PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONAIRE.docx

15 KB Posted

Attached to
USCGC FRANK DREW (WLM 557) Dock Side Repairs
Solicitation number
HSCG85-15-Q-P45026
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Past Performance Questionaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
USCGC_FRANK_DREW_-_Award_-_Contract_Number_HSCG85-15-C-P45026.pdf PDF
FRANK_DREW_(WLM_175)_DS_JCC_15ER0_(Blank).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FRANK_DREW_(WLM_175)_DS_JCC_15R0.docx DOCX document
CGC_FRANK_DREW_SOLICITATION_(12022014).docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE -

Project Title:

Contract No:

Performance Period:

Contract Value:

1.
Quality of Product or Service – Rating:

Comments for Quality of Product or Service

2.
Schedule – Rating:

Comments for Cost Control

3.
Cost Control – Rating:

Comments for Timeliness of Performance

4.
Business Relations – Rating:

Comments for Business Relations

5.
Management of Key Personnel – Rating:

Comments for Management of Key Personnel:

Past Performance information provided by:

The ratings used on the Contractor Performance Survey shall be used to evaluate Past Performance. See the description of ratings below.

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Good
Superior accomplishment of contract requirements and very high customer satisfaction.
Acceptable
Fully compliant accomplishment of contract requirements and positive customer satisfaction.
Marginal
Accomplishes most, but not all, of the desired contract requirements and customer is marginally satisfied.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Unacceptable
Failure to properly accomplish contract requirements and failure to satisfy customer.
Neutral
The offeror has no past performance history OR the Contracting Officer has determined that the past performance information is not directly related or similar to the requirements in the RFP.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .