Attachment_2_Evaluation_Ratings_062215.pdf

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RATING EVALUATION

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings:

i. Outstanding: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

ii. Good: Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

iii. Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

iv. Marginal: Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Note: An offeror with a final rating of Marginal is not eligible for award.

v. Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable. Note: An offeror with a final rating of

Unacceptable is not eligible for award.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings:

i. Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

ii. Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

iii. Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

iv. Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment:

i. Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

ii. Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

iii. Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a limited expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

iv. No Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. Note: An offeror with a final rating of No Confidence is not eligible for award.

v. Unknown Confidence (Neutral): No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.