Attachment_2.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Marine Biology Curriculum
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-16-T-0020
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
Attachment 2
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HE1254-16-T-0020-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| HE1254-16-T-0020-P0001.pdf | ||
| HE1254-16-T-0020_DRAFT_RFQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Part 2: Questionnaire
RFQ: HE1254-16-T -0020 Marine Biology
** Information to be completed by vendor’s references and emailed directly to DoDEA Procurement to Nicole.Williams@hq.dodea.edu by May 31, 2016 at 10:00 A.M ET with subject, “Past Performance Questionnaire Marine Biology.”
REFERENCE INQUIRY
Name of Vendor: ____________________________________________________________________
1. Reference Firm Contacted
2. Project Title: __________________________________________________________________________
3. Contract Number (if known):
4. Name of Key Person Contact:
5. Key Contact Phone No.:
6. Did the Key Contact work directly on the contract referenced? Yes [ ] No [ ]
7. Contract period: From to
8. Brief Description of Work Performed:
9. Quality of Work Performed and Products Delivered:
1. Degree of Cooperation by Contractor and Your Organization.
(a) How well overall did the Contractor work with the Contracting Organization?
| (b) | How well did the key personnel and Contractor’s staff work with COTR and |
| Contracting Organization’s staff? |
1. Timeliness of Contract Work.
(a) Was work completed on time?
(b) Were there any unresolved problems during performance or afterwards? ____________
| 12. | Effectiveness of Cost Controls (For Cost Reimbursement Contracts Only). | |
| (a) | Was the project completed within budget? | |
| (b) | Were costs properly controlled? ____________________________________________ |
13. Would you recommend the Contractor? Yes No If no explain why
Rating __________________ (Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory) Supporting Comments:
Common DoD Assessment Rating System
Excellent (E) - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory (U) - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(End of Attachment 2)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .