |
| Provide accurate and timely information to the fleet of motor coaches and Contractor staff |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or the designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| Ensure fleet management task are successfully performed in accordance with Task Order requirements |
| Ensure fleet management task are successfully performed in accordance with Task Order requirements |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or the designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category. |
| Ensure that motor coach drivers and their vehicles comply with required U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) guidelines |
| Ensure that motor coach drivers and their vehicles comply with required U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) guidelines |
| 100% compliance |
| Random monitoring by COR or the designee |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category. |
Standard Operating Procedures shall update procedure appropriately when federal or state requirements change in respect to Sub Task 2-A thru 2-B, and shall be accurate
Standard Operating Procedures shall update procedure appropriately when federal or state requirements change in respect to Sub Task 2-A thru 2-B, and shall be accurate
100% compliance
| 100% inspection of deliverable(s) |
| If the Standard Operating Procedure address is up-to-date and accurate, the Contractor will receive a rating of “Very Good” or higher in CPARS under Quality Rating. |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
Sub Task 2-B Deactivation
| Deactivate operations by the designated date and time established by the Task Order |
| Deactivate operations by the designated date and time established by the Task Order |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Schedule rating category. |
| Return all assigned communication kits containing GPS and other communication devices to the checkout point of contact (POC) |
| Return all assigned communication kits containing GPS and other communication devices to the checkout point of contact (POC) |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Management rating category. |
| After-action report shall accurately comply with technical requirements outlined in Task 2-B of the PWS |
| After-action report shall accurately comply with technical requirements outlined in Task 2-B of the PWS |
| 100% compliance |
| 100% inspection |
| If performance objective is not met a rating of “Unsatisfactory” will be assigned in the CPARS under the Quality rating category. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .