RFQ_Attachment_1_HQ0034-18-R-0065.pdf

Attachment 1

RFP # HQ0034-18-R-0065

COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

General Information

Document Type: Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Solicitation Number: HQ0034-18-R-0065 Posted Date: 31-Jul-18 Current Response Date: 20 August 2018 Classification Code: R -- Professional, Administrative, and Management Support Services Set Aside: Unrestricted NAICS Code: 541990 – All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Contracting Office Address

Washington Headquarters Services, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350

Description

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 12.6, “Streamlined Procedures for Evaluation and Solicitation for Commercial Items,” as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. Quotes be evaluated in accordance with FAR subpart 12.602 “Streamlined Evaluation of Offers” and FAR 13.106-2 “ Evaluation of Quotations or Offers” as implemented by FAR 13.5 “Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items”. This announcement incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the Federal Acquisition Circular.

This solicitation is a Request for Quotes (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-99 and DFARS change notice 20180629. Solicitation provisions and contract clauses that pertain to this contract are contained in RFQ Attachments 6. There is no assigned Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) rating for this requirement.

The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 541990 – “All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services”, with a small business size standard of $15.0M. The following documents constitute the complete RFQ solicitation and are hereby incorporated:

RFQ Attachment 1_ HQ0034-18-R-0065(Full Text) RFQ Attachment 2_PWS RFQ Attachment 3_Price Template RFQ Attachment 4_Small Business Subcontracting Plan RFQ Attachment 5_Format for Question(s) and Responses RFQ Attachment 6_CLINs & Clauses and Provisions

INSTRUCTIONS TO QUOTERS

Section 1: General RFQ Instructions

1. Quoters shall read this document in its entirety as it contains information and procedures regulating how Quoters will structure their quotes in response to this solicitation.

2. This RFQ is being competed as unrestricted under NAICS 541990 – “All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” with a size standard of $15.0M.

3. The Government anticipates awarding one stand-alone contract for DOD Domestic Preparedness Support Initiative Technology Transfer Program in Support of Sport and Entertainment Spectator Safety and Security (DPSI Support Requirement) to the Quoter whose quote is the most advantageous to the Government as set forth in the “Evaluation for Award” section below and as outlined in RFQ Attachment 2 – DPSI Performance Work Statement (PWS). The contracting officer has a broad discretion in determining suitable evaluation procedures. The Government may award the contract to other than the Quoter quoting the lowest price or achieving the highest adjectival rating.

4. Each Quoter must submit a response to the solicitation, consistent with the instructions herein to be considered for an award. Incomplete quote submissions will not be evaluated and, therefore, will not be considered for an award. Submission of these items will constitute the Quoter’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the RFQ solicitation.

5. The Government intends to award the contract without discussions. Therefore, initial submissions should contain the Quoter’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Notwithstanding its intent to award without discussions, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with Quoters, if it deems necessary, and to permit Quoters to revise their quotes.

6. Quoters are advised to closely read the technical quote instructions, technical evaluation process and evaluation criteria in the following sections prior to preparing a technical quote.

7. The Government will pay no expenses incurred by any Quoter for the preparation and submission of a quote in response to this RFQ.

8. Quoters shall use standard 8 ½ x 11” size paper with, at minimum, 3/4” margins on all sides. The entire written submission shall use Times New Roman or other plain font easily understandable and, at minimum, a 12 point font size for text and a 10 point font size for tables and graphics. All pages shall include page numbering. Any pages over the specific page limitations for each factor as outlined below may not be considered.

9. Submission and File Naming. Quoters shall submit their quotes, for consideration of award, as separate volumes of the total quote package, as outlined above. All non-price information shall be organized by sections, relative to the evaluation factor structure, and be contained within Volume 1 – Technical Quote. Quoters shall omit all pricing details from all technical quote submissions. File attachments for Volumes 1 and 2 shall be named as follows:

Volume 1 – Technical_Company Name

Volume 2 – Pricing_Company Name

10. Questions. All questions regarding this RFQ shall be addressed to Toyia Lewis and Kaitlin Lockett, tilted “DPSI Support RFQ Questions” sent to whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil no later than 06 August 2018 @ 11:00 AM Eastern Time (EST).

Answers to Quoter questions shall be compiled and provided to all Quoters via an Amendment on Federal Business Opportunities website.

11. Quote Due Date. Submission of vendor quotes in response to this RFQ shall be addressed to Toyia Lewis and Kaitlin Lockett, tilted “DPSI Support RFQ Submission” sent to whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil >. Responses are due no later than 20 August

2018 @ 11:00 AM ET.

The government will not consider the text of the emails, only the attachments. A single email cannot exceed 10 MBs. Files should be in Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe .PDF format; zip files are accepted.

Section 2: Quote Instructions

1. Content and Format. Quotes shall consist of two (2) separate volumes and shall be organized as follows:

The technical quote shall consist of a comprehensive written quote containing of four (4) sections: Small Business Participation Plan Compliance, Technical Approach & Staffing Plan, Corporate Experience, and Small Business Subcontracting Plan (applicable to large business Quoters only). Quote content under the section headers should be compiled regarding the technical quote instructions and page limitations detailed below. Volume I is broken down as follows:

Section Header Description Page Count Cover Letter Cover Letter 1 Page Compliance Small Business Participation Plan Compliance 5 Pages Technical Factor 1 Technical Approach & Staffing Plan 8 Pages Technical Factor 2 Corporate Experience 3 Pages Subcontracting Plan

Small Business Subcontracting Plan (applicable to large business Quoters only)

No page limit

The price quote (Volume I) shall consist of the contract pricing and has no page limitation.

Pricing data is prohibited in, and shall be omitted from, Volume I.

2. Quoters are strongly encouraged to be succinct, clear, and concise in writing their quote and adhering to the set page limitations. Bullet-sized or outline formats are welcomed where appropriate.

mailto:whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil

3. The technical quotes must contain the necessary and required information to enable the Government to evaluate the Quoter under the “Evaluation for Award” section below.

4. In the technical quote, Quoters are encouraged to use quantitative and graphical methods to portray facts through charts, lists, matrices, diagrams, tabulations, etc. These quantitative and graphical methods are included in the overall page limitation.

5. Each acronym used shall be spelled out in the text the first time it appears in each volume.

Section 3: Volume I Quote Instructions

1. Introductory information is required (cover letter format is acceptable) on the first page of Volume I of the Technical Quote:

RFQ Number & Title, Name and address of Quoter, Name, telephone number & e-mail address of the main point-of-contact, Name of your Contract Administrator, Date of submission, Name, title, and signature of authorized representative, Quoter's DUNS number, and Exceptions to RFQ/Performance Work Statement (if applicable).

2. Small Business Participation Plan. All Quoters, including small businesses, submitting a quote as a prime contractor for this requirement must maintain at least 25% or better of the total contract value of awards to small business concerns throughout the life of the contract. (A small business as a prime contractor can include its own participation in the 25% or better small business participation commitment.) Small Business Participation Plan commitments will be incorporated into the contract and shall bind the contractor. A Small Business Participation Plan/commitment is required from all Quoters, including companies with commercial plans and comprehensive subcontracting plans. The Small Business Participation Plan/Commitment shall address the following:

Extent to which the Quoter will utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone) small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service-disabled and veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB);

Level of commitment to use such firms;

Types of work small business firms are to perform;

Signed Statement of commitment to subcontract/utilize small businesses at at least

25% or better of the total contract value in subcontracting to small business concerns (small business primes participation is included in the 25% or better participation);

The extent of participation of such firms in the value of the total acquisition; and Detailed explanations/documentation supporting the proposed participation commitment and percentages.

3. Technical Approach & Staffing Plan. The Quoter’s technical quote must provide a clear and complete approach for addressing Technical Factor 1, Technical Approach & Staffing Plan.

Instructions for Technical Factor 1 is detailed below.

Technical Approach. The Quoter’s technical quote must contain a clear, concise, and complete description of the Quoter’s proposed technical approach to accomplishing the requirement outlined in the PWS. Technical responses shall contain sufficient content for the Government to determine whether a Quoter understands and has experience with the PWS requirements. To demonstrate understanding, the Quoter shall propose sound, practical, and feasible methods to accomplish all tasks identified in the PWS, including but not limited to, those tasks in PWS Section VI. Demonstrated understanding and experience also includes whether the Quoter demonstrates a complete understanding of the detailed service requirements involved when providing DPSI Support Services, understanding of the deliverables required, logistics and any potential issues that may be encountered on the project. Quoters are cautioned against using such phrases as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well-known techniques will be used” in their quotes.

Staffing Plan. Quote submissions under this technical factor shall include a Staffing Plan.

The Staffing Plan shall detail the resource allocation for all tasks identified in the PWS.

The Staffing Plan shall show a breakout of all proposed labor, labor categories, and associated hours, by task, for all tasks. The Staffing Plan shall detail how the Quoter proposes to effectively and efficiently meet the Government’s requirement with the proposed staff.

In its quote, the Quoter must also effectively demonstrate that the proposed level-of-effort (LOE) and labor mix can acceptably perform the PWS tasks and requirements and reflects its proposed Management and Technical approach. Note: The Government will compare the proposed LOE, labor mix, and any explanations for innovative approaches to the current/historical LOE provided in this RFQ and perform an analysis. Based on the results of the analysis, the Government will determine if the proposed LOE is sufficient to perform the work.

4. Corporate Experience. Instructions for addressing Technical Factor 2, Corporate Experience, are detailed below.

Quoters are instructed to demonstrate at least three years of total relevant corporate experience in performing services similar in size, complexity, and scope to DPSI Support requirement and the extent to which the experience is relevant.

Relevant collective corporate experience is based upon the size, scope and complexity of the project by demonstrating experience in: capability gaps in existing areas of sports and entertainment spectator safety and security; demonstrate, evaluating, and testing applicable and appropriate DoD technologies to fill capability gaps in sports and entertainment spectator safety and security; and demonstrate facilitating the transfer of identified technologies to Federal, State, and local first responders charged with ensuring sports and entertainment spectator safety and security.

Each project shall have underway for at least 12 months and or has been completed within the past three (3) years of the RFQ closing date.

Quoters are instructed to provide the following for all work cited:

Name of the entity for whom the services were provided (agency, firm, etc.);

Performed as a prime or subcontractor;

Description of services provided, to include magnitude, scope and responsibilities; and

Period of Performance.

Besides the information requested above, Past Performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

5. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (applicable to Large Businesses Only): Quoters shall submit a small business subcontracting plan satisfying the requirements in FAR 52.219-9, Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003. Besides the requirements of FAR clause 52.219-9 Alt II, the Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall address affirmatively all other small business subcontracting requirements in FAR Part 19.7. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted separately from the Small Business Participation Plan/Commitment required below, that applies to both small and other than small businesses. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection, but, a requirement for basis of award to an other than small business. The small business subcontracting plan will be included with the offer in Volume I. The Small Business Participation Plan and a final small business subcontracting plan shall be incorporated into the resulting contract. For uniformity across all Quoter Small Business Subcontracting Plans, Quoters shall follow the provided Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (see Attachment 5_Small Business Subcontracting Plan).

Section 4: Price Data Instructions

1. Pricing data shall be separate from the Quoter’s technical quote. Volume 2 - Pricing data shall contain only the information requested in this section and shall not be an extension of the technical quote.

2. Quoters shall submit pricing data in a manner consistent with the information detailed below. Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word are acceptable formats for submitting Volume 2 price data. Quoters shall include any formulas and factors used in calculating the pricing data.

Quoters shall name the file “Volume 2 – Pricing_Company Name” under the instructions listed above.

*Page Limitation: There is no page limitation for the submission of the pricing data. Besides the requisite price information, Quoters can provide any substantiating price-related information it deems necessary. Substantiating price-related information is optional and not a requirement.

3. The Period of Performance for this contract will be 12 months. Pricing data shall be submitted to cover the entire Period of Performance.

4. Contract Line Item Number Pricing: Quoters shall use the following price templates for submission of requested pricing data relative to DPSI Support Services requirement.

For CLINs 0001, Quoters shall prepare a Firm-Fixed-Price quote for twelve (12) month base period. For uniformity across all Quoter price submissions, Quoters shall follow the provided pricing template (see Attachment 3 – Pricing Template) with supporting documentation. Quoters shall provide an overall pricing summary that lists labor categories; total Full Time Equivalents (FTEs), total hours, labor hourly rates, total price, and any other price build-up for the Base Period. Additionally, Quoters shall include a CLIN pricing summary table, detailing unit prices, Contract Line Item Number(s) CLIN(s) total amounts, and a summary of all contract performance periods detailing the overall total proposed price of the contract. The quote shall contain burdened labor rates for all labor categories proposed under the Firm-Fixed Price portions of the quote.

For CLINs 0002, travel shall be pre-populated and issued as a Not to Exceed amount for evaluation purposes. At award, travel shall be pre-populated as 10% of the awarded value quoted under CLIN 0001.

All pricing shall be provided in the attached spreadsheet format compatible with Microsoft Excel version 2003 or 2007 or higher.

EVALUATION OF QUOTATIONS

Section 6: Evaluation Procedures

1. The Government intends to award a single contract to the Quoter(s) whose quote(s) conforms to the RFQ requirements and is the most advantageous to the Government. In determining the awardee, the Government may, in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 and this RFQ, employ a tradeoff process allowing for an award to other than the lowest priced Quoter or other than the highest technical rated offer. Evaluation will be conducted and selection will be made under the guidelines provided in the FAR, Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS), and this RFQ.

2. The evaluation procedures shall consist of the following steps:

Phase 1: Compliance Factor:

A. Small Business Participation Plan: All Quoters (both large and small businesses) will be reviewed on the level of small business commitment they demonstrate for the proposed contract in their small business participation plan. The Small Business Participation Plan will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis. Specifically, the Government will review:

Extent to which the Quoter meets or exceeds the mandatory minimum of 25% of the total contract value in small business participation;

Extent to which the Quoter will utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUB Zone) small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service-disabled and veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB); and

Commitment to use such firms (formal agreements/level of intent).

If the Small Business Participation Plan is evaluated as “Fail”, then the quote will be deemed ineligible for award and no further evaluation will occur.

Phase 2: Evaluation Factors

STEP 1: If found compliant under the Phase 1 Compliance Factor, the Quoter’s Volume 1 technical quote(s) will be evaluated under Technical Factor 1_Technical Approach and Staffing Plan using the “Technical Capability Performance Evaluation Ratings and Definitions” listed in Section 9 below.

STEP 2: If the Quoter’s Technical Factor 2_Technical Approach and Staffing Plan Technical Rating is “Acceptable” or higher, then the Quoter’s Technical Factor 2_Corporate Experience will be evaluated using the Technical Capability Evaluation Ratings.

STEP 3: If the Quoter’s Compliance Factor 1 is rated as fail and/or Technical Factor 1_Technical Approach and Staffing Plan or Technical Factor 2_Corporate Experience is rated as “Marginal” or “Unacceptable”, then the price will not be evaluated.

STEP 4: For the apparent awardee only (applicable to large businesses only), the Quoter’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be reviewed for acceptability. If found to be unacceptable, the quote will be considerable unawardable and ineligible for award.

The Technical Factor for Technical Approach and Staffing Plan and Corporate Experience are of equal importance. The Technical Factors for Technical Approach and Staffing Plan and Corporate Experience when combined, are more important than the Price Factor. Price will be increasingly more important as non-price evaluation factors become increasingly equal.

Section 8: Evaluation Factors

Technical Factor 1 _ Technical Approach & Staffing Plan

1a) The extent to which the Quoter’s proposed Technical Approach demonstrates a complete understanding and feasibility of the requirement tasks, deliverables, and logistical details relating to the PWS, including addressing its understanding of potential issues that may be encountered and mitigation examples.

1b) The extent to which the Quoter's staffing plan ensures that the Quoter can properly perform the tasks of the PWS. The Government will also evaluate the quote to ensure that its proposed labor mix and level-of-effort are reflect of its proposed Management and Technical Approach.

Receipt of a “Marginal” or “Unacceptable” rating for Technical Evaluation Factor 1 will render the quote unawardable and the Quoter will be ineligible for award and not evaluated further.

Technical Factor 2_Corporate Experience

The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Quoter demonstrates recent (within the last three (3) years), relevant (as defined below), and quality performance of past work identified. The information provided should include the ability to provide the requested services of the same magnitude and complexity of this RFQ.

Specifically, the Government will consider:

2a) The extent to which the Quote demonstrated at least three years total of relevant past experience performing projects of similar size, scope, and complexity to DPSI support requirement and the extent to which the experience is relevant. Relevance is based upon the size, scope, and complexity of the project, as compared to the work required in this RFQ to include experience in demonstrating collective capability gaps in existing areas of sports and entertainment spectator safety and security; collective, evaluating, and testing applicable and appropriate DoD technologies to fill capability gaps in sports and entertainment spectator safety and security; and collective facilitating the transfer of identified technologies to Federal, State, and local first responders charged with ensuring sports and entertainment spectator safety and security. A quotation that does not demonstrate three years of relevant experience will be rated as “Unacceptable.”

Factor 3_Price

The Government will evaluate the total expected price of performing this work, under the process stipulated below.

Price will be evaluated independent of technical evaluations. The Quoter’s price will be evaluated to determine if it is fair and reasonable. Additionally, award will further be contingent upon determinations of contractor responsibility. The Government will determine contractor responsibility through the System of Award Management (SAM) and Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). For a Quoter to be eligible for award, the Quoter shall have an active record SAM with no exclusions and have no negative records in FAPIIS. Price will not be rated adjectivally, but will be evaluated based on a comprehensive review. Price volumes will be evaluated with respect to accuracy and completeness based on information submitted in the Quoter’s written submission. This process will involve verification that figures are correctly calculated, prices are presented in the requested format, and that proposed rates, and any discounts, are accurate. A price evaluation preference for any prime Quoter HUBZone small business concerns shall be evaluated in accordance with FAR 19.1307.

Additionally, the Government may utilize one or more of the methods of the following methods:

- Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation;

- Comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid; or

- Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates.

As part of the price evaluation, the Government will calculate an overall evaluated price. The overall evaluated price will be calculated by completing the following steps:

STEP 1: CLIN 0001 (FFP): The firm-fixed-price portions will be factored into the total evaluate price by multiplying the proposed labor rate by proposed labor hours for each labor category for the 12-month base, using the provided Attachment 3 - Pricing Template.

STEP 2: CLIN 0002 (T&M): The travel CLINs will be factored into the total evaluated price using the not to exceed amount as provided in Attachment 3 – Pricing Template.

STEP 3: The Government will factor into the total evaluated price the optional six-month extension of services (FAR Clause 52.217-8), utilizing the Quoter’s total calculated price for base year, by adding in one half of the total of the CLIN prices for FFP CLIN 0001 and T&M

CLIN 0002.

For the purpose of evaluation under this RFQ, the Quoter's total evaluated price will include one 12-month base period and one six-month optional extension of services period. The Quoter shall not price this optional six-month extension of services period in its quote. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the options.

Note: Price will not be evaluated for an Quoter receiving an adjectival rating of “Marginal” or “Unacceptable” for Technical Factor 1 or Technical Factor 2. A rating of Marginal or Unacceptable will render the quote(s) unawardable and the Quoter ineligible for award without further evaluation.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Applicable to Apparent Large Business Awardee Only: The Small Business Subcontracting Plan will only be evaluated for the apparent Large Business Awardee on a pass/fail basis.

Specifically, the Government will review:

Does Small Business Subcontracting Plan mirrors the submitted Small Business

Participation Plan?

Does the Quoter address the requirements in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Alt II, DFARS 252.219-7003, and FAR 19.7?

Note: A rating of Fail will render the quote(s) unawardable and the Quoter ineligible for award.

Section 9: Technical Capability Performance Evaluation Ratings and Definitions

1. The Quoter’s technical solution will be rated separately from the risk associated with its proposed approach. The technical rating evaluates the quality of the Quoter’s technical solution for meeting the Government’s requirement. The following adjectival rating scale will evaluate the Quoter’s Volume 1 – Technical Quote relative to Technical Factor 1 _ Technical Approach and Staffing Plan and Technical Factor 2 _Corporate Experience:

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Quote meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. The quote contains multiple strengths and no deficiencies.

Good Quote meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Quote contains at least one strength and no deficiencies.

Acceptable Quote meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Quote has no strengths or deficiencies.

Marginal Quote does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Unacceptable Quote does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.

2. Assessment of technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weakness(es), considers potential for disruption of schedule, increased costs, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. The following adjectival rating scale will be utilized to evaluate the Quoter’s Volume 1 – Technical Quote relative to technical risk affiliated with Technical Factor 1 _ Technical Approach and Staffing Plan and Technical Factor 2 _Corporate Experience:

Adjectival Rating Description

Low Has little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Can potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Quote contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

Section 10: WHS/AD Contracting Points of Contact

1. Contracting Officer: Kaitlin Lockett, (703) 545–3357, whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil

2. Contract Specialist: Toyia Lewis, (703)-545-3039, whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil mailto:whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil mailto:whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil mailto:whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil mailto:whs.mc-alex.ad.mbx.ssb-vendor-submissions@mail.mil