HE1260-10-R-4002-0004.pdf

HE126000203002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions ofthe document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1) Extend the proposal submission date for offerors to June 18, 2010 @ 6:00 pm, Japan Standard Time.

2) Delete in its entirety FAR Clause 52.228-3

3) Amend Section L - "Submittal Requirements" by replacing it in its entirety w ith updated information for offerors herein.

4) Amend Section M - "Technical Evaluation Factors" by replacing it in its entirety w ith updated information for offerors herein.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-May-2010

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HE1260-10-R-4002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Apr-2010

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt ofOffer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one ofthe following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies ofthe amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt ofthis amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegramwhich includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. Ifby virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegramor letter, provided each telegramor letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(Ifapplicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-May-2010

CODE

DODEA-PACIFIC - PROCUREMENT DIVISION

MS. GEORGETTE HENDRICKSEN, UNIT 35007

APO AP 96376-5007

HE1260 7. ADMINISTERED BY (Ifother than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HE1260-10-R-4002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 14-May-2010 04:00 PM to 18-Jun-2010 06:00 PM.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been deleted:

52.228-3 Worker's Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) APR 1984

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

I. 1. The following instructions to offerors are to ensure the offerors submit information necessary for the Government to fully understand and evaluate proposals/offers. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions carefully and provide technical information that clearly shows they have the background and expertise necessary to perform the requirements listed in the Performance Work Statement as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussions of such offers.

2. To aid in the evaluation process, proposals shall be complete, comprehensive, and clearly presented.

3. Proposal Format. The price proposal and technical information shall include an electronic version of all proposal documents which are compatible with Windows XP, Microsoft Office 2003 and Adobe Acrobat 6.0.

Proposals may be submitted either electronically to georgette.hendricksen@pac.dodea.edu or via regular mail to one of the following addresses:

Local Japanese Address: U.S. Address:

Torii Station DoDEA Pacific Procurement Office DoDEA Pacific Procurement Office Unit 35007 Sobe, Yomitan-Son, Bldg 290 APO AP 96376-5007 Okinawa, Japan 904-0304

NOTE: Proposals that are mailed shall have 1 original plus 3 copies and must be received at the above address by the due date and time stipulated below.

4. Period of Acceptance. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

5. Proposal Submission. Offerors must submit the following in their proposals; your proposal will not be considered for award if any requested items are not submitted.

i. Complete signed and dated Standard Form 1449;

ii. Section B of the solicitation with all prices filled in;

iii. A completed copy of all Representations and Certifications listed in Section K of this solicitation;

vi. A completed Offeror’s Information Sheet (as provided in Section K of this solicitation).

Proposals are due NLT 6:00 pm, Japan Standard Time on Friday, June 18, 2010.

II. Content of Proposals. A proposal submitted in response to this solicitation must be in English and consist of two separate sections: 1) Technical Proposal (Section 1) and Cost/Price (Section II). The Technical proposal section must not contain any contract cost price information except as indicated below. The Technical and Cost/Price sections must be separate, clearly marked with the solicitation number, and contain sufficient information to permit a detailed evaluation. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation must contain the information as outlined below. The following factors shall be used to evaluate proposals:

(A) Technical Proposal. (Section I)

Factor 1: Management Approach – The offeror shall provide the following:

1) A current and valid business license registration or certification issued by a local, state or national government agency, which indicates the offeror, joint venture partner or offeror’s proposed subcontractor, is authorized to perform service requirements of this contract in the host-nation.

2) A comprehensive Workforce Management Plan which explains the offeror’s plan to hire, conduct background checks on, qualify, train, terminate when necessary and replace employees who will perform requirements of this contract. This Plan should outline the offeror’s recruitment, resource allocation, supervision, and training approach for the contract – e.g., will the offeror be using a subcontractor; if so, specify the name of the proposed subcontractor; is the offeror intending to use all, some or none of the existing workforce of the current incumbent contractor; will employees be recruited from military bases, etc. Include an Organization Chart with this Workforce Management Plan.

3) A detailed resume of the offeror’s proposed Project Manager (PM). The resume should demonstrate that the individual is qualified and has the technical and management ability and capability to perform the requirements set forth herein. The resume should include dates, employment history, education, skills, training and applicable certification(s).

Factor 2: Technical Capability – The offeror shall provide the following:

1) A list of contracts and/or subcontracts with work performance requirements that are the same, or similar in nature, to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements of this contract. Include on this list a description and location of each of the contract or subcontract, the dollar value, dates of performance and the owner client of each contract or subcontract.

2) An overview Quality Control (QC) Plan for the contract.

3) An executive summary which discusses information pertaining to the experience and qualification of the offeror, its subcontractor and/or its joint venture partner in the Security, Transportation Security, Surveillance and/or Anti-Terrorism fields. Include information pertaining to the experience and qualification of the offeror, its subcontractor and/or its joint venture partner in the Special Needs or Special Education field. A brochure of the offeror’s organization may be included as part of this executive summary.

Factor 3: Past Performance – The offeror shall provide the following:

1) A list of at least three (3) customer references who can provide information on the quality of the offeror’s past or current performance of services that are the same or similar to the PWS requirements set forth herein. The referenced services must have been performed by the offeror within the last three (3) years.

The following information should be provided for each customer:

a. Name of Point of Contact

b. Organization

c. Phone Number(s)

d. Email Address

e. Contract Number, Dates of Performance & Contract Value

f. Description of Services Provided

2) Completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) from customer references of the offeror. PPQs must be emailed to the contract specialist, Ms. Georgette Hendricksen, by 6:00 pm, Japan Standard Time, on Friday, June 18, 2010.

The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any reasonable and available source, including PPI databases and past or current project owners.

The Government will contact the Offeror’s references to ascertain PPI on the Offeror. Therefore, Offerors must submit their list of references with the above information NLT 6:00 pm, Japan Standard Time, on Friday, 18 June 2010 to the following e-Mail address: georgette.hendricksen@pac.dodea.edu

(B) Price. (Section II). The Price Proposals will be evaluated to ensure price reasonableness and price realism for the services being provided to the Government, considering the specific terms and conditions, and relevant industry standards.

Submittal Requirements for Price Proposal:

a. Completed fill-in (price proposal) in the Schedule for the solicitation CLINs for the base year and 4 option years

b. Section K Certifications and Representations

c. Section A Offeror’s Information

The following have been modified:

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The basis of award is the determination of the best value proposal via an integrated assessment of each proposal by utilizing trade-off source selection evaluation procedures in accordance with FAR Part 15.

(b) The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) Management Approach

(ii) Technical Capability

(iii) Past Performance (reference FAR 15.304)

Technical Capability is more important than Past Performance and Management Approach. Past Performance and Management Approach are equal in importance. Management Approach, Technical Capability and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

FACTOR 1 - Management Approach – This factor evaluates the Offeror’s basic qualification to perform this contract (possession of a valid business license), and also evaluates the offeror’s approach to manning to determine if contract requirements could be successfully accomplished by this offeror. Additionally, this factor evaluates the offeror’s proposed Project Manager to determine if the submitted resume demonstrates the proposed individual’s capability and ability to successfully manage this contract.

FACTOR 2 - Technical Capability – This factor evaluates the offeror’s technical experience and ability as an organization in providing same or similar requirements as set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) herein. The offeror’s Overview QC Plan will be evaluated to determine if the offeror understands the criticality of PWS requirements.

FACTOR 3 - Past Performance – The Government will be evaluating past performance information on the offeror to determine if the offeror will be successful in performing the specified contract requirements. The Government will consider the relevancy, recency, substance and extent of the past performance information submitted, as well as the size and complexity of the past performance information relative to this solicitation’s requirements. In evaluating past performance, the Government shall consider information in the Offeror’s proposal and information from other sources, including references, past customers, Government agencies and activities, federal databases and other sources deemed necessary by the Government.

Price – The Government will evaluate the total price proposed for the contract and for each performance period. Price evaluation will not be based on absolute standards or given an adjectival rating. Price realism analysis may be used to determine if the proposed prices or rates reflect a clear understanding of the requirements and are realistic in relation to the PWS requirements set forth herein. The Government shall evaluate the price proposals to ensure a fair and reasonable price by using one or more of the following price analysis techniques:

a) Comparison of price proposals to solicitation requirements so that price reflects all the associated costs;

b) Comparison of prices to all other price proposals;

c) Analysis of price for unbalanced items or offers; price is acceptable in relation to market prices;

d) Identification of areas considered unreasonably high or low.

(c) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(d) Subjective judgment on the part of the Government is implicit in the evaluation procedures. This evaluation is intended to perform tradeoffs in strengths and weaknesses among price and non-priced factors. Under Best Value tradeoff source selection evaluation procedures, the Government may award a contract to other than the lowest priced offeror.

(e) Offerors found to be in consideration for award may be required to submit evidence of available financial resources required to ensure successful mobilization and initial performance as allowed in FAR 9.104.

(f) In accordance with FAR 15.306, the government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.

(End of Summary of Changes)