Exhibit_1_-_PPQ.doc
DOC document 89 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CPO Coatings Training
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-14-R-0169
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
Solicitation HQ0034-14-R-0169 Exhibit 1
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HQ0034-14-R-0169_Amend_0002.pdf | ||
| HQ0034-14-R-0169-0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_A.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_3_-_Subcontracting_Plan_Format.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_2_-_Pricing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HQ0034-14-R-0169.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAGE 1NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
RFOW-08026/HAD
SOLICITATION NO: HQ0034-14-R-0170
Exhibit 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
DoD Corrosion Training on Applications of Coatings Technology for the
DOD Corrosion Policy and Oversight Office (CPO) To Be Provided to the Offeror
Pursuant to FAR 42.15
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
(Date)
(Address)
Dear Client:
Our company, ___________________, is currently responding to a solicitation for the Department of Defense (DOD) Corrosion Policy and Oversight Office (CPO).
The CPO is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. As such, a requirement of this response is that past clients of ours be identified and participate in the evaluation process. You are hereby authorized to respond to this and other inquiries.
Please complete the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Angela Hughes, at angela.s.hughes3.civ@mail.mil.
All questions should be directed only to the Contracting Officer.
A response to this questionnaire is requested to the above address by the Proposal due date of September 26, 2014, 5:00pm EST.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely, (Name)
(Title)
Enclosure
Past Performance Questionnaire
(Source Selection Information: See FAR 42.15)
Contractor/Offeror:
Name of your Organization
Address
Reviewer Name
Reviewer Position
Telephone Number
Is your organization a Federal/State/Local Government Office? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
PART 1: Background Information:
1. What type of corrosion-related Implementation/Training Services did you purchase from the Offeror?
| TYPE OF SERVICE(S) |
| DURATION |
(# HRS/ DAYS)
DATE
(MO/YR)
| DOLLAR VALUE ($K) |
| NAME OF CONSULTANT |
PART 2: Quality of Services Performed:
| PLACE AN ‘X’ IN THE APPROPRIATE COLUMN |
| EXCELLENT |
| VERY GOOD |
| GOOD |
| FAIR |
| POOR |
| a. |
| Project implementation on schedule? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. |
| Project implementation within cost? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. |
| Did the contractor provide you with quality product(s)/services? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. |
| Was their approach complete? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. |
| Were the product(s)/services provided technically accurate and relevant to program objectives? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| f. |
| Did the final result meet program objectives? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| g. |
| Was the contractor successful in conforming to the requirements of the contract? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| h. |
| How thorough was the coordination prior to the performance of the services? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| i. |
| Was the contractor cooperative and responsive? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| j. |
| Did the contractor act in the best interest of the customer? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| k. |
| Was the documentation requirement detailed and thorough? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| l. |
| Were they successful in meeting all administrative aspects of the contract such as monthly reports? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| m. |
| Were all deliverables successfully satisfied on schedule? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
PART 3: Comments on Offeror:
1. Describe any problems encountered during contract award or during performance with the offeror's performance.
2. List THREE of the offeror's major strengths a.
b.
c.
3. List THREE of the offeror's major weaknesses a.
b.
c.
4. Overall, how would you rate the contractor’s performance on this contract? Please place an ‘X’ in the appropriate box.
FORMCHECKBOX
EXCELLENT
FORMCHECKBOX
VERY GOOD
FORMCHECKBOX
GOOD
FORMCHECKBOX
SATISFACTORY
FORMCHECKBOX
POOR/UNSATISFACTORY
5. If the decision were yours alone, would you request future services from this offeror?
Please place an ‘X’ in the appropriate box.
FORMCHECKBOX
YES
FORMCHECKBOX
NO
If NO, please explain.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .