Attachment_L-2_PPPQ.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted Dec 30, 2015

Attached to: Audio Visual Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: HQ0028-16-R-0002
Issued by: Defense Media Activity

About this file

From the source

Atch L.2-Organizations's Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Audio Visual Maintenance, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Amendment_0005.pdf	PDF	Jan 15, 2016
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Amendment_0004.pdf	PDF	Jan 5, 2016
Attachment_11_-_WD_15-5630_R1.txt	TXT text file	Jan 5, 2016
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Amendment_0003.pdf	PDF	Dec 30, 2015
Attachment_9_DD_254.pdf	PDF	Dec 30, 2015
Cost_Proposal_Template.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Dec 30, 2015
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Question_Answers.pdf	PDF	Dec 30, 2015
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Amendment_0002.pdf	PDF	Dec 17, 2015
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Amendment_0001.pdf	PDF	Dec 10, 2015
HQ0028-16-R-0002.pdf	PDF	Nov 30, 2015
List_of_Attachments.pdf	PDF	Nov 30, 2015
HQ0028-16-R-0002_Attachments.zip	ZIP file	Nov 30, 2015

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT L.2

ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection

Please complete this questionnaire and email to:

Susan Madrid, Contract Specialist susan.m.madrid.civ@mail.mil

Defense Media Activity Response Date: 11 Jan 2016

23755 Z. Street

Riverside, CA 92518

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

2. PROJECT NAME:

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

10. EVALUATION

a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other) AND ORGANIZATION

b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this contractor:

EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services- Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

B. Overall Performance- Assess the contractor’s overall performance for the project.

FORMCHECKBOX

C. Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).

FORMCHECKBOX

D. Technical Requirements- Assess the contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

FORMCHECKBOX

E. Cost Control- Assess the contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

F. Subcontracting- Assess the contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.

FORMCHECKBOX

G. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.

FORMCHECKBOX

H. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.

FORMCHECKBOX

I. Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.

FORMCHECKBOX

N/O

J. List Contractor’s Weak Points:

List Contractor’s Strong Points:

List any other projects this contractor has completed for you:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.