HC102818R0132-0002.pdf

PDF 57 KB Posted

Attached to
DISA Montgomery CRAH Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HC102818R0132
Issued by
Defense Information Systems Agency

About this file

HC102818R0132-0002

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DISA Montgomery CRAH, newest first.
File Type Posted
HC102818R0132-0005.pdf PDF
HC102818R0132-0004.pdf PDF
HC102818R0132-0003.pdf PDF
HC102818R0132-0001.pdf PDF
Atch_1_QASP.pdf PDF
Atch_3__Subcontracting_Plan_Attachment_L6.docx DOCX document
HC120818R0132.pdf PDF
Atch_2__Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Schedule.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the proposals due date until August 30, 2018. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 23-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HC102818R0132

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Aug-2018

CODE

DISA/DITCO-SCOTT-PL83

2300 EAST DRIVE

SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5406

HC1028 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HC102818R0132

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Aug-2018 03:00 PM to 30-Aug-2018 01:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. This RFP is to support the Workforce Services Directorate’s requirement to purchase and install the equipment and infrastructure necessary to provide redundant power to the site’s Liebert (Vertiv) CRAH units and five in-row coolers located on the 2nd and 4th floors at DECC Montgomery.

2.

The specifics are as follows:

Tracking Number HC102818R0132 Task/Delivery Order Title DECC AL CRAH Small Business Set-Aside No Order Type Firm fixed price (FFP)

NAICS

333415.

Period of Performance The resultant contract will be awarded with a 270 day period of performance (PoP). The anticipated start date of this requirement is September 15, 2018; this date is subject to change.

Incumbent Contractor No Section 508 Applicable No Method of Evaluation Lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) Performance Based Yes DD254 Required No Proposal Due Date Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 1300 CST

2. Offerors are requested to submit a written technical and price proposal (in Excel format) in response to the RFP and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)(Attachment 1). Further information on submission of the technical and price proposals is provided throughout this document.

a. In accordance with Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal whether or not any potential or actual organizational and consultant conflicts of interest (OCCI) as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5 exists for this procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on this procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.

b. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply to this requirement.

c. The following administrative requirements apply to the offeror’s proposals in response to the RFP. The technical portion of the proposal shall include information regarding the offeror’s ability to conform to all required terms and conditions in the solicitation. The offeror’s proposals shall address all aspects of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Page limitations are identified below, under each evaluation factor, and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, and OCCI mitigation plans. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1-inch margin, using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text, to include any text contained in a table. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical proposal and shall be submitted in MS Excel 2007 format. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification.

The total size of each email (including all attachments) shall not exceed 20MB. Email attachments shall not be submitted in a .zip file format. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered as part of a proposal.

The Government reserves the right to not consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP.

d. This requirement is being solicited to all eligible contractors.

3. Evaluation Factors and Basis for Award Determination:

a. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government, using an LPTA evaluation process. The evaluation factors and subfactors identified in paragraph 3c(1) below will be used in the determination of technical acceptability.

b. After receipt of proposals, the Government will first evaluate the lowest priced proposal.

If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically acceptable and otherwise properly awardable, no further evaluations will be conducted, and award will be made. If, however, the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable and/or otherwise not properly awardable, further evaluations will be conducted.

c. The standards for determining technical acceptability are below, as well as information concerning price proposals.

(1) Technical/Management Approach Factor: The Technical/Management Subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the following subfactors must be rated Acceptable.

Technical/management proposals should not exceed 20 pages.

(a) Subfactor 1: PWS Task 1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, provide an executable installation schedule to demonstrate project completion within the stated Period of Performance of 270 calendar days after award.

(b) Subfactor 2: PWS Paragraph 6.1.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, provide equipment submittals that will meet or exceed equipment specifications.

(c) Subfactor 3 PWS Paragraph 6.1.3. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, provide equipment type that is made to operate with the specific manufacturer of the existing switchgear equipment.

(d) Subfactor 4: PWS Paragraph 6.2.1. In order to be rated acceptable, the contractor shall provide equipment submittals that meet or exceed equipment specifications and manufacturer guidelines.

(e) Subfactor 5: Performance Standards, PWS Paragraph 7. In order to be rated acceptable, the contractor shall address and/or exhibit in the proposal on how they plan to accomplish the requirements with the quality control within schedule and cost as described in section 7 of the PWS.

(2) Price Factor:

(a) The price proposal will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR Part 15.404 in order to determine if they are reasonable and complete. The Government will determine completeness of the offeror’s proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and costs are presented in a clear and useful format. The offeror shall submit pricing for the scope of work requested for the PoP. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the work requested.

(b) Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, incidental equipment, contract access fees, etc.).

Again, the price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical/management proposal. The price proprosal shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel only.

Table 1. Technical/Management Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal/quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal/quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

4. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions or seek clarifications if the contracting officer (KO) determines they are necessary. In the event issues pertaining to a proposed task cannot be resolved to the KO’s satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the proposed contract. In such an event, offerors will be notified in writing. In the event a competitive range is established and the KO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the KO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition.

5. In response to this RFP, no terms, conditions, or assumptions will be entertained. If terms, conditions, or assumptions are included in a proposal, the proposal may be excluded on grounds that it failed to comply with the RFP’s instructions.

6. An offeror agrees that if its offer is accepted within 90 calendar days from the date of receipt of proposals (unless a different period is stated in the proposal), it will furnish the items and/or services identified in its proposal at the price offered to the designated point(s) within the time specified in the contract.

7. Portions of the successful offeror’s proposal may be incorporated into the contract.

8. Questions should be addressed to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. Please provide any questions, in writing, no later than August 9, 2018 at 1500 CST. The Government will not answer questions submitted after this time.

9. Proposals are due no later than August 23, 2018 at 1500 (CST) and should be submitted electronically to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. The Government will not accept proposals that are not submitted electronically (i.e., through e-mail).

10. A subcontracting plan is required (FAR 52.219-9) for Other than U.S. Small Businesses only (i.e. Large Businesses). ONLY OTHER THAN U.S. SMALL BUSINESS OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SUBCONTRACTING PLAN. Offerors are required to submit either an individual subcontracting plan, an approved commercial plan, or a negotiated DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan. In addition, offerors are required to complete the DISA Subcontracting Review Checklist (Attachment L6) by inserting dollar values and percentages from your subcontracting plan as applicable for items 1 and 2, and also items 3 through 19 by completing the paragraph and page number columns.

The subcontracting plan is the organization’s business plan for the inclusion of small businesses within their capture/contracting processes. An individual subcontracting plan highlights the general “potential” for subcontracting opportunities within a specific procurement. The contract awardee has the “life of the contract” to make a “good faith effort” to ensure that subcontracted dollars will go to small businesses. Although distinct and different from each other, the small business participation plan is complementary to a subcontracting plan. Subcontracting plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments presented in the small business participation plan.

mailto:kali.r.clement.civ@mail.mil

Other than U.S. Small Business Offerors (i.e., Large Businesses) must submit a subcontracting plan that meets the requirements of FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219- 7004 if the Offeror has a DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan).

The contracting officer will review subcontracting plans on an acceptable or unacceptable basis for compliance with FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations), and the applicable DFARS clause. A subcontracting plan is unacceptable if it does not clearly meet the requirements of FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219- 7004 if the Offeror has a DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan). Subcontracting plans will only be reviewed for acceptability for those Offeror(s) deemed to be an apparent awardee(s).

The subcontracting plan shall be included in the offer, and the approved subcontracting plan shall be incorporated into the contract

11. Site Visit Information.

A site visit is offered at the place of performance on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 9:00 am Central Time during which contractors may obtain a better understanding of the work required.

Offerors are strongly urged to attend this site visit to fully inform themselves about the location and conditions of the work.

All questions from the site visit must be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer no later than one (1) working day after the site visit (close of business Aug 9, 2018). A record of the site visit and answers to the questions submitted will be distributed to all contractors as an amendment to the solicitation. Contractors are cautioned that, notwithstanding any remarks or clarifications given at the site visit, all terms and conditions of their contract apply unless changed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

1.1 Site Visit Itinerary

9:00am - Meet interested contractor representatives at Building 857, 401 East Moore Drive, Gunter Annex, AL 36114 (Please allow yourself enough time to Sign In at the base’s main gate visitor center, as DISA does not control base access.)

9:15am - Project Overview and Location Review with DISA Facilities 11:00am - Conclude Site Visit

UPON CONCLUSION OF THE SITE VISIT, NO ADDITIONAL SITE ACCESS WILL

BE AUTHORIZED TO OFFERORS.

1.2 Visit Authorization Request Requirements

A Visit Authorization Request (VAR) Letter is required for all individuals requesting visitor access to the facility. The request must be on file with the Data Center Montgomery Security Office by 12:00 Noon, Monday, August 6, 2018 for the visit. Companies are required to provide a Visit Authorization Request (VAR) letter listing each employee visiting or working at the DoD Data Center.

The letter must be on company letterhead, signed by the company’s security officer or designated company representative, and contain the following information:

• Company’s Name and Address

• Name and Address of the Facility to be Visited:

DISA Data Center Montgomery, Building 857 401 East Moore Drive, Maxwell AFB, Gunter Annex, AL 36114

• Date(s) of Visit: 8 Aug 2018

• Purpose of Visit: Pre-proposal Site Visit

• Contract Number: Solicitation # DHQCAP18MP60014

• Full Name and Telephone Number of Hosting Facility’s POCs:

Don Boger, Facility Manager, (334) 416-3189, donald.l.boger.civ@mail.mil Wayne Pac, Facility Manager, (334) 819-3434, curtis.w.pace.civ@mail.mil

• Visitor’s Name, Social Security Number, Date and Place of Birth, Citizenship, and Clearance Data (clearance level, agency who granted clearance and date granted)

• Company’s Clearance Data, if any (clearance and safeguarding levels, date granted and CAGE code). N/A if company does not hold a DoD clearance.

• Signed by Company Security Officer, Owner, Representative, or other responsible company Point of Contact (POC) with: Name, Phone Number, Signature and Date

The VAR will be e-mailed from the company to the Security Manager at the DoD Data Center OKC where the work is to be performed.

Attn: Security Manager E-mail: disa.maxwell.opm.list.security-management-office@mail.mil Phone: (334) 416-2751

11. Attachments & Appendixes. The PWS includes reference to various appendixes.

CONTRACTOR’S INTERESTED IN PROPOSING THIS EFFORT SHOULD REQUEST

COPIES OF THE APPENDICES FROM MR. RODNEY PLACZEK AT at rodney.c.placzek.civ@mail.mil.

The following attachments are associated with this requirement:

Atch 1 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Atch 2 Pre-Propsal Site Visit Request Atch 3 Subcontracting Plan Attachment L6

Appendix A_ Design Concept Drawings Appendix B _Flooring Specification mailto:disa.maxwell.opm.list.security-management-office@mail.mil mailto:rodney.c.placzek.civ@mail.mil

Appendix C _ MIL-STD-188-124B Appendix D _PDU & STS Specifications Appendix E_Sample MOP Detail Appendix F_Electrical Safety Program Appendix G_ BAS System Div 25 Integrated Automation Appendix H_CRAH Specification Appendix I _SEC Inventory Format Appendix J_Label Standard

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it.